Gearslutz.com
All Advertisers

Go Back   Gearslutz.com > The Forums > Mastering forum

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Wavelab 6 is out! Revelation New product alert! 28 18th February 2006 11:54 AM
Mastering Programs like T-racks and Wavelab MACHINE Music computers 5 29th January 2006 01:15 PM

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Display Modes
Old 20th July 2006, 09:55 PM   #1
Aka Nameless
Gear interested
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 7
Mastering with Wavelab.

Hi, I have a few questions about mastering with wavelab. Hopefully someone will give their insight on the subject.

Well, when I master an album i've been loading the songs seperately "not in audio montage" and adjusting eq, compression or whatever they need (mostly because my computer cant handle 15 tracks all with 2/3 effects at the same time), then convert all sample rates to 44.1 but keeping in 24 bit, then I bounce them each to another wave file "processed". Then I load up an audio montage put the songs in their correct order, do any loudness maxing "L2" to each song to match the levels "depending on the intensity of the songs". I then do fade in's / fade out's, place track markers, throw POW-R dither on master section, then burn the cd.

Now my question is.. (sorry for my longwindedness).. I feel that i'm adding a few extra steps to the process of mastering an album.. Is it necessary to edit each track seperately to conserve comp resources, or is there a better way of doing it? (My computer isn't "slow" its pent 4 2.54 ghz, 1gig ram)

Also, when using the audio montage, do you place all the tracks from the album on one stereo track and insert effects via clip effects instead of track effects (so the effects effect only that song instead of all songs on that track)? Or do you create a new stereo track for each song?

Well, that is the majority of the questions that I have. Any insight would be greatly appreciated.

Thanks in Advance.

Colin.
Aka Nameless is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21st July 2006, 11:18 AM   #2
illynoise
Lives for gear
 
illynoise's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,607
Quote:
Originally Posted by Aka Nameless
Now my question is.. (sorry for my longwindedness).. I feel that i'm adding a few extra steps to the process of mastering an album.. Is it necessary to edit each track seperately to conserve comp resources, or is there a better way of doing it? (My computer isn't "slow" its pent 4 2.54 ghz, 1gig ram)

Also, when using the audio montage, do you place all the tracks from the album on one stereo track and insert effects via clip effects instead of track effects (so the effects effect only that song instead of all songs on that track)? Or do you create a new stereo track for each song?
Colin.
You doing it the same way that I do it. But I work on Copies instead of finals songs, and then I save to a folder called "Masters".

With the Montage, it gives you more options.

BaseJase
illynoise is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22nd July 2006, 06:32 AM   #3
FaTT Dust
Gear nut
 
FaTT Dust's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 80
Quote:
I then do fade in's / fade out's, place track markers, throw POW-R dither on master section, then burn the cd.
POW-R in wavelab? A quick question, where and which plug do you use to get that in there. I thought the only available options were the (UV dithers)... or additional plugin dithers, eg: Waves IDR/ UAD PL/ Sony dither etc...

The reason I ask is, I would love to have a POW-R dither available in Wavelab. I have it Sequoia v7, but not in Wavelab v5...

Any clues? Thanks
FaTT Dust is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22nd July 2006, 09:42 PM   #4
Aka Nameless
Gear interested
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 7
i'm used to pro tools, which is why I said POW-R, but after checking, seems IDR is only one available to me also..
Aka Nameless is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22nd July 2006, 10:01 PM   #5
T.RayBullard
Lives for gear
 
T.RayBullard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Columbus County, North Carolina
Posts: 2,431
Send a message via AIM to T.RayBullard Send a message via MSN to T.RayBullard Send a message via Yahoo to T.RayBullard
POW-R is in PT, Bias Peak, and Sequoia, but not in WL.When I had WL I preferred
Waves IDR

The real question for FATT is Why use WL when you have Sequoia?? I have sequoia 8 and samp 8 and they both kill!!
__________________
I think it is wrong to make everything equidistant
from the listener with too many mics. The pasting-on effects end up like bad Photoshop work on graphics & photos - too unbelievable.
-Tony Faulkner

http://www.last.fm/user/TeddyBullard/
T.RayBullard is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23rd July 2006, 05:33 PM   #6
FaTT Dust
Gear nut
 
FaTT Dust's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 80
Quote:
Originally Posted by T.RayBullard
POW-R is in PT, Bias Peak, and Sequoia, but not in WL.When I had WL I preferred
Waves IDR

The real question for FATT is Why use WL when you have Sequoia?? I have sequoia 8 and samp 8 and they both kill!!


Glad to hear that. I thought I was missing out!
Personally, IDR is the defacto 16bit dither to CD, either in Wavelab or via CD Architect. IMO, the Sony dither for me, loses or is missing the glam!

And yes, Sequoia is a great alrounder. Although, at times, Wavelab and even Sound Forge suffice.

The edit window in Sound Forge helpful at times, with critical edits like spikes/glitches/digi tear etc.. etc...
Just me ..I know

Cheers.
FaTT Dust is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:42 PM.


Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.0.0