9th October 2012
|
#1 | | Gear nut
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 102
Thread Starter | @Mastering Engineers: What's often done wrong by Mixing Engineers?
What do you personally think is often made wrong by mixing engineers? Just a few things that come to your mind. Could be anything (Not just the mix itself...)!
For example what was an issue at your last Mastering Project that could have been avoided by the Mixing Engineer?
As a guy who only mixes, I'd like to collect a few Ideas to make my mixes more professional so that my final product is on a higher level and can be handled easier by you guys...
Cheers!
|
| |
9th October 2012
|
#2 | | Gear addict
Joined: Oct 2008 Location: Seattle
Posts: 440
Verified Member |
Too many fancy effects, effectively making the mixes too wide and weak in the center.
|
| |
9th October 2012
|
#3 | | Lives for gear
Joined: Jan 2007 Location: Minneapolis
Posts: 1,507
Verified Member |
I'd go back to the tracking before blaming a mix engineer for bad mixing. That's where most of the trouble starts. Then they could avoid all of the layers of processing trying to fix those problems.
Beyond that, too much processing, flat-as-a-pancake mixes, too much <50Hz, spectral imbalances, forgetting what the most important mix elements are (drums louder than vocals for example), mixes that are either too wide or too narrow, mixes where everything masks everything else, mixes with only crash and splash but no tone in the stereo field, mixes where loudness trumps musical intent.
A lot of this has to do with current musical styles. When there is distortion and hype on every instruments it's more difficult to mix with clarity. Can't blame the mixer for not being able to hear articulation on the vocals and bass when he has 4 thin crunchy guitars and a drummer who is riding a heavy crash. OTOH, mixers need to shift gears for different styles. A country song mixed like a hip-hop song won't please anyone.
Pay attention to the most important things in the mix (vocals, solos, etc.) and let other mix elements support them rather than compete with them.
|
| |
9th October 2012
|
#4 | | Lives for gear
Joined: Mar 2004 Location: Chicago (Schaumburg / Hoffman Est.) IL
Posts: 2,878
Verified Member |
Bad core sounds -
Tracking too hot -
Mixing too hot -
|
| |
9th October 2012
|
#5 | | Lives for gear
Joined: Aug 2004 Location: Essex UK
Posts: 867
Verified Member |
Sometimes when things aren't right it's because there's been a failure to serve the song. One cause is sound engineers at the track/mix stage showing off and forgetting what they're there to do: I tracked and mixed for quite a while and was occasionally guilty of that myself.
We live in an age when sound manipulation has never been so sophisticated or easy to achieve, and all too often music falls victim to 'I've got a (insert processor of choice) and I'm going to use it' syndrome. There are exceptions, but musical content is usually more important than the recording.
|
| |
9th October 2012
|
#6 | | Lives for gear
Joined: Mar 2003 Location: Kuhmoinen, Finland
Posts: 788
Verified Member |
Trying to predict what I do. "I mixed the drums too loud because you're going to push them down anyway". No, I wouldn't, but now I have to.
|
| |
9th October 2012
|
#7 | | Gear maniac
Joined: Apr 2011 Location: zurich
Posts: 264
|
mixes who try to sound like masters and try to impress the musicans/ producers/a&r's with
- too loud cymbals /shakers/ tambourines/triangle (who mask the highs of the other instruments)
- too much (plugin-)compression who bring up the artefacts of poor recorded signals
- too much grainy (plugin-)saturation
__________________
mastering for xavas (platin in germany), terry lynn, billy cobham, remady (double platin), eluveitie, stress, ingrid lukas, rebekka bakken, coroner & many more... www.echochamber.ch |
| |
9th October 2012
|
#8 | | Gear maniac
Joined: Apr 2011 Location: zurich
Posts: 264
| Quote:
Originally Posted by Virtalahde Trying to predict what I do. "I mixed the drums too loud because you're going to push them down anyway". No, I wouldn't, but now I have to. | |
| |
9th October 2012
|
#9 | | Lives for gear
Joined: Jan 2009 Location: Boise, Idaho
Posts: 2,585
|
Thinking they have to make the sound in the mix.
|
| |
9th October 2012
|
#10 | | Gear maniac
Joined: Feb 2010 Location: Hamburg | Quote:
Originally Posted by Virtalahde Trying to predict what I do. "I mixed the drums too loud because you're going to push them down anyway". No, I wouldn't, but now I have to. | +1!
|
| |
9th October 2012
|
#11 | | Gear addict
Joined: Aug 2011 Location: London Verified Member |
Mixing engineers usually make really good mixes without many exceptions.
Most other people don't do it as well cause they are not a mix engineer, there are exceptions of course.
It is good to have a definition of what a mixing engineer actually is, like someone who earns a living solely from mixing. They normally know exactly what they are doing cause they do it day in, day out.
If there is a problem I believe is beyond the realms of good taste, I point it out, it can be ignored or acted upon at the producers/musicians/engineers discretion, insert any known audio anomaly 'here' as I am sure many mastering engineers do.
|
| |
9th October 2012
|
#12 | | Gear maniac
Joined: Mar 2011 Location: Near the Salty Water
Posts: 182
|
Over compression. That is mostly the problem I see. Guys fall in love with compressors. Get lazy in the mixing or tracking stage and use the compressor to be their volume control of certain instruments. Which in turn makes things not breathe as much and then fights for frequency space in the mix because the compressor is so heavy handed. Making their job harder and mine in the end also.
This is done both in tracking and mixing.
Just one of the things I have seen recently.
|
| |
9th October 2012
|
#13 | | mymixisbetterthanyours!
Joined: Oct 2006 Location: Berlin
Posts: 2,099
| Quote:
Originally Posted by SASMastering Mixing engineers usually make really good mixes without many exceptions.
Most other people don't do it as well cause they are not a mix engineer, there are exceptions of course.
It is good to have a definition of what a mixing engineer actually is, like someone who earns a living solely from mixing. They normally know exactly what they are doing cause they do it day in, day out.
If there is a problem I believe is beyond the realms of good taste, I point it out, it can be ignored or acted upon at the producers/musicians/engineers discretion, insert any known audio anomaly 'here' as I am sure many mastering engineers do. | this.
|
| |
10th October 2012
|
#14 | | Lives for gear
Joined: Jun 2005 Location: Asheville NC
Posts: 529
|
Misuse of Dynamics processing / over compression....
No HP LP filters on individual channels resulting in build up of frequencies.
Over EQing ......
Panning issues having to do with trying to fill every quadrant between
L C R.....
Every mix element competing for front and center......
To much buss processing using plugins........ 
The lost art of mixing is to stack the stereo field front to back and side
to side using EQ, delay, and light dynamics processing ect...So elements
can live and breath discreetly but connected at the same time.
It takes about ten years of mixing to reach the library door......
__________________ Michael Hynes Mastering Engineer nomaticstudio.com |
| |
10th October 2012
|
#15 | | Gear maniac
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 291
Verified Member |
I recommend to mixers, watch out for the buildup of distortion. Especially IMD that comes from processing, and not enough headroom through the effects chains and busses, etc.
That goes for the tracking folks too, use the pad on those mics!
__________________
Respectfully submitted,
Dana
Dana J. White
specializedmastering.com
|
| |
10th October 2012
|
#16 | | Gear addict
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 306
| Quote:
Originally Posted by sessionatstudiom Over compression. That is mostly the problem I see. Guys fall in love with compressors. Get lazy in the mixing or tracking stage and use the compressor to be their volume control of certain instruments. Which in turn makes things not breathe as much and then fights for frequency space in the mix because the compressor is so heavy handed. Making their job harder and mine in the end also.
This is done both in tracking and mixing.
Just one of the things I have seen recently. | So true
Sent from my MOTWX435KT using Tapatalk
|
| |
10th October 2012
|
#17 | | Lives for gear
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 765
|
Cleaning up the beginning of the mix too much. I'd prefer it if they left the clean ambience (clean up the hums and noisy tracks) right before the top of a song.
|
| |
10th October 2012
|
#18 | | Gear Guru
Joined: Jul 2002 Location: NYC
Posts: 10,205
|
Very interesting topic. I always want to ask my Mastering engineers what they think but I'm afraid of the answer.
Plus, they probably don't want to piss me off and tell the truth.
I usually just listen to what they do (compared to my mix) to see what I'm doing wrong.
__________________
It's a journey. Not a destination. Enjoy yours. |
| |
10th October 2012
|
#19 | | Lives for gear
Joined: Sep 2002 Location: Elmont NY | Quote:
Originally Posted by Kenny Gioia Very interesting topic. I always want to ask my Mastering engineers what they think but I'm afraid of the answer.
Plus, they probably don't want to piss me off and tell the truth.
I usually just listen to what they do (compared to my mix) to see what I'm doing wrong. | I always ask, sometimes I even send the mix for them to check before I'm done. I guess they think what I do is good since they refer clients with bad mixes to me. I would also agree with Greg Reierson, tracking a project is critical, too often I'm dealing with some poorly recorded tracks.
__________________
Lou Gimenez
www.musiclabnyc.com
|
| |
10th October 2012
|
#20 | | Gear maniac
Joined: Dec 2005 Location: Boulder, CO
Posts: 188
|
Those mixing engineers. They almost never bring a nice bottle of wine or tequila to celebrate the completion of a project.
|
| |
10th October 2012
|
#21 | | Gear Guru
Joined: Jul 2002 Location: NYC
Posts: 10,205
| Quote:
Originally Posted by Musiclab I always ask, sometimes I even send the mix for them to check before I'm done. I guess they think what I do is good since they refer clients with bad mixes to me. I would also agree with Greg Reierson, tracking a project is critical, too often I'm dealing with some poorly recorded tracks. | If I attend, I'd obviously ask. It would be rude not to.
But I've attended 1 or 2 sessions in my entire career. You just have to let go at some point and that's when I do. I listen to the result as a fan. Trying not to be the mixer or producer.
|
| |
10th October 2012
|
#22 | | Gear nut
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 102
Thread Starter |
This is awesome! Very very helpful! So much that I can apply to my mixes as I find myself making a lot of these mistakes mentioned!
Cheers.
...And I'll definately bring a bottle of wine or tequila to celebrate the next time;-)
|
| |
10th October 2012
|
#23 | | Craneslut
Joined: Jun 2002 Location: The home of Rock-n-Roll, Memphis, TN
Posts: 1,915
Verified Member |
Printing heavily clipped / limited mixes.
|
| |
10th October 2012
|
#24 | | Lives for gear
Joined: Mar 2009 Location: London, UK
Posts: 1,671
Verified Member |
Many things really.
1. Mixing too hot and/or using lookahead limiting.
2. Too much (or the wrong type of) bus comp.
3. Drum light with too much mid clutter in the sides.
4. Bad tracking.
I'd say that tracking either makes or breaks it and it's often not the mix engineer's fault.
__________________
Ade Emsley
|
| |
10th October 2012
|
#25 | | Lives for gear
Joined: Aug 2007 Location: France
Posts: 535
|
1) Using a limiter on the master buss searching for volume.
2) Accepting poorly recorded tracks in the mix.
3) Messing around with processors to mask the tracking flaws.
|
| |
10th October 2012
|
#26 | | Gear Guru
Joined: Jul 2002 Location: NYC
Posts: 10,205
|
What about Essss?
|
| |
10th October 2012
|
#27 | | Motown legend
Joined: Jun 2002 Location: Songwriter Gulch, Nashville TN
Posts: 12,069
Verified Member |
I think the biggest mistake is trying to second-guess mastering or being afraid to use eq. or compression on the bus. A mixer's goal should be a flat transfer.
|
| |
10th October 2012
|
#28 | | Gear maniac
Joined: Feb 2003 Location: San Diego, California
Posts: 157
| Quote:
Originally Posted by Bob Olhsson I think the biggest mistake is trying to second-guess mastering or being afraid to use eq. or compression on the bus. A mixer's goal should be a flat transfer. |
Yes! Bob says it again.
|
| |
10th October 2012
|
#29 | | Gear Guru
Joined: Jul 2002 Location: NYC
Posts: 10,205
| Quote:
Originally Posted by Bob Olhsson I think the biggest mistake is trying to second-guess mastering or being afraid to use eq. or compression on the bus. A mixer's goal should be a flat transfer. | Yup. As always.
|
| |
11th October 2012
|
#30 | | one man, ONE mic pre
Joined: Jan 2004 Location: New York | Quote:
Originally Posted by Bob Olhsson I think the biggest mistake is trying to second-guess mastering or being afraid to use eq. or compression on the bus. A mixer's goal should be a flat transfer. | exactly.
Ideally, mastering isn't supposed to DO anything, other than the transfer.
|
| | | |