Clean analogue compression... - Gearslutz.com Gearslutz.com
 


All Advertisers
Go Back   Gearslutz.com > The Forums > Mastering forum

Clean analogue compression...
Topic: New Reply New Reply Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 28th May 2012   #1
Gear addict
 
SASMastering's Avatar
 
Joined: Aug 2011
Location: London

Thread Starter
Verified Member
Clean analogue compression...

I am in 2 minds about 'clean/uncoloured' analogue compressors, why do you use an analogue one ?

I am trying to work out what the benefit over a good plug in is, bearing in mind the tasks at hand in mastering rarely need a dB or 2 off. I have 2 compressors capable of colouration and I am considering my 3rd, clean or coloured is the question.

Of course the gain reduction is one thing and the basic pass through another.

I appreciate the definition of clean is debatable and that most equipment even that considered clean can add or take something away as it's character. And of course it is part of an overall chain (though the actual contribution of a clean compressor is the subject of the debate) I am interested in your take on why the analogue counterpart is superior in mastering.

cheers
__________________

Barry Gardner
SafeandSound online mastering
Highly experienced, low rates, free preview
Audio mastering
SASMastering is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 28th May 2012   #2
Gear maniac
 
Chris Bauer's Avatar
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Location: Germany
Posts: 280

Verified Member
Hello Barry,

I had similar thoughts to you, so I decided to give the FCS P3S ME a go. For whatever reason I got on with it very well right from the start and I decided to keep it. In fact, I would not want to work without it now. It gives me the kind of compression I am looking for with minimal effort. Press a few buttons, turn a few knobs, listen, compare and Bob's your uncle.

There is no doubt that plug-ins have their uses, but for compression tasks I normally get better results with hardware. The downside is the significantly higher overall cost and repeatability compared with software. However, ultimately those are factors which pale into insignificance once you have found a tool you can work with well and which produces the kind of results your clients are happy to pay for.

Best regards
__________________
Chris Bauer
Audio Mastering Service
www.audiomasteringservice.com
Chris Bauer is online now  
Reply With Quote
Old 28th May 2012   #3
Gear Head
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 60

i second the remarks on the fcs p3s ME. great piece of gear, has prooved to be a good investment so far.
octave is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 28th May 2012   #4
Lives for gear
 
yeloocproducer's Avatar
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Location: los angeles
Posts: 1,754

The Foote, as mentioned, has proven to be the most transparent compressor I've tried out of STC8, MLA2, and P3S ME (the ones that are known for being transparent). Great piece, +1.
__________________
www.ElysianMasters.com
yeloocproducer is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 28th May 2012   #5
Gear maniac
 
JP__'s Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Location: Germany
Posts: 201

Can recommend ADT Audio. Their products are special.
They have the expensive V700 series with a lot of very interesting modules. Quality is top notch.
And they have the cheaper toolmod series with also very good quality. They have a lot of new modules that are not mentioned on their website yet. And a bunch of other modules will come soon.

Dynamic wise they (will) have for example: VCA-Comps, MS-Comps, Limiter, upward-comp, Decompressor... All with complete parameterset.
Also Tape-Sims, Saturators, a lot of EQs and phase-tools...

Worth a look!
JP__ is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 28th May 2012   #6
Gear addict
 
SASMastering's Avatar
 
Joined: Aug 2011
Location: London

Thread Starter
Verified Member
Thanks Chris for your input. I was rather hoping for some personal answers on why clean compression has a basis at all in mastering from other mastering engineers, not recommendations for specific products. FWIW I actually preferred the before samples with regard to the Foote, the example did not even need compressing. Not that one sample is a good way to make a choice. It also has robust competition in Europe at it's price. Just wanted to hear some reasoning for specific use of analogue clean compression at minimal GR.
SASMastering is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 28th May 2012   #7
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 549

Quote:
Originally Posted by SASMastering View Post
FWIW I actually preferred the before samples with regard to the Foote, the example did not even need compressing. Not that one sample is a good way to make a choice.
Please forgive the intrusion,

I was just wondering which sample those were?

Thanks!
Roger
RogerFoote is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 28th May 2012   #8
Gear addict
 
bendermastering's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 2010
Location: Europe
Posts: 423

Verified Member
Try and demo the elysia Xpressor, it does clean very well!
bendermastering is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 28th May 2012   #9
Gear Head
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 73

Quote:
Originally Posted by SASMastering View Post
I am in 2 minds about 'clean/uncoloured' analogue compressors, why do you use an analogue one ?

I am trying to work out what the benefit over a good plug in is, bearing in mind the tasks at hand in mastering rarely need a dB or 2 off. I have 2 compressors capable of colouration and I am considering my 3rd, clean or coloured is the question.

Of course the gain reduction is one thing and the basic pass through another.

I appreciate the definition of clean is debatable and that most equipment even that considered clean can add or take something away as it's character. And of course it is part of an overall chain (though the actual contribution of a clean compressor is the subject of the debate) I am interested in your take on why the analogue counterpart is superior in mastering.

cheers
I do have a very clean master chain,I use an MLA3,Museq,Xpressor,Phoenix, and the reason why I choose thorse machines is because I found clean analogue more easy to incorporate in a master chain.
Coloration can sometime be difficult to manage,what I mean is,I receive a lot of tracks with far to much bottom end and if all my gears had a transformer in them it will be difficult to manage.
Also I use clean gears because they don't slow the transiens down, and for the music I master (Electronic dance) it's great.
I prefer clean analogue to plugins cause of the power that it deliver,for example the museq as powerfull bass and high no plug can do what it does,and its the same with the MLA3
Saying that I do miss some sweetness in my chain, but I don't know yet what gear to had.
inflater is online now  
Reply With Quote
Old 28th May 2012   #10
Gear addict
 
SASMastering's Avatar
 
Joined: Aug 2011
Location: London

Thread Starter
Verified Member
Hi Roger, I am only aware on 1 set files and it's on the original thread on this forum. Hi inflator sounds cool, you know what you want and thats a good place to be and I think I might understand where you are coming from, clean but it does not lose anything including 'weight'. I am looking for a range of options and as one expands you tend to become more and more discerning and wish to fill potential gaps in flavour. I am just wondering if clean analogue compression can be money ill spent these days. In any event something nice is gonna be added to the rack in the not too distant but I am just weighing up options, no rush really but every decision counts. In any event it's got to be fast but it might be coloured or otherwise
SASMastering is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 28th May 2012   #11
Gear addict
 
Joelistics's Avatar
 
Joined: Nov 2010
Location: Copenhagen, Denmark
Posts: 307

Most transparent analog compressors weren't really for me but there are a few that just offer something very different to digital. I have a matched set of NTPs that just do something AMAZING on the drum bus (and in rare cases in mastering). Very punchy and lively sounding.. Man it's hard to put into words... Maybe it's the fact that they let more transients through than digital compressors.. I don't really know tbh, you should try a few different ones and see for yourself..

I do see where you are coming from with this dilemma/question.. I mostly use colored compressors (when I do use them) in mastering..
Joelistics is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 29th May 2012   #12
Lives for gear
 
wado1942's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Location: Boise, Idaho
Posts: 2,587

I'll say from experience that until recently, plugin compressors SUCKED! I mean, they SUCKED... at least, all the ones I've tried did (dozens)! That was reason enough to stay with analogue a few years ago. While there's now plenty of decent options, there's still the fact that analogue compressors won't add alias distortion, but plugin types still do. It may be small if you watch your settings and use higher sample rates (or if they're oversampling plugins), but it's still there. I'll take a little bit of noise over a little bit of aliasing any day.
__________________
Stephen Baldassarre
www.gcmstudio.com
wado1942 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 29th May 2012   #13
Gear addict
 
SASMastering's Avatar
 
Joined: Aug 2011
Location: London

Thread Starter
Verified Member
With the 'clean' software I use I only ever hear improvements and they are always in OS mode (many are by default these days). I think the aliasing thing is over egged a little, there are cheap software compressors which are exemplary in this regard. You have to remember that the THD will likely go up using analogue compressors too.

Well I appreciate the responses and I will ponder further. There are a few boxes in the running.
SASMastering is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 29th May 2012   #14
Lives for gear
 
polybonk's Avatar
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Location: Sydney Australia
Posts: 657

Clean analogue "feels" different. I am yet to hear a software compressor that even comes close to what the Alpha can do for example. I am convinced there is something going on in the nonlinear reaction to electrical energy that imparts a different feeling or quality to the transient front edge.

There is something going on in high end analogue compression that is far more powerful than just rendering digital signal at a lower volume level.

IMHO this is money well spent at the mastering stage.
polybonk is offline  
Reply With Quote
New Reply New Reply Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook  Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter  Submit Thread to LinkedIn LinkedIn 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Similar Threads
Thread Thread starter Forum Replies Last Post
Who here parallel compresses their entire mix? Methlab So much gear, so little time! 60 3rd September 2012 08:02 PM
Are you tracking with compression? RusRant So much gear, so little time! 93 20th April 2012 04:11 AM
is a clean console a better device to mix colored sounds? shangoe So much gear, so little time! 5 13th November 2007 04:40 AM
Who has strayed away from mix bus compression? Brad McGowan So much gear, so little time! 35 12th December 2006 06:10 AM
Drum Stereo Overhead Compression Alex Wyler So much gear, so little time! 27 9th December 2006 06:05 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:39 AM.

Home - Search Forum - Contact Us - Terms Of Use / Privacy Policy - Advertise on Gearslutz - All Advertisers - Top
 
 
Powered by vBulletin®
Gearslutz.com LTD - UK Company Number 7597610.
Registered Office - 35 Ballards Lane, London, N3 1XW.
Hosted by Nimbus Hosting.

By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies.

SEO by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.