Why seperate channels on mastering eq?
Old 1st March 2012
  #1
Lives for gear
 
Pschelfh's Avatar
 

Thread Starter
Why seperate channels on mastering eq?

Is there a reason why mastering eq's like Manley Massive Passive Mastering or SPL PassEq have both left and right channel controls?

Wouldn't it be easier to have a stereo unit with just 1 set of controls?

Peter.
Old 1st March 2012
  #2
Lives for gear
 
huejahfink's Avatar
 

Verified Member
Flexibility
Old 1st March 2012
  #3
Lives for gear
 
sat159p1's Avatar
It's probably done that because you have slightly better quality doing two separate controls for channels. That has something to do with the pots, someone was talking here that you can't have that precision in moving stereo pots and getting equal signal on each side. I'm not an expert, but this is probably the main issue.

I once had hi-end Pultec copy, stereo version and one set of knobs. It was very precise, I tested it at high boosting and cutting and the mismatch was under 0,2dB at the maximum levels, so mostly unnoticeable.
Old 1st March 2012
  #4
Lives for gear
 
MASSIVE Master's Avatar
 

Verified Member
A lot of the time, the guitar with way too much 2.5kHz is on one side.
Old 1st March 2012
  #5
Lives for gear
 
Pschelfh's Avatar
 

Thread Starter
Interesting, thanks for the replies guys!

Peter.
Old 1st March 2012
  #6
Lives for gear
 
aleatoric's Avatar
I see the ability to work in M/S as the real advantage of having separate stereo controls. Pretty rare that I ever EQ left and right differently.

That being said there are some mastering EQ's that have ganged stereo controls; Sontec MES-482, Gyraf G14, etc.
Old 1st March 2012
  #7
jdg
Lives for gear
 
jdg's Avatar
 

Verified Member
we have two hands (most of us)
Old 1st March 2012
  #8
Lives for gear
 

Verified Member
Quote:
Originally Posted by jdg View Post
we have two hands (most of us)
I actually find that really annoying, but I guess you get used to it, the double hand ninja clicking action.

My "sontec" clone is ganged stereo, but my next eq is not only fully stepped with two channels, the channels can be LR or MS, so I have the option of doing both styles if needs be.. I'm very much looking forward to making tilts overall with ganged stereo, then doing some specific boosts on the M and S after that in my workflow.
Old 2nd March 2012
  #9
Lives for gear
 
bendermastering's Avatar
 

Verified Member
It also makes a mastering equalizer look big and with so many knobs clients just go WOW
Old 2nd March 2012
  #10
Imagine you were sent a Mix and the left channels guitar was sounding a tad harsh and the right channel guitar was just right.
Instead of say cutting the high mids on both left and right channels you can cut just the left channel thus preserving the goodness of the right channel and getting rid of the harshness of the left channel.

G
Old 2nd March 2012
  #11
Quote:
Originally Posted by MASSIVE Master View Post
A lot of the time, the guitar with way too much 2.5kHz is on one side.
Just read your post.

G
Old 2nd March 2012
  #12
Lives for gear
 
IIIrd's Avatar
 

Verified Member
Quote:
Originally Posted by huejahfink View Post
Flexibility

exactly..try eqing a 60's track with the silly panning they had...possiblities...you can never have enough
Old 2nd March 2012
  #13
Lives for gear
 
dcollins's Avatar
 

Verified Member
Quote:
Originally Posted by IIIrd View Post
exactly..try eqing a 60's track with the silly panning they had...possiblities...you can never have enough
While 90% of the time I'm doing stereo EQ, I can't think of any reason to lock yourself into a ganged design. Your panning example is exactly why mastering eq (well, all eq's really) have separate L/R controls.


DC
Old 2nd March 2012
  #14
Lives for gear
 
Greg Reierson's Avatar
 

Verified Member
I'm a fan of ganged controls simply because they allow me to forget about counting clicks so I can just focus on the sound. Both of my main analog EQs are ganged. It's a small thing but it's definitely my preference. I have a couple great sounding plug-in EQs for that 10% of the time when I need separate L/R or M/S so I don't feel it limits my options at all.

GR
Old 3rd March 2012
  #15
Lives for gear
 
IIIrd's Avatar
 

Verified Member
Quote:
Originally Posted by dcollins View Post
While 90% of the time I'm doing stereo EQ, I can't think of any reason to lock yourself into a ganged design. Your panning example is exactly why mastering eq (well, all eq's really) have separate L/R controls.


DC
Classical music can also need this as the tonality is different either side
Old 3rd March 2012
  #16
Lives for gear
 
24-96 Mastering's Avatar
 

Verified Member
Quote:
Originally Posted by Greg Reierson View Post
I'm a fan of ganged controls simply because they allow me to forget about counting clicks so I can just focus on the sound.

GR
Same here. The ganged Sontec gets the most use out of all equalizers here. EQing with one hand, without looking, wthout matching/counting clicks, lets you dial in things so quickly and intuitively. It's a revelation.

There are of course good reasons to have another unganged EQ available, like everyone says. So... in a true gearslut fashion: get yourself two EQs, get one ganged and one with individual channel controls.
Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Similar Threads
Thread
Thread Starter / Forum
Replies
Bob Loblaw / Mastering forum
38
Dannibal / Mastering forum
26
superburtm / Music Computers
18
Bob Boyd / Mastering forum
0
Eric Greedy / Mastering forum
34

Forum Jump
 
Register FAQ Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

SEO by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.