![]() | All Advertisers |
| Member Services Directory | Classifieds | Reviews | Jobs | Deal Zone | Merchandise | Marketplace | Facebook App | Books, DVDs & Gadgets | Video Vault | Tips & Techniques |
| |||||||
New Reply | Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| | #1 |
| Sub-Dude | Define Mastering in Context
It used to refer to the process of creating a Master Disc. Today it seems to have a broader definition. I would like to hear from some Mastering Engineers on their view of the subject nowadays, how the process has changed and where its going...
|
| | |
| | #2 | |
| Gear maniac Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 222
| Quote:
Premastering entails taking someone's collection of mix files (or master tape of mixes) and assembling them on a time line, with fades and transitions. Processing (EQ, Limiting, Auto-Wah, etc...) is optional, still, although quite popular to do, since few recordings don't benefit from judicious adjustments. At minimum, it's a professional proof-listen to assure the production team that all went well. Mostly, it's stereo eq and stereo limiting - maybe Mid/Side processing, rather than Left/Right... Sometimes, however, it involves taking a stereo stem of the bass, the vocal(s), and the rest of the mix and processing each stem differently and resumming them to make the premaster that makes its way to the outside world. Digital Domain have done minor miracles with this approach. Others take stems of every part of the mix for even more control. This borders on, if not encroaches on, remixink. Most radical repairs are best done in the remix session, rather than a stem-powered premastering session. Whether working on singles or albums, having someone other than the mix clerk perform the premastering is advantageous since she is the guinea pig who will react to the sounds before money is spent on making so many physical copies, or careers are subject to scrutiny as the downloading goes viral. Even when you find you are making good mixink in your private hatch studio, it usually helps to have someone else work on the mix (as a downmix) in a different (larger and more sparsely furnished?) room (with different acoustic problems than those which plagued the mix session). Hard to imagine how this could change in the future. Even if the other room is somewhere else in the same facility and even if the other person is merely an alter-ego. At least she should wear a different hat. ![]() Cheersø, Laarsø * she is always really a "mistress," and not a "master" | |
| | |
| | #3 | |
| Lives for gear Joined: Aug 2003 Location: Hollywood CA
Posts: 2,625
Verified Member | Quote:
Gear changes, formats change, yes. But the actual job has not. DC | |
| | |
| | #4 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Mar 2006 Location: Austin, Texas
Posts: 1,960
Verified Member | |
| | |
| | #5 | |
| Gear nut Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 76
| Quote:
In addition, consider these specialized rooms and experienced ears to hear/uncover "noise, crackle, unwanted material" which can be surgically removed using specialized tools which are quite often too expensive to justify purchasing for many project and small studios when only occasionally used. | |
| | |
New Reply
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Why not Master in Protools? | Bob Loblaw | Mastering forum | 38 | 19th May 2008 10:30 PM |
| FS: Maselec MEA-2 Mastering EQ | Bob Boyd | Mastering forum | 0 | 17th April 2007 01:09 AM |
| Tweak on the Buisness Model? Sony Internet Mastering | Eric Greedy | Mastering forum | 34 | 12th April 2007 03:01 PM |
| Looking for Mastering Facility in LA | somedude74 | Mastering forum | 2 | 30th March 2007 01:41 PM |
| Mastering Acoustic Rock in Boston? | jzb | "where to" | 2 | 14th February 2007 08:34 PM |
| |