Headroom for mastering - Gearslutz.com

Gearslutz.com

All Advertisers
Go Back   Gearslutz.com > The Forums > Mastering forum


Headroom for mastering

New Reply New Reply Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 17th November 2011   #1
Gear Head
 
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 39

Thread Starter
Headroom for mastering

how much headroom is actually enough for a premastered track thats about to get mastered? Let me know what you Guys think
habeski is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17th November 2011   #2
Gear nut
 
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 136

Quote:
Originally Posted by habeski View Post
how much headroom is actually enough for a premastered track thats about to get mastered? Let me know what you Guys think
As a mix engineer, it all depends on what I have on my master bus. I like to drive a tube limiter which means my peak level on the limiters back end is around -3 dbfs.

As a mastering engineer, I can deal with any levels as long as the track hasn't been clipped or peak limited leaving me no room to do my own cleaner limiting. If you have peaks hitting near zero it's no problem. It just means I have to gain stage a little differently.
nimblemongoose is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 17th November 2011   #3
Gear maniac
 
Rob Murray's Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Location: NYC
Posts: 177

Just don't clip. Any ME can gainstage digital and analog so as long as nothing has been clipped you should be good.
__________________
Murray Mastering
www.murraymastering.com
Rob Murray is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17th November 2011   #4
Gear maniac
 
Chris Bauer's Avatar
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Location: Germany
Posts: 161

Verified Member
Generally speaking, levels that peak between -6 to -3 dBFS are good to work with. Occasional higher peaks are not a tragedy, as long as no clipping occurs.
__________________
Chris Bauer
www.audiomasteringservice.com
Chris Bauer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17th November 2011   #5
Gear Head
 
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 39

Thread Starter
Sounds good so basically have a limit on the master channel and that will leave some headroom to be able to reach the -0.1 Db on the mastered track. Thanks guys appreciate it
habeski is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18th November 2011   #6
Lives for gear
 
MASSIVE Master's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Location: Chicago (Schaumburg / Hoffman Est.) IL
Posts: 2,709

Verified Member
Send a message via AIM to MASSIVE Master
No, you don't want a limiter on the master channel. You want the mix to "naturally" not clip.
__________________
John Scrip - Massive Mastering, LLC - www.massivemastering.com

Spoon-feed a newb some answer and he'll mix for a day -
Get him to *think* about it and figure it out for himself and he'll mix for a lifetime --- JS
MASSIVE Master is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18th November 2011   #7
Gear Head
 
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 39

Thread Starter
Ok makes sense.. But there's limiter that comes with a master channel on most daws. But anyway while mastering would you hard limit according to the lowest volume or what?
habeski is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18th November 2011   #8
Lives for gear
 
MASSIVE Master's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Location: Chicago (Schaumburg / Hoffman Est.) IL
Posts: 2,709

Verified Member
Send a message via AIM to MASSIVE Master
You would push/limit according to the needs and potentials of the mix.

The point is to keep at least *some* measure of headroom at every possible stage -- The more the better in most cases. Ideally, (well, hardly "ideal" but for lack of a better term in the real world) you get to "use it up" once - Then it's gone. Track too hot, gone. Hit a buss too hard, gone. Sum too high, gone.

And in the current state of 24-bit recording, where you will universally have far more headroom than you'll ever realistically (or non-realistically for the most part) need, there is absolutely no advantage to using it up "too early" -- It won't help.
MASSIVE Master is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18th November 2011   #9
3 + infractions, forum membership suspended.
 
Joined: Jun 2011
Location: at home
Posts: 2,427

Quote:
Originally Posted by habeski View Post
how much headroom is actually enough for a premastered track thats about to get mastered? Let me know what you Guys think

never having been above -12 would be my preference
but if you never clipped it we can just lower it to what we need

if you clipped and then lowered it to -12 it would still come out like crapp
oldeanalogueguy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18th November 2011   #10
Gear Head
 
Technologyworks's Avatar
 
Joined: Apr 2011
Location: London I think...
Posts: 43

Quote:
Originally Posted by MASSIVE Master View Post
Track too hot, gone. Hit a buss too hard, gone. Sum too high, gone.

And in the current state of 24-bit recording, where you will universally have far more headroom than you'll ever realistically (or non-realistically for the most part) need, there is absolutely no advantage to using it up "too early" -- It won't help.
Quoted for emphasis.

The best mixes I receive done totally ITB usually have VERY conservative levels.
__________________
Peter
Technologyworks Mastering
http://www.technologyworks.co.uk
Technologyworks is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18th November 2011   #11
Lives for gear
 
wado1942's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Location: Boise, Idaho
Posts: 2,088

Quote:
Originally Posted by Technologyworks View Post
Quoted for emphasis.

The best mixes I receive done totally ITB usually have VERY conservative levels.
Seconded. The guys who insist on trying to make the mixes loud even without limiting usually sound a lot wimpier than those who don't care about how loud the mix is.
__________________
Stephen Baldassarre
www.gcmstudio.com
wado1942 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18th November 2011   #12
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 561

Quote:
Originally Posted by Technologyworks View Post
The best mixes I receive done totally ITB usually have VERY conservative levels.
I'm just curious since you have lots of experience with mastering:

Isn't it good to start loud and cut volume as needed during mixing? I used to not care about levels and leave lots of headroom and my mixes did not sound better than they do now with good volume on each track...are you saying a soft mix with LOTS of limiting/compression on the mastering side will yield a better end result? You of course as the ME have all the great gear, so I could see why you would want lots and lots of headroom. But as the guy mixing it I would probably be concerned that I'm expecting the ME to do too much to a mix that is quite softer than commercial stuff.
StringBean is offline   Reply With Quote
New Reply New Reply Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook  Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter  Submit Thread to LinkedIn LinkedIn 



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:32 AM.

Home - Search Forum - Contact Us - Terms Of Use - Advertise on Gearslutz - All Advertisers - Archive - Top
 
 
Powered by vBulletin®
Gearslutz.com LTD - UK Company Number 7597610.
Registered Office - 35 Ballards Lane, London, N3 1XW.
Hosted by Nimbus Hosting.

SEO by vBSEO ©2010, Crawlability, Inc.