![]() | All Advertisers |
| |||||||
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| "Upsampling" | Psyko/Acoustics | Mastering forum | 3 | 18th April 2006 05:27 AM |
| Mastering - does use of signal crush maximizers make mastering compression - redunda | Jules | Mastering forum | 15 | 30th August 2005 04:55 PM |
| Upsampling | ttauri | So much gear, so little time! | 1 | 14th March 2005 02:49 AM |
| Upsampling 44.1 to 48 for video? | bdunard | So much gear, so little time! | 7 | 20th February 2005 06:15 PM |
| Pro Tools: Upsampling From 48k to 96k Quality Loss? | Perspectrum | Music computers | 1 | 25th February 2004 11:22 AM |
| View Poll Results: Do you upsample for mastering. | |||
| yes | | 5 | 21.74% |
| no | | 12 | 52.17% |
| sometimes | | 6 | 26.09% |
| Voters: 23. You may not vote on this poll | |||
![]() |
| | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
| | #1 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Feb 2006 Location: Perth Australia
Posts: 665
| Upsampling for mastering How often do you guys do this? Is it standard procedure for you? And if it is, you obviously feel the gains are greater than the down sampling losses? Id like to know the whys and why nots, of what you guys are doing. |
| | |
| | #2 | |
| Moderator Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 1,724
| Quote:
You can sometimes spread out processing artifacts over the wider spectrum and then when using quality SRC coming back to 44.1 the filtering will get rid of the stuff above Nyquist. That's one theoretical advantage, especially for the nonlinear stuff. | |
| | |
| | #3 | |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Feb 2006 Location: Perth Australia
Posts: 665
| Quote:
Where do the processing artifacts come from mostly? | |
| | |
| | #4 |
| Gear maniac Join Date: Dec 2004 Location: Houston
Posts: 260
| I guess I upsample indirectly. The Weiss EQ1-LP and Weiss DS1-MkII internally upsample before processing and then downsample before it's output (when receiving 44.1k or 48k material). I owned these devices before this was available and it made a noticable difference. This is becoming more and can be found in products like the GML Hi-Res EQ, and current products from PSP like MasterQ, Neon, and MasterComp - all great products in their own right.
__________________ Bob Boyd Ambient Digital http://myspace.com/ambientdigital That's why they're called "Business socks". |
| | |
| | #5 |
| Gear maniac Join Date: Dec 2004 Location: Houston
Posts: 260
| delete please - duplicate
__________________ Bob Boyd Ambient Digital http://myspace.com/ambientdigital That's why they're called "Business socks". |
| | |
| | #6 | |
| Gear addict Join Date: Aug 2003 Location: Hollywood CA
Posts: 408
| Quote:
DC | |
| | |
| | #7 |
| Lives for gear | IM experimenting with this now. Someone please correct me if IM doing it wrong. I cant afford to record at 96 k and im use to recording at 44k. For the time being IM experimenting with a song I already recorded at 24 44. Out of nuendo I bounce at 32 but float 44 k. Then in wavelab I upsample to 96k. Once 96 k I apply my eq/compression and final limiting and then set the output for 16 44. IM wondering if I should down sample after I dither or before? Also what would be the better src to use with pc? Is wavelab ok? |
| | |
| | #8 | |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Feb 2006 Location: Perth Australia
Posts: 665
| Quote:
Cool thanks Dee Cee | |
| | |
| | #9 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Feb 2006 Location: Perth Australia
Posts: 665
| I like plugins that give you the option to upsample like voxengo. |
| | |
| | #10 |
| Gear nut Join Date: Apr 2004 Location: Melbourne
Posts: 75
| Even though Im thinking of approaching it with a mixing perspective... What do people here use/rercommend as the best way of upsampling/downsampling? |
| | |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
| |