Eliminating String Noise on steel string guitar - Page 2 - Gearslutz.com

Gearslutz.com

All Advertisers
Go Back   Gearslutz.com > The Forums > Mastering forum


Eliminating String Noise on steel string guitar

New Reply New Reply Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 19th January 2008   #31
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Location: Toronto
Posts: 808

Verified Member
Quote:
Originally Posted by bonne View Post
For those who can't manage the price of Renovator there's a new option at a fraction of the price: Izotope RX. Results on par with Renovator. Easy to use.
I'm looking at one of these options.

Does anyone else share this opinion?
Andy Krehm is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22nd January 2008   #32
Gear maniac
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Location: Norway
Posts: 273

Andy

Here are some people's opinions on the RX:

PSW Recording Forums: Brad Blackwood => You really need to check this out... (noise removal)

Three things about the RX tipped the scales for me:

1) Navigation. You can switch from standard wave display to spectral display and back. Very convenient in that it allows you to quickly zoom in on the problem area using the wave display, then shift to spectral display and do whatever you need to do. Then shift back to wave display to zoom in on the next problem area etc. This is a great timesaver over the Renovator, especially when you need high resolution in the spectral dispaly. You'll spend a lot of time waiting for the Renovator to recalculate at high resolution.

2) 3-in-1. If you need to do noise reduction, click or clip removal and spectral correction all of this (and more) can be done in one instance of RX, whereas with Algorithmix you would need to use 3 different programs to get this done: Renovator, Noisefree and Scrathfree.

3) The price, obviously. It's a steal!


I wouldn't kick the Renovator out of bed though. It's a great tool in it's own right.


For the task at hand, guitar string noises, here's a link to a video tutorial adressing that:

RX Spectral Repair: Replace Mode


The RX is every bit as good soundwise and easier and faster to use.

Hope this helps.
bonne is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22nd January 2008   #33
Mastering
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 3,099

Sounds like Izotope is gaining some converts.

How easy is it to integrate with your DAW? Does it rewrite the file in the same way as Renovator does?

Renovator requires a DAW-specific implementation. But even so, it rewrites to the WAV file with markers where its edits are somehow incorporated into a (proprietary?) header. I'd love to hear more about how this works, about "undo's" and so on.

BK
__________________
Bob Katz DIGITAL DOMAIN http://www.digido.com
"There are two kinds of fools. One says-this is old and therefore good. The other says-this is new and therefore better."

No trees were killed in the sending of this message. However a large number of electrons were terribly inconvenienced.
bob katz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23rd January 2008   #34
mal
Gear Head
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 51

The spectral editor in Wavelab 6 is quite amazing as an alternative possibility....

I recently though manually went through a couple of acoustic tracks (guitar & soprano guitar) and just used the volume automation in PT to reduce the worst offenders.
__________________
Mal Stanley
Jazztrack
ABC Classic FM
Melbourne
Australia
www.abc.net.au/classic/jazztrack
mal is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24th January 2008   #35
Gear maniac
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Location: Norway
Posts: 273

Bob

Here's a quote from Izotope's website:

"While RX is a standalone application, iZotope is currently developing plug-in versions of RX's modules for use in your favorite digital audio workstation. When you buy iZotope RX or iZotope RX advanced, you will receive these plug-ins at no additional charge when they are released. RX plug-ins are currently planned for early 2008".

Yes, the RX rewrites the file when you promp it to, after you've done your corrections using the different modules. You can revert to earlier settings using the undo history list on the user interface.

You'll find more info here:

iZotope RX - Complete Audio Restoration: Declipping, Declicker, Hum Removal, Denoiser, Spectral Repair, Restore, Remaster, Download
bonne is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24th January 2008   #36
Mastering
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 3,099

Quote:
Originally Posted by bonne View Post
Bob

Here's a quote from Izotope's website:
Thanks, Bonne. Well, the price is very attractive! Don't ask me what I invested in having both Renovator AND Retouch here!

Someone would have to do a very careful shootout, I'm partial to my best toys :-)

BK
bob katz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25th January 2008   #37
Gear maniac
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Location: Norway
Posts: 273

Quote:
Originally Posted by bob katz View Post
Someone would have to do a very careful shootout, I'm partial to my best toys :-)
BK
For some things you might still prefer the Renovator. For other tasks RX will give you superior results (check the link in post #32). Over and all I prefer the RX for most things now.

Since the RX was released only a few months ago we've seen great improvements in every update (version 1:04 so far). Expect to see more improvements up until the time RX Advanced will be launched. Izotope seem very intent on making the RX the best of it's kind.

Updating is a breeze by the way. The new version will replace your present version with no hassle at all.

The demo download includes both the Simple and Advanced demo versions. Well worth a try.
bonne is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29th March 2008   #38
Lives for gear
 
Alexey Lukin's Avatar
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 640

Verified Member
Quote:
Originally Posted by bob katz View Post
How easy is it to integrate with your DAW?
Now available as plug-ins, look at iZotope, Inc - Audio Signal Processing Hardware, Software, Plug-ins, Technology Licensing
Alexey Lukin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5th April 2008   #39
Lives for gear
 
Washington's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 976

Hell, I LOVE squeaks. Organic, human, real (I know the question was to get rid of it, but still...)

Manual automation on a good EQ (the Dave Pensado way, sort of) would be my guess if it was to save my life.
Washington is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12th April 2008   #40
Lives for gear
 
beyarecords's Avatar
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Location: Virginia Water, Surrey, England
Posts: 558

Send a message via AIM to beyarecords Send a message via Skype™ to beyarecords
Quote:
Originally Posted by bob katz View Post
I've also had success using Renovator....on the selected section wherever the squeaks occur. Though labor-intensive, it's much more invisible and selective than a compressor or a de-esser, and doesn't affect the sonics of the surrounding material.
thumbsup
beyarecords is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15th March 2009   #41
Gear Head
 
azazel's Avatar
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Location: Birmingham, England
Posts: 70

squeeks and quiet guitar

hi. I'm having major issues in this squeeky area. I'm (literally) currently attempting to record 'One of these things first' by the great Nick Drake. I'm using a pair of Behringer C-2s close to the sound hole/top frets, positioned very close to each other with the gauzes/heads perpendicular to each other (panned hard left/hard right). This particular mic configuration has worked wonders when I'm recording the guitarist in my band. I - however - am normally a drummer and have only been learning guitar for a year or so.

Anyhow, the parts that my guitarist has been laying down for our album are more 'strumming'-type acoustic parts - i.e. relatively loud and firm playing. Whereas the Nick Drake tune that I'm currently trying to record is very much fingerstyle and seems to sound much nicer if played (very) softly. The only problem with this is that every time I move between chords, i get a fret squeek a load of dbs louder. It literally jumps way out of the overall dynamic level.

I've just had a friend round who advised me to learn how to play each chord without sliding, thus eliminating the squeek, but I've been practising this song for over a year (almost every day) and am eager to get it recorded ASAP. I obviously value my compadres opinion, but I don't really wanna spend another 3 months practising the song with the ''eliminating fret squeek technique'' (lifting fingers off between each chord) before actually recording it.

I've actually tried talcum/baby powder, washing my hands with soapy water etc. and had pretty much zero luck with either of these. I also tried using deEsser, noise reduction and/or compression on a previous Nick Drake tune that I recorded and none of these (even when used pretty drastically) really produced the desired effect.

If anyone has any other suggestions, I'd be happy to give them a go and post the results.

P.S. Equipment (for guitar part on this track):
2x Behringer C-2
Behringer Compressor
Applied R&T Tube MP pre-amp
M-Audio Firewire Solo (two inputs)
PC running Cubase SX3 & Cool Edit
Waves and URS plugins
azazel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16th March 2009   #42
Lives for gear
 
Waltz Mastering's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Location: 3rd Stone From The Sun
Posts: 2,933

Verified Member
Finger-Ease




TW
Attached Thumbnails
Eliminating String Noise on steel string guitar-finger-ease.jpg  
Waltz Mastering is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16th March 2009   #43
Gear Head
 
azazel's Avatar
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Location: Birmingham, England
Posts: 70

Hi waltz. Thanks for suggestion.

However, I'm completely broke, so I had to find a way of doing this without shelling out any dollars. And fortunately, I did.

Someone on another forum suggested rubbing a candle over the strings. I tried it and it works like a dream. A tiny little squeek is still there, but its volume is massively reduced. Kind of like a ppp (pianississimo) dynamic in contrast to the notes which are more in the mp/mf kinda range.

The wax makes the fretboard look a little messy, but since I'm recording, that doesn't really matter.

I highly recommend this candle wax thing to anyone who is having this problem.
azazel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16th March 2009   #44
Lives for gear
 
wado1942's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Location: Boise, Idaho
Posts: 2,088

The SOURCE is the best place to eliminate any problem. Now, I think that a little squeak is OK. But if you're getting excessive squeaking, it's because you have poor left-hand technique. You're probably pressing too hard on the strings and or need to trim your finger nails. You don't need to put stuff on your hands or the strings as that will shorten the life of the strings (and possibly the guitar). It's only give a baindaid approach to bypassing a bigger problem. There's plenty of guitar players out there who use lots of slides and hardly have any squeaks.

That said, I've had good luck with an FFT filter applied with a cross fade just over the squeak. I think it's good to reduce the squeak just a few dB but don't try to eliminate it.
wado1942 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17th March 2009   #45
Gear Head
 
azazel's Avatar
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Location: Birmingham, England
Posts: 70

hi wado. yeah. like i said, I'm a drummer and have only been playin the guitar for just over a year, so my left hand technique ain't up to much. it was only about two weeks ago that i actually started recording my guitar playing, and that was when the squeaks became apparent (just hadn't noticed them when playing live). obviously, if I wanna cut down the squeaks (to an appopriate level), I'm just gonna have to practice more. But in the meantime, the candle wax thing did help. I was just desperate to get this (guide) part down, so it sufficed for that purpose. Where necessary, I have indeed noise reduced via cool edit (FFT filter), but that reduction did not have to be as drastic as it was when i was playing untreated strings.

Anyway, judging from the amount of cutting and pasting I've had to do to get a full good take, I can say there's even more reason for me to practice, and rest assured; I'll be factoring the left hand technique into my future practice sessions.

Thanks for the input.

-Az
azazel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18th March 2009   #46
Gear Head
 
azazel's Avatar
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Location: Birmingham, England
Posts: 70

Izotope RX Renovator

Just thought I'd drop by again and say that the spectral repair in Izotope RX is magic. Decided to get myself a copy of it after realizing that the squeaks - even with candle wax on the strings/talcum powder on my fingers etc. were just too loud - and that it was going to take a long while to get to a point where my left hand technique is up to scratch.

+1 for Izotope RX

and thanks to bonne for the helpful video!
azazel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20th March 2009   #47
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Location: OTTAWA
Posts: 654

Elixir acoustic guitar strings nanoweb will cut back 25 % of string squeak ...

AND they will stay consitent in tone for weeks ... this may completely solve your problem at the source.

ps- They may mellow out the tone too much for some ... but give them try.

My string problems went away the day these were invented!

ELIXIR® Strings - Guitar Strings With Great Tone and Long Life

cheers, jls
jlsgear is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21st March 2009   #48
Gear Head
 
azazel's Avatar
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Location: Birmingham, England
Posts: 70

water...

Thanks for the tip jls. I'll keep it in mind. Though, for the sake of those who are having this problem and haven't got any dollars, just wanna also quickly state that my experience these past few days has shown me that by far the most magical way of reducing fret squeaks - without developing a solid left-hand technique or buying Izotope RX (which i did) - is WATER. It's FREE. Seriously, give it a go. It don't cost nothing (well - barring the bills). Just soak a tisssue and grab it for a couple seconds before you do a take. Worked wonders for me. You can slide all you like and there's no hideous sqeuaks. Left hand baptism i guess.

This (the water thing) is not really new to me - even though I'm (primarily) a drummer - - I have heard that Satriani soaks his hands for 20 mins before doing any recordings/performances.. but that might just be an internet rumour.

Anyway, it works. It might not do much good for your strings in the long term, but I'm aiming towards that dead, messed-up guitar string sound for these Nick Drake covers, so it works for me in more ways than one..

For MEs/Producers who are working with pre-recorded parts, Izotope RX is (unquestionably IMO) the way to go. For guitarists - like me - who haven't quite mastered that left hand technique; give water a go.

P.S. I should just add that I tried recording the desired guitar part on a friends fender acoustic guitar. Even without water, the squeaks were pretty much non-existant. And no, he hasn't got flat-wound or any kind of specialist strings, but no squeaks. Only problem for me was the intonation on that guitar took some getting used to: Ended up moving back to my Squier acoustic; squeaks were there until I re-implemented the water thing.

I'm assuming that in terms of squeaks the discrepancy between the fender and the squier had something to do with strings or the guitar itself (though I'm not sure about the latter), but like I said; no specialist strings were involved.

So I'm still slightly puzzled about that latter point. But music is mystery. Wouldn't be so much fun if there weren't anomalies, however much they p**s us off as producers.

P.P.S. I'll probably update this thread when i find out what strings were on the fender. At the mo, I know they ain't flat-wound, but that's all I know.

Last edited by azazel; 21st March 2009 at 02:23 AM.. Reason: updated information
azazel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5th August 2009   #49
Gear interested
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 1

Thank you so much for the post. It's really useful.

demande simulation pret personnel en ligne - Pret personnel en ligne et de comparer les meilleurs taux afin de... La demande de prêt personnelen lignedemande simulation pret personnel en ligne
tyhello12 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6th August 2009   #50
Lives for gear
 
Happy Musicfan's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 2,477

Let's say you're going from a C Major bar chord at fret/position 8 to G Major bar chord at fret/position 3. Apply right hand dampening (tilt the fleshy part of the right hand palm to the right and gently/swiftly touch all the strings by the bridge) while simultaneously moving the left hand STRAIGHT UP off the strings and THEN to the left, and THEN promptly planting the left hand for the G chord. With enough focus and slow motion practice, the string squeaks can be reduced and eliminated.
Happy Musicfan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7th August 2009   #51
Moderator
 
Blast9's Avatar
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Location: London
Posts: 4,597

Or do a couple of passes, then cheat witha couple of additional ones, where you play just the individual chords and hand movements (whilst muting the strings) _ that's got me out of trouble on a fairly sparse track but not one with just vox and gtr.
__________________
::
New Album "Rooms" out now
http://www.andymitchellmusic.com
::
twitter > http://twitter.com/mitchellmusic - http://www.twitter.com/theyardbirds
Blast9 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7th August 2009   #52
3 + infractions, forum membership suspended.
 
Joined: May 2009
Location: Toronto
Posts: 791

There may be alot of tricks to eliminate the squeaks, but the biggest culprit is bad technique - don't let the left hand fingers slide, even lightly, horizontally along the strings (up and down the neck).
zapsmith9 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7th August 2009   #53
Lives for gear
 
rogerbrain's Avatar
 
Joined: May 2009
Location: atlanta
Posts: 1,487

Quote:
Originally Posted by Shandy View Post
Washing your hands (or I guess just your left one) with soap and warm water before playing will temporarily remove the oils responsible for the string squeak. Another option (in the opposite direction) would be a product like Fast Fret, that you apply to the strings to lube 'em up... I usually go with the hand washing. The little moist towelletes they give you with your meal on airplanes also work in a pinch-- I keep a couple in my guitar case.

But to be honest, I like a little squeak in there to keep it sounding real...
very zen.. the sound of one hand washing.

I thought fast fret was a string cleaner... finger ease is a squeek ******ant.

lighter gauge strings sqweek less... but I have not found a plug in that will do that yet...

automate the eq is the best way after it is recorded.. find the energy spot of EACH offensive squeek an attenuate it a little ...also automate any ambience and take it off the sqweek .... after a couple of hours of this you will either convince yourself you like sqweek or stop recording guitar with such good gear..

I use a slower preamp and mic combo, even for solo guitar. there are several dynamics that sound pretty good that are not 'hot' in the sqweek zone. (try an EV 635 and cheap tube pre) ..also the placement of the mic can be critical as well... to sound and sqweeking

the sound of one hand sqweeking....uuuummmmm
__________________
Good Reverb Takes Time

Roger Brainard
www.rogerbrainard.com
rogerbrain is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9th August 2009   #54
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 707

Quote:
Originally Posted by jlsgear View Post
Elixir acoustic guitar strings nanoweb will cut back 25 % of string squeak ...

AND they will stay consitent in tone for weeks ... this may completely solve your problem at the source.

ps- They may mellow out the tone too much for some ... but give them try.

My string problems went away the day these were invented!

ELIXIR® Strings - Guitar Strings With Great Tone and Long Life

cheers, jls
Totally agree on the Elixers. I have them on my Taylors and they are wonderful. They do reduce the squeak, they sound good, they feel cleaner, and I get less wear on my callouses which I appreciate. I did not like them on my electric guitars though. They dulled the tone a bit too much.
riffmachine is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30th March 2010   #55
Lives for gear
 
Guitar Zero's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Location: Salem, OR
Posts: 1,301

Quote:
Originally Posted by arf View Post
Not so! Algorithmix ReNOVAtor, CEDAR Retouch, and other "frequency domain editing" apps can isolate and replace the squeaks with sound re-synthesized from adjacent sound making the removal seemless and invisible. I do it all the time with in the blink of an eye with Algorithmix. Don't go crazy, though, the squeaks are part of the instrument. I only remove the ones that hurt. ReNOVAtor is now available for ProTools.
I got all excited about this until I looked it up and realized this plug is costs over $3000. Holy cow, who spends that kind of cash on one plug in? For that kind of money you could hire a professional guitarist to come play all your tracks with no squeaks.
__________________
_____________________________________________
"For only 25 cents less, you could get the extra small".

http://project4music.com/

http://itunes.apple.com/us/album/project-4/id375600080
Guitar Zero is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30th March 2010   #56
Gear maniac
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Location: Melbourne, Australia.
Posts: 205

just used izotope Rx on a recent project. very cost effective.
definitely in the league of Renovator and retouch. absolutely kills any of the waves stuff in regards to de-noising. the spectral repair mode was so good it allowed me to remove an electric drill noise that was present during a recording. I'm sure removing strings noises would be a snap.

Joe
soundroid is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15th June 2011   #57
Gear interested
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 2

Less squeak with a classical guitar

I play nylon acoustic and only have issues with squeaking when I try to switch over to my steel string. When I pick up the steel string, let the squeaking begin.

So one solution would be to try a classical guitar. You can power chord your way to oblivion on one of those without squeaking. It also makes a really nice slide sound that lacks any squeak at all. The problem there becomes skin loss and excessive heat from the friction caused by moving around too quickly. i kid you not. A little mineral oil solves the heat problem though. Might try baby powder.

I'll have to play the steel string more to improve on the squeaking front, but the classical is so much more fun to play that this hasn't happened.
Mike. is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15th June 2011   #58
Gear maniac
 
heybub419's Avatar
 
Joined: Aug 2010
Location: Toledo, Ohio
Posts: 182

Quote:
Originally Posted by John Peacock View Post
Why would you want to remove it? It's a real guitar. There should be string noise.

-Jp
I agree...Personally, I like string noise. I even like the string noise on the Yamaha MOTIF acoustic guitar patches, haha. Of course, that's just my opinion! If you want to remove it, the best way is to eliminate it at the source. Automation can help though; I'd try automating levels or a de-esser.
heybub419 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15th June 2011   #59
Gear Head
 
makesijoseph's Avatar
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Location: trinidad and tobago
Posts: 46

Send a message via MSN to makesijoseph
What I have dun is record the fret board on another track inverse and automate the phase and get rid of the "EXTREME SQUEEKS". i also thing squeeks are poor technique.... we actually had to add fret noise to some players... O_O
__________________
Music is expression ROCK RAP REGGAE SOCA all expressions
makesijoseph is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12th November 2011   #60
Gear maniac
 
Analok's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 215

I'm on the 'keep the squeaks' bandwagon

I'd exclusively prefer better playing technique over any plug in electro whiz-bang app any hour of any day-period. But if it's irritating to the performer I can only suggest a re-take of the performance with slight mods in mic placement or trying an additional mic to blend with (mind you that practice of the piece should have been well mapped out before the record button is hit-wasted time=wasted $$$=added frustration). I do however like the suggestions brought up to 'naturally' reduce string squeal (like candle wax, hand washing, PLAIN OL' WATER!! etc) and will keep them in mind well before I start slammin' the track through a de-sser!! And where a player repeats a bar or two that 'squeal' a tad more than the last verse, well then that only confirms the take as being straight up 'live' rather than a spliced up frankenstein of loops and snippets from 3 different sessions of varying success. Keep the human element for God's sake! Off the soapbox...
Analok is offline   Reply With Quote
New Reply New Reply Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook  Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter  Submit Thread to LinkedIn LinkedIn 



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Similar Threads
Thread Thread starter Forum Replies Last Post
5-string set for a 4-string musicman? cococontofu instruments, guitar, bass, amps 3 16th September 2006 08:35 AM
Favorite mic pre for steel string acoustic??? araw So much gear, so little time! 36 16th August 2006 01:34 AM
DAV mic pres w/acoustic steel string araw Remote Possibilities in Acoustic Music & Location Recording 6 7th August 2006 11:53 PM
Guitar String Secret toledo3 Expert Question & Answer Archives (read only archive, not open for new posts) 15 28th March 2003 07:35 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:27 AM.

Home - Search Forum - Contact Us - Terms Of Use - Advertise on Gearslutz - All Advertisers - Archive - Top
 
 
Powered by vBulletin®
Gearslutz.com LTD - UK Company Number 7597610.
Registered Office - 35 Ballards Lane, London, N3 1XW.
Hosted by Nimbus Hosting.

SEO by vBSEO ©2010, Crawlability, Inc.