Cleaning a phone conversation - Gearslutz.com

Gearslutz.com

All Advertisers
Go Back   Gearslutz.com > The Forums > Mastering forum


Cleaning a phone conversation

New Reply New Reply Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 23rd December 2010   #1
Lives for gear
 
lasso's Avatar
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Location: Denmark
Posts: 585

Thread Starter
Cleaning a phone conversation

I've benn approached by a guy, that has recorded a telephone conversation. In it, you can clearly hear him talking but the other person is only recorded very faintly through the cell phones own microphone. THe largest problem is, that there is music running in the background which almost completely masks what the other person says. And since the other persons voice is only recorded through the cells own mic, the music is in the same frequency range as the speak. I've triede numerous noise removal filters but to nu surprise the results aren't satisfactory.

I've asked the client to find the exact music that was played and both send it to me raw but also have him record it through his cell. My hope is that I can mess the phase and somehow minimize the music in the file.

Do you have any other clever suggestions? I really wanna help this guy - it's xmas afterall.
__________________
Cheers, Lasso.

www.tonekontrol.dk
www.myspace.com/supershadecph
www.hotmastering.dk - online mastering
lasso is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23rd December 2010   #2
Lives for gear
 
huejahfink's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 1,285

Verified Member
Sounds tricky... do you have a clip to share?
huejahfink is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 23rd December 2010   #3
Gear Head
 
Slyderhodge's Avatar
 
Joined: Aug 2010
Location: Floyd, Va
Posts: 56

I had a job just like this a few months ago. First off I duplicated the track and edited it down so that only one person's voice was on each track, this makes leveling and cleaning each voice much easier. Also if you can't eq the entire voice because of the background noise, try concentrating on the syllabence of the voice. The one I worked on the phone voice was rather high pitched so I had a very thight Q boosted at 1.7k (somewhere in that area). Also using a HPF and a LPF so that your only dealing with the the voice helps too.

Not sure if this would help
Slyderhodge is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29th December 2010   #4
Gear maniac
 
Joined: Dec 2010
Location: London
Posts: 265

See if you can beg a favour off someone (most likely in sound-for-film) who has one of the CEDAR DNS-series units. They're specifically designed for recovering dialogue almost lost in noise.
Richard Black is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30th December 2010   #5
Lives for gear
 
imaginaryday's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 959

Quote:
Originally Posted by lasso View Post
I've benn approached by a guy, that has recorded a telephone conversation. In it, you can clearly hear him talking but the other person is only recorded very faintly through the cell phones own microphone. THe largest problem is, that there is music running in the background which almost completely masks what the other person says. And since the other persons voice is only recorded through the cells own mic, the music is in the same frequency range as the speak. I've triede numerous noise removal filters but to nu surprise the results aren't satisfactory.

I've asked the client to find the exact music that was played and both send it to me raw but also have him record it through his cell. My hope is that I can mess the phase and somehow minimize the music in the file.

Do you have any other clever suggestions? I really wanna help this guy - it's xmas afterall.
download a trial version of Auidonamix and give it a try.
imaginaryday is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30th December 2010   #6
Gear nut
 
LirvA's Avatar
 
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 85

This thread reminds me of a deal I was recently watching about Robert Kennedy's assassination. They got ahold of a tape that was the only known audio recording of the actual gunshots, and an audio forensic scientist analyzed it and came to the conclusion that there were 13 shots fired, and two different types of pistols.

It's a pretty interesting audio related field imo.


fwiw here's one of the vids
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iwvO0u8MseA
LirvA is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2nd January 2011   #7
Lives for gear
 
synthoid's Avatar
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 2,795

I've had decent luck with Soundtrack Pro for this kind of thing (I cleaned up a conversation recorded on a cell phone with it). In addition to basic noise reduction stuff that is not bad, there is a spectral editor that can be very handy for doing radical surgery on something like background music. If you have enough time to throw at the problem, you can work section by section applying different kinds of spectral cuts to eliminate that stuff.

Another thing that you might try, on a lark, might be melodyne's polyphonic mode. If the background music happens to be isolated by that program as a separate melodic line, then you might be able to pull its volume down while leaving the voice alone. It depends entirely though on what Melodyne gives you when it analyzes the file; very much hit or miss.

-synthoid
__________________
jomomusic.com
synthoid is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2nd January 2011   #8
Gear interested
 
Joined: Nov 2010
Location: Mopertingen (BE)
Posts: 16

Quote:
Originally Posted by LirvA View Post
and an audio forensic scientist analyzed it and came to the conclusion that there were 13 shots fired ..
YouTube - RFK assassination acoustic evidence on CBS
By looking at the waveform?

So that's what the loudness war is about, every 'peak of high amplitude' in your recording can be identified as a gunshot ...

If you watch closely you can see someone threw 3 grenades too, by the look of the amp envelope ...
__________________
sidamosaemastering
sidamosae.be is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2nd January 2011   #9
Gear nut
 
LirvA's Avatar
 
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 85

I don't know what all he analyzed, I'm a layman. But a few other people have come to the same conclusion that there were more than 8 shots.
LirvA is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2nd January 2011   #10
Gear nut
 
blusound's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 2010
Location: Italy
Posts: 76

Quote:
Originally Posted by Richard Black View Post
See if you can beg a favour off someone (most likely in sound-for-film) who has one of the CEDAR DNS-series units. They're specifically designed for recovering dialogue almost lost in noise.
Hi Richard,
CEDAR is the top company for forensic noise removal, but the problem is the music in the background and there in no music removal filter implemented until now!
The traditional approach to this kind of problem is to try to find out a comb filter with the use of a delay and more EQ to pull out some speaking, but no guaranteed results.
Synthoid suggestion with melodyne polyphonic mode could helps!
Best regards
Leo
__________________
www.bluemastering.com
blusound is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2nd January 2011   #11
Moderator
 
DrDeltaM's Avatar
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Location: Belgium
Posts: 4,347

Verified Member
Quote:
Originally Posted by blusound View Post
Hi Richard,
CEDAR is the top company for forensic noise removal, but the problem is the music in the background and there in no music removal filter implemented until now!
The traditional approach to this kind of problem is to try to find out a comb filter with the use of a delay and more EQ to pull out some speaking, but no guaranteed results.
Synthoid suggestion with melodyne polyphonic mode could helps!
Best regards
Leo
Actually, Cedar Cambridge does have a forensic 'music removal filter'. The X-Channel Adaptive filters can remove the music (distorted by the broadcast, acoustics, speaker system, recording system, ...) if you give it a reference track (the song in question from another source like a CD).
You don't even have to align the reference track perfectly, Cedar will do the fine aligning in realtime for you.
__________________
Mathijs Indesteege aka Mathew Lane
mixing - mastering - audio restoration - plugins
http://www.mathewlane.com

DrMS. Focus on your stereo field. - NEW v3.2 OUT NOW!
DrMS spatial processor - native RTAS/AU/VST plugin ยป

Digital Audio Product Support
Joystick Audio - Benelux High End Distributor
http://www.joystick.be
DrDeltaM is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2nd January 2011   #12
Gear nut
 
blusound's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 2010
Location: Italy
Posts: 76

Quote:
Originally Posted by DrDeltaM View Post
Actually, Cedar Cambridge does have a forensic 'music removal filter'. The X-Channel Adaptive filters can remove the music (distorted by the broadcast, acoustics, speaker system, recording system, ...) if you give it a reference track (the song in question from another source like a CD).
You don't even have to align the reference track perfectly, Cedar will do the fine aligning in realtime for you.
I'm speechless!
blusound is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7th January 2011   #13
Gear Head
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 37

I thought about finding the original music track (if you can recognize it) and putting it to the parallel track in the reverse phase.
nemo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7th January 2011   #14
Moderator
 
DrDeltaM's Avatar
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Location: Belgium
Posts: 4,347

Verified Member
Quote:
Originally Posted by nemo View Post
I thought about finding the original music track (if you can recognize it) and putting it to the parallel track in the reverse phase.
Simple anti-phase isn't enough usually, especially as the track is 'deformed' a lot by acoustics, speaker system, recording system, ... The Cedar filter can 'adapt' to these sonic changes to achieve a much better result then simple anti-phase.
DrDeltaM is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7th January 2011   #15
Gear maniac
 
Joined: Dec 2010
Location: London
Posts: 265

Quote:
I thought about finding the original music track (if you can recognize it) and putting it to the parallel track in the reverse phase.
Yes, that sounds neat until you realise you need to align the two tracks to a few microseconds over the entire duration, and then ensure that the frequency response and associated phase shift of both are identical to tight limits. When you realise how long that could take you (er, think lifetimes, frankly) you'll see what a bargain a CEDAR system is!
Richard Black is offline   Reply With Quote
New Reply New Reply Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook  Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter  Submit Thread to LinkedIn LinkedIn 



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Similar Threads
Thread Thread starter Forum Replies Last Post
recording cell phone conversation JHourselt So much gear, so little time! 20 4th June 2011 03:01 PM
Brief conversation with my wife Silver Sonya The Moan Zone 16 18th March 2010 06:53 PM
Recording a Group conversation... jlacck Rap + Hip Hop engineering & production 6 29th June 2009 08:31 PM
recording a phone call from a mbile phone Atari Low End Theory 17 17th October 2008 08:39 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:39 AM.

Home - Search Forum - Contact Us - Terms Of Use - Advertise on Gearslutz - All Advertisers - Archive - Top
 
 
Powered by vBulletin®
Gearslutz.com LTD - UK Company Number 7597610.
Registered Office - 35 Ballards Lane, London, N3 1XW.
Hosted by Nimbus Hosting.

SEO by vBSEO ©2010, Crawlability, Inc.