![]() | All Advertisers |
| Member Services Directory | Classifieds | Reviews | Jobs | Deal Zone | Merchandise | Marketplace | Facebook App | Books, DVDs & Gadgets | Video Vault | Tips & Techniques |
| |||||||
New Reply | Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| | #1 |
| Gear maniac Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 235
Thread Starter | Wavelab - how to automate plugin parameter
hello, here a Wavelab user. I need to change some plugin parameter on time but can't figure out how to do this...is there a way? or should I use another software? which one ( window user )? thanks a lot. regards kun |
| | |
| | #2 | |
| Lives for gear Joined: May 2008 Location: Karlsruhe, Germany
Posts: 2,747
Verified Member | Quote:
If you're working with the montage anyway, it's not such a bad way to automate in a mastering context, even if it sounds a bit counter-intuitive at first. | |
| | |
| | #3 |
| Gear maniac Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 235
Thread Starter |
thanks for reply I upgraded to WaveLab 6 and didn't know about Audio Montage, hope this will solve my issue.
|
| | |
| | #4 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Dec 2004 Location: Eugene Oregon
Posts: 832
|
What about the effect morphing feature? You don't need to use the montage at all for that. For example add reverb. 1. highlight the section you wish to add reverb. Insert your reverb plug in the master section. 2. render the section you wish to add reverb. Now you have a wave file that abruptly goes from no reverb to 100% reverb. 3. with that section still highlighted, use the effect morphing feature. 4. if you wish to morph from 0% to 100% over the highlighted section simply draw a straight line from 0 to 100. 5. Click apply and you are done. |
| | |
| | #5 | |
| Lives for gear Joined: May 2008 Location: Karlsruhe, Germany
Posts: 2,747
Verified Member | Quote:
But that's all destructively, right? And I assume it just does a crossfade post effect (as it would when crossfading clips in the montage), right? | |
| | |
| | #6 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Dec 2004 Location: Eugene Oregon
Posts: 832
|
Details are on page 211 in the Wavelab 6 manual. I wish I could refer people to details on the Wavelab 7 manual. ![]() yes destructively, and ....yes. |
| | |
| | #7 |
| Lives for gear Joined: May 2008 Location: Karlsruhe, Germany
Posts: 2,747
Verified Member | |
| | |
| | #8 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Jan 2007 Location: Minneapolis
Posts: 1,209
Verified Member |
I've never understood why people spend so much time in the Wave window. I do everything (except restoration) in the Montage. That way you can make small tweaks without having to render, etc. The only thing that's ever in my master section is the external router and SPAN. Robin's example is how I do it. It's seamless between clips and infinitely adjustable. GR |
| | |
| | #9 |
| Lives for gear Joined: May 2008 Location: Karlsruhe, Germany
Posts: 2,747
Verified Member | Same here. I just assume that many don't really know the montage well - if at all. Which seems weird, because in my mind, that's what you're paying for (a flexible, non-destructive, EDL based mastering application).
|
| | |
| | #10 | |
| Lives for gear Joined: Dec 2004 Location: Eugene Oregon
Posts: 832
| Quote:
2. The montage didn't exist until version 3. It's hard to change habits sometimes? 3. How can you perform any analysis and error check functions in montage? 4. With one button press, and a highlighted clip, I can switch between montage and wave edit. Wave edit is more clean looking and simpler to me. | |
| | |
| | #11 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Jan 2007 Location: Minneapolis
Posts: 1,209
Verified Member |
1) I do look at it from a mastering perspective. I still find the montage window much better for editing, with the sole exception of doing any sort of restoration, de-clicking, etc. 2) V3 was how many years ago? My first DAW was a Sonic Solutions system with a non-destructive editing environment (similar to the montage) back in 1993 (version 0.9). Like you, hard to break that habit. 3) I use a spectral analyzer in the master section if I want some eye candy. I use the spectral editor in the wave window for restoration - then go back to the montage to continue working. Otherwise all of the gee-whiz screens are turned off ![]() 4) Yes, it's easy to access the wave window when I need to fix something at the file level. But you can't edit, assemble, sequence, fade, name, add ISRC, etc., etc. in the wave window. Everyone has different ways of using tools. It's unfortunate when a developer decides to remove some very useful features because they are hard to port to a new platform. This is the reason I left Sonic many years ago. Hoping for the best in WL7. GR |
| | |
| | #12 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Dec 2004 Location: Eugene Oregon
Posts: 832
|
I see where you are coming from. You can fade in the wave window. When I said analysis and error check functions I meant analysis>global analysis to check errors, dbRMs levels etc. I don't believe you can highlight a clip and perform those functions correct? You need to be in the wave window. And also...but not very important today, but the montage would not open any direct X. (of course with a vb rack it's not an issue but there was a time I was working with Waves and no rack existed or I didn't know about it) I think as long as PG listens to the users, and solves issues in the Wavelab forum the program is hard to beat. For myself quick technical support is very important and valuable. |
| | |
| | #13 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Nov 2005 Location: Australia
Posts: 1,323
|
Yes, I live only in the Montage window. Even when I open only one WAV and mess around with it. I have never understood the necessity for the WAV workspace. And in WL7 I have removed it and the window switcher from my default workspace.
|
| | |
| | #14 |
| Gear maniac Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 235
Thread Starter |
really thanks for infos! I didn't know about montage at all. ![]() I am wavelab user sice V3...yes quite years ago. must upgrade my mind not only my software! regards kun |
| | |
| | #15 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Mar 2009 Location: London, UK
Posts: 1,574
Verified Member |
I've only been using WL since version 6 (Sonic before that) but I do really love it! It's like a little "Pandora's box"! Tend to flick between the Wave and Montage (more Montage) depending on what I need to do. If I get a couple mix revisions for an album that I've already assembled, I'll re-label the original 44.1/32 float file to have a V1 after it, and then print the new capture as the original title. As long as both files are topped the same, the montage will automatically apply the same fades etc, and the album will be the same apart from now containing the re-cuts of the mix revisions. |
| | |
| | #16 |
| Gear Head Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 72
|
Wavelab 7's out! Ordered today!
|
| | |
New Reply
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| WaveLab 6 losing saved Plugin-Chain in Master-Section... | laboso | Mastering forum | 4 | 26th September 2010 09:10 AM |
| Does WAVELAB 7 opens Montages recorded with Wavelab on PC ? | VoxPro | So much gear, so little time! | 0 | 16th August 2010 04:35 AM |
| Automation - what to automate and what not to automate? | bloodyh | Post Production forum! | 11 | 15th March 2010 07:24 PM |
| Automate plugins?new to this?? What should i automate | capellino | Geekslutz forum | 0 | 29th May 2009 01:01 PM |
| Wavelab - Plugin Problem | stevens119 | Music computers | 0 | 7th January 2007 02:17 AM |
| |