Mastering 6000 limiting settings? on previously limited music - Gearslutz.com

Gearslutz.com

All Advertisers
Go Back   Gearslutz.com > The Forums > Mastering forum


Mastering 6000 limiting settings? on previously limited music

New Reply New Reply Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 25th September 2010   #1
Lives for gear
 
mixerguy's Avatar
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 4,002

Thread Starter
Mastering 6000 limiting settings? on previously limited music

I have some stereo final music mixes where the music has already been limited with Massey L2007 with about 3-5 db of peak reduction already. The music is instrumental in a variety of styles.... some more dynamic.... and some less dynamic. It is NOT heavy hitting rock or similar.

Now the producers want the music to be an additional 3 db louder, overall. I am thinking i’ll use my Mastering 6000 (hardware) and the MD4 - BrickWall Limiter 2 - to peak limit the music some more.

Unfortunately it is impossible to go back to the non-peak limited versions of the mixes at this point. (I won’t go into the details, but trust me.... I have no other options)

The questions are

- can anyone suggest some good starting points for MD4 BrickWall Limiter 2 settings?

should I try the DXP in this situation? I have never used it.... suggested starting points?

any other tips?

thanks much

mixerguy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25th September 2010   #2
PBM
Lives for gear
 
PBM's Avatar
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Location: Norfolk UK
Posts: 544

Verified Member
Quote:
Originally Posted by mixerguy View Post
I have some stereo final music mixes where the music has already been limited with Massey L2007 with about 3-5 db of peak reduction already. The music is instrumental in a variety of styles.... some more dynamic.... and some less dynamic. It is NOT heavy hitting rock or similar.

Now the producers want the music to be an additional 3 db louder, overall. I am thinking i’ll use my Mastering 6000 (hardware) and the MD4 - BrickWall Limiter 2 - to peak limit the music some more.

Unfortunately it is impossible to go back to the non-peak limited versions of the mixes at this point. (I won’t go into the details, but trust me.... I have no other options)

The questions are

- can anyone suggest some good starting points for MD4 BrickWall Limiter 2 settings?

should I try the DXP in this situation? I have never used it.... suggested starting points?

any other tips?

thanks much

If you want just a straight clean 3dB gain then don't use the DXP. It's a compressor that brings out the middle range of the dynamic range, so you might find yourself changing things too much. It took me a while to use the DXP on anything - and still then not much - as the dreadfully intrusive presets put me off so badly!

Try the Brickwall 2 (i.e. the stand-alone one not part of the MD4 package, set oversampling and adaptive and - I'd guess - universal mode). I've done this a few times to add an extra dB or so to pre-limited material (library CDs) but I've no idea if this would work as required in your situation, so it's just a suggestion.

Good luck,

Eric
__________________
www.phibarnmastering.co.uk
PBM is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25th September 2010   #3
Lives for gear
 
mixerguy's Avatar
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 4,002

Thread Starter
thanks Eric!



any other thoughts from anyone?
mixerguy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25th September 2010   #4
Lives for gear
 
Ari-M.'s Avatar
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Location: San Diego, California
Posts: 972

In this situation I would avoid DXP like the plague. DXP (being an upward expander of sorts) will reallt start to push distortion in the mid bands. I tried DXP on a hot solo piano mastering job once. Even with careful attention to overall processing, DXP was just too overbearing for the midbands. The piano became harsh and even distorted at some points. I think if the original master had been recorded/printed at sane levels, DXP would have been perfect.

That being said, I don't think you have any need to run the master you have to work with through the entire MD4 suite. Unless you want to fix some kind of problem in a specific range. You can instantiate Brickwall2 as a stand alone algo. and simply push the level there. I have done that quite a few times. I would also consider L316 (if you have it). As long as you are only using it to bump a few db, it should actually work w/o the typical artifacts.

Another option would be RMS normalization in PEAK. It is useful for the scenario you describe.

Of course none of these situations are ideal. You will always be dealing with the current peak limiting issues and artifacts, but you should be able to bump 3 to 6 db (1.5 db or so RMS) w/o any noticeable issues.

Sounds good in theory anyhow. I have been in your shoes a few times, and sometimes the results are fantastic and sometimes they take a bit more work and are less than ideal. I think it's going to depend on the needs of the music and the client.

good luck
Ari-M. is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25th September 2010   #5
Lives for gear
 
mixerguy's Avatar
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 4,002

Thread Starter
Thanks Ari-M for the good thoughts!

thumbsup

anyone else?

mixerguy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27th September 2010   #6
Lives for gear
 
mixerguy's Avatar
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 4,002

Thread Starter
and - what about using a little bit of multiband compression (MD4) before the brickwall limiter2?

good or bad idea?
mixerguy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27th September 2010   #7
Lives for gear
 
streetbeats's Avatar
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Location: Wokingham UK
Posts: 672

Verified Member
Send a message via AIM to streetbeats Send a message via Skype™ to streetbeats
Any particular reason you feel the need to use the 6000 be a software limiter? You may find that one of the software limiters (or perhaps even a combination of two different limiters) is the better tool for the job. Or not. Just advocating not ruling anything out before you hear.
__________________
Subvert Central Mastering
http://www.scmastering.com
streetbeats is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27th September 2010   #8
Lives for gear
 
mixerguy's Avatar
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 4,002

Thread Starter
Quote:
Originally Posted by streetbeats View Post
Any particular reason you feel the need to use the 6000 be a software limiter? You may find that one of the software limiters (or perhaps even a combination of two different limiters) is the better tool tofor the job. Or not. Just advocating not ruling anything out before you hear.
I've used my Mastering 6000 for a little bit of multiband compression, and I thought it sounded very, very good. This is why....

mixerguy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29th September 2010   #9
mymixisbetterthanyours!
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Location: Berlin
Posts: 1,759

try this with the 6000:

route the output of engine 1 into the input of engine 2.
Load MD4 stereo into engine 1, brickwall2 into engine 2.
Set the brickwall 2 flat (gain 0, threshold 0).
bypass all sections of MD4 (EQ, dynamics, limiter off!)
Now raise your level with the trim fader in the MD4 engine.

As transparent as it gets.

don't use DXP/multiband.
__________________
www.just-mix-it.com
kosmokrator is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29th September 2010   #10
Lives for gear
 
mixerguy's Avatar
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 4,002

Thread Starter
Quote:
Originally Posted by kosmokrator View Post
try this with the 6000:

route the output of engine 1 into the input of engine 2.
Load MD4 stereo into engine 1, brickwall2 into engine 2.
Set the brickwall 2 flat (gain 0, threshold 0).
bypass all sections of MD4 (EQ, dynamics, limiter off!)
Now raise your level with the trim fader in the MD4 engine.

As transparent as it gets.

don't use DXP/multiband.
COOL - thanks!

Looking at my MD4 - I see:

MD4 CD Master

and in decade 7: MD4 Neutral Fast Attack

obviously different starting points.... I'll play with MD4 CD Master in engine 1, as you suggest, and Brickwall 2 Flat in engine 2....

mixerguy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30th September 2010   #11
Lives for gear
 
mixerguy's Avatar
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 4,002

Thread Starter
Quote:
Originally Posted by kosmokrator View Post
try this with the 6000:

route the output of engine 1 into the input of engine 2.
Load MD4 stereo into engine 1, brickwall2 into engine 2.
Set the brickwall 2 flat (gain 0, threshold 0).
bypass all sections of MD4 (EQ, dynamics, limiter off!)
Now raise your level with the trim fader in the MD4 engine.

As transparent as it gets.

don't use DXP/multiband.
ok.... so... I did as you suggested... but in the engine 1 (MD4) - with all sections of MD4 bypassed... I was getting distortion - as keep in mind - this material was previously limited.

so this setup seemingly does not work in my situation.

i think i'll just use Brickwall Limiter 2 alone

- i mean..... what is the advantage of your routing scheme? I can't see any advantage. in fact - the MD4 distorts if I do things exactly the way you suggest.... unless i'm missing something?


thanks
mixerguy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30th September 2010   #12
PBM
Lives for gear
 
PBM's Avatar
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Location: Norfolk UK
Posts: 544

Verified Member
Quote:
Originally Posted by mixerguy View Post
ok.... so... I did as you suggested... but in the engine 1 (MD4) - with all sections of MD4 bypassed... I was getting distortion - as keep in mind - this material was previously limited.

so this setup seemingly does not work in my situation.

i think i'll just use Brickwall Limiter 2 alone

- i mean..... what is the advantage of your routing scheme? I can't see any advantage. in fact - the MD4 distorts if I do things exactly the way you suggest.... unless i'm missing something?


thanks
I think what was being suggested is that using the MD4 before the BW2 gives you greater gain control. If it's distorting either the engine routing is not quite right (maybe both engines are feeding the master output?) or the other elements of the MD4 are not properly cancelled.

It doesn't matter what preset you engage for the MD4 if it's just for gain. The one you've chosen sounds like a parallel comp pre-set. Easiest option perhaps is to go for the `CD' option and turn the compressor button off.

Cheers,

Eric
PBM is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30th September 2010   #13
Lives for gear
 
mixerguy's Avatar
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 4,002

Thread Starter
Quote:
Originally Posted by PBM View Post
I think what was being suggested is that using the MD4 before the BW2 gives you greater gain control. If it's distorting either the engine routing is not quite right (maybe both engines are feeding the master output?) or the other elements of the MD4 are not properly cancelled.

It doesn't matter what preset you engage for the MD4 if it's just for gain. The one you've chosen sounds like a parallel comp pre-set. Easiest option perhaps is to go for the `CD' option and turn the compressor button off.

Cheers,

Eric
Hi Eric
My routing is correct.
and all the sections of the MD4 are bypassed as the other poster (kosmokrator) had suggested.

and my starting preset is NOT parallel.

but think about it - if the compressor and limiter are both bypassed... (as is the EQ) and I run an already peak limited (full level) signal thru it.... and push up 4 db of gain.... of course it will distort!

This is why I don't understand the logic of kosmokrator's suggestion.

I ended up just using (Mastering 6000) Brickwall Limiter 2 on it's own... and it worked out just fine.

mixerguy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30th September 2010   #14
mymixisbetterthanyours!
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Location: Berlin
Posts: 1,759

Quote:
Originally Posted by mixerguy View Post
Hi Eric
My routing is correct.
and all the sections of the MD4 are bypassed as the other poster (kosmokrator) had suggested.

and my starting preset is NOT parallel.

but think about it - if the compressor and limiter are both bypassed... (as is the EQ) and I run an already peak limited (full level) signal thru it.... and push up 4 db of gain.... of course it will distort!

This is why I don't understand the logic of kosmokrator's suggestion.

I ended up just using (Mastering 6000) Brickwall Limiter 2 on it's own... and it worked out just fine.

Did you route the engines 1 into engine 2 in the TC6000? This does not work with external routing (f.e. using the 2 engines as seperate inserts in your DAW).
Make also sure all other sections of the MD4 are bypassed.Limiter has to be set to off. Also make sure you start with unity gain throughout the MD4-chain. (Trim 0, all gain 0 etc.)

Then slowly raise trim.
It's funny how far you can raise the trim without audible distortion. It's actually my main stage to achieve transparent loudness in mastering.
Of course this is highly dependent on source material, it's possible that it doesn't work with your material.
kosmokrator is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30th September 2010   #15
Lives for gear
 
mixerguy's Avatar
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 4,002

Thread Starter
Quote:
Originally Posted by kosmokrator View Post
Did you route the engines 1 into engine 2 in the TC6000? ........

....Make also sure all other sections of the MD4 are bypassed.Limiter has to be set to off. Also make sure you start with unity gain throughout the MD4-chain. (Trim 0, all gain 0 etc.)
.......
yes.

yes.

I got audible distortion very quickly.

as I said - the material had already been peak limited - perhaps this is the difference?

and... why not go right to Brickwall Limiter 2 in my situation? It worked well for me (on it's own)

mixerguy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30th September 2010   #16
mymixisbetterthanyours!
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Location: Berlin
Posts: 1,759

Quote:
Originally Posted by mixerguy View Post
yes.

yes.

I got audible distortion very quickly.

as I said - the material had already been peak limited - perhaps this is the difference?

and... why not go right to Brickwall Limiter 2 in my situation? It worked well for me (on it's own)

Well, of course you can use BW2 on it's own. If it worked well, all is fine, right?
I just told you how I achieve the most transparent gain changes with the TC6000. Could be that it doesn't work for everyone.
For me, it always sounds more transparent than limiting.
As always, YMMV. Try it with a normal mix one day and maybe you get what I mean.
kosmokrator is offline   Reply With Quote
New Reply New Reply Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook  Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter  Submit Thread to LinkedIn LinkedIn 



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Similar Threads
Thread Thread starter Forum Replies Last Post
Benefits of getting a mix as loud as possible (without limiting) before mastering ? hitsville Mastering forum 31 24th October 2010 06:15 AM
Use of compression/eq/limiting in electronic music Headship Lender Electronic Music Instruments & Electronic Music Production 13 6th October 2009 07:01 AM
need helpe in mastering 6000 raga2000 Mastering forum 11 31st March 2009 01:01 PM
Mixtape remixes -- Vocals & Limiting technique on previously mastered instrumental coyotekells Rap + Hip Hop engineering & production 4 31st October 2008 05:42 PM
TC Mastering 6000 vnt001 High end 3 18th August 2004 10:44 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:27 AM.

Home - Search Forum - Contact Us - Terms Of Use - Advertise on Gearslutz - All Advertisers - Archive - Top
 
 
Powered by vBulletin®
Gearslutz.com LTD - UK Company Number 7597610.
Registered Office - 35 Ballards Lane, London, N3 1XW.
Hosted by Nimbus Hosting.

SEO by vBSEO ©2010, Crawlability, Inc.