high end harsh - Gearslutz.com

Gearslutz.com

All Advertisers
Go Back   Gearslutz.com > The Forums > Mastering forum


high end harsh

New Reply New Reply Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 14th September 2010   #1
Gear interested
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 22

Thread Starter
high end harsh

Hello

I do electro house music.
I am happy with my compression/limitation. my tracks pumps very well (for me ) but when I compress/limit hard I tend to have harsh high end.

What advices could you give me ?
I'm looking for smooth high end and open. Like daft punk, justice and so on..

Thank you for your help.

Cheers
kikidi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15th September 2010   #2
Lives for gear
 
miro's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Location: Berlin
Posts: 2,022

Quote:
Originally Posted by kikidi View Post
Hello

I do electro house music.
I am happy with my compression/limitation. my tracks pumps very well (for me ) but when I compress/limit hard I tend to have harsh high end.

What advices could you give me ?
I'm looking for smooth high end and open. Like daft punk, justice and so on..

Thank you for your help.

Cheers
Mix less bright?
miro is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15th September 2010   #3
Gear addict
 
Odeon-Mastering's Avatar
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Location: A country occupied by the Bankers used to be called Hellas
Posts: 463

Verified Member
Quote:
Originally Posted by kikidi View Post
Hello

I do electro house music.
I am happy with my compression/limitation. my tracks pumps very well (for me ) but when I compress/limit hard I tend to have harsh high end.

What advices could you give me ?
I'm looking for smooth high end and open. Like daft punk, justice and so on..

Thank you for your help.

Cheers
In addittion to Miro's advice...
Use a good ME who has the proper experience and tools. Explain clearly to him/her what your vision is and you should get the sound you are looking for.
I am pretty sure, that this is what Daft Punk or any other major artists do...
__________________
The End Of Fear

Odeon-Mastering is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15th September 2010   #4
Lives for gear
 
Darius van H's Avatar
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Location: Amsterdam
Posts: 1,735

Verified Member
If your hi-end is harsh, i doubt mastering will fix it satisfactorily. Harshness is often caused by distortion, the main culprits likely to be over or mis-use of plugins,bad DAW gainstaging and poor production. Distortion cannot be removed in mastering.
__________________
www.amsterdammastering.com
Darius van H is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15th September 2010   #5
gears for Live
 
Everbeatz's Avatar
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Location: NS
Posts: 568

Send a message via Skype™ to Everbeatz
Your source sounds are harsh, so limiting/compressing and eqing only exaggerate that kind of quality - advice would be to get back to mixing stage and locate what exactly sounds harsh and try to soften it, or simply replace those sounds
Everbeatz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15th September 2010   #6
Gear interested
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 13

use higher Samplerates, if possible.
AK--47 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15th September 2010   #7
Lives for gear
 
huejahfink's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 1,285

Verified Member
What comp / limiting are you using that is making the high end harsh?
Not pushing them so hard might be a good start.
Also, high end harshness doesn't always come from distortion (although it sounds like it in your case)
Have you tried looking at the audio with a spectrum analyser? Often it is rogue frequency spikes in the top end that can make it sound unpleasant. Try SPAN from Voxengo... a very flexible and free analyser.

Real-time audio spectrum analysis plugin - SPAN - Voxengo

Perhaps you could gently filter the worst areas of it to get better results?
__________________
Contact : Rich Hughes / mastering@binaryfeedback.com / Discogs Technical Credits
huejahfink is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 15th September 2010   #8
Gear addict
 
Odeon-Mastering's Avatar
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Location: A country occupied by the Bankers used to be called Hellas
Posts: 463

Verified Member
Quote:
Originally Posted by Everlast View Post
Your source sounds are harsh,
He never really said that.
Odeon-Mastering is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15th September 2010   #9
Gear addict
 
Salty James's Avatar
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Location: alexandria va
Posts: 495

you need to sell all your equipment and get as many u47, c12, u67's as you can THEN your recording will be perfect!!
__________________
Blog

ok ma yb ep ut ti ng ev er yt hi ng on ag ri dd oe ss ou nd be tt er .I me an wh oa re th es eh um an sa ny wa yt ha tt he ir fe el in gs sh ou ld ma tt er .I sa yw ed oa wa yw it ht he m.

-t he gr id
Salty James is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15th September 2010   #10
gears for Live
 
Everbeatz's Avatar
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Location: NS
Posts: 568

Send a message via Skype™ to Everbeatz
Quote:
Originally Posted by Odeon-Mastering View Post
He never really said that.
Believe me, that's the issue here...
Everbeatz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15th September 2010   #11
Gear addict
 
Odeon-Mastering's Avatar
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Location: A country occupied by the Bankers used to be called Hellas
Posts: 463

Verified Member
Quote:
Originally Posted by Everlast View Post
Believe me, that's the issue here...
ok I Believe you
Odeon-Mastering is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15th September 2010   #12
Lives for gear
 
huejahfink's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 1,285

Verified Member
Quote:
Originally Posted by Salty James View Post
you need to sell all your equipment and get as many u47, c12, u67's as you can THEN your recording will be perfect!!
Not sure how relevant a list of microphones is for most electro house producers.

Some very occasional vocals?
huejahfink is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 15th September 2010   #13
Gear addict
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 372

think he was being facetious...

anyways op need to remix

might wanna try a parametric eq on the harsh freqs
__________________
#comingsoon
Ace_TX is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15th September 2010   #14
Lives for gear
 
edva's Avatar
 
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 1,833

HF shelf?
Attached Images
File Type: png Picture 8.png (89.0 KB, 136 views)
edva is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15th September 2010   #15
Gear addict
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Location: Leeds, UK
Posts: 421

Verified Member
high end harsh

Sounds like distortion. Not sure what limiting your using but you don't usually want to be pushing it into much more than 2db gain reduction IMO. Try mixing your track so that you don't have to, and can still achieve the loudness you need.
Dave Rose is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16th September 2010   #16
Lives for gear
 
six_wax's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 1,102

Low-pass filters are your friend if you're mixing digitally.

Treble tends to snowball in digital. There's a ton to begin with, then you boost to make something seem brighter (relative to everything else), then your ears are fried, so you boost the top end on everything else because you can't hear anymore. Next thing you know, all your sources are boosted on the top end, usually with EQs that aren't so smooth (=phase distortion).

Consider rolling off the extreme highs. Most dance music (as well as rock) doesn't have much happening over 10-12k. This way, when you want something bright, there's perspective in which it can sound bright. *That* is the key to "smooth".

Also, judicious low-mid cuts are a great way to "softly" brighten sources.
__________________
Eric Peterson
Anechoic Productions

Major Label Mastering on Indie Budgets

six_wax is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16th September 2010   #17
Lives for gear
 
huejahfink's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 1,285

Verified Member
Quote:
Originally Posted by six_wax View Post
Low-pass filters are your friend if you're mixing digitally.
I like this point. The largest percentage of mixes I deal with are ITB at 44.1, and in the majority of cases it seems that the very very top end is overlooked.
I am gently rolling off at anywhere between 12k (pretty rarely) to 17k (with regularity) on pretty much everything. Obviously if the extreme top end is already smooth I don't bother.
huejahfink is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 16th September 2010   #18
Lives for gear
 
Jesse Graffam's Avatar
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,114

Quote:
Originally Posted by kikidi View Post
when I compress/limit hard I tend to have harsh high end.
Straight to the point, assuming you're talking about a decent broadband compressor/limiter...

What that's telling you is that your monitoring & room are far from flat. You're changing the crest - the peak to average ratio - which is causing your mix to no longer compensate for your non-linear amplitude/frequency response as well.

The important thing is that you try to mix everything so that it sounds great together on your system, even if the overall EQ seems a slight bit off, and even if you're nowhere near the loudness you wanna be at (if your mastering engineer can't at least make something loud, much less great sounding, then you shouldn't be paying them). Don't overprocess anything. When you then hand that work off to a mastering engineer, the only thing they'll have to do to "un-compensate" for your monitoring/room is use EQ. If you start to over-process the dynamics, you'll -A- accentuate the amount of compensation you need to use to get it back to sounding "OK" on your non-linear monitoring, and -B- it'll be harder to correct on the mastering side the more you use.
__________________
©1976
Jesse Graffam is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20th September 2010   #19
Gear maniac
 
heybub419's Avatar
 
Joined: Aug 2010
Location: Toledo, Ohio
Posts: 182

You might want to try checking the mix on some good headphones before mastering, too. And if you're using samples, they'll often sound harsh and may need some EQing or de-essing.
heybub419 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21st September 2010   #20
Gear addict
 
OceanMan's Avatar
 
Joined: May 2009
Location: Texas
Posts: 460

dont be afraid to throw a waves c4 (or other multiband compressor) in with everything bypassed except your high end before you limit. Tame down at least the 8.5k and on beforehand if it is getting nasty, and try to pinpoint which frequency range as precisely as possible... I am no pro, but I know that multiband compression is a vital step in my mastering chain and also in many others as well.
OceanMan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21st September 2010   #21
Gear nut
 
Jean Doe's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 132

Harshness, as I define it, is a problem in the upper mids not in the very highs, so lo-pass filtering and and high shelve cutting might actually make the problem worse.
Go about the problem like this. Use a bell type filter to find out where in the upper mids the problem resides. Say it is worst at around 5k. Now you go back to your mix and listen to which element has too much 5k. Is it a snare, or a hi hat, or a vocal, or the top of a synth maybe? Take EQ, fix problem. Done!

In general, if you keep getting these harshness bi-products from limiting you might want to go about trying only to limit where it is needed in the mix and fix any problems caused by the limiting immediately. That way your mixbuss will need very little limiting and should be able to get the appropriate level in a transparent way...
Jean Doe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27th September 2010   #22
Gear maniac
 
cemski's Avatar
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 157

op has left the building...
cemski is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28th September 2010   #23
Gear maniac
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Location: Sweden
Posts: 196

Quote:
Originally Posted by six_wax View Post
Low-pass filters are your friend if you're mixing digitally.

Treble tends to snowball in digital. There's a ton to begin with, then you boost to make something seem brighter (relative to everything else), then your ears are fried, so you boost the top end on everything else because you can't hear anymore. Next thing you know, all your sources are boosted on the top end, usually with EQs that aren't so smooth (=phase distortion).

Consider rolling off the extreme highs. Most dance music (as well as rock) doesn't have much happening over 10-12k. This way, when you want something bright, there's perspective in which it can sound bright. *That* is the key to "smooth".

Also, judicious low-mid cuts are a great way to "softly" brighten sources.
I like this point too. What I have experienced is that you tend to push above 13khz to much and in the end the mixes lack 6-9 as you try to compensate while listening to reference music. The result is unfocused, and unclear
fixitinthemix is offline   Reply With Quote
New Reply New Reply Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook  Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter  Submit Thread to LinkedIn LinkedIn 



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Similar Threads
Thread Thread starter Forum Replies Last Post
Decision time: High end front end or High end recorder? Lumin One High end 9 28th January 2011 10:43 PM
high end harsh kikidi Electronic Music Instruments & Electronic Music Production 13 15th September 2010 09:13 PM
Mid priced vocal tube mics that are not harsh in the high end Peacock So much gear, so little time! 24 31st August 2008 05:47 AM
Mics that decrease harsh high end without loss of clarity Peacock High end 13 10th March 2008 02:24 AM
High end seems a little too harsh? DP40oz So much gear, so little time! 23 21st February 2006 06:50 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:24 AM.

Home - Search Forum - Contact Us - Terms Of Use - Advertise on Gearslutz - All Advertisers - Archive - Top
 
 
Powered by vBulletin®
Gearslutz.com LTD - UK Company Number 7597610.
Registered Office - 35 Ballards Lane, London, N3 1XW.
Hosted by Nimbus Hosting.

SEO by vBSEO ©2010, Crawlability, Inc.