Login / Register
 
Dr Dre Beats Headphones
New Reply
Subscribe
sammyp
Thread Starter
#1
10th July 2010
Old 10th July 2010
  #1
Gear maniac
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Location: NB, Canada
Posts: 150

Thread Starter
sammyp is offline
Dr Dre Beats Headphones

just wondering if anyone has sampled either of the two varieties of Beats headphones. opions? How do they stack up against Beyers, AkGs, Senns etc in the same price range?
#2
10th July 2010
Old 10th July 2010
  #2
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 4,140

work2do is offline
they gave us a few when at the LA office and they sound like "the club". Very hyped and great sounding for that club feel in the headphones. I wouldn't try to mix anything with them but artist love to record with them in the booth replacing the 7506's for that purpose. The Diddy beats don't sound good at all to me. Haven't checked the Gaga ones that were dropped off.
#3
10th July 2010
Old 10th July 2010
  #3
Gear maniac
 
DamZ's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2010
Location: Italy
Posts: 182

DamZ is offline
dj producer class....something like bose....maybe they are good as a "commercial source" reference, but then i would prefere technics or sony dj ones....

dont give up your akg or beyerD.
__________________
"How long before i get in? Before it starts, before i begin..."
#4
11th July 2010
Old 11th July 2010
  #4
Lives for gear
 
Jesse Graffam's Avatar
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,149

Jesse Graffam is offline
Yeah the Monster headphones are... wow. Very far from the refinement of Beyerdynamic 770/880, AKG 701/702/240DF, and Sennheiser 600/650 on basically every front (freq/phase/resonance/distortion/etc).
__________________
©1976
sammyp
Thread Starter
#5
11th July 2010
Old 11th July 2010
  #5
Gear maniac
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Location: NB, Canada
Posts: 150

Thread Starter
sammyp is offline
Thanks gents, just curious ......absolutely, the Beyer 770s stay on my skull! Love em.
#6
11th July 2010
Old 11th July 2010
  #6
Gear addict
 
maxwelldub's Avatar
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Location: Berkeley, CA
Posts: 485

maxwelldub is offline
I work for a certain company that is named after a piece of fruit and see them returned all the time because the plastic snaps off. They're cheaply made. For that money I'd pick up the B&W P5s, those are some incredibly durable, comfortable, and beautiful sounding headphones.
#7
24th August 2010
Old 24th August 2010
  #7
Gear interested
 
Joined: Jul 2010
Location: Queens Village, NY
Posts: 5

Send a message via AIM to Actualfractal Send a message via Skype™ to Actualfractal
Actualfractal is offline
Dr Dre Beats Headphones

Quote:
Originally Posted by maxwelldub
I work for a certain company that is named after a piece of fruit and see them returned all the time because the plastic snaps off. They're cheaply made. For that money I'd pick up the B&W P5s, those are some incredibly durable, comfortable, and beautiful sounding headphones.
Yes this is so true, although they sound good they aren't sturdy or durable it's all show, shame on you Dr. Dre I'm selling mine as soon as I get them back. I'll get some grados I should have in the first place.
#8
23rd September 2010
Old 23rd September 2010
  #8
Lives for gear
 
ONDRAY's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Location: Toronto
Posts: 820

ONDRAY is offline
so back to earbuds, not headphones, curious what are the best out there?
dcollins
Verified Member
#9
24th September 2010
Old 24th September 2010
  #9
Lives for gear
 
dcollins's Avatar
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Location: Hollywood CA
Posts: 3,170

Verified Member
dcollins is offline
Quote:
Originally Posted by ONDRAY View Post
so back to earbuds, not headphones, curious what are the best out there?
As always there is no "Best." I've heard Shures and Eytomotics that sounded good to me, but you might disagree.

The more expensive Apple buds with the little silicone ends are much better than what comes stock, imo.


DC
__________________
Dave Collins Mastering
www.collinsaudio.com
+1 323 467 5570
#10
24th September 2010
Old 24th September 2010
  #10
Lives for gear
 
Teddy Ray's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Location: Carolina is where they'll bury me.
Posts: 7,095

Teddy Ray is offline
Quote:
Originally Posted by ONDRAY View Post
so back to earbuds, not headphones, curious what are the best out there?

I Love the AKG 701s and Denon 7000 as modified by Lawton audio
Bonati
Verified Member
#11
24th September 2010
Old 24th September 2010
  #11
Gear nut
 
Bonati's Avatar
 
Joined: Feb 2010
Location: Brooklyn, NY
Posts: 139

Verified Member
Bonati is offline
Just realized that I've had my Sennheiser HD600s for 10 years now. Two pairs. I also love Etymotic (except the first iPod phones - the "i6" I think) and I've used their high attenuation earplugs for close to 12 years. After I settled on those products I haven't thought that much about phones in a bit.
__________________
Josh Bonati
Brooklyn, NY
www.bonatimastering.com
#12
24th September 2010
Old 24th September 2010
  #12
Gear Head
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 66

4130 is offline
I'm sure you'll get a million opinions, but I'm very happy with my Sennheiser IE-7 earbuds. They fit well and sound great. Far better than at least the original Shure E Series stuff.
#13
24th September 2010
Old 24th September 2010
  #13
Lives for gear
 
api2500's Avatar
 
Joined: May 2010
Location: London
Posts: 3,058
My Recordings/Credits

api2500 is offline
Why are the Dr Dre Beats even in the Mastering Forum. You kidding right?

Cue My Favourite Headphone thread.
__________________



Waltz Mastering
Verified Member
#14
24th September 2010
Old 24th September 2010
  #14
Lives for gear
 
Waltz Mastering's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Location: 3rd Stone From The Sun
Posts: 3,268

Verified Member
Waltz Mastering is offline
Quote:
Originally Posted by api2500 View Post
Why are the Dr Dre Beats even in the Mastering Forum.
Beats by Dr. Dre
Might not be so bad?

Using Sony MDR V600's
& the cheap Skull Candy and ear buds
__________________

www.waltzmastering.com

#15
24th September 2010
Old 24th September 2010
  #15
Lives for gear
 
parissound's Avatar
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Location: Lancaster, Pa
Posts: 754

parissound is offline
They do sound really good though. I dont think for mixing but for playback it sounds great.
#16
24th September 2010
Old 24th September 2010
  #16
Lives for gear
 
api2500's Avatar
 
Joined: May 2010
Location: London
Posts: 3,058
My Recordings/Credits

api2500 is offline
Quote:
Originally Posted by Waltz Mastering View Post
Beats by Dr. Dre
Might not be so bad?

Using Sony MDV V600's
& the cheap Skull Candy and ear buds
I know what they are. I just really don't like them.

If I want to check for a club "sound" I've got a set of old Phonic PAs. Of course playback testing is important, but I wouldn't even buy them to enjoy music on...
#17
24th September 2010
Old 24th September 2010
  #17
Gear maniac
 
heybub419's Avatar
 
Joined: Aug 2010
Location: Toledo, Ohio
Posts: 189

heybub419 is offline
My friend has a pair of them...they're fun to listen with (especially hip hop), but the bass is kind of exaggerated IMO.
#18
26th September 2010
Old 26th September 2010
  #18
Lives for gear
 
Ari-M.'s Avatar
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Location: San Diego, California
Posts: 972

Ari-M. is offline
they offer a good representation of what the non-informed public would be listening on....

think of the "tone" controls on a car or home stereo.....the "beats" headphones sound like the typical home/car installation, where the bass and treble tilt have been turned all the way up

in that respect they do offer a scenario that resembles the average listeners "loudness curve" preferences....

as sad as that may seem, it's reality

I personally use HD600's powered by a Bryston 2bLP....but that's me

for the record I did listen to the "beats" for a few minutes....I found them to be cheaply built, and downright annoying for my ear (in comfort and spectral balance)....to be fair I have not heard them through a decent headphone amp
#19
26th September 2010
Old 26th September 2010
  #19
Gear addict
 
s34nsm411's Avatar
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 470

s34nsm411 is offline
someone I know had a pair of these. listened to my audio technica ath-m50, then I listened to the dre beats. The m50's sounded far better. I had to hold my tongue from loling at the dude for buying them
#20
26th September 2010
Old 26th September 2010
  #20
Lives for gear
 
Jesse Graffam's Avatar
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,149

Jesse Graffam is offline
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ari-M. View Post
they offer a good representation of what the non-informed public would be listening on....
Possibly, but I still wouldn't use them for reference purposes of any kind. I've spent decent effort over the years into figuring out the problems that can be caused by certain audio on many different kinds of setups, and then working toward techniques reducing some of those problems as much as I can without altering how it sounds on legitimately great systems.

For instance...... just something as simple as learning the total basics of a non-linear EQ, and how the phase changes can be just as good or bad for audio... sometimes requiring what most people would consider a smaller change in gain than should be required for a large change in the sound. You can alter the overall perception of the spectral balance with less actual gain change needed. Sometimes way less, depending on the change you're trying to make, and how the specific EQ band itself sounds on it. thumbsup


Quote:
Originally Posted by Ari-M. View Post
to be fair I have not heard them through a decent headphone amp
They are all about 32ohms across the frequency response so a better headphone amp wouldn't have made a monstrous difference anyways in that regard. The quality of the headphone amp itself of course would but not nearly as much of a "bad presentation" as an amp not capable of higher resistance loads at some frequencies. Like an HD-800 that peaks at nearly 700 Ohms around 120-140Hz area usually, but is "only" 350 Ohms by 1kHz, which would be much more effected by that effect.
#21
26th September 2010
Old 26th September 2010
  #21
Lives for gear
 
Ari-M.'s Avatar
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Location: San Diego, California
Posts: 972

Ari-M. is offline
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jesse Graffam View Post
Possibly, but I still wouldn't use them for reference purposes of any kind. I've spent decent effort over the years into figuring out the problems that can be caused by certain audio on many different kinds of setups, and then working toward techniques reducing some of those problems as much as I can without altering how it sounds on legitimately great systems.

For instance...... just something as simple as learning the total basics of a non-linear EQ, and how the phase changes can be just as good or bad for audio... sometimes requiring what most people would consider a smaller change in gain than should be required for a large change in the sound. You can alter the overall perception of the spectral balance with less actual gain change needed. Sometimes way less, depending on the change you're trying to make, and how the specific EQ band itself sounds on it. thumbsup



They are all about 32ohms across the frequency response so a better headphone amp wouldn't have made a monstrous difference anyways in that regard. The quality of the headphone amp itself of course would but not nearly as much of a "bad presentation" as an amp not capable of higher resistance loads at some frequencies. Like an HD-800 that peaks at nearly 700 Ohms around 120-140Hz area usually, but is "only" 350 Ohms by 1kHz, which would be much more effected by that effect.


nor would I use them for "reference purposes"....they do however represent the tonal balance of most modern consumer playback systems (just as the ns-10 did when it was released)

certainly people used/use ns-10's....I personally do not.....but I do understand why they are used

a reasonable headphone amp would have made a significant difference, as the kiosk I listened to them on was flat out unacceptable.....

regardless of load or input impedance an amplifier with more stability during transient swings would give a more accurate representation of what the headphones are/were capable of

as I said already....I personal use the HD600 and a 2bLP....it's what I like

if someone makes a great sounding product on something else, including the "Beats" then more power to them

not sure the basis of your statements, as you attempt to offer a rebuttal to opinions of mine....which, regardless of what you say, are still my opinions....because I trust what I hear and can measure

to say that a different headphone amp wouldn't make a difference....when I never told you what amp was driving them to being with doesn't strike me as rational

<DELETED BY MODERATOR>

Last edited by GS moderation; 28th September 2010 at 06:22 AM..
#22
27th September 2010
Old 27th September 2010
  #22
Lives for gear
 
api2500's Avatar
 
Joined: May 2010
Location: London
Posts: 3,058
My Recordings/Credits

api2500 is offline
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ari-M. View Post
they offer a good representation of what the non-informed public would be listening on....
Only the public who are donuts would buy them.

They sound far more clubby than hi-fi-y in my opinion.

But I have totally different tastes to what the Beats are aiming for.
#23
27th September 2010
Old 27th September 2010
  #23
Gear addict
 
K. Evan Hodge IV's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Location: Oregon
Posts: 445

K. Evan Hodge IV is offline
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bonati View Post
I also love Etymotic (except the first iPod phones - the "i6" I think) and I've used their high attenuation earplugs for close to 12 years.
I love those things. They are the only way I can attend and enjoy most any concert these days. thumbsupthumbsup


K.
#24
27th September 2010
Old 27th September 2010
  #24
Lives for gear
 
Ari-M.'s Avatar
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Location: San Diego, California
Posts: 972

Ari-M. is offline
Quote:
Originally Posted by api2500 View Post
Only the public who are donuts would buy them.

They sound far more clubby than hi-fi-y in my opinion.

But I have totally different tastes to what the Beats are aiming for.


a very large majority of the public are, as you describe, "donuts"

the "beats" have sold quite well, so I think they represent the spectral balance that the modern consumer wants/expects to hear (sad as that may be)

#25
27th September 2010
Old 27th September 2010
  #25
Lives for gear
 
api2500's Avatar
 
Joined: May 2010
Location: London
Posts: 3,058
My Recordings/Credits

api2500 is offline
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ari-M. View Post
a very large majority of the public are, as you describe, "donuts"

the "beats" have sold quite well, so I think they represent the spectral balance that the modern consumer wants/expects to hear (sad as that may be)

Large Minority yes. But I think a lot of people (punters) are skeptical of them.

iPod headphones seem to be absolutely the most widespread headphone, yet no one here owns up to checking mixes back on them.
Waltz Mastering
Verified Member
#26
27th September 2010
Old 27th September 2010
  #26
Lives for gear
 
Waltz Mastering's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Location: 3rd Stone From The Sun
Posts: 3,268

Verified Member
Waltz Mastering is offline
Quote:
Originally Posted by api2500 View Post
iPod headphones seem to be absolutely the most widespread headphone, yet no one here owns up to checking mixes back on them.
Post #14... but not at all on the regular.
#27
27th September 2010
Old 27th September 2010
  #27
Lives for gear
 
api2500's Avatar
 
Joined: May 2010
Location: London
Posts: 3,058
My Recordings/Credits

api2500 is offline
Quote:
Originally Posted by Waltz Mastering View Post
Post #14... but not at all on the regular.
I do it a fair bit. But tbh, thats what NS10s are for (and the similar ilk).
#28
27th September 2010
Old 27th September 2010
  #28
Lives for gear
 
Ari-M.'s Avatar
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Location: San Diego, California
Posts: 972

Ari-M. is offline
Quote:
Originally Posted by api2500 View Post
Large Minority yes. But I think a lot of people (punters) are skeptical of them.

iPod headphones seem to be absolutely the most widespread headphone, yet no one here owns up to checking mixes back on them.
interesting....have you read this article about the beats?

A force in music turns to its sound - Los Angeles Times

if you read that you will see that the beats are one of the most successful lines of audio accessories in current production....grossing well over $50million in US sales the first quarter of this year?

did you also know the beats are Jimmy Iovine's brainchild?

I check every single mix of mine through an iPOD (gen 3) with AAC encoding and the stock earbuds....not sure why you think no one does that or no one will admit it? it represents the largest standard in music playback systems

bit puzzled

read the articles....it might offer you some insight
#29
28th September 2010
Old 28th September 2010
  #29
Lives for gear
 
api2500's Avatar
 
Joined: May 2010
Location: London
Posts: 3,058
My Recordings/Credits

api2500 is offline
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ari-M. View Post
interesting....have you read this article about the beats?

A force in music turns to its sound - Los Angeles Times

if you read that you will see that the beats are one of the most successful lines of audio accessories in current production....grossing well over $50million in US sales the first quarter of this year?

did you also know the beats are Jimmy Iovine's brainchild?

I check every single mix of mine through an iPOD (gen 3) with AAC encoding and the stock earbuds....not sure why you think no one does that or no one will admit it? it represents the largest standard in music playback systems

bit puzzled

read the articles....it might offer you some insight
I'm saying no one admits to it. I do it. Quite a bit. Just the iPod Headphones though.

Hold on... $50 Million in the first quarter, $350 Headphones, thats only 142,857 (rough crude possibly misleading maths) per quarter, thats not all that many is it? I know the iPod sales trumped that easily.

I personally don't like the sound of them at all. I certainly don't don't feel the need to check mixes back on it at all, I'm not sure it they'd make good mix checkers. I have other headphones and monitors and cars etc to check back on. I certainly wouldn't buy them anyway if I don't like the sound. Thats just my opinion.
#30
28th September 2010
Old 28th September 2010
  #30
Lives for gear
 
Ari-M.'s Avatar
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Location: San Diego, California
Posts: 972

Ari-M. is offline
Quote:
Originally Posted by api2500 View Post
I'm saying no one admits to it. I do it. Quite a bit. Just the iPod Headphones though.

Hold on... $50 Million in the first quarter, $350 Headphones, thats only 142,857 (rough crude possibly misleading maths) per quarter, thats not all that many is it? I know the iPod sales trumped that easily.

I personally don't like the sound of them at all. I certainly don't don't feel the need to check mixes back on it at all, I'm not sure it they'd make good mix checkers. I have other headphones and monitors and cars etc to check back on. I certainly wouldn't buy them anyway if I don't like the sound. Thats just my opinion.


no no read the article more carefully, also look at the entire product line

only the upper tier model is $350 (which accounts for a very small percentage of the overall product line sales)

not saying that the beats account for more sales than the iPOD, that would be absurd....

but they do represent a slice of consumer playback options

I personally didn't like them, and wouldn't own a pair...they felt cheaply made

I do think they show a current trend for spectral response though
New Reply Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook  Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter  Submit Thread to LinkedIn LinkedIn  Submit Thread to Google+ Google+ 
 
Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Similar Threads
Thread
Thread Starter / Forum
Replies
JH1 / Rap + Hip Hop engineering & production
44
Dirty Halo / Electronic Music Instruments & Electronic Music Production
107
BlazinBeats / So much gear, so little time!
12
youngmain / So much gear, so little time!
3
Checkmate Muzik / Rap + Hip Hop engineering & production
5

Forum Jump

SEO by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.