Dithering to 24 bit question (64 bit plugins/DAW) - Gearslutz.com

Gearslutz.com

All Advertisers
Go Back   Gearslutz.com > The Forums > Mastering forum


Dithering to 24 bit question (64 bit plugins/DAW)

New Reply New Reply Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 28th March 2010   #1
Lives for gear
 
aleatoric's Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Posts: 1,517

Thread Starter
Verified Member
Dithering to 24 bit question (64 bit plugins/DAW)

Let me see if I understand this correctly.

When I am working with 24 bit source files and using 64 bit precision plugins (in a 48 bit or 64 bit DAW) I should apply a flat 24 bit dither (no noise shaping) at the end of my chain right? I always bounce processed 24 bit source files to 24 bit and only apply 16 bit noise shaping dither in my assembly DAW (WaveBurner) after any SRC or fades . My understanding is that in this situation I should be applying a flat 24 bit dither when bouncing to 24 bits. However if my final target medium was 24 bits (for DVD audio or archival purposes) I would then use a 24 bit noise shaping dither. Is that making sense? Also, yes I know this is a very minor detail in the grand scheme of things but none the less I would like to confirm that I am indeed doing this "correctly". Thanks.
__________________
Full Circle Mastering
aleatoric is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 29th March 2010   #2
Lives for gear
 
aleatoric's Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Posts: 1,517

Thread Starter
Verified Member
No one huh?
aleatoric is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 29th March 2010   #3
Gear nut
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Location: FRANCE
Posts: 85

mmm...When bouncing, that may be correct, though I think it's already done by the plugin itself, processing internaly at 64 bit and resulting in a 24 bits output, not sure though, it may depend on the plugin actually...

AFAIC I don't bounce, just record back the track in realtime into the daw.


Quote:
Originally Posted by aleatoric View Post
Let me see if I understand this correctly.

When I am working with 24 bit source files and using 64 bit precision plugins (in a 48 bit or 64 bit DAW) I should apply a flat 24 bit dither (no noise shaping) at the end of my chain right? I always bounce processed 24 bit source files to 24 bit and only apply 16 bit noise shaping dither in my assembly DAW (WaveBurner) after any SRC or fades . My understanding is that in this situation I should be applying a flat 24 bit dither when bouncing to 24 bits. However if my final target medium was 24 bits (for DVD audio or archival purposes) I would then use a 24 bit noise shaping dither. Is that making sense? Also, yes I know this is a very minor detail in the grand scheme of things but none the less I would like to confirm that I am indeed doing this "correctly". Thanks.
the unik is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30th March 2010   #4
Lives for gear
 
CZ101's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Location: Cincinnati, OH
Posts: 736

Quote:
Originally Posted by aleatoric View Post
Let me see if I understand this correctly.

When I am working with 24 bit source files and using 64 bit precision plugins (in a 48 bit or 64 bit DAW) I should apply a flat 24 bit dither (no noise shaping) at the end of my chain right? I always bounce processed 24 bit source files to 24 bit and only apply 16 bit noise shaping dither in my assembly DAW (WaveBurner) after any SRC or fades . My understanding is that in this situation I should be applying a flat 24 bit dither when bouncing to 24 bits. However if my final target medium was 24 bits (for DVD audio or archival purposes) I would then use a 24 bit noise shaping dither. Is that making sense? Also, yes I know this is a very minor detail in the grand scheme of things but none the less I would like to confirm that I am indeed doing this "correctly". Thanks.
It depends on what's going on in your DAW..

If your DAW by default dithers from floating point or 48 bit back into 24-bit integer (which it should, either set by you or by design), then adding an additional dither stage (later or as a plugin on the DAW's output bus, etc), with or without noise shaping is redundant for a 24 bit target medium.

If your assembly program is WaveBurner, I'm assuming your DAW is Logic? If you're going 24 bit file to 64 bit fp process to 24 bit output from Logic (either D/A or bounced file), the conversion from 24 bits to 64 bits and back again dithers down automatically by default in Logic - this internal dither may or may not include noiseshaping (anyone know? either way, ns for >=32 bit floating point to 24 bit integer dither won't reaaally matter, imho).

So the "flat 24 bit dither" you speak of is probably already happening in your DAW, and maybe even w/ noiseshaping included in the process (internally, not sure)... Best to avoid having either of them happen subsequently - alone or together...

Anyone please correct me if I am wrong about this..
CZ101 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30th March 2010   #5
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Location: Espoo Finland
Posts: 868

Dither or no dither at 24 bits: the artefacts would be around -140 dBFS. With the best possible recording systems* the bottom 20-30 dB will be just noise anyway, so why bother polishing the bottom 6 dB of that pile of dust?

*)The very best converters get about 120 dB dynamic range, as do mic preamps. The last 3-4 bits are just random noise always, even if nominally using 24 bits.
Petrus is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 30th March 2010   #6
Lives for gear
 
CZ101's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Location: Cincinnati, OH
Posts: 736

Quote:
Originally Posted by Petrus View Post
Dither or no dither at 24 bits: the artefacts would be around -140 dBFS. With the best possible recording systems* the bottom 20-30 dB will be just noise anyway, so why bother polishing the bottom 6 dB of that pile of dust?

*)The very best converters get about 120 dB dynamic range, as do mic preamps. The last 3-4 bits are just random noise always, even if nominally using 24 bits.
Well, if he's dithering from 24-bit to 24-bit then yes, the dither noise would be inaudible to most humans on most systems.. But it's unnecessary...

Also, most stuff these days will get dithered to 16 bit at some point, so although dithering 64 fp - 24 bit - 24 bit might not make that much of a difference, the extraneous 24 bit dither will become more audibly apparent when that file is dithered to 16 bit.
CZ101 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30th March 2010   #7
Motown legend
 
Bob Olhsson's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Location: Songwriter Gulch, Nashville TN
Posts: 10,878

Verified Member
My experience has been that failing to dither a 24 bit file can definitely come back around and bite you with crunchy sound upon subsequent processing.

The dithered 24 bit files should sound exactly the same or subtly smoother. Unfortunately sometimes 24 bit software dithering is broken so you always need to use your ears.
Bob Olhsson is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 30th March 2010   #8
Lives for gear
 
CZ101's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Location: Cincinnati, OH
Posts: 736

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bob Olhsson View Post
My experience has been that failing to dither a 24 bit file can definitely come back around and bite you with crunchy sound upon subsequent processing.

The dithered 24 bit files should sound exactly the same or subtly smoother. Unfortunately sometimes 24 bit software dithering is broken so you always need to use your ears.
Interesting.. So you're saying that (let's just use Logic as an example) if you were bouncing to a 24 bit file from Logic, you'd still make sure that there be dithering (that you approved of, sonically) -to- 24 bits going on at the end of the chain.. If so, then I've learned something.

What about the possibility of that 24 bit file being dithered to 16 bit in the future? Would you still put it through 24 bit - 24 bit dither if you thought it might later end up as 16 bit?
CZ101 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31st March 2010   #9
Lives for gear
 
Coyoteous's Avatar
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 4,130

Not to answer for BO, but dither when you reduce word-length... simple as that.

I use flat TPDF, unless I know material will have not further processing... which is never.
Coyoteous is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31st March 2010   #10
Motown legend
 
Bob Olhsson's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Location: Songwriter Gulch, Nashville TN
Posts: 10,878

Verified Member
What dithering does is to randomize the bottom bit where the audio cuts off so that the truncation sounds like hiss rather than like distortion. The dither level always needs to be appropriate for the word length you are truncating to and some software developers have screwed this up.

Dither is not used to mask the distortion, it simply eliminates it provided it is done properly.
Bob Olhsson is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 5th October 2010   #11
Gear nut
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Location: San Antonio
Posts: 114

Bob,
I'm mixing down in PTLE with a Waves L2 for dithering only. Should I use noise shaping, if so which profile? Moderate, Normal or Ultra?

Thanks,
cjac9
cjac9 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5th October 2010   #12
Lives for gear
 
UnderTow's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Location: the Netherlands
Posts: 3,953

Verified Member
Quote:
Originally Posted by cjac9 View Post
Bob,
I'm mixing down in PTLE with a Waves L2 for dithering only. Should I use noise shaping, if so which profile? Moderate, Normal or Ultra?

Thanks,
cjac9
If this is the final bit reduction to 16 bit, you can use shaping. Use yours ears to decide which one (if any). If you are going to 24 bit, no shaping.

Alistair
__________________
Alistair Johnston - TV & Film Post, Mastering, Sound Design
--
"The first principle is that you must not fool yourself -- and you are the easiest person to fool" -- Richard P. Feynman

"There's a sucker born every minute" -- P.T. Barnum
UnderTow is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5th October 2010   #13
Lives for gear
 
Cellotron's Avatar
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Location: Brooklyn, New York
Posts: 3,638

Verified Member
In my direct experience there's been no audible difference between the sound of truncating the sum of my DAW's 64bit processing to 24bit versus dithering the same to 24bit. Obviously OMMV! (and this may in fact depend on what processing you apply and what DAW app you use)

Best regards,
Steve Berson
Cellotron is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5th October 2010   #14
Gear Head
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 45

Quote:
Originally Posted by aleatoric View Post
Let me see if I understand this correctly.

When I am working with 24 bit source files and using 64 bit precision plugins (in a 48 bit or 64 bit DAW) I should apply a flat 24 bit dither (no noise shaping) at the end of my chain right? I always bounce processed 24 bit source files to 24 bit and only apply 16 bit noise shaping dither in my assembly DAW (WaveBurner) after any SRC or fades . My understanding is that in this situation I should be applying a flat 24 bit dither when bouncing to 24 bits. However if my final target medium was 24 bits (for DVD audio or archival purposes) I would then use a 24 bit noise shaping dither. Is that making sense? Also, yes I know this is a very minor detail in the grand scheme of things but none the less I would like to confirm that I am indeed doing this "correctly". Thanks.
Hi,

What is the level of the analog noise floor [e.g. mic pres, hiss, pickup / amp hum, microphones, "component noise", ambient sound,......] in your material?

Is all that quieter than -96dBfs?
mr.farkendorfer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5th October 2010   #15
Lives for gear
 
aleatoric's Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Posts: 1,517

Thread Starter
Verified Member
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cellotron View Post
In my direct experience there's been no audible difference between the sound of truncating the sum of my DAW's 64bit processing to 24bit versus dithering the same to 24bit.
+1. This is a somewhat older thread of mine. I have concluded that there is really no need to dither to 24 bits. In my listening tests it proves inaudible. That being said if the final delivery format intended for listening is 24 bits I will apply a noise shaping 24 bit dither. It certainly does not hurt. If anything there could be an audible benefit if DA converters ever started performing at a true 24 bit resolution (144dB dynamic range).
aleatoric is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 5th October 2010   #16
Motown legend
 
Bob Olhsson's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Location: Songwriter Gulch, Nashville TN
Posts: 10,878

Verified Member
I'd say it's more often than not inaudible however I've also gotten bit occasionally and for sure the dither is more inaudible if it's working right.

I use the L2 on moderate for 24 bit. or the others with no noise shaping for my mixes. I've occasionally sent pro tools mixes back for a re-bounce using the dithered mixer plug and gotten a less crunchy sounding master.

Samplitude is the only DAW application I've encountered that just handles dither properly and lots of folks say it sounds better. Pro Tools le sounds just as good to me with 24 bit dither using the same converters and monitor system.
Bob Olhsson is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 6th October 2010   #17
Gear Head
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 45

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bob Olhsson View Post
I've occasionally sent pro tools mixes back for a re-bounce using the dithered mixer plug ....
And they bought it?

Not the whole mix, just the bounce?
mr.farkendorfer is offline   Reply With Quote
New Reply New Reply Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook  Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter  Submit Thread to LinkedIn LinkedIn 



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Similar Threads
Thread Thread starter Forum Replies Last Post
dithering at 24 bit ?? plus6vu Mastering forum 41 23rd September 2009 03:33 PM
Help: Dithering in Logic 44.1 at 24 bit? JAY55 Mastering forum 20 18th June 2009 04:32 PM
When recording @ 16 bit with 24 bit soundcards will the 16 bit recordings sound same? rokuez Music computers 4 12th March 2008 02:43 AM
Bit depth and dithering hackenslash Mastering forum 4 11th December 2007 04:31 PM
DAW 32-bit float - converters 24-bit: should I use dither? sound_forward So much gear, so little time! 4 3rd October 2007 08:09 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:17 AM.

Home - Search Forum - Contact Us - Terms Of Use - Advertise on Gearslutz - All Advertisers - Archive - Top
 
 
Powered by vBulletin®
Gearslutz.com LTD - UK Company Number 7597610.
Registered Office - 35 Ballards Lane, London, N3 1XW.
Hosted by Nimbus Hosting.

SEO by vBSEO ©2010, Crawlability, Inc.