Gearslutz.com
All Advertisers

Go Back   Gearslutz.com > The Forums > Mastering forum

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Display Modes
Old 27th November 2009, 01:58 AM   #1
The Beatsmith
Lives for gear
 
The Beatsmith's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: UK
Posts: 1,555
Send a message via AIM to The Beatsmith Send a message via MSN to The Beatsmith
Charging by the track... always?

Hi

I see that people charge by the track usually. That's fine, however i'm creating my own personal project/album, separate to the mixing work i do. The album is going to be an instrumental album, and i wanted it to be quite long with a load of shorter tracks (as well as some 'traditional' length songs too). I'm talking that the shortest tracks will be perhaps only 40 seconds long, 'musical idea's type thing. I don't have any 'skits' per se, but maybe i will by the end.

There are tracks that consist of 2 actual pieces of music that flow from one into another, and are actually going to be considered 'one track' as it flips from a more laid back piece of music to a loud/abrasive piece of music (or vice versa).

How does that figure into the idea of paying for mastering? Someone could get around the 'x per track' by making it 10 songs long when really there are 18 real 'tracks' on there.

If i had, say 18 tracks but really have them as 13 CD tracks (because they are joined together), would people do a deal (perhaps you would do one anyway for that many tracks?), charge for 18 tracks, etc?

The reason i ask is because the mastering costs are possibly prohibitive of the creative process and i need to know what kind of money we need to gather and work towards that, or if i need to scale things down, etc.

Thanks for any info you can give on the particular way you work. It's not a traditional album with 12 x 3-5 minute songs or whatever.

Sorry if my question isn't clear.

Eddie

P.S - I'm not shopping for work here or asking for a deal, the project isn't finished, i was just curious so that i know what i need to do.
The Beatsmith is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27th November 2009, 02:10 AM   #2
NorseHorse
Lives for gear
 
NorseHorse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Virginia
Posts: 1,529
Lightbulb No sweat.

A. Find an engineer you like.
B. Ask them how much it will take to master "an album".

I'm sure no one would have a problem accomodating you. Remember, you're dealing with people - not mindless corporations!

The only tricky part would is if all your short tracks have completely different sonic material.
__________________

I-95, I-64, I-85
NorseHorse is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27th November 2009, 02:48 AM   #3
Waltz Mastering
Lives for gear
 
Waltz Mastering's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: 3rd Stone From The Sun - USA
Posts: 1,508
If the project is not in the "conventional" song format, I will talk to the artist about the particular details and work out a album / project rate instead of a song rate.

On the opposite side, I've worked on albums that were "through composed" or one song for the length of the album, but adjusted the price accordingly.

I know some ME's may charge per minute of music to be mastered or an hourly rate, so there's also that possibility.
__________________
Tom W

www.waltzmastering.com
waltzmastering@gmail.com
eMastering
Waltz Mastering is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 27th November 2009, 04:21 AM   #4
jayfrigo
Moderator
 
jayfrigo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 2,757
I don't necessarily think that "most" people charge by the track, though it is becoming more common, especially with internet mastering. However, hourly plus parts is still the rule for many commercial mastering facilities, especially if it's an attended session.

I do offer a per-song estimate that works well for the typical job, but I let clients know that ultimately it's hourly plus parts. This way, if they need a bunch of extra discs, master versions, skits between the songs, experimentation with signal chains etc., they know the hourly billing is in effect. It can also work in the client's favor if things are quick and easy. Some jobs come in below the per-track estimate.
__________________
Jay Frigoletto
Mastersuite
www.promastering.com
www.studiometronome.com
jayfrigo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27th November 2009, 04:53 AM   #5
jdg
Lives for gear
 
jdg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: seattle, WA
Posts: 1,837
i only charge per track because when i did hourly, my clients often complained they needed to know exactly what it would cost exactly before they showed up.

that said, i do not charge for all the "little" segues or bits, im sure most ppl would do the same.

i'm not a supermarket, my rate isn't that fixed.

good luck :)
__________________
Brevity is the soul of wit.

panicStudios - mastering in seattle
jdg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27th November 2009, 05:22 AM   #6
Brad Blackwood
Craneslut
 
Brad Blackwood's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: The home of Rock-n-Roll, Memphis, TN
Posts: 1,824
Send a message via AIM to Brad Blackwood
Hourly plus parts here.

Can / will do flat-rates when necessary.
__________________
Brad Blackwood
euphonic masters

"What do I buy and how do I set it?"
Brad Blackwood is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27th November 2009, 06:36 AM   #7
William Bowden
Gear maniac
 
William Bowden's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney Australia
Posts: 240
Hourly here too, if it's per track some clients want to spend all day!

Also if the tracks are very short (or very long) it can be hard to judge. I did an album the other month that was 59:59 exactly but was all one track!

The King
__________________
www.myspace.com/williambowden
William Bowden is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27th November 2009, 09:04 AM   #8
Thor
Gear addict
 
Thor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Norway
Posts: 438
Almost never charge per song, here it's hourly rates plus parts.

We do give quotes which are pretty firm based on the number of tracks and total length of the album, as after a while you pretty much figure out about how much time you need per track to get things jumping. Rarely does that change, although we do include a disclaimer that prices are hourly and may vary depending on what needs to be done.

Those projects (that go over budget) represent only around 10% of all the stuff we do, almost everything stays within our quote. We generally do revisions for free (i.e. EQ, levels) as long as they're not remixed tracks that need to be approached from scratch (i.e. because the band/engineer screwed up).

Once in a blue moon we'll give a fixed rate offer on a project, in most cases we end up regretting it.

Cheers,
Thor
__________________
Sonovo mastering
stereo + 5.1 mastering, editing and restoration
Stavanger, Norway
www.sonovo.no
Thor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27th November 2009, 09:25 AM   #9
inlinenl
Lives for gear
 
inlinenl's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 1,254
track price overhere, but will discuss any option or request from the client ...
sometimes switching to a hour rate for regular clients is cheaper.
when albums/tracks take a lot off care in de-click/fix I'll discuss a price for that before doing it ...
sometimes mastering 12 tracks takes 4 hours for soundbalancing , but the restoration work takes 8 or more .....

also I find myself doing a better job payed in advance ... no sub-process in my head while working like "will they ever pay me" it's more like, okay these guys trust me, let's give them max value ...
but that should count on every project.
__________________


Greetings/Regards Wim Bult
www.inlinemastering.com
inlinenl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27th November 2009, 09:42 AM   #10
johnnyc
Gear maniac
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 204
I think most guys will do hourly if you ask, the per track thing is more catered to singles and itunes. The last album I had mastered was quoted as $150/hr and the total time would be about 6x the running time (meaning an hour of music would take about 6 hours to master). That's about the time it took and was pleased with the results. The experienced guys should be able to give you a pretty accurate quote if you explain what's needed.
johnnyc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27th November 2009, 05:09 PM   #11
The Beatsmith
Lives for gear
 
The Beatsmith's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: UK
Posts: 1,555
Send a message via AIM to The Beatsmith Send a message via MSN to The Beatsmith
Thanks guys! I'll make a few phone calls, and in the meantime get on with trying to work on my own project.

I really do not want to have the stress of mastering this project myself.

Great stuff
The Beatsmith is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27th November 2009, 10:27 PM   #12
aleatoric
Lives for gear
 
aleatoric's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Posts: 698
I charge per minute of music + parts. For me I find this to be the most accurate way to charge for the amount of time I put into a project.. Hourly is cool but I honestly like to take breaks and stuff and don't really feel like constantly watching the clock. Plus most of my sessions are unattended. The hourly thing can possibly draw questions from clients but per minute of music is represented right there on there production master. Plus clients can come up with a total cost estimate pretty easily before even contacting me.

Per song seems OK but has its faults if a song is really short or really long.
__________________
Full Circle Mastering
aleatoric is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28th November 2009, 03:48 AM   #13
Adam Dempsey
Lives for gear
 
Adam Dempsey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Melbourne - Australia's music capital.
Posts: 1,006
Per project here, based on no. of tracks, total length, whether multiple versions, etc. Of course I'll re-quote ahead of the job if necessary (eg, client suddenly has B sides or a radio edit or high res vinyl master required). No hidden extras. Keeps everything relaxed.
__________________
Adam
twitter.com/adam_dempsey
Is adding presence the same as subtracting absence?
Adam Dempsey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28th November 2009, 12:24 PM   #14
carlsaff
Gear addict
 
carlsaff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Chicago
Posts: 352
I'm hourly for attended sessions now, but I've always been flat rate for unattended work. Exactly because of odd situations such as hour long records composed of thirty two-minute tracks or hour long single track albums, I charge unattended work based on the number of minutes of material rather than the number of tracks.
__________________
Carl Saff
Saff Mastering
myspace.com/saffmastering
carlsaff is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28th November 2009, 04:32 PM   #15
Alécio Costa
Lives for gear
 
Alécio Costa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Brazil, Florianópolis/SC
Posts: 1,536
I charge for song and deliver two versions: nice and ****ing loud.
__________________
Alécio Costa Studio
High-end E-Mastering, Music Production
www.aleciocosta.com

Artist career at:
http://www.audiostreet.net/aleciocosta

MySpace:
http://www.myspace.com/aleciocostastudio
http://www.myspace.com/aleciocosta
Alécio Costa is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28th November 2009, 07:59 PM   #16
t_d
Lives for gear
 
t_d's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: pound ridge, NY
Posts: 909
i master a lot of experimental and ambient music where the songs can be very very short or very very long... so i've felt the per-minute-of-audio rate works best for my customers. it ensures i'm not overcharging for really short pieces or undercharging for very long ones. evens things out.
__________________
taylor deupree | www.12k.comphotography

looking for: simplicity
t_d is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 28th November 2009, 10:13 PM   #17
brethes@mac.com
Gear maniac
 
brethes@mac.com's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: London
Posts: 226
For online album mastering, I offer a package price based on the number of tracks and/or length of the album. For unusual length or number of tracks, I adjust the price according to the actual time required to do the job once I know the exact requirements.

For attended sessions, I charge strictly by the hour.
brethes@mac.com is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28th November 2009, 10:37 PM   #18
Riccardo
Mastering Moderator
 
Riccardo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Always on the Run
Posts: 1,950
Hourly rate plus parts for attended sessions. Per track charge for on-line mastering (plus parts if needed).
__________________
Velvet Room Mastering



"Can you imagine how great the Beatles or Pink Floyd could have sounded if they had used better cables?

I expect a Nobel prize to someday be awarded to an audiophile cable designer, as they clearly are way ahead of the rest of us.
" - DC -
Riccardo is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
What should I be charging per hour? killersoundz So much gear, so little time! 27 8th July 2009 06:41 AM
that's it... im charging deposits Jordan Jerkwad The Moan Zone 7 4th April 2009 09:21 PM
about charging (clients) sadworld So much gear, so little time! 15 6th August 2004 02:12 PM
Charging Clients? How Much? cleantone Remote Possibilities in Acoustic Music & Location Recording 12 27th February 2003 12:35 PM
How much should I be charging now? nemisis633 High end 49 7th January 2003 05:11 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:47 PM.


Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.0.0