+++ Powercore Master X5 For mastering Dance music - Gearslutz.com Gearslutz.com
 


All Advertisers
Go Back   Gearslutz.com > The Forums > Mastering forum

+++ Powercore Master X5 For mastering Dance music
New Reply New Reply Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 20th August 2009   #1
Gear nut
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 76

Thread Starter
+++ Powercore Master X5 For mastering Dance music

hi,is a good solution for mastering DANCE MUSIC the plugin MASTER X5 for POWERCORE ?
deltaforce is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 21st August 2009   #2
u don't wanna know
 
deft_bonz's Avatar
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Location: switzerland
Posts: 4,305

I did that years ago, on my Protools. But I never liked the end results. It always sounded very harsh to me and I never achieved the average loudness, that is very important in this genre.

But... you might consider me as a non-pro-mastering-engineer
Nevertheless, Ozone gives me a much better sound and is easier to use
__________________
.

stardustmedia - murat
high end analog music production
stay tuned thru my facebook fanpage: deft bonz
deft_bonz is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 21st August 2009   #3
Gear nut
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 76

Thread Starter
re:

thanks for reply , more replys ?
deltaforce is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 21st August 2009   #4
Lives for gear
 
javahut's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Location: Austin, TX

Yeah, X5, to me, is a harsh for the master bus. Works great on individual tracks if you need multi-band, though. If you have Powercore already, and you wanna do some of your own mastering, I'd spring for MD3. Clean sound (if not over used). Very easy to get stuff loud if the spectral balance is right in the mix... slam the Brickwall Limiter... or rather, use the Brickwall Limiter to slam the mix. And if the spectral balance is off a bit, use MD3's EQ to get it in line. A little (alot?) expensive but way better than X5.
__________________
downtempo.dub.psychedelic.twang
Canartic lossless downloads here...
Latest Canartic - Modulotion
javahut is online now  
Reply With Quote
Old 21st August 2009   #5
Lives for gear
 
polybonk's Avatar
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Location: Sydney Australia
Posts: 657

Cant stand it. Same problem here for me. Harsh is a good way of describing it. However It probably depends on the style of dance music. Could be good for something. MD3 is great. Same with Character and dynamic EQ. And the brick wall is the best. No loss of 3D in the depth of field.
polybonk is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 22nd August 2009   #6
Lives for gear
 
dietrich10's Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,009

Send a message via AIM to dietrich10
You can often tell when something was slammed through the X5. Which to my ears is never pleasing
__________________
www.completemastering.com
dietrich10 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 22nd August 2009   #7
Lives for gear
 
superjc's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,557

My card has the X3, yes harsh is the word. The limiter is terrible.... odd because I love the reverbs on my powercore, maybe there is a genre where this plugin is better suited.
__________________
Cubase Essentials: Tips & Tricks for the Urban/Electronic producer available now!
superjc is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 22nd August 2009   #8
Gear addict
 
Kayo's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 425

Quote:
Originally Posted by deltaforce View Post
hi,is a good solution for mastering DANCE MUSIC the plugin MASTER X5 for POWERCORE ?

The above consensus, regarding the MasterX5’s reputation is kindda true.

But, if you do venture outside the given presets of the X5, like I did, you’d find it’s a useable tool and suprisingly useful. It now dances according to instructions, and has been used on several stuff by me. I do agree, as mentioned earlier.. it’s presets of the bat, do highlight a harshness etc.. But, when tweaked step by step, it works great! Yeah sure, the MD3 is a fantastic plug. Period.. I’ve had one since its conception or porting to the Powercore, and you’d find many a post on GS, of me praising it, to no end…

Only to be fair to the MasterX5 … it is a useable tool, maybe not off the bat. Not only, would it be good enough for dance music, but for anything, if caressed into the form required for the master. Sure, it ain’t no holy grail! But, useable for sure..


Bye mate..

Ciao,
KAyo
__________________
http://www.Kantabiz.com
Business Video Directory
Kayo is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 25th August 2009   #9
Gear interested
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Location: England
Posts: 27

The presets are horrid but who seriously uses presets for mastering anyway?

I have X3 and its pretty good in moderation

It has an exciter type algorithm i think.. I find it best set to flat, perhaps this is the source of harshness you guys are hearing

Old GUI i know but see it there on the right, bellow dither.

Try setting it to flat and see how you like it?
DJRossfader is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 25th August 2009   #10
Gear addict
 
Kayo's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 425

Here is the new GUI. Looks heaps better.. doesn't it? All the TC plugs have been updated somewhat, in sound quality too, I thought! A bit of a face lift..

I am very fond of that dither tool on the MasterX5. Great shapes and avoid the presets as mentioned. Start from zero, and see how you go.

Cheers,
KAyo

Kayo is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 26th August 2009   #11
u don't wanna know
 
deft_bonz's Avatar
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Location: switzerland
Posts: 4,305

Quote:
Originally Posted by DJRossfader View Post
It has an exciter type algorithm i think.. I find it best set to flat, perhaps this is the source of harshness you guys are hearing
No, I really tried everything, but it still sounded harsh as soon as I tried to get some loudness out of it. Of course there is always the possibility that I don't know it better ... as a humble amateur ME
deft_bonz is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 26th August 2009   #12
Gear interested
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Location: England
Posts: 27

How hard were you pushing it?
I dont think you can get away with as much gain reduction on that one

I use it for the multiband but turn off the limiter
DJRossfader is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 26th August 2009   #13
u don't wanna know
 
deft_bonz's Avatar
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Location: switzerland
Posts: 4,305

I don't remember how hard I pushed it, but I never got the needed loudness. Not even if I pushed it to hell and back, needless to say it sounded like

I switched to L2 and got much better results, loudness- and soundwise, with much less effort.

Now I use Ozone 4 *loveitmucho*
deft_bonz is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 26th August 2009   #14
Gear addict
 
Kayo's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 425

If volume or level is the only reason you’re using the MasterX5, then maybe the L2 is preferablle. Use the MasterX5, for the given below..

[This plug-in provides even more detailed access during the mastering process for CD and broadcast. It is optimized for 44.1 and 48 kHz processing and is also an ideal tool for optimizing material like commercials for broadcast applications; the 5 bands allow to get even more "level" out of the program material].

Cheers,
KAyo
Kayo is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 27th August 2009   #15
u don't wanna know
 
deft_bonz's Avatar
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Location: switzerland
Posts: 4,305

But that was exactly the reason...

"...during the mastering process for CD... the 5 bands allow to get even more "level" out of the program material."

Yeah, L2 is way better, and I think Ozone 4 is way better than L2

I think I can even get better results with Logics Adaptive Limiter and Linear EQ than with the X5
deft_bonz is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 27th August 2009   #16
Lives for gear
 
Slogun's Avatar
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Location: Sweden
Posts: 556

I thought X5 sounded good untill I bought MD3.

My clients also noticed the better resluts achieved by the MD3, but then again, they didn't complain when I used the X5 either. So I'd say that you actually can get good results from the X5, but be carefull, it can sound harsch and gritty!
__________________
Recording, mixing and mastering at http://www.servantstudio.com
Slogun is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 28th August 2009   #17
Gear addict
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 483

Quote:
Originally Posted by Slogun View Post
I thought X5 sounded good untill I bought MD3.
The MD3 is way better! You can hear the difference even on small multimedia speakers. To me they're not in the same league.
ssl_ambition is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 28th August 2009   #18
Lives for gear
 
Slogun's Avatar
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Location: Sweden
Posts: 556

Quote:
Originally Posted by ssl_ambition View Post
The MD3 is way better! You can hear the difference even on small multimedia speakers. To me they're not in the same league.
I agree with you, they're not comparable! All I'm saying is, back then when I had to suffice with X5 my customers were happy. When I bought MD3, they became happier
Slogun is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 29th August 2009   #19
Lives for gear
 
Alécio Costa's Avatar
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Location: Brazil, Florianópolis/SC
Posts: 1,893

Verified Member
Master X 3+5 is pretty old technology. Circa 1999-2000?

MD3 Suite is much better, cleaner.

Even better is the MD4 Combo with the System 6000.
__________________
Alécio Costa Studio - Mastering & Music Production, Brazil
www.aleciocosta.com

http://www.facebook.com/alecio.costa
Alécio Costa is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 29th August 2009   #20
Lives for gear
 
Alécio Costa's Avatar
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Location: Brazil, Florianópolis/SC
Posts: 1,893

Verified Member
Lots of guys requested TC that they ported Master X 5 for HD/HD Accell but that never happened. No chip power for 88.2k....stuff like this..

However, they released MD3 a few years later.

Frankly, I do not miss Master X 5 at all. And the upgrade path from Master X 5 to MD3 was a surprise and greatly wellcomed.


Depending upon your license and Master X version , You would pay up to 50% only. Interesting because I emailed them and months later this promotion popped up.

Seems they do care for their clients and take feedback seriously.
Alécio Costa is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 30th August 2009   #21
Lives for gear
 
Slogun's Avatar
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Location: Sweden
Posts: 556

Quote:
Originally Posted by Alécio Costa View Post
Frankly, I do not miss Master X 5 at all. And the upgrade path from Master X 5 to MD3 was a surprise and greatly wellcomed.


Depending upon your license and Master X version , You would pay up to 50% only. Interesting because I emailed them and months later this promotion popped up.
They had an upgrade path? *doh* ;-)
Slogun is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 30th August 2009   #22
Lives for gear
 
Alécio Costa's Avatar
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Location: Brazil, Florianópolis/SC
Posts: 1,893

Verified Member
Did you miss it?
What a pity...
:(
Alécio Costa is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 30th August 2009   #23
Lives for gear
 
Slogun's Avatar
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Location: Sweden
Posts: 556

I will be damn sure not to miss it if they ever port MD4
Slogun is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 2nd September 2009   #24
Lives for gear
 
polybonk's Avatar
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Location: Sydney Australia
Posts: 657

I second that one
polybonk is offline  
Reply With Quote
New Reply New Reply Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook  Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter  Submit Thread to LinkedIn LinkedIn 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Similar Threads
Thread Thread starter Forum Replies Last Post
TC Powercore - possible to transfer plugin licenses? Nigel Jopson Music Computers 1 14th February 2006 06:20 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:20 PM.

Home - Search Forum - Contact Us - Terms Of Use / Privacy Policy - Advertise on Gearslutz - All Advertisers - Top
 
 
Powered by vBulletin®
Gearslutz.com LTD - UK Company Number 7597610.
Registered Office - 35 Ballards Lane, London, N3 1XW.
Hosted by Nimbus Hosting.

By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies.

SEO by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.