L2 Industry Standard - Page 3 - Gearslutz.com

Gearslutz.com

All Advertisers
Go Back   Gearslutz.com > The Forums > Mastering forum


L2 Industry Standard

New Reply New Reply Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 21st August 2009   #61
Gear Guru
 
lucey's Avatar
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Location: Columbus, Ohio
Posts: 12,407

Verified Member
Quote:
Originally Posted by dcollins View Post
I thought people had determined it was exactly the same as the hardware code?


DC
If you read my post more carefully you'll see the point that was made ... a chain's power is in the interaction of the small choices. So a little L2 along with clipping is a fine choice.

An L2 in an all digital world used for heavy lifting makes no sense to me, thus the comment.
__________________
Brian Lucey
Magic Garden Mastering
Dr. John, The Shins, The Black Keys, OAR, David Lynch, Sami Yusuf, moe., Sigur Ros

Spiral Groove Studio One - mixing monitors
lucey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21st August 2009   #62
Lives for gear
 
UnderTow's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Location: the Netherlands
Posts: 3,953

Verified Member
Quote:
Originally Posted by dcollins View Post
I thought people had determined it was exactly the same as the hardware code?
That is what I thought. I seem to remember reading about several tests showing that in linked mode and using the digital I/O it gives bit for bit identical output to the software.

Alistair
__________________
Alistair Johnston - TV & Film Post, Mastering, Sound Design
--
"The first principle is that you must not fool yourself -- and you are the easiest person to fool" -- Richard P. Feynman

"There's a sucker born every minute" -- P.T. Barnum
UnderTow is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 21st August 2009   #63
Gear nut
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 129

Surprised

My Limiters of Choice Are L316 and Oxford (and even a combo)

only one person is mentioning L316.. it's so versatile and easy to cater to your own needs..

who needs L2?
Zownd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22nd August 2009   #64
Lives for gear
 
Table Of Tone's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Location: London, UK
Posts: 1,574

Verified Member
Quote:
Originally Posted by dcollins View Post
I thought people had determined it was exactly the same as the hardware code?


DC
There is more DSP available in a hardware L2 and although waves marketed the software as the same as the hardware, I found that not to be the case.

The hardware L2 definitely has more headroom than the native software.
Not sure about the TDM version?

The hardware depends on if it's working properly in the first place, connection, the ADC, how it's being hit, what else is running before it, etc.

The software really depends on the host, the platform and the application, among other things.

There are just so many variables!
Table Of Tone is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23rd August 2009   #65
Motown legend
 
Bob Olhsson's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Location: Songwriter Gulch, Nashville TN
Posts: 10,878

Verified Member
The TDM and hardware version inputs will clip if you send anything in above full scale. The floating point version inputs won't clip and simply limit the signal more. I would call that behavior having more headroom but indeed there will be more gain reduction indicated because the input didn't clip.
Bob Olhsson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23rd August 2009   #66
Gear maniac
 
fenderbender.'s Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Location: Golden
Posts: 224

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bob Olhsson View Post
The TDM and hardware version inputs will clip if you send anything in above full scale. The floating point version inputs won't clip and simply limit the signal more. I would call that behavior having more headroom but indeed there will be more gain reduction indicated because the input didn't clip.
Yet another reason why PT-LE (floating point) is superior to HD (aside from the delay comp., obviously). . .


Additionally, the Waves L2 hardware will allow for a much longer release time to be set. Useless in most mastering situations, though it is a major difference between the HW and SW. Also, the HW is prone to failure unlike the SW. You can un-insert and re-insert the SW plug., whereas you must send the HW to Waves 'support'.


Regardless, the L2 has Nothing to do with how leading ME's get loudness!...
fenderbender. is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23rd August 2009   #67
3 + infractions, forum membership suspended.
 
Joined: May 2009
Location: SJCap
Posts: 1,148

Quote:
Originally Posted by Table Of Tone View Post
Well....that anti ME poster certainly got his b*****ks kicked in this thread, didn't he!
just coming back to this...fair enough... the comment was harsh...couple of things to clarify

I'm not a Mastering Engineer, I mix

Of course we all have to do what the client wants. I do it as much as the next guy

Clipping converters IS a cop out and DOES sound bad...I can't concede that point at all

Still wanna know who isn't clipping converters ever as part of their mastering process ( no not basement engineers)

The L2 makes a way better mixing tool than a mastering tool

Anyone suggesting that limiting isn't appropriate on your busses/groups is wrong

Mainly I think that it's the engineer not the tools in real life. This is not real life...it's a GEAR forum.....Boys
glissando is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23rd August 2009   #68
Gear Guru
 
lucey's Avatar
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Location: Columbus, Ohio
Posts: 12,407

Verified Member
Quote:
Originally Posted by glissando View Post
Clipping converters IS a cop out and DOES sound bad...I can't concede that point at all

Still wanna know who isn't clipping converters ever as part of their mastering process ( no not basement engineers)

The L2 makes a way better mixing tool than a mastering tool

Anyone suggesting that limiting isn't appropriate on your busses/groups is wrong
(speechless)
lucey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23rd August 2009   #69
Gear maniac
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 238

Quote:
Originally Posted by lucey View Post
(speechless)
+1
First Aid is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23rd August 2009   #70
Lives for gear
 
Table Of Tone's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Location: London, UK
Posts: 1,574

Verified Member
Quote:
Originally Posted by lucey View Post
(speechless)
+2
Table Of Tone is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23rd August 2009   #71
Lives for gear
 
Table Of Tone's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Location: London, UK
Posts: 1,574

Verified Member
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bob Olhsson View Post
The TDM and hardware version inputs will clip if you send anything in above full scale. The floating point version inputs won't clip and simply limit the signal more. I would call that behavior having more headroom but indeed there will be more gain reduction indicated because the input didn't clip.
You have a very good way of putting things Bob!

There ya go!
Cheers
Table Of Tone is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23rd August 2009   #72
Lives for gear
 
thermos's Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Location: Brooklyn
Posts: 3,656

Quote:
Originally Posted by Table Of Tone View Post
+2
+3. I disagree with all of them. But hey, it takes all kinds.
thermos is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26th August 2009   #73
Gear maniac
 
Fabio's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Location: Italy
Posts: 157

Usually I use it for just 1db of limiting after the ad converter!
Fabio is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26th August 2009   #74
Lives for gear
 
24-96 Mastering's Avatar
 
Joined: May 2008
Location: Karlsruhe, Germany
Posts: 2,747

Verified Member
Quote:
Originally Posted by lucey View Post
(speechless)































. . .
24-96 Mastering is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26th August 2009   #75
Lives for gear
 
Virtalahde's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Location: Kuhmoinen, Finland
Posts: 666

Verified Member
Quote:
Originally Posted by lucey View Post
(speechless)
*cricket chirping*
Virtalahde is offline   Reply With Quote
New Reply New Reply Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook  Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter  Submit Thread to LinkedIn LinkedIn 



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Similar Threads
Thread Thread starter Forum Replies Last Post
ProTools Still the Industry Standard? midnightsun Music computers 184 31st December 2007 01:33 AM
Industry Standard Rack Equipment mr suckymoto So much gear, so little time! 23 7th December 2006 10:06 PM
Industry standard noise gate? Unknown soldier So much gear, so little time! 18 17th June 2005 05:02 AM
Define Industry Standard PRS1JAZZ So much gear, so little time! 13 29th December 2003 07:21 AM
Industry standard dither? Unknown soldier High end 26 5th April 2003 08:56 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:21 AM.

Home - Search Forum - Contact Us - Terms Of Use - Advertise on Gearslutz - All Advertisers - Archive - Top
 
 
Powered by vBulletin®
Gearslutz.com LTD - UK Company Number 7597610.
Registered Office - 35 Ballards Lane, London, N3 1XW.
Hosted by Nimbus Hosting.

SEO by vBSEO ©2010, Crawlability, Inc.