So who owns the infamous Vinyl Recorder? - Gearslutz.com

Gearslutz.com

All Advertisers
Go Back   Gearslutz.com > The Forums > Mastering forum


So who owns the infamous Vinyl Recorder?

New Reply New Reply Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 21st July 2009   #1
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Location: Nottingham
Posts: 1,268

Thread Starter
Verified Member
Send a message via MSN to Joe_caithness
So who owns the infamous Vinyl Recorder?

Do any MEs posses this impressive beast?

vinyl recorder, dubplate, phono, analog, single, maxi, record, recording, directmastering, pressing, pressung, schallplatten

I have had vinyl dubs cut for me, and actually preffered them to another house cutting acetates.

I find the website mesmerising, Flexi Disk dubs? amazing!
__________________
Subsequent Mastering: http://www.subsequentmastering.com
Joe_caithness is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 22nd July 2009   #2
Moderator
 
sniperschool's Avatar
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Location: UK
Posts: 4,686

Verified Member
i remember looking at this a while ago but never moved on getting one
be interested to hear anyone that has used one
__________________
Souviens-toi que tu vas mourir...
sniperschool is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 22nd July 2009   #3
Lives for gear
 
Cellotron's Avatar
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Location: Brooklyn, New York
Posts: 3,638

Verified Member
The fact that the stock cutter head with these is not a feedback type is a big limiting factor - although apparently they are offering a feedback cutter head now - just haven't heard anything made with this. Also the fact you're running off a Technics or similar turntable is another big limiting factor. For casual one offs it might be ok as long as the expectation is not the same that you have for an acetate cut on a Neumann or a Scully. Most posts that I've read from those that have compared the Vinyl Recorder with the Vinylium Kingston dubcutter (which goes for more money - welcome to vinylium gmbh switzerland ) have preferred the fidelity gotten from the Kingston. I don't have direct experience with either of these models so you can take all of the above with a grain of salt if you wish.

A nice forum that has a good bit of discussion of the Vinylrecorder and Vinylium dubcutter - as well as lots of info on vintage "semi-pro" cutters made by the likes of Presto, RCA and Rek-o-cut can be found at The Secret Society of Lathe Trolls

Best regards,
Steve Berson
Cellotron is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22nd July 2009   #4
Lives for gear
 
IIIrd's Avatar
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 815

Verified Member
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cellotron View Post
The fact that the stock cutter head with these is not a feedback type is a big limiting factor - although apparently they are offering a feedback cutter head now - just haven't heard anything made with this. Also the fact you're running off a Technics or similar turntable is another big limiting factor. For casual one offs it might be ok as long as the expectation is not the same that you have for an acetate cut on a Neumann or a Scully. Most posts that I've read from those that have compared the Vinyl Recorder with the Vinylium Kingston dubcutter (which goes for more money - welcome to vinylium gmbh switzerland ) have preferred the fidelity gotten from the Kingston. I don't have direct experience with either of these models so you can take all of the above with a grain of salt if you wish.

A nice forum that has a good bit of discussion of the Vinylrecorder and Vinylium dubcutter - as well as lots of info on vintage "semi-pro" cutters made by the likes of Presto, RCA and Rek-o-cut can be found at The Secret Society of Lathe Trolls

Best regards,
Steve Berson
Secret Society of Lathe Trolls....bloody good find that, thanks

oh yeah...that funny cutter thing....never tried one, to be honest I wasn't convinced that it would do the job. You'd have to cut alot dubs to pay for it wouldn't you, seeing as you can get a dub cut for about 30 quid
__________________
Splglnie swa rnvee my stnogrpotin

Sean Magee
Abbey Road Studios
IIIrd is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 22nd July 2009   #5
Lives for gear
 
wado1942's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Location: Boise, Idaho
Posts: 2,088

In the photos, it looks like they were using a $200 Sony turntable. I wonder if you can really cut with a belt-driven table like that.
__________________
Stephen Baldassarre
www.gcmstudio.com
wado1942 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23rd July 2009   #6
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Location: Nottingham
Posts: 1,268

Thread Starter
Verified Member
Send a message via MSN to Joe_caithness
Quote:
Originally Posted by wado1942 View Post
In the photos, it looks like they were using a $200 Sony turntable. I wonder if you can really cut with a belt-driven table like that.
by cheap Sony you mean the most famous turntable ever, the Technics 1210s?!
Joe_caithness is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 24th July 2009   #7
Lives for gear
 
wado1942's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Location: Boise, Idaho
Posts: 2,088

Maybe that's what it is. I guess Sony ripped of Technics's design.
wado1942 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24th July 2009   #8
Gear addict
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 315

Quote:
Originally Posted by wado1942 View Post
Maybe that's what it is. I guess Sony ripped of Technics's design.
A company the size of Sony are more than capable designing their own turntable. They wouldn't need to rip off anybody else's.
Hane is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25th July 2009   #9
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Location: Nottingham
Posts: 1,268

Thread Starter
Verified Member
Send a message via MSN to Joe_caithness
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hane View Post
A company the size of Sony are more than capable designing their own turntable. They wouldn't need to rip off anybody else's.
It's an iconic look..

I guess it's the same as 100000000000 SM58 shaped mics which all sound different
Joe_caithness is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 26th July 2009   #10
Lives for gear
 
wado1942's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Location: Boise, Idaho
Posts: 2,088

Quote:
A company the size of Sony are more than capable designing their own turntable. They wouldn't need to rip off anybody else's.
And yet, the $200 Sony in my living room looks EXACTLY like it.
wado1942 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26th July 2009   #11
Lives for gear
 
Nordenstam's Avatar
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Location: Norway
Posts: 1,741

Verified Member
Bet the technics will outlast the sony by a dozen spilled beers.
Nordenstam is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28th July 2009   #12
Lives for gear
 
wado1942's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Location: Boise, Idaho
Posts: 2,088

Probably, I only use it for casual listening and with a better cart, it's fine for that. I have a much better turntable in my studio for critical stuff.
wado1942 is offline   Reply With Quote
New Reply New Reply Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook  Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter  Submit Thread to LinkedIn LinkedIn 



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Similar Threads
Thread Thread starter Forum Replies Last Post
Mobb Deeps - The Infamous LP GL Respect Due Rap + Hip Hop engineering & production 37 22nd July 2011 04:57 AM
Jimmy's infamous hats fooman Q & A with Butch Vig 3 19th June 2009 05:17 AM
vestax vinyl recorder - is there a cheaper alternative? paulneedles Low End Theory 4 7th January 2007 08:27 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:18 AM.

Home - Search Forum - Contact Us - Terms Of Use - Advertise on Gearslutz - All Advertisers - Archive - Top
 
 
Powered by vBulletin®
Gearslutz.com LTD - UK Company Number 7597610.
Registered Office - 35 Ballards Lane, London, N3 1XW.
Hosted by Nimbus Hosting.

SEO by vBSEO ©2010, Crawlability, Inc.