![]() | All Advertisers |
| Member Services Directory | Classifieds | Reviews | Jobs | Deal Zone | Merchandise | Marketplace | Facebook App | Books, DVDs & Gadgets | Video Vault | Tips & Techniques |
| |||||||
New Reply | Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| | #1 |
| Gear interested Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 22
Thread Starter | Sysex dump issue
We're in the process of setting up our mastering gear to dump sysex midi dumps to our software for backup purposes. We have a TC6000, Weiss DS1, Weiss EQ1, and a Digital Domain DD-2. Here's my question: How do you know if the sysex dump into the computer went error free? The DS1 and EQ1 have error checking for when loading into memory. However I was thinking, what if the dump into the computer went wrong. You wouldn't know until trying to load it back in, at which point everything would be FUBAR. Anyone have any experience trying this? Lessons, tips etc? |
| | |
| | #2 |
| Gear addict Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 345
|
Do it twice, calculate the CRC for each file, and see if they match.
|
| | |
| | #3 | |
| Mastering Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 3,099
| Quote:
BK
__________________ Bob Katz DIGITAL DOMAIN http://www.digido.com "There are two kinds of fools. One says-this is old and therefore good. The other says-this is new and therefore better." No trees were killed in the sending of this message. However a large number of electrons were terribly inconvenienced. | |
| | |
| | #4 |
| Gear interested Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 22
Thread Starter |
A CRC in the sequencer was what I was wondering about. I know a fair bit about MIDI, but I've never dealt with Sysex too much before. Doing it manually is waaaay to much. So to clarify, let me ask...do sequencers have any kind of Checksum for sysex? And if not, Bob, you're saying you've been doing it for years and the only mess up has been human? Encouraging, well it would be if I didn't mess things up so often. ![]() Anyone automating parameters using MIDI? If you had to jump a threshold up for a solo, do these mastering units respond in time and consistently? |
| | |
| | #5 | |
| Mastering Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 3,099
| Quote:
Anyway, my answer is yes. It is worth it, if you can pass the learning barrier. Regardless, ALWAYS CAPTURE THE RESULT OF YOUR MASTERING TO A FILE, NEVER RELY ON A COMPUTER TO KEEP ANY PARAMETERS, plugin settings, automation or routing over a long period of time. | |
| | |
| | #6 |
| Gear interested Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 22
Thread Starter |
Do you get any lag you have to compensate for in MIDI. Anticipating automation moves so that they happen on time? On a side note, similar to your surprise that nobody does it more, we here find it so time consuming and awkward to have a separate playback system from recording. You get used to instant lock, and having your masters with the unmastered track so you can reference and just generally move around faster. But I digress.... |
| | |
| | #7 | |
| Lives for gear Joined: Aug 2007 Location: USA
Posts: 1,339
| Quote:
BTW - have you ever checked out the sysex faders/buttons, etc, in the Logic Environment window? You can build complete editors, fully automatable, for just about anything you can think of. It's kind of like the StudioWare panels in Sonar. I'm primarily a PT user, but these features in Logic (and Sonar) are awesome. In PT, sysex is essentially limited to straight-up recording and playback. Fine for bulk dumps, or for recording automation moves from outboard processors. Not quite as cool as being able to set up editors and controllers right from within the software though. -Ben B | |
| | |
| | #8 | |
| mymixisbetterthanyours! Joined: Oct 2006 Location: Berlin
Posts: 1,759
| Quote:
I've NEVER had the sequencer (PT) screw up the sysex. But, as Bob said, sometimes the user is the problem...
__________________ www.just-mix-it.com | |
| | |
| | #9 |
| Lives for gear Joined: May 2006
Posts: 2,795
|
A special-purpose sysex capture program for this purpose is worth it IMO. I use this same capability for capturing synth settings and I have a ton of them. On a Mac, I recommend SysEx Librarian. It's free! It gives you message counts and other stuff that will generally give you peace of mind. Most often the sysex dump from a particular piece of gear will have a fixed size or a few fixed sizes, so once you've got checksum verification and the right size, you can be pretty confident you've got the thing properly captured. On a PC, the standard is MIDIOX. I've never used it but it has a good reputation. -synthoid
__________________ jomomusic.com |
| | |
| | #10 | |
| Gear interested Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 22
Thread Starter | Quote:
| |
| | |
| | #11 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Aug 2007 Location: USA
Posts: 1,339
|
Just curious -- has anyone actually experienced significant errors doing bulk dumps? I'd be kind of surprised to hear this. Relatively speaking, it's just not that much data. -Ben B |
| | |
| | #12 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Jan 2009 Location: Boise, Idaho
Posts: 2,088
|
You know, I was just having a conversation with another engineer friend of mine about MIDI. I've never in my life used MIDI (in session anyway) for anything other than hooking 2 keyboards together with similar patches and different signal paths to thicken the sound. I borrow a synth once and a while that lets you program patches in a computer and dump them to the synth through MIDI. I've also used an SMPTE->MTC box to practice slaving my 16-track to computer but have yet to use it in session. This other engineer, on the other hand, uses MIDI for all sorts of logic functions that I can't even begin to explain. I admit, aside from my computer, my sync box and one of my reverbs, I don't have any actual MIDI capable equipment in my studio. Guess I never saw the need for it. Where does one even learn about programming and automating hardware perameters with MIDI? |
| | |
| | #13 | |
| Lives for gear Joined: May 2006
Posts: 2,795
| Quote:
The reverse problem happens sometimes too: the gear that generates the sysex dump can sometimes be unable to absorb it as fast as a sequencer wants to transmit it, when restoring. -synthoid | |
| | |
| | #14 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Aug 2007 Location: USA
Posts: 1,339
|
Fascinating. I've used sysex functions in Pro Tools, Vision, Logic, Cakewalk/Sonar, DP, etc, and have never once experienced this kind of problem. Just lucky, I guess. -Ben B |
| | |
| | #15 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Aug 2007 Location: USA
Posts: 1,339
|
Just to add to my above post, I never tried this with a hardware sequencer. Back in the day, I had a Yamaha MIDI data filer (I forget the model number) that I used for bulk dumps, which could then be saved to floppies. I've only used software sequencers for realtime sysex parameter control, and have never had a problem (except for a known problem in a certain version of Pro Tools that has been corrected). I wonder if it's really the interfaces that are to blame, in general. -Ben B |
| | |
| | #16 | |
| Lives for gear Joined: May 2006
Posts: 2,795
| Quote:
That said, I still use SysEx Librarian because this is an archival function and it's really important to get it right. MIDI is wonderful in some ways but it has been left in the dust by audio, in terms of performance and robustness. That's just plain weird if you ask me, haha. One channel of 96KHz audio in digital format has enough bandwidth for hundreds of MIDI channels running with perfect timing accuracy. With MIDI interfaces we get crappy jitter figures and stomach-aches about sysex dumps, haha. -synthoid | |
| | |
New Reply
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| keep these mics or dump 'em? | violindave | Low End Theory | 3 | 22nd December 2008 02:51 AM |
| Ensoniq DP/4 Sysex Dump | anza | So much gear, so little time! | 1 | 22nd April 2008 12:17 AM |
| ATC-1 sysex dump | bz_rtl | Electronic Music Instruments & Electronic Music Production | 6 | 11th April 2008 06:15 AM |
| Roland D50 to MidiOx sysex dump. Need help! | paully | Music computers | 4 | 17th February 2008 05:58 PM |
| Should I Dump My Distressors | Aearth | So much gear, so little time! | 22 | 22nd January 2008 10:19 PM |
| |