![]() | All Advertisers |
| Member Services Directory | Classifieds | Reviews | Jobs | Deal Zone | Merchandise | Marketplace | Facebook App | Books, DVDs & Gadgets | Video Vault | Tips & Techniques |
| |||||||
New Reply | Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| | #1 |
| Gear Head Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 47
Thread Starter | Help Setting up Volume Attenuator
Hi All, I was wondering if someone could help me set up the gain structure for my Goldpoint SA1X Volume attenuator. Basically the end of my signal chain comprises of a LUCID DA9624 which feeds my Adam P11A's. The question is do I run the Lucid at full volume into the Goldpoint (and then attenuate the Goldpoint to 83db SPL) or just up to the point where it reaches 83db SPL into the Goldpoint at full tilt (0 attenuation). Thanks for any help and I hope this makes sense :0) |
| | |
| | #2 | |
| Mastering Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 3,099
| Quote:
As for gain optimization, any reasonable output gain setting for the DAC is acceptable. As long as it produces an output which keeps it from being noisy or distorted, you're fine. Say, any level from, say, -10 dBu through +4 dBu at -20 dBFS 1 kHz sine wave into your Goldpoint you should be fine. Next, is the Goldpoint balanced? If not, then further precautions will be necessary and I'm not covering unbalanced in this post! Since the Adams have an adjustable input gain, I suggest you first adjust the Lucid to produce 0 dBu with a 1 kHz -20 dBFS sine wave. This is a conservative level, it won't distort or be noisy. Then set the Goldpoint to fully open (0 dB) and adjust each Adam's input gain to produce the standard SPL with the standardized pink noise signal. (can be downloaded from digido.com). Then you're ready to rumble (or not rumble, ideally :-). BK
__________________ Bob Katz DIGITAL DOMAIN http://www.digido.com "There are two kinds of fools. One says-this is old and therefore good. The other says-this is new and therefore better." No trees were killed in the sending of this message. However a large number of electrons were terribly inconvenienced. | |
| | |
| | #3 |
| Gear Head Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 47
Thread Starter |
Thanks Bob!! Funny you should reply as the whole reason I am doing this is so that I can use your K monitoring standard. I have been using it for a while unwittingly but in this way I always know I am monitoring at K20, 14 or 12 and that the DA is working at its optimum. Is there a device that you would recommend over the Goldpoint? Hope you are well :0) |
| | |
| | #4 | |
| Mastering Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 3,099
| Quote:
Anyway, I would recommend a custom passive attenuator made from a good rotary switch and metal film resistors. I have a spreadsheet on that for different impedances if you are interested. Outside of that, I LOVE my Cranesong Avocet, but it's considerably more money than a passive attenuator. | |
| | |
| | #5 |
| Gear Head Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 47
Thread Starter |
Thanks for that and hope you manged to catch up on your z's at some point :0) The Avocet looks awesome but is way out of my league ![]() Thanks again Mr.Katz for giving so much so freely |
| | |
New Reply
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Best Volume Attenuator for a Fender Hot Rod Deluxe 40W | filthyrich | instruments, guitar, bass, amps | 9 | 26th June 2008 05:35 PM |
| Volume attenuator with a Fireface 800? | redddog | Music computers | 32 | 12th June 2008 04:40 AM |
| Temporary Volume Attenuator | fooman | So much gear, so little time! | 13 | 3rd October 2007 05:41 PM |
| Is there a big difference between a Goldpoint attenuator and a SPL Volume 2? | Marrone | High end | 4 | 20th August 2007 10:46 PM |
| Stereo DA, which one, Benchmark or Mytek over the Rosetta 800?Volume Attenuator too? | spiderdragon | High end | 0 | 23rd August 2005 04:48 PM |
| |