Quick question about sample rates. - Gearslutz.com

Gearslutz.com

All Advertisers
Go Back   Gearslutz.com > The Forums > Mastering forum


Quick question about sample rates.

New Reply New Reply Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 1st July 2009   #1
Gear maniac
 
prismtheory's Avatar
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Location: New York, NY
Posts: 296

Thread Starter
Quick question about sample rates.

I'm wrapping up mixing a record that was recorded at different studios, different drum set ups and different sampling rates. Most of it was recorded by me at 24/44.1 the other recording engineer recorded everything at 24/48. I mixed all of these songs in the box because of all the changes these guys typically have me make.

My question is: Before I send the final mixes to mastering should I upsample all of the 44.1 tracks to 48 or convert all of the 48 songs to 44.1? I used to use a bus comp and print all final mixes to an external 2 track at 24/882, but I've scaled down my rig these days.
Thanks in advance. I'm just curious if there are benefits or consequences either way.

-<T>
__________________
...when keepin it real goes wrong.
prismtheory is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1st July 2009   #2
Mastering Moderator
 
Riccardo's Avatar
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Location: Always on the Run
Posts: 2,675

Verified Member
Stay with the same sample rate and bit depth as the session. Leave SRC to the mastering engineer.
__________________
Velvet Room Mastering



"Can you imagine how great the Beatles or Pink Floyd could have sounded if they had used better cables?

I expect a Nobel prize to someday be awarded to an audiophile cable designer, as they clearly are way ahead of the rest of us.
" - DC -
Riccardo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1st July 2009   #3
Gear maniac
 
prismtheory's Avatar
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Location: New York, NY
Posts: 296

Thread Starter
HI thanks so much for your response. The thing is, the "mastering engineer" is not exactly a mastering engineer only. The band doesn't have the budget to send it to the guy I typically use...and I don't want to master my own mixes. The engineer is going to be using PT HD for the mastering so he's essentially going to be using the same SRC as I would be. I've just put a lot of work into this project and don't want to do anything that would affect the tracks in a negative way.

-<T>
prismtheory is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1st July 2009   #4
Mastering Moderator
 
Riccardo's Avatar
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Location: Always on the Run
Posts: 2,675

Verified Member
Quote:
Originally Posted by prismtheory View Post
HI thanks so much for your response. The thing is, the "mastering engineer" is not exactly a mastering engineer only. The band doesn't have the budget to send it to the guy I typically use...and I don't want to master my own mixes. The engineer is going to be using PT HD for the mastering so he's essentially going to be using the same SRC as I would be. I've just put a lot of work into this project and don't want to do anything that would affect the tracks in a negative way.

-<T>
Talk to him and see what he prefers. We all have slightly different modus operandi. Some use two DAWs, some upsample, load in, load out and so on. Communication is the key.
Riccardo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1st July 2009   #5
3 + infractions, forum membership suspended.
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Location: NYC
Posts: 457

Quote:
Originally Posted by prismtheory View Post
HI thanks so much for your response. The thing is, the "mastering engineer" is not exactly a mastering engineer only. The band doesn't have the budget to send it to the guy I typically use...and I don't want to master my own mixes. The engineer is going to be using PT HD for the mastering so he's essentially going to be using the same SRC as I would be. I've just put a lot of work into this project and don't want to do anything that would affect the tracks in a negative way.

-<T>
do u understand what Riccardo said?? just give everything to that ME as 48kHz/24 bit if u like ...
It'sJoeAgain is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1st July 2009   #6
Gear maniac
 
prismtheory's Avatar
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Location: New York, NY
Posts: 296

Thread Starter
Thanks for the incredibly helpful insight Joe. I guess I wasn't being clear. I actually just wanted to know if there would be any degradation if I upsampled the songs that were 44.1 TO 48K. I found the answer I was looking for. I wanted a scientific explanation, not a procedural opinion. Thanks anyway.

-<T>
prismtheory is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1st July 2009   #7
3 + infractions, forum membership suspended.
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Location: NYC
Posts: 457

Quote:
Originally Posted by prismtheory View Post
Thanks for the incredibly helpful insight Joe. I guess I wasn't being clear. I actually just wanted to know if there would be any degradation if I upsampled the songs that were 44.1 TO 48K. I found the answer I was looking for. I wanted a scientific explanation, not a procedural opinion. Thanks anyway.

-<T>
hey man...i was just trying to spare u all the digital mumbo jumbo but if that's what u were looking for then knock urself out...i am sure u saw that upsampling ur files is pointless. Right.
It'sJoeAgain is offline   Reply With Quote
New Reply New Reply Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook  Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter  Submit Thread to LinkedIn LinkedIn 



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Similar Threads
Thread Thread starter Forum Replies Last Post
Real Quick Question About Sample Rates rallycapmusic Rap + Hip Hop engineering & production 4 8th December 2008 09:26 AM
Quick PT sample rate question. Chris Music computers 5 26th February 2008 06:55 PM
Sample rates mr. torture So much gear, so little time! 6 21st December 2007 04:57 PM
sample rates? edmann So much gear, so little time! 46 1st June 2004 04:13 PM
Sample rates Jason Poulin High end 6 24th September 2003 06:05 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:12 AM.

Home - Search Forum - Contact Us - Terms Of Use - Advertise on Gearslutz - All Advertisers - Archive - Top
 
 
Powered by vBulletin®
Gearslutz.com LTD - UK Company Number 7597610.
Registered Office - 35 Ballards Lane, London, N3 1XW.
Hosted by Nimbus Hosting.

SEO by vBSEO ©2010, Crawlability, Inc.