![]() | All Advertisers |
| Member Services Directory | Classifieds | Reviews | Jobs | Deal Zone | Merchandise | Marketplace | Facebook App | Books, DVDs & Gadgets | Video Vault | Tips & Techniques |
| |||||||
New Reply | Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| | #1 |
| Gear maniac Joined: Sep 2005 Location: New York, NY
Posts: 296
Thread Starter | Quick question about sample rates.
I'm wrapping up mixing a record that was recorded at different studios, different drum set ups and different sampling rates. Most of it was recorded by me at 24/44.1 the other recording engineer recorded everything at 24/48. I mixed all of these songs in the box because of all the changes these guys typically have me make. My question is: Before I send the final mixes to mastering should I upsample all of the 44.1 tracks to 48 or convert all of the 48 songs to 44.1? I used to use a bus comp and print all final mixes to an external 2 track at 24/882, but I've scaled down my rig these days. Thanks in advance. I'm just curious if there are benefits or consequences either way. -<T>
__________________ ...when keepin it real goes wrong. |
| | |
| | #2 |
| Mastering Moderator Joined: Apr 2003 Location: Always on the Run
Posts: 2,675
Verified Member |
Stay with the same sample rate and bit depth as the session. Leave SRC to the mastering engineer.
__________________ Velvet Room Mastering "Can you imagine how great the Beatles or Pink Floyd could have sounded if they had used better cables? I expect a Nobel prize to someday be awarded to an audiophile cable designer, as they clearly are way ahead of the rest of us. " - DC - |
| | |
| | #3 |
| Gear maniac Joined: Sep 2005 Location: New York, NY
Posts: 296
Thread Starter |
HI thanks so much for your response. The thing is, the "mastering engineer" is not exactly a mastering engineer only. The band doesn't have the budget to send it to the guy I typically use...and I don't want to master my own mixes. The engineer is going to be using PT HD for the mastering so he's essentially going to be using the same SRC as I would be. I've just put a lot of work into this project and don't want to do anything that would affect the tracks in a negative way. -<T> |
| | |
| | #4 | |
| Mastering Moderator Joined: Apr 2003 Location: Always on the Run
Posts: 2,675
Verified Member | Quote:
| |
| | |
| | #5 | |
| 3 + infractions, forum membership suspended. Joined: Apr 2009 Location: NYC
Posts: 457
| Quote:
| |
| | |
| | #6 |
| Gear maniac Joined: Sep 2005 Location: New York, NY
Posts: 296
Thread Starter |
Thanks for the incredibly helpful insight Joe. I guess I wasn't being clear. I actually just wanted to know if there would be any degradation if I upsampled the songs that were 44.1 TO 48K. I found the answer I was looking for. I wanted a scientific explanation, not a procedural opinion. Thanks anyway. -<T> |
| | |
| | #7 | |
| 3 + infractions, forum membership suspended. Joined: Apr 2009 Location: NYC
Posts: 457
| Quote:
| |
| | |
New Reply
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Real Quick Question About Sample Rates | rallycapmusic | Rap + Hip Hop engineering & production | 4 | 8th December 2008 09:26 AM |
| Quick PT sample rate question. | Chris | Music computers | 5 | 26th February 2008 06:55 PM |
| Sample rates | mr. torture | So much gear, so little time! | 6 | 21st December 2007 04:57 PM |
| sample rates? | edmann | So much gear, so little time! | 46 | 1st June 2004 04:13 PM |
| Sample rates | Jason Poulin | High end | 6 | 24th September 2003 06:05 PM |
| |