transparent gain - Page 3 - Gearslutz.com

Gearslutz.com

All Advertisers
Go Back   Gearslutz.com > The Forums > Mastering forum


transparent gain

New Reply New Reply Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 16th June 2009   #61
Mastering
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 3,099

Quote:
Originally Posted by Paul Gold View Post
I have observed over time that the fancy resistor crowd tends to claim superiority when working with tubes more often than solid state. I'm guessing that resistor differences are more pronounced in high impedance circuits. I of course have not done the leg work myself.

I think that noise of high source resistance or impedance is the primary issue there. For example, tube microphone manufacturers need a high gigohm resistor at the grid of the input tube and its construction (I hear) is very critical. As far as the influence of distortion such as dielectric distortion, and questions about Holco versus something more ordinary, you have to consider the relative impedances in the circuit. That's why I think that if a steel end cap adds some distortion to a resistor, that it would be far more significant if the resistor were 1000 ohms and it was a gain-determining resistor than if it were 10000 ohms. It seems to me. But I haven't done the legwork either! If I had the time to test every theory on every box I build I wouldn't have time to master. Every intern I bring in has to know how to solder, too!
__________________
Bob Katz DIGITAL DOMAIN http://www.digido.com
"There are two kinds of fools. One says-this is old and therefore good. The other says-this is new and therefore better."

No trees were killed in the sending of this message. However a large number of electrons were terribly inconvenienced.
bob katz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16th June 2009   #62
3 + infractions, forum membership suspended.
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 1,978

Quote:
Originally Posted by krytikal1 View Post
i'm looking for a really transparent stereo or dual mono gain stage in my chain. something with extremely high headroom, and stepped or easily repeatable settings. it would be the last thing in my chain if i wanted to make up gain into the converter. either to allow a lower level through the chain for a smoother ride, or a higher level into the converter for more artifacts . i'd love for it to be unoticable (if possible) if it were left inline but not in use. i really don't need more than a couple db, but up to 6 would be cool.

i don't mind diy, and i'm not necessarily looking at a console.....but am open to any suggestions. i'm farely happy with what i have, but always looking for other color.....or in this case, lack thereof.


thanks,

k
Aphex Dominator ][ 720
APHEX Systems 720 / 722 Dominator II Precision Multiband Peak Limiter

space2012 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16th June 2009   #63
Lives for gear
 
dcollins's Avatar
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Location: Hollywood CA
Posts: 2,625

Verified Member
Quote:
Originally Posted by bob katz View Post
Aha. Now I remember. The leads of the Holco resistors are not attracted to a magnet. Indicating copper or silver and no steel. Well, the counterclaim could be, if you have a 10 kohm resistor with a 0.1 ohm pair of connection leads....
As with most audiophile claims, it would be trivial to measure if there really were hysteresis or whatever distortion caused by the steel ends. The lead is more like 0.00001 Ohms anyway.

And I do use 2% Silver solder for everything. Actually if you are connecting to a Silver contact (like an XLR pin) you should always use a Silver bearing solder.

DC
__________________
Dave Collins Mastering
www.collinsaudio.com
+1 323 467 5570
dcollins is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17th June 2009   #64
Lives for gear
 
Paul Gold's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Location: Brooklyn
Posts: 1,009

Verified Member
Mouser started carrying AIM brand solder. Their silver solder is much less expensive than others. I was using 63/37 but ordered some. I like it. It flows better and is really shiny. The sound is marvelous. Everything is more fluid and shiny sounding.
__________________
Paul Gold
www.saltmastering.com
Greenpoint's No. 1 online purveyor of poo on a boot
Paul Gold is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17th June 2009   #65
Lives for gear
 
Waltz Mastering's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Location: 3rd Stone From The Sun
Posts: 2,933

Verified Member
Quote:
Originally Posted by lucey View Post
the argument for an active monitor is the gain matching potential of the mix to the master. Or at least getting within a fraction of a db for instant A/B. Both signals go through the same path keeping the comparison more fair than with only the mix going through a gain booster. A gain booster on the mix signal destroys the A/B to a small but real degree. And small matters. As a practice, I'll make sure the mix is on the hot side of that db.
Quote:
Originally Posted by bob katz View Post
That of course is the real challenge. If the mix played a little louder than the master still sounds worse, then you can feel very comfortable your master is the better one.
I'm not sure if this is the topic of the original post, but these two comments caught my eye. How many ME's are gain matching before and after. Seems like it would be a little over the top as far as validating the decisions of the master?

edit: to be clear, meaning precise gain matching through the whole process. Beginning through end.
I'll start in the beginning, but not sweat it so much later on...but be in the ballpark in either direction.
__________________
Tom Waltz

www.waltzmastering.com

Waltz Mastering is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17th June 2009   #66
Lives for gear
 
inlinenl's Avatar
 
Joined: May 2005
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 1,821

Verified Member
Quote:
Originally Posted by Waltz Mastering View Post
I'm not sure if this is the topic of the original post, but these two comments caught my eye. How many ME's are gain matching before and after. Seems like it would be a little over the top as far as validating the decisions of master?
I know I'm doing it almost all the time,when making sound-decisions/ setting / finding the sound the projects needs in real time with the croockwood console .... after the first capture .. lining up and volume match the original and processed one in the montage .... after the sound has settled ... it's not that much anymore ... more focussed on the balance between the versions/tracks ...

once in a while I just throw and slam a software limiter on a track and then A/B it to my mastered versions .... quite interresting ....
__________________
Wim @
www.inlinemastering.com
inlinenl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17th June 2009   #67
Lives for gear
 
dcollins's Avatar
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Location: Hollywood CA
Posts: 2,625

Verified Member
Quote:
Originally Posted by Paul Gold View Post
Mouser started carrying AIM brand solder. Their silver solder is much less expensive than others. I was using 63/37 but ordered some. I like it. It flows better and is really shiny.
It really is better even for just general use. They only thing to watch out for is that a lousy connection still looks shiny.

Quote:
The sound is marvelous. Everything is more fluid and shiny sounding.
I have some custom cables you might be interested in.


DC
dcollins is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17th June 2009   #68
Gear Guru
 
lucey's Avatar
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Location: Columbus, Ohio
Posts: 12,407

Verified Member
If we're getting into solder, Cardas quad is the best balance of 4 metals I know of, and not too bad on the $ either.
__________________
Brian Lucey
Magic Garden Mastering
Dr. John, The Shins, The Black Keys, OAR, David Lynch, Sami Yusuf, moe., Sigur Ros

Spiral Groove Studio One - mixing monitors
lucey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17th June 2009   #69
Gear addict
 
turtlerock's Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Location: Sydney Australia
Posts: 386

Verified Member
Quote:
Originally Posted by lucey View Post
If we're getting into solder, Cardas quad is the best balance of 4 metals I know of, and not too bad on the $ either.
i have been using mundorf supreme 9/% silver gold for about six months , i have no idea how it sounds ...but it tins and flows like i am an expert , starts and stays shiney and is lead free , so read that as unlike the standard lead free stuff it works and even has sane smell
.
the audiofool crowd covet it so it must sound magical .
its dearer then standard solder by a huge amount , but really at $70 for the really big roll in the scheme of things its cheap .

oh yeah i bought a new iron to use it which i should have done 20 years ago .
"some times you don't do the obvious because its just too obvious "
__________________
Rick

www.turtlerockmastering.com
i think we went to different schools together
turtlerock is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17th June 2009   #70
Gear addict
 
krytikal1's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Location: Portland, OR.
Posts: 442

Thread Starter
side track back into the gain circuit before we go on with solder.........

what is the ideal impedance be for a potentiometer in that location?



ok.....back to solder....what is the best silver ratio....2%, 9%... is 100% silver just too expensive, or does it lose it's "shiny" sound and properties at some point.

k
krytikal1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17th June 2009   #71
Gear Guru
 
lucey's Avatar
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Location: Columbus, Ohio
Posts: 12,407

Verified Member
Quote:
Originally Posted by krytikal1 View Post
ok.....back to solder....what is the best silver ratio....2%, 9%... is 100% silver just too expensive, or does it lose it's "shiny" sound and properties at some point.

k
George Cardas' cables are not my style, but he knows his solder ...


Solder

Q.) I'd like to know what makes Cardas solder better than all other solders for audio work. What advantage does Cardas solder have over other eutectic solders that makes it worth its much higher price? On the one hand, there is Jennifer of Jena Labs claiming that no other solder should ever be used, and on the other hand there are people in DIY chat rooms that say these exotic audiophile solders are a waste of money and no better than products like Kester. Thanks for your response. - Michael

A.) Hi Michael. The vast majority of solders in the world are slurries or mixtures such as 60/40 tin lead solder. They go through a slurry stage as they solidify wherein one component solidifies first and then another. The result is a solder connection rather than a joint. Eutectic solders such as Kesters Ultra pure Tin/lead Silver are in fact excellent because they solidify at a temperature lower than any of the component parts thus they form a solder joint rather than a connection - the key here is the eutectic formula which must be very precise - the solders are obviously different in that they set up with a mirror finish rather than a dull finish, the reason they do this is because they solidify as a unit. The week link in the solders is contamination - the molten solder easily dissolves other metals, this is no problem if you are soldering to a metal that is part of the eutectic mixture (such as tin or lead) you will get contiguous flow right in to the joint (easy to see) but if you solder to a dissimilar metal (such as copper or silver) you will see an obvious dulling at the connection where the eutectic formula fails and and the continuous joint becomes a connection. Cardas Quad Eutectic is tin, lead silver, copper, eutectic. The results are obvious. Most highend products use this solder and other cable manufactures have been using it for over a decade - to them it represents good sound and absolute reliability. - George


Quadeutectic

Q.) What is Quadeutectic solder? What percentage of each element does it contain; tin, silver, lead, copper?

A.) It is tin, lead, silver, copper eutectic. 61/35/3/1 is the approximate ratio. The key is a ratio that has several decimal points after each number. It is very precise in order to hit the "eutectic point". It took years to pinpoint. - George
lucey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18th June 2009   #72
Lives for gear
 
dcollins's Avatar
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Location: Hollywood CA
Posts: 2,625

Verified Member
Quote:
Originally Posted by krytikal1 View Post
side track back into the gain circuit before we go on with solder.........

what is the ideal impedance be for a potentiometer in that location?
It depends. Even the worst opamp can drive 2k, some can drive 200 Ohms. 5k is a good starting point.

Quote:
ok.....back to solder....what is the best silver ratio....2%, 9%... is 100% silver just too expensive, or does it lose it's "shiny" sound and properties at some point.
2% Silver is used is many applications other than audio, where things actually have to work.

I would steer well clear of any solder "designed" for audio.


DC
dcollins is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18th June 2009   #73
Gear addict
 
krytikal1's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Location: Portland, OR.
Posts: 442

Thread Starter
Quote:
Originally Posted by dcollins View Post
It depends. Even the worst opamp can drive 2k, some can drive 200 Ohms. 5k is a good starting point.

figure at this place in the chain, it is only ever going to see my converters. does that make a difference depending on the converter......or do they pretty much have the same resistance. thanks dave.


k
krytikal1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18th June 2009   #74
Gear addict
 
krytikal1's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Location: Portland, OR.
Posts: 442

Thread Starter
interesting. was that off of the website?

Quote:
Originally Posted by lucey View Post
George Cardas' cables are not my style, but he knows his solder ...


Solder

Q.) I'd like to know what makes Cardas solder better than all other solders for audio work. What advantage does Cardas solder have over other eutectic solders that makes it worth its much higher price? On the one hand, there is Jennifer of Jena Labs claiming that no other solder should ever be used, and on the other hand there are people in DIY chat rooms that say these exotic audiophile solders are a waste of money and no better than products like Kester. Thanks for your response. - Michael

A.) Hi Michael. The vast majority of solders in the world are slurries or mixtures such as 60/40 tin lead solder. They go through a slurry stage as they solidify wherein one component solidifies first and then another. The result is a solder connection rather than a joint. Eutectic solders such as Kesters Ultra pure Tin/lead Silver are in fact excellent because they solidify at a temperature lower than any of the component parts thus they form a solder joint rather than a connection - the key here is the eutectic formula which must be very precise - the solders are obviously different in that they set up with a mirror finish rather than a dull finish, the reason they do this is because they solidify as a unit. The week link in the solders is contamination - the molten solder easily dissolves other metals, this is no problem if you are soldering to a metal that is part of the eutectic mixture (such as tin or lead) you will get contiguous flow right in to the joint (easy to see) but if you solder to a dissimilar metal (such as copper or silver) you will see an obvious dulling at the connection where the eutectic formula fails and and the continuous joint becomes a connection. Cardas Quad Eutectic is tin, lead silver, copper, eutectic. The results are obvious. Most highend products use this solder and other cable manufactures have been using it for over a decade - to them it represents good sound and absolute reliability. - George


Quadeutectic

Q.) What is Quadeutectic solder? What percentage of each element does it contain; tin, silver, lead, copper?

A.) It is tin, lead, silver, copper eutectic. 61/35/3/1 is the approximate ratio. The key is a ratio that has several decimal points after each number. It is very precise in order to hit the "eutectic point". It took years to pinpoint. - George
krytikal1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18th June 2009   #75
Gear Guru
 
lucey's Avatar
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Location: Columbus, Ohio
Posts: 12,407

Verified Member
Yes, that's just lifted from the Cardas site.

Quote:
Originally Posted by dcollins View Post
I would steer well clear of any solder "designed" for audio.
That's a really dumb thing to suggest. The quad solder I mentioned is designed for audio. What on Earth is your beef?
lucey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18th June 2009   #76
Lives for gear
 
Paul Gold's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Location: Brooklyn
Posts: 1,009

Verified Member
Quote:
Originally Posted by krytikal1 View Post
what is the ideal impedance be for a potentiometer in that location?
The ideal impedance would be high enough for the source to drive cleanly and low enough so that the source impedance to the following device (A/D) isn't high enough to alter frequency response.

Generally a 1:10 source to load impedance is desired.

This means you have to do it carefully because only a really beefy amplifier will be able to drive a load 10x lower than the load impedance. Integrating passives into a modern voltage transfer system is tricky.
Paul Gold is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18th June 2009   #77
Gear maniac
 
zenmastering's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Location: Left Coast of Canada
Posts: 298

I used to notice resistor differences in high-gain tube guitar amp modifications. Because the metal film resistors have a low (~100V) max. applied voltage, I'd have to use small parallel/series networks for plate resistance. There were slightly different noise levels and 'tones' with different brands/designs, even within the world of metal-film. Of course, this is worlds away from the linearity that I think we're discussing here, but that's where I first noticed a difference.

Roderstein (quasi 'garden-variety') were readily available and worked well.

Graemme


Quote:
Originally Posted by Paul Gold View Post
I have observed over time that the fancy resistor crowd tends to claim superiority when working with tubes more often than solid state. I'm guessing that resistor differences are more pronounced in high impedance circuits. I of course have not done the leg work myself.
zenmastering is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 18th June 2009   #78
Mastering
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 3,099

Quote:
Originally Posted by Paul Gold View Post
Mouser started carrying AIM brand solder. Their silver solder is much less expensive than others. I was using 63/37 but ordered some. I like it. It flows better and is really shiny. The sound is marvelous. Everything is more fluid and shiny sounding.
Thanks for the tip on Mouser! I'm running out of Silver solder.

So, what kind of solder do you all use on Neutrik Gold?

BK
bob katz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18th June 2009   #79
Lives for gear
 
Paul Gold's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Location: Brooklyn
Posts: 1,009

Verified Member
I use the Nickel/Silver Neutrik. Most gear uses Nickel/Silver so it makes sense to use the same. On old gear I replace the connector if it's too tarnished.
Paul Gold is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24th June 2009   #80
Gear addict
 
phild's Avatar
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Location: Toronto
Posts: 441

Quote:
Originally Posted by Table Of Tone View Post
Try to get hold of a pair of Neuman R75's and hook them up to a 24 volt power supply.
These have half db steps for input and output gain and are really transparent.
They sound killer!

I believe George Marino uses these to hammer his ADC.
I've worked with George - could you elaborate a bit further on the R75? (I don't know what it is)
Is this a i/o line stage module for a Neumann SP75 console?

If he has one it's not visible
__________________
Phil Demetro
Lacquer Channel Mastering, Toronto
www.lacquerchannel.com/phil-demetro/
www.lacquerchannel.com/phil-demetro-blog/
phild is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24th June 2009   #81
Lives for gear
 
Paul Gold's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Location: Brooklyn
Posts: 1,009

Verified Member
Quote:
Originally Posted by phild View Post
Is this a i/o line stage module for a Neumann SP75 console?
Yes, the SP75 and SP79. It's the module with the zillion position switches that move to carbon? tracks at the bottom of the throw for smooth fades to silence. It's a seriously nice switch. The rest of the module, ehh... I replaced the LF356's with OPA134's which helped. Mine need calibration every month or so. The whole damn (SP75) console needs to be calibrated monthly. Even with a full rebuild.
Paul Gold is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24th June 2009   #82
Gear addict
 
phild's Avatar
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Location: Toronto
Posts: 441

Quote:
Originally Posted by Paul Gold View Post
Yes, the SP75 and SP79. It's the module with the zillion position switches that move to carbon? tracks at the bottom of the throw for smooth fades to silence. It's a seriously nice switch. The rest of the module, ehh... I replaced the LF356's with OPA134's which helped. Mine need calibration every month or so. The whole damn (SP75) console needs to be calibrated monthly. Even with a full rebuild.
Paul Gold.... Mastering Engineer. My kinda guy.

Does anyone have a *nice* picture of this thing?

I'm pretty sure GM isn't using one since moving to the Chelsea location.
phild is offline   Reply With Quote
New Reply New Reply Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook  Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter  Submit Thread to LinkedIn LinkedIn 



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Similar Threads
Thread Thread starter Forum Replies Last Post
The most transparent Limiter (at 1db gain reduction) danielbest Music computers 28 16th June 2009 03:54 PM
Cubase - Input Gain + gain setting? dickiefunk Low End Theory 14 19th May 2009 01:52 AM
Looking for 15db of 'transparent' line gain khai So much gear, so little time! 10 13th February 2009 07:25 PM
Best transparent ITB plugin to boost gain with? Rukas Rap + Hip Hop engineering & production 6 28th June 2008 05:48 AM
Most transparent DI on the thru z_man_barzel High end 11 14th July 2005 04:37 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:36 AM.

Home - Search Forum - Contact Us - Terms Of Use - Advertise on Gearslutz - All Advertisers - Archive - Top
 
 
Powered by vBulletin®
Gearslutz.com LTD - UK Company Number 7597610.
Registered Office - 35 Ballards Lane, London, N3 1XW.
Hosted by Nimbus Hosting.

SEO by vBSEO ©2010, Crawlability, Inc.