output ceiling and sample rate conversion - Gearslutz.com

Gearslutz.com

All Advertisers
Go Back   Gearslutz.com > The Forums > Mastering forum


output ceiling and sample rate conversion

New Reply New Reply Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 25th March 2009   #1
Gear interested
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 29

Thread Starter
output ceiling and sample rate conversion

Hello everyone,

I used to bounce my masters into Pro Tools and making all down conversion during the bounce.
Knowing I could get better sample rate conversion than Digidesign's, I'm testing Sample Manager.

Here's my issue: I have a brickwall limiter at the end of my chain seted at -0.3dBFs. I bounce without conversion meaning in this case, 24_88,2
Then I load the bounce into Sample Manager and get down to 44.1
At this stage already my master clips. It announces maximum volume at+0.2. That is 0.5 dB higher than my brickwall settings.

Is it normal ?? Should I bounce with more marge ? Should I brickwall limit after sample rate conversion and for example use L2 with dither ?

How do you guys do this please ? Thanks.

Swell
Swell is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25th March 2009   #2
Lives for gear
 
Alexey Lukin's Avatar
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 640

Verified Member
Increase in peak levels during SRC is normal. You should either leave more margin or render to 32-bit float format and apply peak limiter at the target sampling rate.
Alexey Lukin is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 25th March 2009   #3
Lives for gear
 
wado1942's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Location: Boise, Idaho
Posts: 2,088

Pro Tools won't do floating point as far as I know. However, you can save the limiter till the last stage and have an increase in aliasing or you can set the ceiling of the limiter lower.
wado1942 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26th March 2009   #4
Lives for gear
 
dave-G's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Location: Florida
Posts: 2,486

Verified Member
Send a message via AIM to dave-G Send a message via Skype™ to dave-G
I'm not sure if there's any SRC besides the one in Peak 6 that ends up as 'gain neutral', preventing or limiting clipping in the process (is there?). It's a slow one, but it's a good SRC anyway, and that's a very handy feature.

I was told that iZotope was considering adding a similar feature for offline processing, and that if not, Audiofile Engineering may consider adding the feature themselves in some form to Sample Manager and Wave Editor (both of which use the iZotope SRC).

-dave
__________________
DAVE GREENBERG
SONOPOD MASTERING

dave-G is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26th March 2009   #5
Lives for gear
 
Greg Reierson's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Location: Minneapolis
Posts: 1,209

Verified Member
Quote:
Originally Posted by Alexey Lukin View Post
Increase in peak levels during SRC is normal. You should either leave more margin or render to 32-bit float format and apply peak limiter at the target sampling rate.
That's the way I do it. Do 95% of your limiting at the higher rate, then SRC, then a final safety limiter to catch last few tenths.


GR
__________________
Greg Reierson
www.RareFormMastering.com
Greg Reierson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26th March 2009   #6
Gear interested
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 29

Thread Starter
Greg, Dave, Wado, Alexey,

Thank you for your advise. I find in Greg's "way" an interesting aspect:
limiting "artistically" at a rate not making the music suffer, then re-importing the 44.1kHz file and with a last limiter getting it louder if the client request it...
Anyone having a similar method ?

About Sample Manager and Barbabatch...any preferences ?? I like the fact that
Sample manager is powered by Izotop. There dither seems more relyable than Barbabatch's.

Thank for the exhange !

Swell
Swell is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26th March 2009   #7
Lives for gear
 
Table Of Tone's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Location: London, UK
Posts: 1,574

Verified Member
You will probably find that down sampling a pair of 24 bit, left and right mono files, will raise the ceiling much less.
You can do this after the limiter but before the dither.
Check it out but I think you will only see a raise of 0.1db, if you do the above on most of the better sample rate converters.
You can then go ahead and dither you audio to 16 bit, at the same time bringing your DAW output down 0.1db (before the dither!)

The results will sound closer to using two puters, one for playback (88.2k/24 bit) and one for capture (44.1k/16 bit), dithering to 16 bit on the AD converter that you are using for capture after the outboard.

Hope this helps
Give it a go
Table Of Tone is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26th March 2009   #8
Gear maniac
 
Jenz's Avatar
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Location: Örebro
Posts: 190

I usually set the output to -0.2dB before SRC, and i've never heard a problem, even if it does indicate clipping at some point. If you re-visit your master it's a pain to first limit safely, then SRC, and then limit again. At least if the SRC is offline, and the rest in real time.
Jenz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26th March 2009   #9
Lives for gear
 
Lagerfeldt's Avatar
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Location: Copenhagen, Denmark
Posts: 4,770

Verified Member
Quote:
Originally Posted by Table Of Tone View Post
You will probably find that down sampling a pair of 24 bit, left and right mono files, will raise the ceiling much less.
Be careful doing that. I've seen and heard problems when SRC'ing split mono files as opposed to SRC'ing an interleaved file.

I even did some testing and came to the conclusion that it's safer not to SRC on split files.
__________________


Professional geek


Online Mastering


-
At the moment: Mastering Christopher (EMI) · Mixing Michalis (Universal)
Lagerfeldt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26th March 2009   #10
Gear interested
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 29

Thread Starter
Then if you find dangerous to SRC split files, would you trust Pro Tools doing the interleaved bounce ? I'm mean letting PT boncing and converting the split files into interleaved ?

Thanks !

Swell
Swell is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27th March 2009   #11
Lives for gear
 
Table Of Tone's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Location: London, UK
Posts: 1,574

Verified Member
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lagerfeldt View Post
Be careful doing that. I've seen and heard problems when SRC'ing split mono files as opposed to SRC'ing an interleaved file.

I even did some testing and came to the conclusion that it's safer not to SRC on split files.
What happened?
Did you get phasing issues?
What SRC and what DAW did you use?

If I master on only one puter and the playback is digital and upwards of 48k, I'll use soundblade in a zinman loop to capture (still at 24 bit and at the original SR) after the outboard.
This will make a realtime capture of split audio in it's own folder.
I'll then use soundblade's SRC to down sample those two wav's to 44.1k. (Off line)
Then I'll export it, bringing down the EDL desk a further 0.1db before the dither to 16. (Off line also)

I've never had an issue with regards to sound and I never get overs doing that. (on that setup anyway)

Cheers
Ade
Table Of Tone is offline   Reply With Quote
New Reply New Reply Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook  Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter  Submit Thread to LinkedIn LinkedIn 



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Similar Threads
Thread Thread starter Forum Replies Last Post
Sample Rate Conversion Glenn Bucci Music computers 3 19th February 2009 08:43 PM
Sample Rate Conversion Mike Brown The Moan Zone 1 31st March 2008 05:19 PM
96-44.1 sample rate conversion AlphaDingo High end 12 1st May 2005 01:18 AM
SAMPLE RATE CONVERSION bellehard High end 9 27th October 2004 09:22 AM
SAMPLE RATE CONVERSION bellehard Music computers 0 25th October 2004 03:54 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:29 AM.

Home - Search Forum - Contact Us - Terms Of Use - Advertise on Gearslutz - All Advertisers - Archive - Top
 
 
Powered by vBulletin®
Gearslutz.com LTD - UK Company Number 7597610.
Registered Office - 35 Ballards Lane, London, N3 1XW.
Hosted by Nimbus Hosting.

SEO by vBSEO ©2010, Crawlability, Inc.