![]() | All Advertisers |
| Member Services Directory | Classifieds | Reviews | Jobs | Deal Zone | Merchandise | Marketplace | Facebook App | Books, DVDs & Gadgets | Video Vault | Tips & Techniques |
| |||||||
New Reply | Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| | #1 |
| Gear interested Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 29
Thread Starter | output ceiling and sample rate conversion
Hello everyone, I used to bounce my masters into Pro Tools and making all down conversion during the bounce. Knowing I could get better sample rate conversion than Digidesign's, I'm testing Sample Manager. Here's my issue: I have a brickwall limiter at the end of my chain seted at -0.3dBFs. I bounce without conversion meaning in this case, 24_88,2 Then I load the bounce into Sample Manager and get down to 44.1 At this stage already my master clips. It announces maximum volume at+0.2. That is 0.5 dB higher than my brickwall settings. Is it normal ?? Should I bounce with more marge ? Should I brickwall limit after sample rate conversion and for example use L2 with dither ? How do you guys do this please ? Thanks. Swell |
| | |
| | #2 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 640
Verified Member |
Increase in peak levels during SRC is normal. You should either leave more margin or render to 32-bit float format and apply peak limiter at the target sampling rate.
|
| | |
| | #3 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Jan 2009 Location: Boise, Idaho
Posts: 2,088
|
Pro Tools won't do floating point as far as I know. However, you can save the limiter till the last stage and have an increase in aliasing or you can set the ceiling of the limiter lower.
|
| | |
| | #4 |
| Lives for gear |
I'm not sure if there's any SRC besides the one in Peak 6 that ends up as 'gain neutral', preventing or limiting clipping in the process (is there?). It's a slow one, but it's a good SRC anyway, and that's a very handy feature. I was told that iZotope was considering adding a similar feature for offline processing, and that if not, Audiofile Engineering may consider adding the feature themselves in some form to Sample Manager and Wave Editor (both of which use the iZotope SRC). -dave |
| | |
| | #5 | |
| Lives for gear Joined: Jan 2007 Location: Minneapolis
Posts: 1,209
Verified Member | Quote:
GR | |
| | |
| | #6 |
| Gear interested Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 29
Thread Starter |
Greg, Dave, Wado, Alexey, Thank you for your advise. I find in Greg's "way" an interesting aspect: limiting "artistically" at a rate not making the music suffer, then re-importing the 44.1kHz file and with a last limiter getting it louder if the client request it... Anyone having a similar method ? About Sample Manager and Barbabatch...any preferences ?? I like the fact that Sample manager is powered by Izotop. There dither seems more relyable than Barbabatch's. Thank for the exhange ! Swell |
| | |
| | #7 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Mar 2009 Location: London, UK
Posts: 1,574
Verified Member |
You will probably find that down sampling a pair of 24 bit, left and right mono files, will raise the ceiling much less. You can do this after the limiter but before the dither. Check it out but I think you will only see a raise of 0.1db, if you do the above on most of the better sample rate converters. You can then go ahead and dither you audio to 16 bit, at the same time bringing your DAW output down 0.1db (before the dither!) The results will sound closer to using two puters, one for playback (88.2k/24 bit) and one for capture (44.1k/16 bit), dithering to 16 bit on the AD converter that you are using for capture after the outboard. Hope this helps Give it a go |
| | |
| | #8 |
| Gear maniac Joined: Nov 2006 Location: Örebro
Posts: 190
|
I usually set the output to -0.2dB before SRC, and i've never heard a problem, even if it does indicate clipping at some point. If you re-visit your master it's a pain to first limit safely, then SRC, and then limit again. At least if the SRC is offline, and the rest in real time.
|
| | |
| | #9 | |
| Lives for gear Joined: Sep 2004 Location: Copenhagen, Denmark
Posts: 4,770
Verified Member | Quote:
I even did some testing and came to the conclusion that it's safer not to SRC on split files.
__________________ Professional geek Online Mastering - At the moment: Mastering Christopher (EMI) · Mixing Michalis (Universal) | |
| | |
| | #10 |
| Gear interested Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 29
Thread Starter |
Then if you find dangerous to SRC split files, would you trust Pro Tools doing the interleaved bounce ? I'm mean letting PT boncing and converting the split files into interleaved ? Thanks ! Swell |
| | |
| | #11 | |
| Lives for gear Joined: Mar 2009 Location: London, UK
Posts: 1,574
Verified Member | Quote:
Did you get phasing issues? What SRC and what DAW did you use? If I master on only one puter and the playback is digital and upwards of 48k, I'll use soundblade in a zinman loop to capture (still at 24 bit and at the original SR) after the outboard. This will make a realtime capture of split audio in it's own folder. I'll then use soundblade's SRC to down sample those two wav's to 44.1k. (Off line) Then I'll export it, bringing down the EDL desk a further 0.1db before the dither to 16. (Off line also) I've never had an issue with regards to sound and I never get overs doing that. (on that setup anyway) Cheers Ade | |
| | |
New Reply
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Sample Rate Conversion | Glenn Bucci | Music computers | 3 | 19th February 2009 08:43 PM |
| Sample Rate Conversion | Mike Brown | The Moan Zone | 1 | 31st March 2008 05:19 PM |
| 96-44.1 sample rate conversion | AlphaDingo | High end | 12 | 1st May 2005 01:18 AM |
| SAMPLE RATE CONVERSION | bellehard | High end | 9 | 27th October 2004 09:22 AM |
| SAMPLE RATE CONVERSION | bellehard | Music computers | 0 | 25th October 2004 03:54 PM |
| |