LFE calibration? - Gearslutz.com Gearslutz.com
 


All Advertisers
Go Back   Gearslutz.com > The Forums > Mastering forum

LFE calibration?
New Reply New Reply Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 25th February 2009   #1
Gear nut
 
teacue's Avatar
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Location: Germany
Posts: 106

Thread Starter
LFE calibration?

Due to new DA converter I had to calibrate my 5.1 setup again.
During the process, and following Bob Katz book, I am suddenly not completely sure that I am doing it right for the LFE!

As I only have a cheap Sound Level Meter, according to Bobs explanations, I use a band limited 500 Hz to 2 KHz pinknoise signal, calibrated to -20 dB FS, to read 83 dB SPL for each Monitor Box (L, R, C, sL, sR)

But for the LFE, I use a 40-80 Hz Pink Noise signal, calibrated to -20 dBFS, to read 93 dB SPL.

I choose 93 dB SPL for the LFE instead of 83 dB SPL because Bob Katz writes:
"To meet the RP 200 standard, the individual RTA bands for the LFE channel only should read 10 dB higher than the 1 kHz band. That is 78 dB SPL if the 1 KHz band is at 68 with -20 dBRS RMS pink noise. Solo the LFE output and adjust the level of the LFE channel trim until the 50 or 63 Hz band reads 78 dB."

So I thought using a SPL meter method the LFE level should read 10 dB more than the other channels.

Is it correct?

Best regards
teacue is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 25th February 2009   #2
Gear maniac
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Location: Boulder, CO
Posts: 188

Quote:
Originally Posted by teacue View Post
Due to new DA converter I had to calibrate my 5.1 setup again.
During the process, and following Bob Katz book, I am suddenly not completely sure that I am doing it right for the LFE!
You should check out the NARAS surround guidelines. Available on the Grammy.com website, it has detailed instructions for setting up surround monitoring, including the LFE.
__________________
David Glasser
Airshow Mastering
Boulder, CO

Mastering for CD, DVD, and SACD

http://www.airshowmastering.com
glassmaster is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 26th February 2009   #3
Gear nut
 
teacue's Avatar
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Location: Germany
Posts: 106

Thread Starter
Thanks a lot glassmaster for your informations.

I have read attentively (or tried to) the part about LFE calibration in "Recommendations For Surround Sounds Productions" but I am not able to understand following informations:
Quote:
Route band-limited pink noise (low-pass filtered at 80 – 120Hz) at -10 vu via the LFE channel bus to the subwoofer. (The 10dB of attenuation compensates for approximately 10dB of “in-band gain” in the LFE channel as compared with a main channel.)
In particular the "in-band gain" concept is too difficult for me to understand.
So i am not really able to follow the instructions provided on this paper.

I finally then came back to Digido site,and tried to follow the advice from this article:
Subwoofers
and I followed in particular this statement:
Quote:
The subwoofer's settings are exactly correct when its amplitude is identical to the satellite's at the crossover frequency.
I have downloaded the mentioned Subwoofer Test tones .
I choosed the 80 Hz tone test, convert it to mono (it means paste one side of the stereo tone to a mono wave)
I send this tone to the LFE paying attention that it reads -20 dB FS on the level meter of my DAW.

80 Hz being the cross frequency of my Sub, I adjusted the level of the Sub so that the 80 HZ tone reads 83 dB SPL on the SPL meter.

I hope this is right.

Now, as I also have to create music for a theater that has a Stereo (2.1) PA with a higher cross frequency for the Subwoofer, I tried the 100 Hz Test tone, set the cross frequency at 100 Hz and did the same procedure as above.
The result is that I had to set the level of the LFE much higher.
Is it right?
In fact the cross frequency of the PA system is 140 Hz.

Maybe I should precise that I use the LFE "only" for Bass Management as well for 5.1 as for Stereo mix and never put any informations on the LFE when creating a surround mix.

Best regards
teacue is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 26th February 2009   #4
Motown legend
 
Bob Olhsson's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Location: Songwriter Gulch, Nashville TN
Posts: 12,074

Verified Member
Quote:
Originally Posted by teacue View Post
Maybe I should precise that I use the LFE "only" for Bass Management as well for 5.1 as for Stereo mix and never put any informations on the LFE when creating a surround mix.
Bass management is a real bad idea for mixing because of exact kinds of translation problems you experienced. What you can do is to use a sub placed right next to each monitor to extend its range.

Ideally, you want to mix to stems and then set up the final balance right in the theater with it half-full of people.
Bob Olhsson is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 26th February 2009   #5
Mastering
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 3,099

Quote:
Originally Posted by teacue View Post
Due to new DA converter I had to calibrate my 5.1 setup again.
During the process, and following Bob Katz book, I am suddenly not completely sure that I am doing it right for the LFE!

As I only have a cheap Sound Level Meter, according to Bobs explanations, I use a band limited 500 Hz to 2 KHz pinknoise signal, calibrated to -20 dB FS, to read 83 dB SPL for each Monitor Box (L, R, C, sL, sR)

But for the LFE, I use a 40-80 Hz Pink Noise signal, calibrated to -20 dBFS, to read 93 dB SPL.

I choose 93 dB SPL for the LFE instead of 83 dB SPL because Bob Katz writes:
"To meet the RP 200 standard, the individual RTA bands for the LFE channel only should read 10 dB higher than the 1 kHz band. That is 78 dB SPL if the 1 KHz band is at 68 with -20 dBRS RMS pink noise. Solo the LFE output and adjust the level of the LFE channel trim until the 50 or 63 Hz band reads 78 dB."

So I thought using a SPL meter method the LFE level should read 10 dB more than the other channels.

Is it correct?

Best regards
You've probably arrived at the most accurate LFE for your testing method. The only way to improve on that is to actually do octave band analysis and in the range covered by the subwoofer, to see that each octave is 10 dB more than the 500 to 1 kHz band. To be safe, perhaps that should be the 40 Hz band since you're probably filtering the LFE circa 80 Hz.

Hope this helps,


Bob
__________________
Bob Katz DIGITAL DOMAIN http://www.digido.com
"There are two kinds of fools. One says-this is old and therefore good. The other says-this is new and therefore better."

No trees were killed in the sending of this message. However a large number of electrons were terribly inconvenienced.
bob katz is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 28th February 2009   #6
Gear nut
 
teacue's Avatar
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Location: Germany
Posts: 106

Thread Starter
Quote:
Originally Posted by bob katz
You've probably arrived at the most accurate LFE for your testing method. The only way to improve on that is to actually do octave band analysis and in the range covered by the subwoofer, to see that each octave is 10 dB more than the 500 to 1 kHz band. To be safe, perhaps that should be the 40 Hz band since you're probably filtering the LFE circa 80 Hz.

Hope this helps,

Bob
Thanks a lot for your help.
As you seem to approve it, I came back then to the first method I described.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bob Olhsson
Bass management is a real bad idea for mixing because of exact kinds of translation problems you experienced. What you can do is to use a sub placed right next to each monitor to extend its range.

Ideally, you want to mix to stems and then set up the final balance right in the theater with it half-full of people.

Thanks for your suggestions.

I have only one sub in my studio and there is only one sub in the theater too.
I always thought mixing with bass management would be a good simulation of the theater PA.
At least since I do this, I get much better results as before.

Indeed, mixing or halb mixing in the theater would be an ideal solution.
Though a little bit difficult for me to realise with the half-full theater.
I will think about this idea.
In fact the situation is a bit more difficult as the music I produce is for playback for live singing during Musicals performance.
But I am already glad when at least the playback does translate well.

Best regards
teacue is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 28th February 2009   #7
Mastering
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 3,099

After Bob Olhsson pointed out that bass management is not such a good idea, teacue replied:

Quote:
Originally Posted by teacue View Post
Thanks a lot for your help.
As you seem to approve it, I came back then to the first method I described.




Thanks for your suggestions.

I have only one sub in my studio and there is only one sub in the theater too.
I always thought mixing with bass management would be a good simulation of the theater PA.
At least since I do this, I get much better results as before.

Indeed, mixing or halb mixing in the theater would be an ideal solution.
Though a little bit difficult for me to realise with the half-full theater.
I will think about this idea.
In fact the situation is a bit more difficult as the music I produce is for playback for live singing during Musicals performance.
But I am already glad when at least the playback does translate well.

Best regards
In a discussion group such as this, discussing this entire issue thoroughly without taking things out of context and getting them wrong is very hard.

I'm certain that with the proper context, Bob Olhsson's comment would be more clear.

Let me summarize, with the caveat that a thorough study of the subject goes far beyond this summary:

The title of this thread is LFE, and yet it has drifted into bass management pe se. Managing LFE as a channel and managing subwoofer(s) to extend the frequency response of the mains are part of a larger subject but must be distinguished carefully.

The two subjects to keep separate are:

1) extension of the mains to yield flat frequency response by adding one or more subwoofers
2) proper setup of the LFE channel

Both of these subjects are the provenance of a bass manager, but they have entirely different alignments and purposes!

I am guessing that Bob Olhsson was cautioning against using bass management in a professional monitoring system to a single subwoofer to extend the response of the mains. Bob will correct me if I'm wrong about what he meant. I agree that caution is required as to my experience and seeing one other surround house that implemented bass extension to a single subwoofer resulted in very bad translation. But once the crossover points were more carefully adjusted (crossing over to the mono sub at the lowest possible frequency that still gives flat total response) that other production house yielded good translation to other venues.

It's easier to NOT screw up a two subwoofer-based extension of the mains than a single subwoofer. Plus, my cautions in a related thread about using a 2.1 system for mastering, at least you know my position on the subject.

a) Let's briefly talk about the bass extension aspects:

All full range speaker systems are also "bass managed" in the primitive sense that bass management is just a crossover. Where this diverges depends on how accurately you set up your bass manager to emulate a discrete full-range system. For example, if you are competent and knowledgeable, you can add two subwoofers to a stereo system to create a full-range stereo system that sounds totally integrated and as holitistic as a full-range system. This requires great skill and practice to achieve. I've heard more "disconnected-sounding" subwoofers than well-integrated ones, so caution is advised on that point. Then when you decide to compromise further by extending the stereo system to a single subwoofer, the choice of crossover points becomes even more critical, the placement of the single sub even more critical, and your chances of getting it to professional level even more dim, especially without the aid of a high-end acoustical consultant. And if what you seek is translation without compromise, a casually-set up, single-sub-bass-managed system is not a wise decision.

As a secondary system set up in a different room to see how it might translate, I highly recommend it, however.

b) The LFE. The LFE channel in all surround systems but SACD is designed to produce 10 dB more level with the calibration signal than the main channel (within the LFE bandwidth---where people go wrong is to use full range pink noise and then try to adjust their LFE to produce +10 dB... this is entirely wrong. The one place not to skimp is in adjusting LFE. Use a spectrum analyzer. Also confirm when doing surround productions that the signal you feed to the LFE is band limited below, say, 80Hz). If you keep your LFE separate and use it strictly as an effects channel with its own source and NOT CORRELATED WITH THE BASS INFORMATION OF THE MAIN CHANNELS, and NOT TO SUPPLEMENT THE BASS OF THE MAINS, then the LFE setup and adjustment is far less critical. Where you start to get into trouble is if you reproduce or produce a surround recording where you decide to, for example, supplement the extension of the bass drum by "putting a little energy in the LFE". Then the alignment, bandwidth and accuracy of your LFE channel and sub become far more critical. This practice can only be justified in cases where extreme required bass energy would cause the regular channel to clip. LFE was designed to permit increased headroom, but the number of times in regular music mixing where that increased headroom is really needed are quite slim. In film production, though, I must tell you that my two subs, which reproduce the LFE together (for even more headroom!) rocks on those explosions!

Bob Ludwig uses an entirely separate subwoofer dedicated to LFE so he can see exactly how it is affecting his results. But even he could conceivably run into trouble in those dangerous cases where people have used the LFE channel to extend the power of the mains. He probably had to place his dedicated LFE woofer and phase it with the others so that he could judge the extension when it was being used for that. In music, a more proper (if "proper" is even applicable here) way to "extend" the headroom would be to route an entirely supplementary signal to the LFE channel that is one that is not fed to the mains at all, so you don't get into any phasing or alignment issues.... like a synth bass, for example, to supplement an upright or electric bass, and recognize that only people who have LFE connected will hear that synth bass. That could be "really cool"... and takes advantage of the LFE channel's increased headroom.

Bottom line: Your mileage may vary, your knowlege is required.

I still have a lot to learn on this subject and I'm not pretending I know it all. The more I learn, the bigger the mistakes that I end up making! Because I seem to already have made and learned from most of the smaller ones :-).
bob katz is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 28th February 2009   #8
Motown legend
 
Bob Olhsson's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Location: Songwriter Gulch, Nashville TN
Posts: 12,074

Verified Member
The problem is that system to system translation between mono "bass managed" systems is about zip whereas material mixed using separate full range speakers has been found to translate reasonably well to both full range and mono 'bass-managed" reproduction.

As Bob said, LFE is a completely different issue and requires a separate speaker for mixing or mastering.
Bob Olhsson is offline  
Reply With Quote
New Reply New Reply Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook  Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter  Submit Thread to LinkedIn LinkedIn 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Similar Threads
Thread Thread starter Forum Replies Last Post
Calibration help John The Cut So much gear, so little time! 7 28th July 2009 12:04 AM
DVD-Audio and LFE-Level julian.david Mastering forum 12 30th March 2008 09:21 AM
Filtering Lfe on the print Dunebuggy Post Production forum! 0 4th June 2007 09:50 PM
calibration tomwehrle High end 3 25th February 2006 02:01 AM
Calibration Q? maks So much gear, so little time! 0 4th February 2004 05:43 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:47 PM.

Home - Search Forum - Contact Us - Terms Of Use / Privacy Policy - Advertise on Gearslutz - All Advertisers - Top
 
 
Powered by vBulletin®
Gearslutz.com LTD - UK Company Number 7597610.
Registered Office - 35 Ballards Lane, London, N3 1XW.
Hosted by Nimbus Hosting.

By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies.

SEO by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.