Warming plugins - Page 2 - Gearslutz.com

Gearslutz.com

All Advertisers
Go Back   Gearslutz.com > The Forums > Mastering forum


Warming plugins

New Reply New Reply Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 14th January 2009   #31
Motown legend
 
Bob Olhsson's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Location: Songwriter Gulch, Nashville TN
Posts: 10,877

Verified Member
Quote:
Originally Posted by Alécio Costa View Post
Yes, in some specific material I was able to listen to this somewhat edginess.
So, it is worth upsampling all the 44k 24 files here to 96k 24 or 88.2k 24 and later do the BTD, right?
It depends on the quality of the upsampling and how much a particular device benefits. There's no getting away from listening to your particular tools to make such decisions.

Theory is great but real world tools can be broken and not perform according to theory.
Bob Olhsson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14th January 2009   #32
Banned
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Location: Toronto
Posts: 1,678

A great plug warmer is the URS Classic Console Strip Pro...not really intended as a warming plug...but...if used right, is the best warmer I've ever heard...more so than the URS Saturation plug...which is great.

Nick
nickynicknick is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14th January 2009   #33
Lives for gear
 
heathen's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 1,525

I dunno I don't think there is one. I think nearly all of them I've heard sound better when switched off.

I find I get more warmth, depth punch, (insert other descriptions here) and joy from my old neumann or telefunken eq's in 5 seconds than any "warming plug" on the market and that's before I even switch in any comps/limiters.
heathen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14th January 2009   #34
Banned
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Location: Toronto
Posts: 1,678

Quote:
Originally Posted by heathen View Post
I dunno I don't think there is one. I think nearly all of them I've heard sound better when switched off.

I find I get more warmth, depth punch, (insert other descriptions here) and joy from my old neumann or telefunken eq's in 5 seconds than any "warming plug" on the market and that's before I even switch in any comps/limiters.
well of course they are warm...dudes asking what the best plug is...is your answer "my vintage telefunken eq's plug ( in bypass)"?????


nickynicknick is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14th January 2009   #35
Lives for gear
 
KEYBEEETSSS's Avatar
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Location: Memphis, TN
Posts: 2,044

Send a message via AIM to KEYBEEETSSS Send a message via Yahoo to KEYBEEETSSS Send a message via Skype™ to KEYBEEETSSS
Quote:
Originally Posted by Alécio Costa View Post
The Process section of the Hedd192 is unbeatable, but it is hardware.
Plug-ins:
1) Crane Phoenix
2) PSP Vintage Warmer II, Saturator II
3) Mc DSP AC1, AC2

Since he did state Plugs, I favor #2 & 3, less the Vintage Warmer which I use to like until I tried the MixSaturator...Tapehead works on certain things as well...
__________________
LAUTEN MICS & ME
MYSPACE ON'EIM
KEYBEEETSSS...."u HeaR dAt"......
"IS TAMARA HOME?"
KEYBEEETSSS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14th January 2009   #36
Mastering Engineer
 
Adam Dempsey's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Location: Melbourne - Australia's music capital.
Posts: 1,722

Verified Member
Quote:
Originally Posted by nickynicknick View Post
well of course they are warm...dudes asking what the best plug is...is your answer "my vintage telefunken eq's plug ( in bypass)"?????


Um, see also here, here, here and here.

But yes, preventing things from going "cold" in the first place, via good headroom A-D & dsp, has always tended to work, in my experience.

I've also used to good effect a (very subtly mixed in) soft knee comp plug in, in parallel with hi shelf cut EQ on the returns, somewhat similarly to the TC MD4 as mentioned by Bob K.
__________________
Adam
Jack the Bear's Deluxe Mastering
facebook | twitter | myspace
Is adding presence the same as subtracting absence?
Adam Dempsey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14th January 2009   #37
Mastering
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 3,099

Quote:
Originally Posted by Alécio Costa View Post
Yes, in some specific material I was able to listen to this somewhat edginess.
So, it is worth upsampling all the 44k 24 files here to 96k 24 or 88.2k 24 and later do the BTD, right?

Thanks

Probably. If you are going to do any digital non-linear processes, especially distortion generators (warmers) or the warmth will be accompanied by harshness, sort of defeats the purpose, doesn't it?

Around here we routinely upsample anything that is not already at 88.2 or 96K and then don't think twice about it. The biggest hit (loss) is the downsampling, not the up.

Some exceptions have been purist classical music projects already recorded at 44.1K and which are not going to undergo any compression. There I would feel the losses of upsampling outweigh any so-called advantages.

BK
__________________
Bob Katz DIGITAL DOMAIN http://www.digido.com
"There are two kinds of fools. One says-this is old and therefore good. The other says-this is new and therefore better."

No trees were killed in the sending of this message. However a large number of electrons were terribly inconvenienced.
bob katz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14th January 2009   #38
Gear addict
 
markus enochson's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Location: stockholm, sweden
Posts: 497

as far as plugs are concerned (non hardware)

Crane Song Phoenix

best plug out there in my opinion.

markus
__________________
it doesn't matter what knobs you have - its how you use them - almost...

"After silence, that which comes nearest to expressing the inexpressible is music." - Aldous Huxley, 1931
markus enochson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14th January 2009   #39
kjg
Lives for gear
 
Joined: May 2008
Location: Amsterdam, NL
Posts: 937

Quote:
Originally Posted by bob katz View Post

Around here we routinely upsample anything that is not already at 88.2 or 96K and then don't think twice about it.
BK
Hi Bob,

Do you still use the Weiss hardware SRC? Any other suggestions for asynchronous SRC these days? Or is the Weiss really the only one that can do it with high enough quality?

regards,
Klaas-Jan
kjg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14th January 2009   #40
Lives for gear
 
skiltrip's Avatar
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Location: New York
Posts: 2,425

I use Massey Tape-Head for this. Super economical and it's just awesome. Always put it on snare, and often on piano, guitars.
__________________
2011 MacBook Pro i7 (2.0GHz Quad, 8GB RAM) | Studio One Pro 2.0.5 (64bit) | Pro Tools 9.0.6 | ProFire 610
skiltrip is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14th January 2009   #41
Mastering
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 3,099

Quote:
Originally Posted by kjg View Post
Hi Bob,

Do you still use the Weiss hardware SRC? Any other suggestions for asynchronous SRC these days? Or is the Weiss really the only one that can do it with high enough quality?

regards,
Klaas-Jan
I think it was in another thread on upsampling that we discussed the contenders. I still believe the Weiss Saracon is marginally the best SRC on the market, certainly the fastest! Look in the other thread for the other contenders. The Saracon is based on the identical algorithms used in the hardware unit, but it is one generation better. It is marginally higher resolution than the hardware unit in a careful shootout, but so subtly that I don't feel guilty about using my SRC-2 (hardware) for my downsampling chores and the Saracon for the upsampling. In the most purist project I audition through the SFC-2 so I can hear the 44.1K and dither it to 16 and make my dithering choices---in real time. Then afterward I take a 96K capture and pass it through Saracon. Overkill, really.

BK
bob katz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14th January 2009   #42
Mastering
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 3,099

Quote:
Originally Posted by bob katz View Post
I think it was in another thread on upsampling that we discussed the contenders. I still believe the Weiss Saracon is marginally the best SRC on the market, certainly the fastest! Look in the other thread for the other contenders. The Saracon is based on the identical algorithms used in the hardware unit, but it is one generation better. It is marginally higher resolution than the hardware unit in a careful shootout, but so subtly that I don't feel guilty about using my SRC-2 (hardware) for my downsampling chores and the Saracon for the upsampling. In the most purist project I audition through the SFC-2 so I can hear the 44.1K and dither it to 16 and make my dithering choices---in real time. Then afterward I take a 96K capture and pass it through Saracon. Overkill, really.

BK

As for asynchronous SRC, I believe the Crystal 8420 chip does the nicest job of all the three major hardware ASRC contenders. The Crystal chip is very transparent, and someday I'll shoot it out against Saracon. I blew up a test board I was building with the Crystal chip, so it will have to wait.

BK
bob katz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15th January 2009   #43
kjg
Lives for gear
 
Joined: May 2008
Location: Amsterdam, NL
Posts: 937

Quote:
Originally Posted by bob katz View Post
As for asynchronous SRC, I believe the Crystal 8420 chip does the nicest job of all the three major hardware ASRC contenders. The Crystal chip is very transparent, and someday I'll shoot it out against Saracon. I blew up a test board I was building with the Crystal chip, so it will have to wait.

BK
Thank you, Bob
kjg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15th January 2009   #44
Lives for gear
 
heathen's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 1,525

Quote:
Originally Posted by nickynicknick View Post
well of course they are warm...dudes asking what the best plug is...is your answer "my vintage telefunken eq's plug ( in bypass)"?????


I actually said I don't like any of them I've heard. I've tried quite a few and spent hours screwing with them for no joy what so ever. Some of these old eq's can be bought for less than a plugin bundle and sound 10X better. To me urs plugs are some of the worst sounding plugs on the market.

I'll still use plugs occasionally but usually during or after some type of analog processing.

Also alot of people think distortion plugs or some type of tube emulated limiting plugs are what they think they need when usually some very nice eq will give more warmth and tone than any of these others in a quarter of the time.

Last album I mixed the producer sent out a couple of the tracks for purely digital mastering on the recommendation of a well respected producer/engineer he knows, the test masters sounded terrible, I could have done it better. So he went with an ME who uses nearly all analog gear in one of the best listening environments available and we were totally blown away by the end result, could not have been better I believe.
heathen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16th January 2009   #45
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Location: NYC
Posts: 1,171

Quote:
Originally Posted by macc View Post
Voxengo VariSaturator
Do you feel that VV gets a tad flappy when you drive the low into the red? And do you generally bypass the digital stage? I find I like the valve stage much better, but I like to push the general drive and keep the Low and High band gain at a reasonable level. Also it really sounds WAY better at 8x ovrsmpl. The tube preset is a good starting point.
smoke is offline   Reply With Quote
New Reply New Reply Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook  Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter  Submit Thread to LinkedIn LinkedIn 



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Similar Threads
Thread Thread starter Forum Replies Last Post
Tape emulation and tube warming plugins. potex So much gear, so little time! 6 5th April 2006 09:34 PM
Warming up your signals fishman So much gear, so little time! 6 12th January 2005 02:57 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:22 AM.

Home - Search Forum - Contact Us - Terms Of Use - Advertise on Gearslutz - All Advertisers - Archive - Top
 
 
Powered by vBulletin®
Gearslutz.com LTD - UK Company Number 7597610.
Registered Office - 35 Ballards Lane, London, N3 1XW.
Hosted by Nimbus Hosting.

SEO by vBSEO ©2010, Crawlability, Inc.