![]() | All Advertisers |
| Member Services Directory | Classifieds | Reviews | Jobs | Deal Zone | Merchandise | Marketplace | Facebook App | Books, DVDs & Gadgets | Video Vault | Tips & Techniques |
| |||||||
New Reply | Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| | #1 |
| Gear Head Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 59
Thread Starter | Mastering directly from tape
I am wondering how other mastering engineers here feel about mastering directly from tape like if a client sent you a 1/2 inch reel, and you just leave the A to D conversion as the very last step, using volume, EQ and compression on the way in. I have noticed much different results by running the signal straight from tape. Best, Metroplex Mastering Dallas, TX 214-603-2726 Metroplex Mastering julian@metroplexmastering.com |
| | |
| | #2 | |
| Lives for gear Joined: Aug 2003 Location: Hollywood CA
Posts: 2,625
Verified Member | Quote:
Is there any other way? DC | |
| | |
| | #3 |
| Lives for gear |
1/2" tape>Crookwood router>Analogue inserts>A/D>digital inserts>DAW Some times I'll do the Analogue processing and record into the DAW, leaving the digital processing until later when I'm compiling the album.
__________________ Studios 301 |
| | |
| | #4 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Aug 2004 Location: Brooklyn, New York
Posts: 3,638
Verified Member |
Usually the only time I transfer from tape directly to capture by DAW without any processing is if the tape is in pretty bad shape and it most likely won't be able to handle multiple plays and rewinds - or if an archival "flat transfer" by the client has been requested. Otherwise I nearly always will eq and compress using analog tools as needed prior to capture by the ADC. One thing that really helps when doing this is a y-cable or passive splitter multing the signal from the deck - with one pair of feeds going directly to the monitor controller - and the second pair feeding the analog process chain - so that you can do one button push (and level matched) a/b's of the original source signal vs. the processed changes. Best regards, Steve Berson |
| | |
| | #5 |
| Lives for gear |
"Hybrid" again -- I do a quick flat transfer and mess with some settings, make sure "all is well" jot down some notes (this track is really boomy, that track is really quiet, etc., etc.) then capture using those notes as a guide. Cuts down on tape / machine wear. I can get my settings in the ballpark before hitting the PLAY button for the second time - Fewer surprises.
__________________ John Scrip - Massive Mastering, LLC - www.massivemastering.com Spoon-feed a newb some answer and he'll mix for a day - Get him to *think* about it and figure it out for himself and he'll mix for a lifetime --- JS |
| | |
| | #6 |
| Moderator Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 3,389
Verified Member |
I love working straight off tape. I come out of the deck, right into the outboard chain, then A/D, and still can put some digital tools after that if desired before getting into the workstation.
|
| | |
New Reply
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| benefits & difference between mastering to tape or recording each track to tape.. | ine-kpro... | High end | 4 | 7th January 2009 09:15 PM |
| Any mastering engineers work directly from tape? | Lek | Mastering forum | 13 | 13th May 2006 02:29 PM |
| going to tape during mastering? | yourmomsp | Mastering forum | 2 | 4th January 2006 12:53 AM |
| 1/4" TAPE mastering tape recorders | Rep | High end | 17 | 16th September 2005 05:46 PM |
| mastering to tape | Jason Poulin | So much gear, so little time! | 1 | 6th August 2004 06:16 PM |
| |