![]() | All Advertisers |
| Member Services Directory | Classifieds | Reviews | Jobs | Deal Zone | Merchandise | Marketplace | Facebook App | Books, DVDs & Gadgets | Video Vault | Tips & Techniques |
| |||||||
New Reply | Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| | #1 |
| Gear interested Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 4
Thread Starter | string quartet demo mastering
Hi! I searched and read all I could find here first. We are doing a string quartet demo, classical and rock covers. Crown GLM100 clip on mics. (warm with a high roll-off) Fostex 8 track (4 simult) 44.1 kHz HD Recorder Backup zoom H4 portable stereo recorder For editing / mastering: Cubase 3 sx Cubase 4 le I've played with the cubase 4 equilizer, compressor and reverb on my old tracks, improving the loudness (not too much) and warming. --compared to other mass produced quartet recordings, sounds similar, not bad at all. This is for a demo, so doesn't have to be amazing. 1) what is the proper chaining of effects? there will be 4 mono wav files. Is it equilize , send to Stereo FX for Compression, then send to Reverb.. then compress again a little? 2) to get a consistent master sound, can I do the whole demo (30 songs, 30- 40 total min) in one cubase project, using automations? OR each song a separate project? 3) any thoughts or advice welcome. thank you! Drew |
| | |
| | #2 | ||
| Gear addict Joined: Jun 2006 Location: New York, NY
Posts: 310
| Quote:
Quote:
John Link | ||
| | |
| | #3 |
| Lives for gear |
First off, this sounds like a mixing question, not a mastering question. Secondly, a string quartet could be recorded with just one stereo pair. And it would probably sound better than only getting up-front individual instruments tracks. So.... Record just like you plan, but I recommend mixing the H4 stereo signal into the mix. Try it, and you'll probably find that it adds key cohesiveness (and perhaps some natural reverb as well!). In the end, you might even decide to go with just the H4. Some answers.... - Keep all the songs in the same project. You'll be using the same settings and everything. - Carefull with EQ. Don't choke the instruments. - Get the mix sounding good with moderate compression. - Add reverb late in the process. (Careful about compressing AFTER adding reverb, because it messes with the natural decay.) |
| | |
| | #4 |
| Gear interested Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 4
Thread Starter | thank you!
great suggestions. We have been in a small practice room so a stereo pair is not great. I did record all sets on the H4, but the fostex is rocking. Due to differences between the two nights... mics, levels, I will make one project for each night session, that will save time! compression is tricky. i want to to be loud! http://www.denverquartet.com/U2 DSQ - Beautiful Day.mp3 this is a special track with a timed delay. what do you think? i have to do 43 tracks quick for demo cd replication. later when i have time I will go back and do a better job. thank you Drew |
| | |
| | #5 |
| Lives for gear |
Ooooooo... nice.... I can hear now that you aren't going for the traditional classical sound. The instrument mics are great for what you are going for. I even dig the delay! Keep up the good work, and post an update when you have a demo printed. |
| | |
| | #6 |
| Gear addict Joined: Jun 2006 Location: New York, NY
Posts: 310
| It sounds great! Please post more, and let us know where to buy the CD. I'm interested in the GLM 100s you said you clipped onto each instrument. I see that there is a version that can be used with a wireless transmitter: http://www.multiconnects.com/audio-v...rown-glm-100-e http://www.theavspot.com/audio-video...wn-glm-100-e-3 Have you ever used the GLM 100 for vocals? John Link |
| | |
| | #7 | |
| Gear interested Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 4
Thread Starter | Quote:
It has a high rolloff, so its great for wind and string instruments. very warm. you can get close but avoid a lot of the mechanical / wind noise. It is very flexible based on where you place it close the the bridge / bow. aimed to the side, it gets dark and warm. I got them mainly for live performance; you'd lose a lot of high frequencies on vocal unless you got close to the mouth. on the side there it could be very clean and natural. | |
| | |
| | #8 |
| Mastering Engineer Joined: Jan 2007 Location: Melbourne - Australia's music capital.
Posts: 1,723
Verified Member | For a string quartet? How loud? I suppose, as far as live performance situations go, I'm yet to hear the performers being told off for being too loud... But compress for the sound of it, not for level. Personally I definitely wouldn't go for treading further on the dynamics based on that sample. Nice, clean captured sound.
__________________ Adam Jack the Bear's Deluxe Mastering facebook | twitter | myspace Is adding presence the same as subtracting absence? |
| | |
| | #9 |
| Gear interested Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 4
Thread Starter | Demo up
Thanks for the pointers! Mixed down, available in HQ aac audio on our website. Andrew Music | The Denver String Quartet facebook page Denver String Quartet | Facebook |
| | |
| | #10 |
| Gear addict Joined: Jun 2006 Location: New York, NY
Posts: 310
|
Very nice work! I noticed that the titles for tracks 37 and 38 are reversed. John Link |
| | |
New Reply
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Micing a string quartet | rarseman | Remote Possibilities in Acoustic Music & Location Recording | 12 | 27th August 2008 02:01 AM |
| Recording A String Quartet | soupking | Remote Possibilities in Acoustic Music & Location Recording | 53 | 26th March 2008 01:37 AM |
| String Quartet in the studio | benthebass | Remote Possibilities in Acoustic Music & Location Recording | 7 | 9th April 2007 04:50 PM |
| Singer + String Quartet | pkautzsch | Remote Possibilities in Acoustic Music & Location Recording | 5 | 1st April 2006 10:33 PM |
| String quartet! | RaGe | Remote Possibilities in Acoustic Music & Location Recording | 4 | 12th June 2004 09:48 PM |
| |