![]() | All Advertisers |
| |||||||
| Mastering forum All things to do with mastering audio! Moderated by Riccardo Ricci, The Velvet Room, London, UK and Jay Frigoletto, Mastersuite, Boston, USA |
![]() |
| | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
| | #31 | |
| Mastering Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,826
| Quote:
BK
__________________ Bob Katz DIGITAL DOMAIN http://www.digido.com "There are two kinds of fools. One says-this is old and therefore good. The other says-this is new and therefore better." No trees were killed in the sending of this message. However a large number of electrons were terribly inconvenienced. | |
| | |
| | #32 | |
| Gear addict Join Date: Aug 2003 Location: Hollywood CA
Posts: 395
| Quote:
Unlike RMS that we hear a lot about. Why is that? DC | |
| | |
| | #33 | |
| Mastering Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,826
| Quote:
Because RMS is available, and because it's an accurate energy measure when measuring pink noise it's a better substitute for a VU meter than a peak meter. Otherwise RMS is useless!!!!!! If you haven't heard, the K-system is expandable to other loudness measures, including the latest IEC measure. It will happen, when someone wishes to bother coding it. Over 15 manufacturers so far have embraced the K-System, all they have to do is convert over to the IEC loudness standard and retain the scale. I firmly believe that having a "ZERO reference" for the loudness is far more ergonomic for engineers, including relevant change of colors when you are "under" or "over". Far more useful than a negative number (or a positive number) for that matter. The TC meter has a variable scale option and the relative scale permits use of a "ZERO" reference point (like the K-system). This makes a lot more sense than the current Orban scale with "zero at the top" or any loudness scale measured in "phons" or "absolute loudness in dB scale". BK
__________________ Bob Katz DIGITAL DOMAIN http://www.digido.com "There are two kinds of fools. One says-this is old and therefore good. The other says-this is new and therefore better." No trees were killed in the sending of this message. However a large number of electrons were terribly inconvenienced. | |
| | |
| | #34 |
| Gear interested Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 21
| Interestingly, there is research on the Pinguin site that suggests that RMS is actually a very useful measure of perceived level: Loudness Research Results Go figure...
__________________ SRT - www.soundrecordingtechnology.com My blog - Mastering Media - DIY mastering tips |
| | |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
| |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Why use a peak limiter instead of a compressor? | maxhype | So much gear, so little time! | 2 | 24th February 2008 07:56 PM |
| which is the best hardware for peak limiter or brickwall limiter ? | Lion | Mastering forum | 36 | 11th September 2007 07:06 PM |
| How to use peak limiter? | jhaudio | Post Production forum! | 4 | 30th July 2007 12:52 AM |
| First true peak limiter? | Ribbledox | Geekslutz forum | 17 | 22nd February 2006 09:15 PM |
| Inexpensive Peak Limiter? | moon_unit | So much gear, so little time! | 5 | 28th March 2003 01:40 PM |