Gearslutz.com
All Advertisers

Go Back   Gearslutz.com > The Forums > Mastering forum

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
To All Known Mastering Engineers...Would You? M2E Mastering forum 6 3rd August 2007 05:57 AM
For Mastering Engineers!!! adrianex Mastering forum 6 19th April 2006 03:36 AM
Mastering Engineers Help! Gravity8058 Mastering forum 6 25th July 2005 04:32 PM
Mastering engineers known for mastering movie soundtracks Autowow High end 0 26th January 2005 07:05 PM
Mastering Engineers RichT High end 17 8th June 2004 11:10 AM

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Display Modes
Old 17th April 2008, 07:43 PM   #1
Keyflo
Lives for gear
 
Keyflo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 654
Send a message via AIM to Keyflo Send a message via MSN to Keyflo
Mastering Engineers

Whats is the difference between Electro Mastering and Opto Mastering?
Is one better than the other?
__________________
My New Site: http://www.soundsinhd.com

♫ SOUNDS IN HD ON MYSPACE ♫

Keyflo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17th April 2008, 08:19 PM   #2
Cellotron
Lives for gear
 
Cellotron's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Brooklyn, New York
Posts: 1,221
I'm not sure exactly what you are referring to - but in the case of compressors "electro-optical" refers to a type of compressor design where the audio signal feeds a light source and then has a light detector to trigger the gain reduction, as opposed to other methods to control the gain (such as VCA, Variable MU, FET, diode bridge).

Some compressors that use optical detection designs often used in mastering studios include the Pendulum OCL-2, the Prism/Maselec MLA-2, Manley ELOP and the TFPro P38. It is also very common to find compressors used in mastering that use other designs.

Each compressor design will give a different sounding result - what is "best" completely depends on the source material and what is the desired sound for the master.

Best regards,
Steve Berson
Cellotron is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18th April 2008, 08:08 AM   #3
ripper
Lives for gear
 
ripper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 624
if you're refering to the "choices" certain plug-ins give, i'd say the difference is insignificant...
'cause you're still using a plug in!!!!
__________________
Originally Posted by adisc :
I work more editing then listening , that's why I'm so impatient
But I'm very faster .
-------------------------------------
www.easternblocstudios.com
ripper is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18th April 2008, 12:40 PM   #4
macc
Lives for gear
 
macc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: London
Posts: 588
Send a message via AIM to macc
Sounds like you're talking about Waves RenComp to me

I seem to remember from years ago the manual saying about RComp's electro mode tending to shorter release times under heavy compression, and opto tending to longer release times.

But the P38 is better (just installed mine) !
macc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18th April 2008, 02:53 PM   #5
Cellotron
Lives for gear
 
Cellotron's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Brooklyn, New York
Posts: 1,221
Quote:
Originally Posted by macc View Post
Sounds like you're talking about Waves RenComp to me
oh - I think you're right. I still really like this plugin for in-the-box mixing - particularly on vox - but would personally never use it across the 2-bus (but have used it once in a blue moon on stems).

Anyway from the manual - http://www.dc.umich.edu/dmc/emusic/D.../waves/RCL.pdf -
Quote:
Electro (the original mode of the v1.0 software) has a release time behavior that is increasingly faster as the gain reduction approached zero, but only when gain reduction is less than 3dB. When GR is above 3dB, the release time becomes slower, behaving more like a leveler in high gain reduction situations. Therefore, when used with moderate compression, the Electro mode produces a great increase in RMS (average level), and is ideal for "loud" applications, such as voiceover and certain genre of music.

Opto is actually the inverse of Electro. Opto-coupled behavior always "put on the brakes" as the gain reduction approaced 0dB, i.e., the release time gets slower as the "needle comes back to zero". As in Electro, this is true only
when the GR is less than 3dB; when greater than 3dB, the release time is faster. This is the vintage emulation that sounds so great for drums and more!
Best regards,
Steve Berson
Cellotron is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18th April 2008, 05:26 PM   #6
macc
Lives for gear
 
macc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: London
Posts: 588
Send a message via AIM to macc
Ah, i got it the wrong way round. Not a bad guess considering I ain't read that in 8 years or something

I did used to really like it, but I went right off it. There are much (!) better software comps around nowadays :)
macc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20th April 2008, 11:27 AM   #7
Virtalahde
Gear nut
 
Virtalahde's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Helsinki, Finland
Posts: 80
Quote:
Originally Posted by Keyflo View Post
Is one better than the other?
One is definately better than the other in some cases.
__________________
Jaakko Viitalähde

http://www.virtalahde.com
http://www.studiokuu.fi
Virtalahde is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:23 AM.


Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.0.0