![]() | All Advertisers |
| |||||||
| Notices |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| How to tell an SG Special from a Standard | sleepwalker | instruments, guitar, bass, amps | 15 | 8th November 2007 03:40 PM |
| Standard Royalties | dc80 | Rap + Hip Hop engineering & production | 4 | 11th May 2007 04:33 PM |
| New TG2 Standard Feature | wade goeke | So much gear, so little time! | 28 | 22nd May 2005 05:44 PM |
| Define Industry Standard | PRS1JAZZ | So much gear, so little time! | 15 | 29th December 2003 07:21 AM |
![]() |
| | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
| | #1 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Jul 2007 Location: Toronto
Posts: 807
| Is L2 standard for everyone? Hey guys just curious if everyone is using the L2 now...it seems to be a key piece of gear...is there anyone who doesn't like/use it?....and what was everyone doing before the L2... does anyone feel like it's being leaned on too much these days? Thanks Nick |
| | |
| | #2 | |
| Gear addict Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: the Netherlands
Posts: 495
| Quote:
Many people don't use the L2. Quite a few people feel that there are better limiters than the L2. Do a search on the forum. There are quite a few threads a bout this. Alistair | |
| | |
| | #3 |
| Lives for gear | I donīt think everybody is using L2 and to me personally it sounds quite bad and I donīt use it at all ... |
| | |
| | #4 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Jul 2007 Location: Toronto
Posts: 807
| thanks for the response...have to say searching on here is dicey...you have to spend an hour wading through BS just to find one post...I feel this is a valid question |
| | |
| | #5 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Jul 2007 Location: Toronto
Posts: 807
| |
| | |
| | #6 |
| Gear maniac Join Date: Dec 2004 Location: Houston
Posts: 260
| I don't think L2 sounds bad when used in moderation. Problem is, in today's expectation of aggressive-sounding masters, I don't find much place for it. I haven't printed L2 across a whole record in probably 4 years. IMO with more than light limiting, I think L2 tends to eat up the low end. If I'm looking for that kind of limiting, I'm more likely to grab PSP's flexible Xenon or Massey's L2007 for better results.
__________________ Bob Boyd Ambient Digital http://myspace.com/ambientdigital That's why they're called "Business socks". |
| | |
| | #7 |
| Gear maniac Join Date: Dec 2004 Location: Houston
Posts: 260
| I don't think L2 sounds bad when used in moderation. Problem is, in today's expectation of aggressive-sounding masters, I don't find much place for it. (I master a lot of rock/pop.) I haven't printed L2 across a whole record in probably 4 years. IMO with more than light limiting, I think L2 tends to feel soft and eat up the low end. If I'm looking for that kind of limiting, I'm more likely to grab PSP's flexible Xenon or Massey's L2007 for better results.
__________________ Bob Boyd Ambient Digital http://myspace.com/ambientdigital That's why they're called "Business socks". |
| | |
| | #8 |
| Gear addict Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: Netherlands
Posts: 372
| Still used a lot but less and less with excellent (software) alternatives available now. I use the L2 for no more than 1.5 dB of peak reduction and preferably only at incidents. Just have the reduction lights come on every now and then. Once led's stay on during a song, you'll be losing snare impact. It's my guess that the unit's bad name came from people who solely relied on the L2 for level. True, the unit is called 'loudness maximizer' but one shouldn't rely on it (or any limiter !!) just to reach desired level. Having said that, the unlink switch comes in handy sometimes and i find the unit a very convenient headroom indicator with hold and reset .Before that, i used TC Electronic M5000's soft clipping limiter. 'bit dirty.. It's successor, System 6000 with MD4 is probably still the best hardware alternative available, but more than that. Peter van't Riet FineTune Mastering |
| | |
| | #9 |
| Gear maniac Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 158
| It can add the sound of "someone walking on broken glass" to your mix, compared to better limiters. I've used it on rock songs when the artist wanted it LOUD and didn't care about the sacrafice. But can't apply it to classical or acoustic songs. |
| | |
| | #10 | |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Jul 2007 Location: Toronto
Posts: 807
| Quote:
Nick | |
| | |
| | #11 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Aug 2005 Location: seattle, WA
Posts: 981
| i think the big "plus" (at least it was for me) for the L2 was it was available as racked outboard. this made it very easy for me as i didn't have to rely on plugs, upgrades, WUP, etc.... that said, i now use the sonnox or the limiter in ozone3 (amazing limiter) |
| | |
| | #12 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Aug 2004 Location: Brooklyn, New York
Posts: 1,116
| I find there are a good number of digital brick wall peak limiters out there that sound quite a good bit better than the L2 (and the L3 for that matter) - so you can count me as someone who doesn't use it either. Best regards, Steve Berson |
| | |
| | #13 |
| Lives for gear | atleast i know i'm hitting my mixes with what other people enjoy ![]() |
| | |
| | #14 |
| Gear addict Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: the Netherlands
Posts: 495
| |
| | |
| | #15 |
| Gear maniac Join Date: Dec 2004 Location: Houston
Posts: 260
| yup, got those in the 'toolbox' too...
__________________ Bob Boyd Ambient Digital http://myspace.com/ambientdigital That's why they're called "Business socks". |
| | |
| | #16 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Aug 2005 Location: seattle, WA
Posts: 981
| the new psp limiter.. i just couldn't get my head around it when i demo'd it everyone seems to really like it.. i could not get it sounding transparent. |
| | |
| | #17 |
| Gearslutz.com admin Join Date: Apr 2002 Location: London, UK
Posts: 11,125
| Another vote for the SonOx Limiter.. Uber loudness is possible with a pleasant tone.
__________________ Jules "While we're at it, insert the standard rant about shit being mixed and mastered to "cd quality". - msquared |
| | |
| | #18 |
| Gear maniac Join Date: Sep 2006 Location: Boston, MA
Posts: 249
| i barely ever use the L2...maybe once every 15-20 records.
__________________ http://twwalsh.com |
| | |
| | #19 |
| Gear addict Join Date: Dec 2007 Location: Hamburg
Posts: 358
| I like the L3 much more than the L2.For me it Sounds better and more versatile. |
| | |
| | #20 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Sep 2004 Location: Copenhagen, Denmark
Posts: 2,235
| Sonnox Oxford Limiter or Flux Pure limiter would be my recommendations instead of the L2.
__________________ Producer & engineer Apple Certified Pro for Logic Pro Popmusic.dk my production company Hit Kit V3 Sample CD urban & electronic beat production - used on Billboard #1 hits (recently on: Katy Perry, Britney, Usher, Jordin Sparks, Leona Lewis, Sugababes, The Pussycat Dolls |
| | |
| | #21 |
| Gear Head Join Date: Feb 2008 Location: Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Posts: 54
| I prefer the Massey to the L2 these days... |
| | |
| | #22 |
| Gear maniac Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 262
| sonnox limiter here too. haven't used the l2 in a long time. |
| | |
| | #23 |
| Moderator Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 1,704
| I have the L2 hardware still sitting in the rack, and every once in a while I'll use a bit, but for the most part I'm using the t.c. 6000 with the MD4 limiter. For super loud, sometimes I use some t.c followed by a bit of L2 (often in conjunction with other techniques). The L2 was great when it first came out, and still useful in many situations where you don't need more than a couple dB, or if you want a somewhat bright, aggressive sound; but for real transparent limiting or heavy hitting, there are many things that have surpassed it in the years since it was introduced. Anybody want to buy a hardware L2? |
| | |
| | #25 |
| Lives for gear | I gave up my L2 for lent... 2003... ![]()
__________________ John Scrip - Massive Mastering - www.massivemastering.com Spoon-feed a newb some answer and he'll mix for a day - Get him to *think* about it and figure it out for himself and he'll mix for a lifetime. |
| | |
| | #26 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Nov 2006 Location: Seattle
Posts: 1,135
| I had the L2 Hardware in here for a while and never really liked it. There's lots better out there. Regards, Bruce |
| | |
| | #27 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Jul 2007 Location: Toronto
Posts: 807
| That's a lot of good replies...and is helping to reaffirm what I think about it.... in my limited experience(I'm not a mastering engineer)....I'm not a big fan of it. Thanks guys. Nick |
| | |
| | #28 | |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Jul 2004 Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 1,770
| Quote:
I think people also like the L2 hardware over the plug because its dual mono, which is really preferable imo with light gain reduction. But you can just take any ol' plug limiter and just use 2 of them. | |
| | |
| | #29 |
| Gear maniac Join Date: Dec 2004 Location: Houston
Posts: 260
| After updating, I recently noticed that with Waves new release, 5.9.7, you can run the L2 plug in dual mono.
__________________ Bob Boyd Ambient Digital http://myspace.com/ambientdigital That's why they're called "Business socks". |
| | |
| | #30 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: May 2005 Location: Netherlands
Posts: 683
| How do you guys audit/listen to you're processing including the "limiting" when you're having a software limit ..... or do you guys capture without limiting and adding if needed limiting .... I like the L2 hardware and/or the weiss ds1 as a hardware limiter box because I can process into the limiter and hearing the "final" result/capture .... the L2 will be a classic one day ... on ebay they're asking € 1500,- for a 3 years old one ... |
| | |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
| |