Gearslutz.com
All Advertisers

Go Back   Gearslutz.com > The Forums > Mastering forum

Notices

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
How to tell an SG Special from a Standard sleepwalker instruments, guitar, bass, amps 15 8th November 2007 03:40 PM
Standard Royalties dc80 Rap + Hip Hop engineering & production 4 11th May 2007 04:33 PM
New TG2 Standard Feature wade goeke So much gear, so little time! 28 22nd May 2005 05:44 PM
Define Industry Standard PRS1JAZZ So much gear, so little time! 15 29th December 2003 07:21 AM

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Display Modes
Old 2nd March 2008, 03:53 PM   #1
nickynicknick
Lives for gear
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Toronto
Posts: 807
Is L2 standard for everyone?

Hey guys just curious if everyone is using the L2 now...it seems to be a key piece of gear...is there anyone who doesn't like/use it?....and what was everyone doing before the L2... does anyone feel like it's being leaned on too much these days? Thanks

Nick
nickynicknick is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2nd March 2008, 04:07 PM   #2
UnderTow
Gear addict
 
UnderTow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: the Netherlands
Posts: 495
Quote:
Originally Posted by nickynicknick View Post
Hey guys just curious if everyone is using the L2 now...it seems to be a key piece of gear...is there anyone who doesn't like/use it?....and what was everyone doing before the L2... does anyone feel like it's being leaned on too much these days? Thanks

Nick

Many people don't use the L2. Quite a few people feel that there are better limiters than the L2. Do a search on the forum. There are quite a few threads a bout this.

Alistair
UnderTow is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2nd March 2008, 04:10 PM   #3
ISedlacek
Lives for gear
 
ISedlacek's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Czech mountains and forests
Posts: 2,767
Send a message via ICQ to ISedlacek
I donīt think everybody is using L2 and to me personally it sounds quite bad and I donīt use it at all ...
__________________
Ivo
Velvet Mastering
Savita Music
ISedlacek is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2nd March 2008, 04:13 PM   #4
nickynicknick
Lives for gear
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Toronto
Posts: 807
Quote:
Originally Posted by UnderTow View Post
Many people don't use the L2. Quite a few people feel that there are better limiters than the L2. Do a search on the forum. There are quite a few threads a bout this.

Alistair
thanks for the response...have to say searching on here is dicey...you have to spend an hour wading through BS just to find one post...I feel this is a valid question
nickynicknick is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2nd March 2008, 04:15 PM   #5
nickynicknick
Lives for gear
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Toronto
Posts: 807
Quote:
Originally Posted by ISedlacek View Post
I donīt think everybody is using L2 and to me personally it sounds quite bad and I donīt use it at all ...
what do you think sounds bad about it...is it too grainy when pushed, too squishy...too boring...too digital....none of the above?

Nick
nickynicknick is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2nd March 2008, 04:20 PM   #6
Bob Boyd
Gear maniac
 
Bob Boyd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Houston
Posts: 260
I don't think L2 sounds bad when used in moderation. Problem is, in today's expectation of aggressive-sounding masters, I don't find much place for it. I haven't printed L2 across a whole record in probably 4 years.

IMO with more than light limiting, I think L2 tends to eat up the low end. If I'm looking for that kind of limiting, I'm more likely to grab PSP's flexible Xenon or Massey's L2007 for better results.
__________________
Bob Boyd
Ambient Digital
http://myspace.com/ambientdigital


That's why they're called "Business socks".
Bob Boyd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2nd March 2008, 04:22 PM   #7
Bob Boyd
Gear maniac
 
Bob Boyd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Houston
Posts: 260
I don't think L2 sounds bad when used in moderation. Problem is, in today's expectation of aggressive-sounding masters, I don't find much place for it. (I master a lot of rock/pop.) I haven't printed L2 across a whole record in probably 4 years.

IMO with more than light limiting, I think L2 tends to feel soft and eat up the low end. If I'm looking for that kind of limiting, I'm more likely to grab PSP's flexible Xenon or Massey's L2007 for better results.
__________________
Bob Boyd
Ambient Digital
http://myspace.com/ambientdigital


That's why they're called "Business socks".
Bob Boyd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2nd March 2008, 04:31 PM   #8
finetuner
Gear addict
 
finetuner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 372
Still used a lot but less and less with excellent (software) alternatives available now.

I use the L2 for no more than 1.5 dB of peak reduction and preferably only at incidents. Just have the reduction lights come on every now and then. Once led's stay on during a song, you'll be losing snare impact.

It's my guess that the unit's bad name came from people who solely relied on the L2 for level.
True, the unit is called 'loudness maximizer' but one shouldn't rely on it (or any limiter !!) just to reach desired level.

Having said that, the unlink switch comes in handy sometimes and i find the unit a very convenient headroom indicator with hold and reset .

Before that, i used TC Electronic M5000's soft clipping limiter. 'bit dirty..
It's successor, System 6000 with MD4 is probably still the best hardware alternative available, but more than that.

Peter van't Riet
FineTune Mastering
finetuner is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2nd March 2008, 05:35 PM   #9
surflounge
Gear maniac
 
surflounge's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 158
It can add the sound of "someone walking on broken glass" to your mix, compared to better limiters.
I've used it on rock songs when the artist wanted it LOUD and didn't care about the sacrafice. But can't apply it to classical or acoustic songs.
__________________
MUSIC • VIDEO • ENTERTAINMENT
http://surflounge.com/
surflounge is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2nd March 2008, 05:39 PM   #10
nickynicknick
Lives for gear
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Toronto
Posts: 807
Quote:
Originally Posted by surflounge View Post
It can add the sound of "someone walking on broken glass" to your mix, compared to better limiters.
I've used it on rock songs when the artist wanted it LOUD and didn't care about the sacrafice. But can't apply it to classical or acoustic songs.
Maybe I should be asking what did everyone replace their L2's with? Thanks and any more info would be great.

Nick
nickynicknick is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2nd March 2008, 05:55 PM   #11
jdg
Lives for gear
 
jdg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: seattle, WA
Posts: 981
i think the big "plus" (at least it was for me) for the L2 was it was available as racked outboard. this made it very easy for me as i didn't have to rely on plugs, upgrades, WUP, etc....

that said, i now use the sonnox or the limiter in ozone3 (amazing limiter)
__________________

panicStudios - mastering in seattle
jdg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2nd March 2008, 06:07 PM   #12
Cellotron
Lives for gear
 
Cellotron's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Brooklyn, New York
Posts: 1,116
I find there are a good number of digital brick wall peak limiters out there that sound quite a good bit better than the L2 (and the L3 for that matter) - so you can count me as someone who doesn't use it either.

Best regards,
Steve Berson
Cellotron is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2nd March 2008, 06:09 PM   #13
xmostynx
Lives for gear
 
xmostynx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 1,560
Send a message via AIM to xmostynx
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bob Boyd View Post
Massey's L2007 for better results.
atleast i know i'm hitting my mixes with what other people enjoy
__________________
-Make no mistakes I am what you make me
http://www.myspace.com/xmostynx
xmostynx is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2nd March 2008, 06:09 PM   #14
UnderTow
Gear addict
 
UnderTow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: the Netherlands
Posts: 495
Quote:
Originally Posted by nickynicknick View Post
Maybe I should be asking what did everyone replace their L2's with? Thanks and any more info would be great.

Nick
Sonnox Oxford Limiter
Voxengo Elephant
PSP Xenon
iZotope Ozone Limiter

To me these all sound better than the L2.

Alistair
UnderTow is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2nd March 2008, 06:11 PM   #15
Bob Boyd
Gear maniac
 
Bob Boyd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Houston
Posts: 260
Quote:
Originally Posted by jdg View Post
the sonnox or the limiter in ozone3 (amazing limiter)
yup, got those in the 'toolbox' too...
__________________
Bob Boyd
Ambient Digital
http://myspace.com/ambientdigital


That's why they're called "Business socks".
Bob Boyd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2nd March 2008, 06:39 PM   #16
jdg
Lives for gear
 
jdg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: seattle, WA
Posts: 981
the new psp limiter.. i just couldn't get my head around it when i demo'd it

everyone seems to really like it.. i could not get it sounding transparent.
__________________

panicStudios - mastering in seattle
jdg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2nd March 2008, 06:40 PM   #17
Jules
Gearslutz.com admin
 
Jules's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: London, UK
Posts: 11,125
Another vote for the SonOx Limiter..

Uber loudness is possible with a pleasant tone.
__________________
Jules

"While we're at it, insert the standard rant about shit being mixed and mastered to "cd quality". - msquared
Jules is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2nd March 2008, 06:54 PM   #18
twwalsh
Gear maniac
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Boston, MA
Posts: 249
i barely ever use the L2...maybe once every 15-20 records.
__________________
http://twwalsh.com
twwalsh is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2nd March 2008, 06:58 PM   #19
Jaques Beraques
Gear addict
 
Jaques Beraques's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Hamburg
Posts: 358
I like the L3 much more than the L2.For me it Sounds better and more versatile.
Jaques Beraques is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2nd March 2008, 07:33 PM   #20
Lagerfeldt
Lives for gear
 
Lagerfeldt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Copenhagen, Denmark
Posts: 2,235
Sonnox Oxford Limiter or Flux Pure limiter would be my recommendations instead of the L2.
__________________

Producer & engineer
Apple Certified Pro for Logic Pro

Popmusic.dk
my production company

Hit Kit V3 Sample CD
urban & electronic beat production - used on Billboard #1 hits (recently on: Katy Perry, Britney, Usher, Jordin Sparks, Leona Lewis, Sugababes, The Pussycat Dolls
Lagerfeldt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2nd March 2008, 09:13 PM   #21
swirlyd
Gear Head
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Posts: 54
I prefer the Massey to the L2 these days...
swirlyd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2nd March 2008, 09:25 PM   #22
idrinkalot
Gear maniac
 
idrinkalot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 262
sonnox limiter here too. haven't used the l2 in a long time.
__________________

idrinkalot is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3rd March 2008, 12:28 AM   #23
jayfrigo
Moderator
 
jayfrigo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 1,704
I have the L2 hardware still sitting in the rack, and every once in a while I'll use a bit, but for the most part I'm using the t.c. 6000 with the MD4 limiter. For super loud, sometimes I use some t.c followed by a bit of L2 (often in conjunction with other techniques).

The L2 was great when it first came out, and still useful in many situations where you don't need more than a couple dB, or if you want a somewhat bright, aggressive sound; but for real transparent limiting or heavy hitting, there are many things that have surpassed it in the years since it was introduced. Anybody want to buy a hardware L2?
__________________
Jay Frigoletto
Mastersuite
www.promastering.com
www.studiometronome.com
jayfrigo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3rd March 2008, 01:03 AM   #24
Ben F
Lives for gear
 
Ben F's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 526
The L2 has been used a couple of times in the last year, mainly to match aggressive mastering from other studios on compilations.
__________________
Myspace
Ben F is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3rd March 2008, 01:43 AM   #25
MASSIVE Master
Lives for gear
 
MASSIVE Master's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Chicago (Schaumburg / Hoffman Est.) IL
Posts: 1,440
Send a message via AIM to MASSIVE Master
I gave up my L2 for lent... 2003...
__________________
John Scrip - Massive Mastering - www.massivemastering.com

Spoon-feed a newb some answer and he'll mix for a day -
Get him to *think* about it and figure it out for himself and he'll mix for a lifetime.
MASSIVE Master is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3rd March 2008, 03:49 AM   #26
DSD_Mastering
Lives for gear
 
DSD_Mastering's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Seattle
Posts: 1,135
I had the L2 Hardware in here for a while and never really liked it. There's lots better out there.

Regards,
Bruce
__________________
Bruce A. Brown
Puget Sound Studios
Seattle, Washington
DSD_Mastering is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3rd March 2008, 06:21 AM   #27
nickynicknick
Lives for gear
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Toronto
Posts: 807
That's a lot of good replies...and is helping to reaffirm what I think about it.... in my limited experience(I'm not a mastering engineer)....I'm not a big fan of it. Thanks guys.

Nick
nickynicknick is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3rd March 2008, 07:01 AM   #28
thermos
Lives for gear
 
thermos's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 1,770
Quote:
Originally Posted by jdg View Post
the new psp limiter.. i just couldn't get my head around it when i demo'd it

everyone seems to really like it.. i could not get it sounding transparent.
I knew we heard things the same way. It sounded harsh to me, and far from transparent in the action, regardless of the setting. The Ozone Limiter is my favorite.

I think people also like the L2 hardware over the plug because its dual mono, which is really preferable imo with light gain reduction. But you can just take any ol' plug limiter and just use 2 of them.
thermos is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3rd March 2008, 07:43 AM   #29
Bob Boyd
Gear maniac
 
Bob Boyd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Houston
Posts: 260
Quote:
Originally Posted by thermos View Post
I think people also like the L2 hardware over the plug because its dual mono, which is really preferable imo with light gain reduction. But you can just take any ol' plug limiter and just use 2 of them.
After updating, I recently noticed that with Waves new release, 5.9.7, you can run the L2 plug in dual mono.
__________________
Bob Boyd
Ambient Digital
http://myspace.com/ambientdigital


That's why they're called "Business socks".
Bob Boyd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3rd March 2008, 11:47 AM   #30
inlinenl
Lives for gear
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 683
How do you guys audit/listen to you're processing including the "limiting" when you're having a software limit ..... or do you guys capture without limiting and adding if needed limiting ....

I like the L2 hardware and/or the weiss ds1 as a hardware limiter box because I can process into the limiter and hearing the "final" result/capture ....

the L2 will be a classic one day ... on ebay they're asking € 1500,- for a 3 years old one ...
__________________


Greetings/Regards Wim Bult
www.inlinemastering.com

The Netherlands
inlinenl is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:14 AM.


Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.0.0