![]() | All Advertisers |
| Member Services Directory | Classifieds | Reviews | Jobs | Deal Zone | Merchandise | Marketplace | Facebook App | Books, DVDs & Gadgets | Video Vault | Tips & Techniques |
| |||||||
New Reply | Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| | #1 |
| Lives for gear | mastering in wavelab , HELP!!!!
hello ppl, my prob is... my mix file is in 48hz and 24bits i master... i render, when i save as 44.1hz and 16bits, i'm gonna listening in other prog the file, and i have less high freq. , alot less. what i need to kill ? to resolve this problem ? |
| | |
| | #2 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Dec 2006 Location: HAMBURG
Posts: 701
|
The loss in high freq should not be THAT dramatic.....sure you did everything right?
__________________ www.nickoosterhuis.com "That's not a bug, that's a feature." – Phil Cork, SSL software engineer |
| | |
| | #3 |
| Lives for gear | |
| | |
| | #4 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Dec 2006 Location: HAMBURG
Posts: 701
|
Of course it depends on the source, the dynamics etc But with the usual compressed pop-rock-soul-stuff the difference between 24/48 and 16/44.1 is less significant then to mp3 IMO So there seems to be something going wrong...... |
| | |
| | #5 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Jul 2006 Location: Germany
Posts: 2,420
| |
| | |
| | #6 |
| Lives for gear | |
| | |
| | #7 |
| Lives for gear | mix file 48hz 24 bits -----> www.formatic.pt/gabriel/4824-mix.wav master file 48hz 24 bits -----> www.formatic.pt/gabriel/4824.wav master file 44.1hz 16 bits ---> www.formatic.pt/gabriel/44116.wav |
| | |
| | #8 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Jul 2006 Location: Germany
Posts: 2,420
|
Hm, I neither hear nor see a significant difference, if at all...
|
| | |
| | #9 |
| Lives for gear |
perhaps is in my mind, or the winamp plays the audio different than wavelab. what you think about my master ? thanks a lot |
| | |
| | #10 | |
| Gear addict Joined: Apr 2004 Location: North Haledon NJ
Posts: 454
Verified Member | Quote:
Ed | |
| | |
| | #11 |
| Lives for gear |
DAC = digital audio converter ? i'm using wavelab. can some one tell me a nice program do play audio files, i think the prob é winamp dontplay the same that wavelab |
| | |
| | #12 | |
| Gear addict Joined: Apr 2004 Location: North Haledon NJ
Posts: 454
Verified Member | Quote:
the application that one uses has nothing to do with what digital analog converter is used. How are you monitoring? how do you feed your your power amp? If it's the sound card from your motherboard I would suspect that it is not jitter immune. how do the 2 files sound playing from wavelab? Ed | |
| | |
| | #13 |
| Gear interested Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 13
| |
| | |
| | #14 | |
| Lives for gear | Quote:
I was doing this. win wave lab i played the 48-24 master. than i'm goind to winamp and play 44.1-16 master. on my winamp i dont have EQ | |
| | |
| | #15 | |
| Gear nut Joined: Jul 2006 Location: Iguana Hell
Posts: 85
| Quote:
How does it sound on the Mediaplayer? You should do some kind of a loop-back recording, i mean - just connect a digital out with digital in of your Soundinterface - re-record the stuff playbacked by winamp... Then import both files (16/44.1) into a audiomontage, phase align - then phaseinvert one wave. You should hear ... NOTHING. If the winamp playback realy lacks in the high frequencys you will have those frequencys left now. brandy P.S Make shure both aplications (WL and Winamp) are using the same audiodrivers, routing, clock source etc
__________________ Christoph Brandes | Iguana Studios | Freiburg/Germany | |
| | |
| | #16 |
| Lives for gear |
You posted the exact same question at RECORDING - mastering in wavelab , HELP!!!! - Mastering Sound and you are getting almost the same answers over there. I don't know if this is a language problem of if you are a troll but you need to tell us much more about your procedures and the equipment you are using. Dither cannot take out the high frequencies. You cannot simply save a file with different attributes in WL you have to sample rate convert and then dither it using the render function of WL. Why don't you use WL to listen to both versions? It would make the most sense and then you can compare them using a "standard" instead of listening to one on WL and the other on Win Amp. Everyone is trying to help but you are less than forthcoming with real information. Thanks!
__________________ -TOM- Thomas W. Bethel Managing Director Acoustik Musik, Ltd. Room with a View Productions Oberlin, OH 44074 www.acoustikmusik.com Doing what you love is freedom. Loving what you do is happiness. |
| | |
| | #17 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Apr 2006 Location: Toronto
Posts: 808
Verified Member |
I don't know WaveLab but it seems like the main difference you are hearing between 24b/48k and 16b/44.1k would be the sample rate conversion and program specific conversion quality rather than dither. Also, if you can't flip a switch (or two) and listen in at least an A/B set-up using exactly the same set of playback equipment, you are only going by memory which is not always the most reliable way to do a comparison! |
| | |
| | #18 | |
| Lives for gear | Quote:
| |
| | |
| | #19 |
| Gear nut Joined: Dec 2005 Location: Israel
Posts: 142
|
I use Wave lab for mastering and it actually has a good conversion plug-in called Crystal re-sampler ,if you put it in the master section you can listen to your sound in real time and have no surprises .
__________________ ************* ***Fat Studio** ************* |
| | |
New Reply
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| something else than wavelab... | G-lay | Music computers | 10 | 6th November 2007 06:01 PM |
| Wavelab 6 | feyshay | Music computers | 5 | 5th April 2007 04:07 PM |
| Mastering with Wavelab. | Aka Nameless | Mastering forum | 5 | 23rd July 2006 05:33 PM |
| Mastering Programs like T-racks and Wavelab | MACHINE | Music computers | 5 | 29th January 2006 01:15 PM |
| |