12th June 2007
|
#1 | | Gear addict
Joined: Apr 2005 Location: São Paulo, Brasil
Posts: 471
Thread Starter | Which Limiter/Compressor to buy
I am about to head to the states to pick up some gear for the completion of my mastering studio. So far I have:
Crane Song HEDD 192
Weiss EQ MK2
Waves MaxxBCL
I will buy the Crane Song Avocet and a compressor?
Which one is the question:
Chandler TG1
Crane Song ST8
?
I have no tube gear and don´t feel a real need to have it in my signal chain. I just want a really good compressor/limiter to help out a bit. One in the about $5000 range.
Thanks
|
| |
12th June 2007
|
#2 | | Lives for gear
Joined: May 2006 Location: Poland, Warsaw
Posts: 706
|
Different compressors work in a different way.
If you want to soften your tracks and add some "analog warmth" you can buy STC-8.... If you want more dynamic and aggressive sound, buy Smart C2... if you want some real power without so much compromise I have found Tube-Tech STC-8 very useful... there are many other compressors...
IMO buy at least 2 compressors, may be used. One compressor has too few flavours for the mastering.
I'm not sure if the TG1 would be the best option for the mastering. Zener Limiter has HPF option it might be better... Chandler has foggy sound, it's not perfectly clean. Depending what you search for, one may like it one not.
|
| |
12th June 2007
|
#3 | | Audio Alchemist
Joined: Sep 2004 Location: Copenhagen, Denmark
Posts: 5,010
Verified Member |
Of the mentioned units (and in general) I wouldn't hesitate getting the Crane Song STC-8. It's a smashing great unit.
I agree with Yareck it would be wise getting two different compressors, e.g. the STC-8 and another more aggresive or "fun" compressor or perhaps an SSL type comp.
The MaxxBCL has the L2 right? Don't know if you should get an analogue limiter too, probably not. I'm very satisfied with the digital solutions in the L2 and Sony Oxford Limiter, and clipping maybe.
Personally I find that spreading out compression and even limiting in several units often sound better and is more flexible. Chaining two different types of compression for instance, e.g. low & slow and then slightly faster peak compression. The downside of more processing steps (be it analogue or digital) is usually outweighed by the end result in my experience. I don't think the puristic approach is necessarily true.
__________________ Online Mastering
Currently working on David Guetta feat. Ne-Yo & Akon Albert Neve Remix (EMI) · Vinnie Who (EMI) · Basim (Sony) · Ida Corr feat. Fatman Scoop (Sony) · Alphabeat (Universal) · Infernal (Warner) |
| |
12th June 2007
|
#4 | | Gear addict
Joined: Oct 2004 Location: Chicago
Posts: 371
Verified Member |
The STC-8 is a great first-choice comp. You likely won't use the limiter.
The API 2500 is a great, affordable complement to the STC-8. It can be a bit more "exciting" than the STC-8. Those two along with my Requisite L2M, and I have little want for more in the way of dynamics processing.
|
| |
12th June 2007
|
#5 | | Gear addict
Joined: Apr 2005 Location: São Paulo, Brasil
Posts: 471
Thread Starter |
I looked at the Requisite L2M but wasn´t sure I needed to spend that much at the current moment. Is it worth the cash? A lot of people have told me the the SPL Kultube is quite good too. I would like to avoid Manley to differentiate me from the other mastering facilites in the area who use almost 100% Manley. Any thoughts on the DW Fearn VT-7?
|
| |
12th June 2007
|
#6 | | Gear addict
Joined: Oct 2004 Location: Chicago
Posts: 371
Verified Member |
I think the mk. III is indeed worth it, especially at the pre-order price I got it for ($5000... I think $6000 will be the street price once it is officially announced). I have no experience with the mk. I or II models, though I'm sure they're both fantastic as well. Even so, I think that a few mk. I and mk. II units will be for sale in the coming year as some people are inevitably going to upgrade.
It's a great box. Seems to do nice things to the midrange just by being in path... sort of like what tape does for hard, digital mids. The new limiter feedback control has to be heard to be believed/understood, but is essentially akin to a presence/harmonics control. I've used just that to lift dull tracks that otherwise would've needed EQ. Pretty remarkable, and certainly unique.
I can't slag the Vari-Mu, as I've never used it, and I can't slag Manley, as I love my Massive Passive... but I think that the L2M would be a fine choice for any mastering room.
|
| |
12th June 2007
|
#7 | | Gear addict
Joined: Apr 2005 Location: São Paulo, Brasil
Posts: 471
Thread Starter |
If you are talking about the Weiss Limiters.... they are out of my price range. $6500 is too much for me to spend at the moment.
|
| |
12th June 2007
|
#8 | | Lives for gear
Joined: Mar 2004 Location: Chicago (Schaumburg / Hoffman Est.) IL
Posts: 2,890
Verified Member |
Another  on the STC-8. I have a few compression choices here, but the STC-8 is rarely *not* in the chain. Ugly green knobs rule. thumbsup
__________________ John Scrip - Massive Mastering, LLC - www.massivemastering.com Spoon-feed a newb some answer and he'll mix for a day -
Get him to *think* about it and figure it out for himself and he'll mix for a lifetime --- JS |
| |
12th June 2007
|
#9 | | Mastering Moderator
Joined: Apr 2003 Location: Always on the Run
Posts: 2,950
Verified Member | Quote:
Originally Posted by Duffster I looked at the Requisite L2M but wasn´t sure I needed to spend that much at the current moment. Is it worth the cash? A lot of people have told me the the SPL Kultube is quite good too. I would like to avoid Manley to differentiate me from the other mastering facilites in the area who use almost 100% Manley. Any thoughts on the DW Fearn VT-7? | It is is the same class as the Requisite, Thermionic and Cranesong to give you an idea.
Ideally you would try them all and start from the one you feel is really indispensable .......... knowing that sooner or later you will want to add the others
__________________ Velvet Room Mastering
"Can you imagine how great the Beatles or Pink Floyd could have sounded if they had used better cables?
I expect a Nobel prize to someday be awarded to an audiophile cable designer, as they clearly are way ahead of the rest of us.
" - DC -
|
| |
13th June 2007
|
#10 | | Gear addict
Joined: Apr 2005 Location: São Paulo, Brasil
Posts: 471
Thread Starter | Quote:
Originally Posted by Riccardo It is is the same class as the Requisite, Thermionic and Cranesong to give you an idea.
Ideally you would try them all and start from the one you feel is really indispensable .......... knowing that sooner or later you will want to add the others  | I would love to try them but I live in Brazil and we have none of this equipment here. That is why I need some opinions from people who actually are using the things.
|
| |
13th June 2007
|
#11 | | Head of Bumping Security (B.S)
Joined: Feb 2004 Location: in the hills of Southern California
Posts: 3,018
|
The Fearn VT-7 is a great sounding unit. It's generally a bit easier to use than the STC-8... less options. The shape control is subtle but useful. I find it pretty easy to dial in the attack and release on this unit. The line amp has a ton of clean gain. The only weird thing about the VT-7 is that it doesn't have a bypass.
|
| |
13th June 2007
|
#12 | | Mastering Moderator
Joined: Apr 2003 Location: Always on the Run
Posts: 2,950
Verified Member | Quote:
Originally Posted by Duffster I would love to try them but I live in Brazil and we have none of this equipment here. That is why I need some opinions from people who actually are using the things. | Yes I understand. What I'm trying to say is that they are all VERY good units. See if you can find info leading to the "most flexible" of the bunch and maybe start from that one. I am sure you will want the others later on as budget allows.
|
| |
13th June 2007
|
#13 | | Gear maniac
Joined: Jan 2007 Location: Italy
Posts: 157
|
Another vote for Cranesong and, above all, Weiss mkII if you have to take just one unit!
With Weiss you can stay in digital and use Hedd for some further processing (if needed)...it could be a good solution
[quote=carlsaff;1323487]I think the mk. III is indeed worth it, especially at the pre-order price I got it for ($5000... I think $6000 will be the street price once it is officially announced). I have no experience with the mk. I or II models, though I'm sure they're both fantastic as well. Even so, I think that a few mk. I and mk. II units will be for sale in the coming year as some people are inevitably going to upgrade.
It's a great box. Seems to do nice things to the midrange just by being in path... sort of like what tape does for hard, digital mids. The new limiter feedback control has to be heard to be believed/understood, but is essentially akin to a presence/harmonics control. I've used just that to lift dull tracks that otherwise would've needed EQ. Pretty remarkable, and certainly unique.
How is the mkIII version? I haven't seen anything on the site
|
| |
13th June 2007
|
#14 | | Lives for gear
Joined: May 2005 Location: Netherlands
Posts: 2,029
Verified Member |
I second Fabio ... weiss DS1-MKII would be a nice option ... much accoustic music in brazil ????
it's more flexibel/ has more options than a straight-forward analog compressor ..
after that mayby you want some tubes .. manley vari-mu ????? ( don't push it )
wim
|
| |
13th June 2007
|
#15 | | Lives for gear
Joined: Aug 2006 Location: EUtopia, Stockholm
Posts: 959
| |
| |
13th June 2007
|
#16 | | Gear addict
Joined: Apr 2005 Location: São Paulo, Brasil
Posts: 471
Thread Starter | Quote:
Originally Posted by inlinenl I second Fabio ... weiss DS1-MKII would be a nice option ... much accoustic music in brazil ????
it's more flexibel/ has more options than a straight-forward analog compressor ..
after that mayby you want some tubes .. manley vari-mu ????? ( don't push it )
wim | Except for the fact that it costs $7200.00 My limit is $5000. That compressor is just way too expensive for me. Remember I pay is Reals which means that would cost me around R$16,000.00 as where anything $5000 and below is around the R$10,000.00
For me a $1000.00 difference is a huge leap.
|
| |
13th June 2007
|
#17 | | Gear addict
Joined: Oct 2004 Location: Chicago
Posts: 371
Verified Member | Quote:
Originally Posted by Fabio How is the mkIII version? I haven't seen anything on the site | As mentioned above, it's great. I know that Danny is planning a site re-design very soon. The mk. III should be featured when that's done.
|
| |
13th June 2007
|
#18 | | Gear maniac
Joined: Jul 2006 Location: Golden
Posts: 224
|
Duffster,
Check out the Maselec MLA-2. It's opto., works great as a limiter and can be had from Mercenary for $4,275
|
| |
14th June 2007
|
#19 | | Lives for gear
Joined: Feb 2006 Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 3,054
Verified Member |
The STC-8 would be a very good choice as it is a flexible unit. The Chandler gear is not very flexible, even the zener limiter, it does the 70s vibe really well but I'd say they are more of a mixing tool. I don't really get chandler gear...I don't think they sound like the original TG gear...tested the zener out and was very underwhelmed.
To compliment the STC-8 a vari-mu tube compressor would work really well. As mentioned the Phoenix or Vari-mu (with HPF option) are a little more agressive and both can be flexible depending on how you drive them. It's good to have an optical and vari-mu combination, you can use either or both depending on what sound you are after.
Good luck!
|
| | | |