Volume vs Normalization - any dynamics difference? - Gearslutz.com

Gearslutz.com

All Advertisers
Go Back   Gearslutz.com > The Forums > Mastering forum


Volume vs Normalization - any dynamics difference?

New Reply New Reply Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 5th June 2007   #1
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 2,254

Thread Starter
Volume vs Normalization - any dynamics difference?

I'm using Cubase and SoundForge.

Does raising the level of tracks with volume/dB gain tools or normalize tools affect dynamic range ratios in the source material? When raising levels I want to know for certain I'm lifting the whole thing evenly, including the noise floor.

Does anyone know how apparent levels work and how these tools (volume and normalize) work? Do they work identically in this regard?

P.S. i know that normalize references 0 dBFS to pull up and volume references the existing level to push up or pull down. My question is about distorting the ratio between soft and loud when the tools are used to alter program level.
MichaelPatrick is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5th June 2007   #2
Gear Guru
 
Sid Viscous's Avatar
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 15,878

No.
Sid Viscous is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5th June 2007   #3
Gear maniac
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 183

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sid Viscous View Post
No.
More specifically, "no" to the first question, "yes" to the second and third. Normalization is a standard volume increase, just automated to bring the highest peak to the target (not necessarily 0dBFS).
beachhunt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5th June 2007   #4
Lives for gear
 
masteringhouse's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Location: Philadelphia Metropolitan Area
Posts: 1,044

Verified Member
It depends on the settings that you use in the case of SoundForge. You can raise levels to max at 0 or other value (traditional normalization), or use their compress or saturate features to change the dynamic range.
__________________
Tom Volpicelli
The Mastering House Inc.
www.masteringhouse.com
masteringhouse is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5th June 2007   #5
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 2,254

Thread Starter
This bit of theory 101 hadn't sunk in enough for me to be certain. I thought I knew it and then a few passages of classical material with bigger than usual dynamic range came along and that's what made me wonder if I was affecting it in any way to make the soft passages even softer.

Thanks for the helpful replies. It's comforting to know dynamic range won't be altered by raising volume or by normalizing.
MichaelPatrick is offline   Reply With Quote
New Reply New Reply Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook  Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter  Submit Thread to LinkedIn LinkedIn 



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Similar Threads
Thread Thread starter Forum Replies Last Post
Is there a big difference between a Goldpoint attenuator and a SPL Volume 2? Marrone High end 4 20th August 2007 10:46 PM
Normalization & Vocal Intelligibility... xeojax Geekslutz forum 1 7th February 2007 01:10 AM
Do you guys ever use normalization? jgrif08 Rap + Hip Hop engineering & production 26 8th January 2007 03:42 AM
RMS Normalization - when/how best to do it? videohlper Mastering forum 7 15th August 2006 09:23 PM
Patch Bay Insert normalization Tascam M2600 firby Low End Theory 3 8th May 2006 07:23 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:00 AM.

Home - Search Forum - Contact Us - Terms Of Use - Advertise on Gearslutz - All Advertisers - Archive - Top
 
 
Powered by vBulletin®
Gearslutz.com LTD - UK Company Number 7597610.
Registered Office - 35 Ballards Lane, London, N3 1XW.
Hosted by Nimbus Hosting.

SEO by vBSEO ©2010, Crawlability, Inc.