How'd she do that? Pat Sullivan mastering - Gearslutz.com Gearslutz.com
 


All Advertisers
Go Back   Gearslutz.com > The Forums > Mastering forum

How'd she do that? Pat Sullivan mastering
New Reply New Reply Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 17th May 2007   #1
Lives for gear
 
audiomichael's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Location: L. A.-ish
Posts: 2,186

Thread Starter
How'd she do that? Pat Sullivan mastering

I just got back from mastering with Pat Sullivan @ Bernie Grundman. Needless to say, she totally rock'd it.

I was trying to see if I could match the sound she got. I was looking at the waveform her's vs. mine. I know at some point she had hardware L2 engaged, I had the plugin at the end of my line. Why are my waveforms samurai chopped clean, while Pat's still has some little life left there???

Mine's in blue, her's is in red.
Attached Thumbnails
How'd she do that?  Pat Sullivan mastering-my-mastering-sucks.jpg  
__________________
Michael David Nielsen - Composer / Producer / Lover ...of gear
http://michaelnielsenmusic.com/

audiomichael is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 17th May 2007   #2
Lives for gear
 
lowland's Avatar
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Location: Essex UK
Posts: 875

Verified Member
Presumably because much of the required loudness has been generated prior to the L2, so the limiter is not having to work as hard as in your version - I bet the mastered version sounds cleaner too, with less of that distinctive L2 'roar'.

I can't speak for Pat, but in my case the final limiter is often only ticking over to control occasional peaks as transparently as possible, and a combination of other techniques further upstream has got us pretty much there already loudness-wise.

Why don't you ask Pat?
__________________
Nigel Palmer
Lowland Masters
www.lowlandmasters.com
lowland is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 17th May 2007   #3
Lives for gear
 
audiomichael's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Location: L. A.-ish
Posts: 2,186

Thread Starter
Now that's a good idea!
audiomichael is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 17th May 2007   #4
Gear interested
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 17

yeah, and don't forget to post Pat's reply here!
optik is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 17th May 2007   #5
Gear maniac
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Location: manchester uk
Posts: 256

Any chance of a before and after example, its always nice to hear good work
__________________
Alex Ivory
http://www.ivorymastering.com
aivoryuk is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 17th May 2007   #6
Lives for gear
 
Rick Sutton's Avatar
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 4,848

Verified Member
In addition to any audible differences it looks like a screenview issue to me. There's gotta be a low level floor on the blue file, it's just lower than the red and not showing on the screenview.
Rick Sutton is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 17th May 2007   #7
Gear addict
 
krid's Avatar
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Location: World
Posts: 485

Quote:
Originally Posted by aivoryuk View Post
Any chance of a before and after example, its always nice to hear good work
I would love to hear that.
krid is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 18th May 2007   #8
Lives for gear
 
Ben F's Avatar
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 3,055

Verified Member
It would come down to a touch of decent compression and less limiting. It looks like you have a lot of limiting on your waveform. The L2 should be 1-3dB GR, 3 is even pushing it for most music except perhaps dance or hip-hop.
Ben F is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 18th May 2007   #9
Lives for gear
 
audiomichael's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Location: L. A.-ish
Posts: 2,186

Thread Starter
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rick Sutton View Post
In addition to any audible differences it looks like a screenview issue to me. There's gotta be a low level floor on the blue file, it's just lower than the red and not showing on the screenview.
It's not a screenview. I double checked by throwing it into Peak. Mine is razor sliced.
Attached Thumbnails
How'd she do that?  Pat Sullivan mastering-razor.jpg  
audiomichael is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 18th May 2007   #10
Lives for gear
 
audiomichael's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Location: L. A.-ish
Posts: 2,186

Thread Starter
I'm slammed with work, but I'll try and get back in touch with Pat next week. I'm not sure I can post and example, but I'll look into it.
audiomichael is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 18th May 2007   #11
Lives for gear
 
Bob Yordan's Avatar
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Location: EUtopia, Stockholm
Posts: 959

Hiya audiomichael

What is the average RMS levels for those songs/parts ?

Best wishes

__________________
Cheers
Bob

"Dr Behringers I presume? No it's a copy!"
"ken lee... tulibu dibu douchoo"
"It's not 96khz idiot, it's 96hz. Now who sounds dumb?...Yu"
" Hello! Is it ME your looking for?"
- Bob Katz : "This loudness race is self-defeating. I'm using Thomson sub-machine guns on folk music now."
http://www.byd-media.net/om.mp3
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6KsFz...layer_embedded
Bob Yordan is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 25th May 2007   #12
Lives for gear
 
Switchcraft's Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,060

I just started to be able to get those round and tall edges in my masters.
i do it by mastering with a high ratio (approaching limit, but not quite) and long attack, letting peacks through (the ones you see), then following it up with a 2-1 ration to pull those edges that slipped through back down, but keeping them round. Last I use Software limiter to bring up the level approaching 0.0, but I also push the inputs of the converter to get it close to 0.0. I do everything out of the box, except for the last limit.
Switchcraft is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 20th September 2012   #13
Gear interested
 
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 17

Mastering engineers look for an output of around -0.3 to -1 Db. Thats because they want to leave headroom for further conversions that are common nowadays (eg. Wav to Mp3). It is believed that some wav to mp3 converters, or cheap players do in fact cause clipping if you dont leave some headroom!
derekbo is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 20th September 2012   #14
Gear maniac
 
kuasalogam's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 2012
Location: Indonesia
Posts: 156

try using Kramer Tape and/or Stillwell Event horizon, I can do similar result to the pic
kuasalogam is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 20th September 2012   #15
Lives for gear
 
echoRausch's Avatar
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 506

My waveforms look similar like Pats since I started using a limiter capable of limiting intersample peaks.

I assume she was using such a device...
echoRausch is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 22nd September 2012   #16
Lives for gear
 
dave-G's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Location: Florida
Posts: 2,507

Verified Member
Send a message via AIM to dave-G Send a message via Skype™ to dave-G
SRC after a peak limiter set to say -0.3dBFS often causes peak alterations like that above the previously rendered output ceiling.
__________________
DAVE GREENBERG
SONOPOD MASTERING

dave-G is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 23rd September 2012   #17
Lives for gear
 
huejahfink's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Location: underneath the dank, cobbled streets of Landon Taaaan'
Posts: 1,879

Verified Member
Yep - and limiters with a bit of a soft knee, Elephant can be set this way with a knee control.
__________________
Contact : Rich Hughes / mastering@binaryfeedback.com / Discogs Technical Credits
huejahfink is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 23rd September 2012   #18
Gear Head
 
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 63

Quote:
Originally Posted by huejahfink View Post
Yep - and limiters with a bit of a soft knee, Elephant can be set this way with a knee control.
+1
You can have same effect in the oxford limiter by engaging the soft knee.
Cubic Spline is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 23rd September 2012   #19
Lives for gear
 
MASSIVE Master's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Location: Chicago (Schaumburg / Hoffman Est.) IL
Posts: 2,890

Verified Member
Send a message via AIM to MASSIVE Master
As much as I hate "looking at sound" -- Anything I run out and in again -- Even if it's a simple AD/DA loop, ends up looking like that just because I have my AD backed down a few 10th's from the DA. If there's a lot of extra gain involved, a whole bunch of things can take over... Processing on the HEDD (a whole lot of people use 'em), capturing with a limiter before the AD, certain adjustable digital limiters, etc.
__________________
John Scrip - Massive Mastering, LLC - www.massivemastering.com

Spoon-feed a newb some answer and he'll mix for a day -
Get him to *think* about it and figure it out for himself and he'll mix for a lifetime --- JS
MASSIVE Master is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 25th September 2012   #20
Gear Head
 
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 32

Some limiters (e.g. iZotope Ozone's Maximizer) give you the option to preserve/recover transients during limiting.

If you look at Ozone's gain reduction trace while turning Transient Recovery off and on it seems like it basically adds a small amount of lookahead time. By reducing gain immediately before the transient, you don't have to clamp down so hard ON the transient.

Quote:
Originally Posted by derekbo View Post
It is believed that some wav to mp3 converters, or cheap players do in fact cause clipping if you dont leave some headroom!
I used to always export at -0.5 dB for that reason; anything higher would clip when I converted to MP3, but -0.5 would just touch -0.0 without clipping.

Then I figured out that it does depend on the converter. The same MP3 codec through a different conversion app only boosts files 0.2 dB during conversion. Some apps might boost a whole dB.
HB Stone is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 26th September 2012   #21
Gear nut
 
paintitblack's Avatar
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 134

Did you have a fast attack and her a slow attack?
paintitblack is online now  
Reply With Quote
Old 26th September 2012   #22
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 777

Quote:
Originally Posted by audiomichael View Post
I just got back from mastering with Pat Sullivan @ Bernie Grundman. Needless to say, she totally rock'd it.

I was trying to see if I could match the sound she got. I was looking at the waveform her's vs. mine. I know at some point she had hardware L2 engaged, I had the plugin at the end of my line. Why are my waveforms samurai chopped clean, while Pat's still has some little life left there???

Mine's in blue, her's is in red.
Between yours and hers, which one was perceptively louder?
Camera is offline  
Reply With Quote
New Reply New Reply Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook  Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter  Submit Thread to LinkedIn LinkedIn 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Similar Threads
Thread Thread starter Forum Replies Last Post
How'd you start? ecsound So much gear, so little time! 9 9th March 2007 04:52 AM
hip hop mix - How'd I Do? NesNeedsGear Work In Progress / Advice Requested / Show & Tell / Artist Showcase / Mix-Offs 2 9th October 2006 07:06 PM
DAW Patchbay - How'd you do it? kittonian High end 12 19th August 2006 05:13 AM
ed sullivan show - great drum sound from 1 mic!! which one?? joninc High end 12 21st May 2006 10:34 PM
How'd you get your job? (In Music) Tibbon So much gear, so little time! 28 7th January 2006 06:12 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:57 AM.

Home - Search Forum - Contact Us - Terms Of Use / Privacy Policy - Advertise on Gearslutz - All Advertisers - Top
 
 
Powered by vBulletin®
Gearslutz.com LTD - UK Company Number 7597610.
Registered Office - 35 Ballards Lane, London, N3 1XW.
Hosted by Nimbus Hosting.

By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies.

SEO by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.