Time offset for track markers? - Gearslutz.com Gearslutz.com
 


All Advertisers
Go Back   Gearslutz.com > The Forums > Mastering forum

Time offset for track markers?
New Reply New Reply Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 21st January 2007   #1
Gear maniac
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 188

Thread Starter
Time offset for track markers?

Hello everyone. I would like to ask what is the prefered time offset for track indices? Is there a minimum time offset that should be considered so that a cd can be defined as "Red Book"?

Thank you in advance for sharing your experience and knowledge.
rodhmos is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 21st January 2007   #2
Gear Head
 
MorganN's Avatar
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Location: Norway
Posts: 38

Send a message via MSN to MorganN Send a message via Skype™ to MorganN
you could perhaps look at this thread:

Explain "the offset for the first track"?
__________________
Morgan Nicolaysen
MorganN is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 25th January 2007   #3
Gear maniac
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 188

Thread Starter
Thank you for that link. It was informative but I did not find a a clear answer.
If someone would like to comment and share his experience, I would greatly appreciate it.

Besides that, I also have an additional concern:
What about albums that are to be released exclusively as digital downloads?
Is there a need for a time offset of the track indices?

Thank you!
rodhmos is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 25th January 2007   #4
Lives for gear
 
Coyoteous's Avatar
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 4,130

There are two ways to do it - offsets in your CD burning program or manual extra silence. I used to process incoming media for a replication plant and received masters from all over. Times vary greatly from 0 to 2 or more seconds (not pause gap, but silence after start ID - index 1).

I used to do 20 ms on my work, but after some complaints - I went to 200 ms, then later I went to 333 ms or 25 CD frames (manual, no offsets). Some may think this is very long, but I haven't had a single complaint in hundreds of masters. I also like to have 666 ms or 50 CD frames of actual silence (or dither) at the end of the track.
Coyoteous is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 25th January 2007   #5
Lives for gear
 
Cellotron's Avatar
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Location: Brooklyn, New York
Posts: 3,834

Verified Member
I had a brain fart in the post on I had the thread that was linked to - my usual offset is in fact 200ms and not 20ms - forgot to type in a zero. My initial track offset after the very first index point is usually 333ms also. I haven't received a complaint with these timings to date.

Of course with "live" CD's where the audio is continuous throughout the CD, or when there is an index point that occurs at a crossfade - or if tracks are kept extremely close to each other (which is typical of a lot of hiphop and dance records) - then this kind of gets thrown out the window and I usually err on the side of having the PQ point "right" for CD players with quicker unmute times so that the start point doesn't occur during the tail of the previous track - but these things really are best determined on a case by case basis.

As far as digital download files - I still think having an offset helps in case the digital media player also has a slow unmute time coded into it - or if the end user uses the file to burn a CD-R themselves.

Best regards,
Steve Berson
Cellotron is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 26th January 2007   #6
Lives for gear
 
Coyoteous's Avatar
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 4,130

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cellotron View Post
...
As far as digital download files - I still think having an offset helps in case the digital media player also has a slow unmute time coded into it - or if the end user uses the file to burn a CD-R themselves.

Best regards,
Steve Berson
- agreed
Coyoteous is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 27th January 2007   #7
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Location: Toronto
Posts: 811

Verified Member
Quote:
Originally Posted by Coyoteous View Post
There are two ways to do it - offsets in your CD burning program or manual extra silence. I used to process incoming media for a replication plant and received masters from all over. Times vary greatly from 0 to 2 or more seconds (not pause gap, but silence after start ID - index 1).

I used to do 20 ms on my work, but after some complaints - I went to 200 ms, then later I went to 333 ms or 25 CD frames (manual, no offsets). Some may think this is very long, but I haven't had a single complaint in hundreds of masters. I also like to have 666 ms or 50 CD frames of actual silence (or dither) at the end of the track.
I do mine all manually. My mastering setup up, without using tape, has an approx. 1/3 of a sec. delay as it passes through all my gear so I just use that. If I'm adding tape, the delay is about 400 ms. I do make sure the audio is muted up until the start of the audio so that the manual offset is digital black.

As Barry says, 333 ms or even a bit more is just fine. It's not long at all. I also add 2 seconds to the end of all my CDs so the listener has a chance to flip back before the CD goes to the next one or stops.
__________________
Andy,

Silverbirch Productions

www.silverbirchmastering.com
Andy Krehm is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 27th January 2007   #8
Mastering Moderator
 
Riccardo's Avatar
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Location: Always on the Run
Posts: 2,946

Verified Member
Quote:
Originally Posted by Coyoteous View Post
There are two ways to do it - offsets in your CD burning program or manual extra silence. I used to process incoming media for a replication plant and received masters from all over. Times vary greatly from 0 to 2 or more seconds (not pause gap, but silence after start ID - index 1).

I used to do 20 ms on my work, but after some complaints - I went to 200 ms, then later I went to 333 ms or 25 CD frames (manual, no offsets). Some may think this is very long, but I haven't had a single complaint in hundreds of masters. I also like to have 666 ms or 50 CD frames of actual silence (or dither) at the end of the track.
Just about the same here , used to be less but I like it safer especially with nowadays multiple standard players.
__________________
Velvet Room Mastering



"Can you imagine how great the Beatles or Pink Floyd could have sounded if they had used better cables?

I expect a Nobel prize to someday be awarded to an audiophile cable designer, as they clearly are way ahead of the rest of us.
" - DC -
Riccardo is offline  
Reply With Quote
New Reply New Reply Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook  Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter  Submit Thread to LinkedIn LinkedIn 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Similar Threads
Thread Thread starter Forum Replies Last Post
Explain "the offset for the first track"? masterpool Mastering forum 1 15th January 2007 05:53 PM
Real Time track Bounce in PT le Scott Alger Music Computers 9 26th May 2006 11:48 PM
moving markers along with session dangeorge6 So much gear, so little time! 2 16th September 2005 12:20 AM
spare time track cajonezzz Work In Progress / Advice Requested / Show & Tell / Artist Showcase / Mix-Offs 1 22nd August 2004 12:15 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:42 AM.

Home - Search Forum - Contact Us - Terms Of Use / Privacy Policy - Advertise on Gearslutz - All Advertisers - Top
 
 
Powered by vBulletin®
Gearslutz.com LTD - UK Company Number 7597610.
Registered Office - 35 Ballards Lane, London, N3 1XW.
Hosted by Nimbus Hosting.

By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies.

SEO by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.