SE Electronics Reflexion Filter X - Gearslutz.com Gearslutz.com
 


All Advertisers
Go Back   Gearslutz.com > The Forums > Low End Theory

SE Electronics Reflexion Filter X
Topic: New Reply New Reply Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 15th January 2013   #1
Gear interested
 
mhidrissi's Avatar
 
Joined: Dec 2012
Location: London, United Kingdom
Posts: 19

Thread Starter
SE Electronics Reflexion Filter X

I was look around at the SE Electronics Reflexion filters and came across the RF-X (sE Electronics Reflexion Filter X | DV247) and was wondering if anyone has used it and could provide some commentary?

How does it stack up against the RF-Pro which costs £180 more. Is it worth getting?
mhidrissi is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 16th January 2013   #2
Gear nut
 
malekmusic's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Location: Germany, Duesseldorf
Posts: 138

Send a message via MSN to malekmusic Send a message via Yahoo to malekmusic
i think they both suck. i dont know this one but as soon as i see foam i cant imagine that anything good may be recorded in that.

the rf-pro also sucks. combfilter all the way...

do yourself a favor and get some basotect absorbers or get the pvb from real traps.
__________________
www.myspace.com/alexabedi
malekmusic is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 16th January 2013   #3
Lives for gear
 
Ephi82's Avatar
 
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 625

Overpriced, underperformers imo. A thick blanket hung over a boom micstand at 90 degrees is more effective, a hell of alot cheaper and probably easier to set up.

Ymmv
Ephi82 is online now  
Reply With Quote
Old 16th January 2013   #4
Lives for gear
 
Ephi82's Avatar
 
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 625

I have one i dont use. Want to buy it?
Ephi82 is online now  
Reply With Quote
Old 16th January 2013   #5
Gear nut
 
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 113

I made one for about $20 in parts using air conditioner foam and radiator grille metal. i can't say if it made a huge difference or not, but I leave it in place since I'm reasonably happy with the sounds I'm getting.
cargojon is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 17th January 2013   #6
Gear addict
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 405

yeah, a wok and a bit of foam from an old pillow would be better than that thing
loaf is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 18th January 2013   #7
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Location: Maryland
Posts: 5,219

Quote:
Originally Posted by malekmusic View Post
the rf-pro also sucks. combfilter all the way...
It's not that bad. Just don't bury the mic all the way in the middle of it. It all depends on whether your rear reflections are worse. Moving blanket gobos are a good solution for a lot of situations, also.
__________________
- It looks just like a Telefunken U47 - with leather. You'll love it ...
- Jazz is not dead - it just smells funny.
- It doesn't make much difference how the paint is put on as long as something has been said. Technique is just a means of arriving at a statement.
kafka is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 18th January 2013   #8
Gear interested
 
Joined: Jan 2013
Location: Annandale, VA
Posts: 1

A lot of people seem to use them, they can't be that bad...
SOMA is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 18th January 2013   #9
Gear maniac
 
gruenburger's Avatar
 
Joined: Dec 2010
Location: Miami Beach

if you want to sound like you recorded in a cardboard box then go for it, althouhg an actual carboard box would be cheaper.
gruenburger is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 18th January 2013   #10
Gear interested
 
mhidrissi's Avatar
 
Joined: Dec 2012
Location: London, United Kingdom
Posts: 19

Thread Starter
Strange that all of these negative comments on the RF Pro are being said, normally I only hear good things about it. Paul White (of Sound On Sound) who I met recently seemed to really like the RF Pro and I've seen loads of threads here praising it.

I'll definitely be avoiding the RF-X then, at least.
mhidrissi is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 18th January 2013   #11
Lives for gear
 
DR Music's Avatar
 
Joined: Feb 2011
Location: Chicago Subs, IL
Posts: 2,288

Quote:
Originally Posted by mhidrissi View Post
Strange that all of these negative comments on the RF Pro are being said, normally I only hear good things about it. Paul White (of Sound On Sound) who I met recently seemed to really like the RF Pro and I've seen loads of threads here praising it.

I'll definitely be avoiding the RF-X then, at least.
RF Pro is great... But not the foam based products..
The big $$ one works fantastic. Some of these guys on GearSlutz overall don't have a clue on what is good, try it your self.
__________________
Favorite Gear = Mac Pro 5,1, Apollo/BlackLionAudio Conversion, Dangerous Music Summing, PT9, Universal Audio's HW and UAD-2,ISA 428, Event20/30, NS10M GIK Acoustics, and more...........
DR Music is offline  
Reply With Quote
New Reply New Reply Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook  Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter  Submit Thread to LinkedIn LinkedIn 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Similar Threads
Thread Thread starter Forum Replies Last Post
Daking filter question andychamp So much gear, so little time! 3 21st November 2007 11:00 PM
SE Electronics Reflexion Filter MKR So much gear, so little time! 14 16th November 2007 11:21 AM
sE Electronics release the ‘Reflexion Filter’ The Press Desk at Gearslutz.com So much gear, so little time! 0 18th May 2006 11:28 AM
se electronics reflexion filter vtone So much gear, so little time! 0 11th April 2006 02:12 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:26 AM.

Home - Search Forum - Contact Us - Terms Of Use / Privacy Policy - Advertise on Gearslutz - All Advertisers - Top
 
 
Powered by vBulletin®
Gearslutz.com LTD - UK Company Number 7597610.
Registered Office - 35 Ballards Lane, London, N3 1XW.
Hosted by Nimbus Hosting.

By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies.

SEO by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.