Pro's and Con's of using a Live sound mixer for recording - Gearslutz.com Gearslutz.com
 


All Advertisers
Go Back   Gearslutz.com > The Forums > Low End Theory

Pro's and Con's of using a Live sound mixer for recording
New Reply New Reply Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 28th September 2012   #1
Gear interested
 
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 7

Thread Starter
Pro's and Con's of using a Live sound mixer for recording

Hello guys!

I'm hoping to buy a new board in the next month or so. I'm upgrading from a Behringer MX9000. I'm looking at digital, however I love analog, and the "bling factor".

I was looking at a couple of big boards, live sound mixers from Allen & Heath. I was looking at the GL4000, GL2800 & GL3300... 40-48 channels.

I was hoping some of you guys can break down the pro's and cons of recording and mixing (hip-hop & R&B) with a live mixer (particularly the above) or suggest a large (affordable) console in that size.

I cant find much online breaking down the difference. I did read live boards EQ's and Pres are flat and bad for recording, but that was one post.

Please help me understand if I can use this type of board.

Thanks!
cion is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 28th September 2012   #2
Gear Head
 
Dominion28's Avatar
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Location: Glasgow
Posts: 64

Send a message via Skype™ to Dominion28
If you get a mixer with direct outputs on the channels you can be looking at a reasonably cheap source of mic pre's and you'll have the option of printing eq on the way into your converters should you wish. On a budget it's not a bad way to go. Just be picky about your mixer choice :-)
__________________
www.shadowsound.co.uk
0141 941 2654
Dominion28 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 28th September 2012   #3
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 5,476

A bad generalization, but, Quality. Often the budget live boards don't have the same specs (S/N crosstalk, etc) nor as good a grounding scheme as a studio board because the ambient noise in a live room overcomes the need for such better specs.

". I did read live boards EQ's and Pres are flat and bad for recording, but that was one post."

crap.

Yes, you can use this type of a board.
__________________
"I believe that entertainment can aspire to be art, and can become art, but if you set out to make art you're an idiot."

Steve Martin

Show business: we're all here because we're not all there.

Resistance is not futile. It is voltage divided by current.
Bill@WelcomeHome is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 28th September 2012   #4
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 1,150

How many channels do you need? What interface do you have now?
gravyface is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 28th September 2012   #5
Gear interested
 
John R Truman's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2012
Location: Chillicothe, OH
Posts: 27

The main issue I find with using a live console is that I need the faders and the levels and the EQs for the room mix, and it doesn't always compliment the recorded tracks.
If you're not using the console for the live venue mix, there wouldn't be that particular issue. However if you wish to monitor and mix the recorded tracks while recording, you'd be well suited to return the multi-tracks back to open line inputs, and use those channels to mix, thereby creating a "split console" (half inputs and half monitor mixer).
As far as EQs for a live and studio consoles, their function should be the same, and the way you use them typically has more impact than the quality of the EQ itself.
__________________
John Truman
Engineer / Instructor
www.RecordingWorkshop.com
John R Truman is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 29th September 2012   #6
Lives for gear
 
fastlanestoner's Avatar
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 2,639

Send a message via AIM to fastlanestoner Send a message via MSN to fastlanestoner
I find that groups and auxes on live mixers work somewhat counterproductively for recording work
__________________
Guitar/Backline Tech and Mobile Recording services in the Los Angeles area!
Custom stompboxes and cabling for stage and studio.

Audio Ecstasy

Die-hard Phila Eagles fan!
fastlanestoner is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 29th September 2012   #7
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 5,667

Hi
The main issue is that the routing of channels and auxes may not be the way you want to work. If this is flexible enough then most other issues are relatively minor.
While there may be differences in quality, it is not necessarily so simple to catagorise them.
The AMEK Recall and 501 desks were a 'reconfiguration' of the 'BIG' with essentially the same 'guts' just reconfigured in terms of signal routing.
Matt S
__________________
Matt S
www.mseaudio.co.uk
Matt Syson is offline  
Reply With Quote
New Reply New Reply Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook  Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter  Submit Thread to LinkedIn LinkedIn 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Similar Threads
Thread Thread starter Forum Replies Last Post
"Microphone Placement in Live Recording", or , "Stop reading labels and Listen!" Waylon Remote Possibilities in Acoustic Music & Location Recording 13 2nd November 2007 05:13 PM
Opinions on Mixers for Live Electronica wormsoftheearth Live Sound 5 20th February 2007 03:27 AM
Digital desks and the future of live recording Gerax Remote Possibilities in Acoustic Music & Location Recording 11 13th February 2007 12:57 PM
mic and pre for live use Jose Mrochek Remote Possibilities in Acoustic Music & Location Recording 23 8th November 2006 03:45 PM
Providing sound reinforcement AND multi-track recording Gedit Remote Possibilities in Acoustic Music & Location Recording 16 29th July 2006 04:33 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:05 PM.

Home - Search Forum - Contact Us - Terms Of Use / Privacy Policy - Advertise on Gearslutz - All Advertisers - Top
 
 
Powered by vBulletin®
Gearslutz.com LTD - UK Company Number 7597610.
Registered Office - 35 Ballards Lane, London, N3 1XW.
Hosted by Nimbus Hosting.

By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies.

SEO by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.