A/D Converter - Audient Mico vs ECHO Audiofire 4 - Gearslutz.com Gearslutz.com
 


All Advertisers
Go Back   Gearslutz.com > The Forums > Low End Theory

A/D Converter - Audient Mico vs ECHO Audiofire 4
New Reply New Reply Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 23rd August 2012   #1
Gear interested
 
Joined: Jan 2012
Location: Malaysia
Posts: 10

Thread Starter
A/D Converter - Audient Mico vs ECHO Audiofire 4

I was wondering if anyone here has had experience working with the digital output of both or either one of these products. I'm stuck wondering whether to get the Audient Mico as my preamp and wire it via SPDIF to the Audiofire's SPDIF in, into my laptop.

But if the A/D conversion on the Mico is of similar or poorer quality than the Audiofire, then I was thinking of getting a better preamp for my money's worth.

The Mico has gotten good reviews from what I've gathered, but mostly because of its all-round package and features rather than anything specific. What do you guys think?
RakeshR is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 23rd August 2012   #2
Gear interested
 
Joined: Jan 2012
Location: Malaysia
Posts: 10

Thread Starter
Anyone? I've been hankering to get the Summit 2BA-221 instead of the Audient, but i'm concerned that sending the signal to the Audiofire's Line Ins and using its A/D converter will compromise the sound. Any thoughts?
RakeshR is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 23rd August 2012   #3
Lives for gear
 
Jimbo's Avatar
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Location: Pennsyltucky
Posts: 2,683

I doubt the Mico has inferior conversion to the Echo. Audient upgraded the conversion in the ASP008 before the Mico came out, and I would imagine that they leveraged the same conversion in the Mico.

If it were me, and I wanted only two channels of preamp/conversion I would go with the Mico instead of the Summit/Echo. I like Summit gear, but I think you're getting better value overall with the Mico. Plus, the Mico takes line inputs, so you can always buy the Summit later, and run it through the Mico converters.
__________________

Jimbo is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 24th August 2012   #4
Gear interested
 
Joined: Jan 2012
Location: Malaysia
Posts: 10

Thread Starter
Thanks for your reply :-) . Could you elaborate on the overall value bit? I've found a decent amount of positive reviews and comments on the MICO but nowhere near as much as the emphatic praise the Summit unit has gotten.. Its because of this that I would rather go for the Summit

But if you or anyone can indicate that the Audiofire's conversion is of lesser quality than the MICO's then I'll definitely get the MICO over the Summit.

Or are the conversion quality indistinguishable?
RakeshR is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 24th August 2012   #5
Lives for gear
 
Jimbo's Avatar
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Location: Pennsyltucky
Posts: 2,683

The 2ba-221 has been around for many years while the Mico is a newer product, so you'll find more reviews/praise for the Summit.

In terms of value I think that 2 x preamps/converters is greater than 1 x preamp. I also think 2 channels of Dave Deardon (Audient) conversion that's made in England is probably better than 2 channels of ??? (Echo) conversion that's made in ???.

However, if you need only one channel of preamp, and the Summit features match your needs then the Summit is the way to go.

Only you can decide.

I'm not a converter snob, but I am a manufacturing quality snob. Look at the connectors on the Mico -- now look at the connectors on the Echo. See how the Audient has good quality connectors that are bolted to the chassis? See how the Echo doesn't? The Summit also has good quality connectors that are bolted to the chassis. One of these things is not like the rest.

Good luck!
Jimbo is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 24th August 2012   #6
Gear interested
 
Joined: Jan 2012
Location: Malaysia
Posts: 10

Thread Starter
Fair point, very fair point. The problem is I'll be working with a DAW and I will need the Audiofire regardless of whichever preamp I choose.

I was very satisfied with the mico after listening to clips, just felt the Summit would provide me with more coloration options. But you've highlight a very good point that's swayed me back to the Mico.

I've got one possible monkey wrench for the mico tho. How would the Mico fare when used for passive ribbons? I've found a real good deal for a couple of fatheads and now I'm wondering if the lack of switchable impedance on the Mico may be an issue? I know I can't expect one preamp to cover all bases but at 1.8k ohm, would that work well on 200-300ohm ribbon mics?

Sent from my HTC One X using Tapatalk
RakeshR is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 24th August 2012   #7
Lives for gear
 
Jimbo's Avatar
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Location: Pennsyltucky
Posts: 2,683

Quote:
Originally Posted by RakeshR View Post
Fair point, very fair point. The problem is I'll be working with a DAW and I will need the Audiofire regardless of whichever preamp I choose.

I was very satisfied with the mico after listening to clips, just felt the Summit would provide me with more coloration options. But you've highlight a very good point that's swayed me back to the Mico.

I've got one possible monkey wrench for the mico tho. How would the Mico fare when used for passive ribbons? I've found a real good deal for a couple of fatheads and now I'm wondering if the lack of switchable impedance on the Mico may be an issue? I know I can't expect one preamp to cover all bases but at 1.8k ohm, would that work well on 200-300ohm ribbon mics?

Sent from my HTC One X using Tapatalk
I get that you need the Audiofire dongle, and it probably works well in that mode.

As for impedance, you'd probably want the impedance of the preamp to be in the 2-3K ohm range (i.e., 10 x ribbon output impedance). However, I don't think it makes THAT much of a difference. My preamps are 2.2K input (not much above the Mico), and they sound great with ribbons.

Honestly, regardless of the amount of gain in the preamp I think slapping a Fethead on the ribbon mic makes a lot of difference in performance -- just the added volts pushing the mic signal down the line reduces EMI dramatically. If you're in a real studio EMI might not be such a problem, but for location-recording people (like me) it's a bigger problem.

It sounds like the Summit might give you more of what you're looking for, though. Perhaps it is your better option.
Jimbo is offline  
Reply With Quote
New Reply New Reply Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook  Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter  Submit Thread to LinkedIn LinkedIn 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Similar Threads
Thread Thread starter Forum Replies Last Post
4 mic channel "desk" with good pres - Yamaha Mg10/2? Soundcraft powerpad? Blast9 Low End Theory 4 6th March 2013 10:24 PM
hooking up lavry blue to echo layla 3G's spdif in and out? ITBoy So much gear, so little time! 3 20th April 2007 01:56 AM
Delta Sigma vs. PCM Musikvilla High end 15 9th March 2007 02:37 AM
Converters (emu 1616m vs RME) Jomega So much gear, so little time! 6 7th January 2007 09:38 PM
Opinion - UK Garage Convert/Studio build - Prices paulbankier Studio building / acoustics 2 3rd December 2006 10:49 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:11 PM.

Home - Search Forum - Contact Us - Terms Of Use / Privacy Policy - Advertise on Gearslutz - All Advertisers - Top
 
 
Powered by vBulletin®
Gearslutz.com LTD - UK Company Number 7597610.
Registered Office - 35 Ballards Lane, London, N3 1XW.
Hosted by Nimbus Hosting.

By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies.

SEO by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.