Black Lion Audio Mod for Liquid Saffire 56 - Page 2 - Gearslutz.com Gearslutz.com
 


All Advertisers
Go Back   Gearslutz.com > The Forums > Low End Theory

Black Lion Audio Mod for Liquid Saffire 56
New Reply New Reply Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 5th October 2012   #31
Gear nut
 
jkervin's Avatar
 
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 131

Has anyone gone for the BLA mod? How's it compare to the original?

Sent from my ADR6400L using Tapatalk
jkervin is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 5th October 2012   #32
Gear addict
 
zvukofor's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2010
Location: St.Petersburg, Russia
Posts: 436

Send a message via Skype™ to zvukofor
Do not know about Focusrite, but i suppose there're a lot of cheap awful components inside it, same with all not high-end intefaces. I'm modding some of them, but i'm going deeper than BLA, and i must say that difference between stock and modded is like day and night, even with Digis.

There're a lot of marketing compromises inside - cheapest caps, opamps, unsufficient PSU filtering - all of it must be modded to get real high quality sound. It is one of the differencies of medium and high priced audio interfaces, so basically improving it makes, for example, Profire 2626 sound at the same level as Apogee Ensemble, easily. It is not a doubtable thing, it is engineering fact, which at least can be prooved by unbiased ears, and this was done many times.
__________________
Where the supreme pleasure which is beyond senses is perceived through intelligence, having established himself there, he no longer wavers away from the Lord.
Gaining which he considers no other gain to be superior to that and abiding therein, he is not shaken even by the greatest of the sorrow.
zvukofor is online now  
Reply With Quote
Old 5th October 2012   #33
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 527

Quote:
Originally Posted by kludge View Post
"Measureable" with "specs" is not a good approach to audio gear. Scientific method wants things as simple and clean as possible, to eliminate variables. But music is inherently messy and variable. Look at THD, everyone's favorite spec when they want to pretend they know what they're talking about. It's measured with a 1khz sine wave. That's like measuring how well a car drives 60mph. MUSIC is made up of ten octaves of frequencies and a 20-60db dynamic range! Measuring "total harmonic distortion" in a way that is meaningful to actual music is nonsense.

A/B testing is a little better, but still not in any way perfect.

Now here's the question... do you think there's an audible difference between budget gear and pro gear? If so, then why? That's probably due to a: circuit differences, and b: parts quality. The mods are addressing both. So it makes sense than they'd show some improvement. Whether the improvement is worth the money is a judgment call, not something that can be measured.
Thank you.


The whole "shows me the specs" arguement is dumb (for lack of a better choice of word)
CPhoenix is offline  
1
Reply With Quote
Old 9th October 2012   #34
Gear nut
 
jkervin's Avatar
 
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 131

Would love to hear someone who's had BLA mod their LS56 chime in
jkervin is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 12th October 2012   #35
Gear nut
 
Lala Land's Avatar
 
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 103

Quote:
Originally Posted by jkervin View Post
Would love to hear someone who's had BLA mod their LS56 chime in
Yeah - anyone got the mod? I'm not over the moon about my LS56 so think I would be a target market for this mod.
Lala Land is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 14th November 2012   #36
Gear nut
 
jkervin's Avatar
 
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 131

Quote:
Originally Posted by jkervin View Post
Would love to hear someone who's had BLA mod their LS56 chime in
:D

Sent from my ADR6400L using Tapatalk
jkervin is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 14th November 2012   #37
Gear nut
 
poopynuggeteer's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2012
Location: Cape Girardeau MO
Posts: 134

Yeah I'm very interested in this as well. Maybe someone from BLA can chime in and elaborate a little bit on it.
poopynuggeteer is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 14th November 2012   #38
Gear nut
 
Joined: Mar 2010
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 145

Go to the BLA Facebook page you will find some answers from pro 56 owners. I have a modded 2626 from them and the difference was day and night it's safe to say that it would be the same with the Saffire 56.
__________________
Robert(AOS)
airusersblog.com/es
Robert(AOS) is online now  
Reply With Quote
Old 27th January 2013   #39
Gear Head
 
Joined: Nov 2011
Location: Dublin, Ireland
Posts: 34

Bumping to see if anyone has had one modded and can give an informed opinion
Maldini is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 31st January 2013   #40
Gear nut
 
jkervin's Avatar
 
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 131

I should have mine back next week. Once I've had a chance to check it out I'll reply.
jkervin is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 31st January 2013   #41
Gear nut
 
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 130

Looking forward to your experience here for sure!
wearecreative is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 2nd February 2013   #42
Gear interested
 
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 1

Can't wait to hear the results as well! Could we get a picture of the insides as well in high-resolution? I am curious to know what op-amps were used.
jdbressler is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 21st February 2013   #43
Gear nut
 
jkervin's Avatar
 
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 131

Ok so I have a few comments on this. I'm not a pro by any means, I just do this at home so keep that in mind.

There were a couple of issues that I'll mention first. The first is that it took a lot longer for me to get it back than the normal 7 - 10 day turn that they quote. I think that this was because mine was there during NAMM, and also that they had an issue with the clock upgrade which is the other issue. I checked their web site recently and it looks like they're not even offering the clock mod for this anymore. They shipped mine back to me with a microclock MKII - which seems ok. I've been told that this is a better upgrade than I would have gotten with the upgraded internal clock. So be it. I had to go get cables for the clock so I haven't even tried that out yet to see how much difference it makes.

The first thing that I noticed was how much quieter it is. Much less hiss/noise. On the tracks that I was working on, I notice a very big difference in the mid range especially. Mixes sound clearer and have a lot more detail. I'll be doing a lot of tweaking now. I can't comment on how it compares to any high end stuff. It does sound a lot better to me, though - even without the clock.

I'm glad that I did it for sure, just wish that it hadn't taken so long. If the clock makes a huge difference, I'll comment on that too. Part of me thinks that for a little more I could have picked up an Apollo, but for what I've gotten I think it's well worth it.
jkervin is offline  
1
Reply With Quote
Old 21st February 2013   #44
Lives for gear
 
Arksun's Avatar
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Location: Cotswolds, UK
Posts: 1,435

Quote:
Originally Posted by kludge View Post
Look at THD, everyone's favorite spec when they want to pretend they know what they're talking about. It's measured with a 1khz sine wave. That's like measuring how well a car drives 60mph.
To be fair it depends on the company. Some give a THD spec for just 1khz (which I agree is stupid),many give THD A-weighted, then the higher end stuff gives a THD spec based on a sine wave sweep through the entire audible range at near or max volume.
__________________
Music Producer | Sound Designer
http://www.arksun-sound.com
Arksun is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 4th March 2013   #45
Gear nut
 
jkervin's Avatar
 
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 131

I wanted to add something because I hooked up the microclock mk2 over the weekend. To my ears, it made a difference. I think made things open up a little, and I seemed to notice more clarity in the low mids (or I'm imagining things). My wife was in the studio with me and I asked her if she could hear a difference when I did some A/B'ing. She said without a doubt.

So yeah overall I'm really happy with this mod. I love the LS56 and to me this just takes it to a new lever.
jkervin is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 4th March 2013   #46
Gear nut
 
Lala Land's Avatar
 
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 103

Thanks for your review of the mod JKervin, some invaluable information .. I see thats a nice touch also giving you one of the microclocks, that included making it good value in your case anyway. Just a couple of questions, did they give you a full list of what exactly was changed in the mod? and also how are you finding the clarity of stacked tracks in your mixes? I find overdriven quitars through my LS56 never seem to glue themselves in the mix without a lot of work.



Cheers

Lance
Lala Land is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 5th March 2013   #47
Gear Head
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 48

Interesting thread

On one hand (after god knows how many months), we finally have a single, subjective opinion. I wonder how much of this debate could have been quelled by a few before-and-after files on the BLA site. Frankly, it surprises me that they don't simply post them. Not doing so only increases my skepticism.

That said, they have a pretty good rep and anyone who has worked in electronics knows that you can almost always improve something. Consequently, it's not difficult to imagine they have improved the 56

On the other hand, "if it ain't broke, don't fix it". I've grown weary of chasing unicorns. My LS56 sounds good to me. The pres are quite usable and the I/O options afford all the flexibility I need for what I am currently working on. I don't see the need, speaking strictly for myself, and I am not moved by reading about it, I want to hear the difference (in context).

After 40+ years of playing and recording (much of it professionally), I always ask myself if I am better than a given piece of kit. If the answer is no, I prefer to leave it alone. I've had and used many of the pres the LS emulates. It's no slouch. The stock pres are perfectly handy, too. Certainly worth the $700 (new) I paid for it and it does its job in my "project" studio.
jholt57 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 5th March 2013   #48
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Location: Maryland
Posts: 5,205

Quote:
Originally Posted by jkervin View Post
The first thing that I noticed was how much quieter it is. Much less hiss/noise. On the tracks that I was working on, I notice a very big difference in the mid range especially. Mixes sound clearer and have a lot more detail. I'll be doing a lot of tweaking now. I can't comment on how it compares to any high end stuff. It does sound a lot better to me, though - even without the clock.

I'm glad that I did it for sure, just wish that it hadn't taken so long. If the clock makes a huge difference, I'll comment on that too. Part of me thinks that for a little more I could have picked up an Apollo, but for what I've gotten I think it's well worth it.
I think you'd probably hear a bigger difference between the upgraded pre's and a Daking MP1, or an API 512c, or a Neve 1073LB, or an Avedis MA5, than you could with all the upgrades combined that you had done to the Focusrite. If the Focusrite pre's are usable in the first place and the conversion isn't bad, then there's nothing wrong with having them around as utility pre's. I still keep my Mackie 800R around for exactly that reason. However, $575 + shipping would put a pretty big dent in something that you'd find in a professional studio, and you would still have the option of letting go of any component you weren't happy with for about as much as you put into it, without having to go back to square one.

Just my 2ยข.
__________________
- It looks just like a Telefunken U47 - with leather. You'll love it ...
- Jazz is not dead - it just smells funny.
- It doesn't make much difference how the paint is put on as long as something has been said. Technique is just a means of arriving at a statement.
kafka is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 15th April 2013   #49
Gear nut
 
ejbragg's Avatar
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Location: Fort Smith, AR
Posts: 122

Black Lion's "Customer Care"

If I felt the fire of temptation to ask this company to do a mod on this unit, they pretty much doused it with their plethora of fees. First, let me quote their website on this matter - I'll tag the matters I'm complaining about in red font...
----------------------------
Pricing
Standard Liquid 56 Modification = $575 (+ return shipping)

Contact us to schedule an appointment for your modification.

Return Policy & Warranty
We extend a two-year warranty on all of our work beginning on the date your unit is delivered. *
Should your unit experience any mod-related failure during the warranty period, immediately contact us and we will gladly correct the issue at no charge (excluding shipping).

(Please note: Due to such high demand and because of our tight production schedule, we will charge a cancellation fee (30% of your down payment amount) if you cancel your appointment for modification once it has been scheduled. In the event you do cancel your appointment, please allow 3-4 weeks for your partial-refund to be processed. We do not offer any refunds for cancellations made within two weeks of the original scheduled appointment date.

If you wish to simply reschedule your mod's appointment date, we do require a two-week notice, and there is only a nominal $25 rescheduling fee.)

-------------------------------------------

First of all, anyone who has bought high end equipment knows that technical support is usually head and shoulders above mass-marketed equipment. Although the Liquid Sapphire 56 may be considered a mid-range (pro-sumer) unit, this mod is certainly an attempt to increase the unit's worth, and is likely a hands-on mod. In my estimation, it should count as a "high end" mod.

Asking the consumer to pay for the unit's modification + shipping does make sense, because it cannot be predicted how far away someone lives, and the packages should probably be insured. However, should the unit have problems, which are proven to be caused by said modification, which Black Lion would be responsible for, I see no valid reason to make the consumer pay for the shipping in EITHER direction. I could possibly have my arm twisted if they politely asked me to cover the expenses of shipping it out to them. But if their mod is indeed the problem, I see absolutely no reason to foot the bill for the return shipping, as it is likely going to be a costly inconvenience to me as the user, as it is. And really, they should pay for shipping both ways. If it were my handi-work, I'd gladly eat that cost to save my reputation!

Now this 30% nonrefundable fee... What in the world is THIS all about? Are they really charging $172.50 for cancelling your "appointment" for the mod? I can logically deduce that they will make an order for parts, but as they stated, "Due to such high demand..." they would very likely have another person in-line to use those parts. Furthermore, a $25 rescheduling fee seems another rip-off. If someone has a tight schedule themselves (as we work with clients every day) and a situation may arise where we can't afford not to have a specific piece of gear, then we are penalized by them. This is an insult. If their waiting list is so long to get my gear in there, and there's no such thing as a quick turnaround, then they had better NOT charge me a DIME if I have to reschedule.

And have I mentioned the fact that they are also claiming the right to hold our money for 3-4 weeks, AFTER they've already taken a third of it? What gives?!

C'mon, if we're willing to dish out over half a grand for a modification, we really ought to be getting more professional consideration than this!
ejbragg is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 4 Weeks Ago   #50
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Location: Maryland
Posts: 5,205

Quote:
Originally Posted by ejbragg View Post
And have I mentioned the fact that they are also claiming the right to hold our money for 3-4 weeks, AFTER they've already taken a third of it? What gives?!

C'mon, if we're willing to dish out over half a grand for a modification, we really ought to be getting more professional consideration than this!
Dude, relax. They're just a bunch of gear modders. There is no reason why anybody on the planet NEEDS a BLA mod of anything. BLA only exists because some people habitually buy the wrong tools to begin with, and then think they're going to get out of that decision for a few hundred bucks.
kafka is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 1 Week Ago   #51
Gear interested
 
Hoegersson's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2013
Location: Germany
Posts: 2

We also modded some Saffire 56s here in Germany since there was nobody here in the EU doing such mods. It's really worth it. Although BLA seems pricey...
Difference is huge if you know where it's weak spots are and how to modify it
Hoegersson is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 1 Week Ago   #52
Gear nut
 
jkervin's Avatar
 
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 131

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lala Land View Post
Thanks for your review of the mod JKervin, some invaluable information .. I see thats a nice touch also giving you one of the microclocks, that included making it good value in your case anyway. Just a couple of questions, did they give you a full list of what exactly was changed in the mod? and also how are you finding the clarity of stacked tracks in your mixes? I find overdriven quitars through my LS56 never seem to glue themselves in the mix without a lot of work.



Cheers

Lance


So sorry for taking so long to respond. They didn't give me a list of what was changed. I can't comment on stacked guitars before and after as I never really did it before. What I can say is that after the mod I had to go into one of my mixes and tame the distorted guitar tracks as they were really overpowering. I may have overcompensated for what I couldn't hear before. I still haven't really done much stacking but will let you know how it goes.

I'm still very happy that I did this. I had considered buying an Apollo but I'm pretty happy with how this thing is sounding. Also - consider buying and modding can be done for about $1300.
jkervin is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 1 Week Ago   #53
Lives for gear
 
FilmNMusicman's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 2011
Location: Marz
Posts: 713

I own an MR816csx, NOW, BLA does Mods for these as well...Mine has been used on commercial releases from various artists. No one ever said that the quality of what was recorded was lacking and never had a problem with stacking etc.

Black Lion Audio mods gear for people who are looking for something "MORE" from something they already have. Their mods cost basically the price of if you just researched and purchased the right piece of gear in the 1st place.

I think BLA audio's gear is Legit (Sparrow, B12A etc)!!

Their MODS, with all the FEES is something I wouldn't recommend to anyone.
__________________
SYNTH: Moog Little Phatty/DSI Mopho/DSI Tetra/DSI Evolver/Sequential Circuits MultiTrak/Korg MS2000B

RACK: MR816CSX/Presonus Eureka/GAP 73/Valley People Dynamite/Ashly CL52E/Ashly PQX571/DBX 166A/VLA PRO

PEDALS: Moogerfooger MF102 RingModulator, Way Huge Aqua Puss MKII, Way Huge Green Rhino MKII, EHX Big Muff

http://soundcloud.com/godsons
FilmNMusicman is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 1 Week Ago   #54
Lives for gear
 
richgilb's Avatar
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Location: hull
Posts: 1,164

They are pretty cool people. If you haven't started an email dialog with them I would. They are quick to respond and very helpful,

I don't remember any of that payment and contractual stuff. It is low priority. I had a Motu. It hissed at high gain. I didn't want to replace it as it is stable. I sent it to them. They modded it and returned it. Now it doesn't hiss on full gain. That and their good email communication is what I remember.

What's not to recommend?
richgilb is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 1 Week Ago   #55
Gear nut
 
Lala Land's Avatar
 
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 103

I do think the mod is worthwhile but ...

I ended up going with a used HD2 system with a 96 i/o for slightly more than the asking price, I am still using the Focusrite for its preamps and outputs. I really like having the volume knob and headphone outputs on the LS56 to tweak volumes as the 96 i/o is only 16 in 2 out. But the beauty of this system is when I am recording in Ableton, which I use more than Protools, I use the 96 i/o for 16 great A/Ds or inputs from my Preamps including the LS56's pres, and I can use the LS56 for the outputs, head phone monitoring and it works prefectly.
In order to use the the HD Core and accel cards power I do have to use just the 96 i/o in Protools HD, and I know Protools 10HD is as far as I can go with this hardware, but I still can use normal Protools 11 with the LS56.

Running the Focusrite pres out into the 96 i/o inputs IME provides a slightly clearer sound, which in my short experience so far with this setup makes mixing a bit easier.

Just saying this is a great option for some of us, especially us small studio guys, as used HD rigs are going cheap these days, and some people will only use a studio running HD. LS56 is a great unit, and I will keep it on for as long as I need to.
Lala Land is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 1 Week Ago   #56
Gear nut
 
Lala Land's Avatar
 
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 103

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lala Land View Post
Running the Focusrite pres out into the 96 i/o inputs IME provides a slightly clearer sound, which in my short experience so far with this setup makes mixing a bit easier.
Haha there I said it
Lala Land is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 1 Week Ago   #57
Gear nut
 
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 92

The cost of the mod just doesn't make sense to me. It's really cost prohibitive. I 'd much rather use that kind of money towards a new product.
Reverb is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 1 Week Ago   #58
Lives for gear
 
FilmNMusicman's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 2011
Location: Marz
Posts: 713

Quote:
Originally Posted by Reverb View Post
The cost of the mod just doesn't make sense to me. It's really cost prohibitive. I 'd much rather use that kind of money towards a new product.
Yes, this is why I can't recommend the "MODs" plus you're gonna have to deal with downtime in your studio if say your main interface is gone.

At some point we all have to say to yourselves "Enough is enough" get back to making music and stop worrying.

I mean, good lord, a new product comes out every 2 years that claims to be the best thing at this price point ever. I mean, it's kinda fountain of youth mentality.
FilmNMusicman is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 6 Days Ago   #59
Gear Head
 
Joined: Nov 2011
Location: Dublin, Ireland
Posts: 34

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hoegersson View Post
We also modded some Saffire 56s here in Germany since there was nobody here in the EU doing such mods. It's really worth it. Although BLA seems pricey...
Difference is huge if you know where it's weak spots are and how to modify it
What kind of differences can you hear? LS56 with the mod is getting into Fireface 800/UFX level $$$ it'd want to be a marked difference

Sent from my HTC One using Tapatalk
Maldini is offline  
Reply With Quote
New Reply New Reply Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook  Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter  Submit Thread to LinkedIn LinkedIn 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Similar Threads
Thread Thread starter Forum Replies Last Post
Real Names for Focusrite Liquid Mix emus - brought to you by St. Peeder peeder Music Computers 79 9th March 2013 01:54 PM
needed: AK5393 A/D chips / Black Lion Mod pschniddy Geekslutz forum 8 4th October 2010 10:53 AM
Black Lion Audio Microclock... WKG So much gear, so little time! 4 13th October 2008 02:25 PM
black lion audio 002 mod droidtn So much gear, so little time! 10 12th February 2007 03:51 PM
DIGI002 with Black Lion Aud. MOD??? kingofthecrate Low End Theory 6 8th December 2006 11:47 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:37 AM.

Home - Search Forum - Contact Us - Terms Of Use / Privacy Policy - Advertise on Gearslutz - All Advertisers - Top
 
 
Powered by vBulletin®
Gearslutz.com LTD - UK Company Number 7597610.
Registered Office - 35 Ballards Lane, London, N3 1XW.
Hosted by Nimbus Hosting.

By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies.

SEO by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.