Axe FX2 Vs. 6505+ for recording. - Gearslutz.com

Gearslutz.com

All Advertisers
Go Back   Gearslutz.com > The Forums > Low End Theory


Axe FX2 Vs. 6505+ for recording.

New Reply New Reply Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 21st January 2012   #1
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 2,195

Thread Starter
Axe FX2 Vs. 6505+ for recording.

I suppose I'm getting lazy, but the sound of an Axe FX 2 is becoming more and more tempting.

What sounds the best recorded? An Axe FX or a 6505?

Convenience is definitely in favour of axe FX and bands like Periphery are avid users.
ShadowAMD is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21st January 2012   #2
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 596

Depends how much you like the 6505. One trick pony.

The axe fx is a 70 trick pony. Purists love to bash it. I personally love my ultra. For a person recording in a space that a) is imperfect acoustically and b) can't have a lot of noise, it's an ideal solution.
dasnub is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21st January 2012   #3
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 2,195

Thread Starter
Quote:
Originally Posted by dasnub View Post
Depends how much you like the 6505. One trick pony.

The axe fx is a 70 trick pony. Purists love to bash it. I personally love my ultra. For a person recording in a space that a) is imperfect acoustically and b) can't have a lot of noise, it's an ideal solution.
Well if you can have a bit of noise and you do have a well treated room, what would you go for?
ShadowAMD is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21st January 2012   #4
Gear Head
 
Joined: Jan 2012
Location: Los Angeles, CA.
Posts: 56

Record them both. Best of both worlds.
maggotspawn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21st January 2012   #5
Lives for gear
 
NEWTON IN ORBIT's Avatar
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Location: East Coast USA
Posts: 2,095

Get the 6505. At least there will be no surprises. You know a good tone can be had from it.

Also, not sure if it's a one trick pony, maybe like 3 or 4. For most projects, this can be enough.

The axe efx? Sure it will do a lot. Not crazy about amp sims myself. They are difficult for me to mix with other instruments that move air. Why? I have no idea.

They seem to work ok with drum machine stuff, but the minute you throw a real kit in the mix, they sound separate to me.

Everybody's got an opinion though.

john
NEWTON IN ORBIT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21st January 2012   #6
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 2,195

Thread Starter
Quote:
Originally Posted by NEWTON IN ORBIT View Post
Get the 6505. At least there will be no surprises. You know a good tone can be had from it.

Also, not sure if it's a one trick pony, maybe like 3 or 4. For most projects, this can be enough.

The axe efx? Sure it will do a lot. Not crazy about amp sims myself. They are difficult for me to mix with other instruments that move air. Why? I have no idea.

They seem to work ok with drum machine stuff, but the minute you throw a real kit in the mix, they sound separate to me.

Everybody's got an opinion though.

john
Also I have to think that the AXE FX cost's $3000, for that you could buy a Mesa rig..

Even a second hand Ultra, you are looking at $1300.

But I'll be honest with you, I'm getting tired of Mic'ing up amp's lol.. I know it's my job.. But I would easily say getting a professional sounding guitar recording, is one of the hardest most time consuming things..
ShadowAMD is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21st January 2012   #7
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 2,195

Thread Starter
Quote:
Originally Posted by maggotspawn View Post
Record them both. Best of both worlds.
They are a lot of money for what they are, the Axe FX would have to be better than my mesa for the price.
ShadowAMD is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22nd January 2012   #8
Gear Head
 
Joined: Jan 2012
Location: Los Angeles, CA.
Posts: 56

Another suggestion is tracking with Overloud's TH-2. I believe there's a demo. Awesome sounding amp sim.
maggotspawn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22nd January 2012   #9
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 2,195

Thread Starter
Quote:
Originally Posted by maggotspawn View Post
Another suggestion is tracking with Overloud's TH-2. I believe there's a demo. Awesome sounding amp sim.
Cool, I'll check it out thanks .
ShadowAMD is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22nd January 2012   #10
Gear nut
 
Joined: Jul 2011
Location: Paradise City
Posts: 84

In my experience sim amps tend to sound pretty good solo, though once you start trying to mix them in with other instruments they sound like mud. I've never recorded one though, this is just from being in bands and having a guitarist use one from time to time. Can't say I'm a fan.
flybeereligion is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22nd January 2012   #11
Lives for gear
 
NEWTON IN ORBIT's Avatar
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Location: East Coast USA
Posts: 2,095

Quote:
Originally Posted by ShadowAMD View Post
Also I have to think that the AXE FX cost's $3000, for that you could buy a Mesa rig..

Even a second hand Ultra, you are looking at $1300.

But I'll be honest with you, I'm getting tired of Mic'ing up amp's lol.. I know it's my job.. But I would easily say getting a professional sounding guitar recording, is one of the hardest most time consuming things..
I feel like elec gtr is the easiest, and requires the least gear and room myself.

Drums? That separates the men from the whippersnappers IMO.

Bass too I guess sometimes. Getting it to sit in the mix can be a mofo with a bad player.

I guess it depends what tone you are trying to nail maybe on gtr.

Anyways...

Peace,
john
NEWTON IN ORBIT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22nd January 2012   #12
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 2,195

Thread Starter
Quote:
Originally Posted by NEWTON IN ORBIT View Post
I feel like elec gtr is the easiest, and requires the least gear and room myself.

Drums? That separates the men from the whippersnappers IMO.

Bass too I guess sometimes. Getting it to sit in the mix can be a mofo with a bad player.

I guess it depends what tone you are trying to nail maybe on gtr.

Anyways...

Peace,
john
You see what do you mean by electric guitar? Rock / pop style electric guitar is a doddle.

Well I have a group in trying to sound like Periphery:

Periphery - Icarus Lives! - YouTube

They are great at what they do, but just trying to get that raw heaviness whilst it being super clean is difficult. Getting there though, I told the guitarist to try a new guitar with some passives.

But still I had to audition a few amps to get the tone (or near), we settled on renting an ENGL out. But I can't rent an amp out every time someone want's "that" tone.

Also I'm recording at home for my band stuff (When I have time), keep getting a bit of a weak signal for reasons unknown?

I have an SM57 and MD421 on two separate speakers, looked out for any phase issues.. got it dead centre about two inches away, moved it of axis till I found the tone I like.

Signal is at -18 on the way in and sounds fine like the thousand other time's I have mic'ed an amp up.

Then it get's in the DAW... AND GRR!! It don't sound right.

So I'm playing around with it again and again.. Then I just think why not buy an AXE FX LOL!?

It's trying to get a clean hi-fi sound out of amp's in metal, some time's it works other times it can go seriously wrong.
ShadowAMD is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22nd January 2012   #13
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 596

One thing: I would advise against listening to the variety of axe fx haters who have never used the product for any substantial length of time. Like recording an amp, it takes knowledge and experience to dial in the recorded tone you want. Less time than micing up an amp, but it still takes some effort.

It is not an "amp sim" in the traditional sense. Fractal Audio has added a variety of features to the modeled amps that are not there in real life. Certain amps have EQs that have additional knobs where the original amp didn't, some allow control of parameters like presence that weren't originally there. In my opinion, the tonal flexible is vastly better than the actual amps.
dasnub is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22nd January 2012   #14
RiF
Lives for gear
 
RiF's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Location: Germany
Posts: 1,613

I just digged out an old recording that I did using the ENGL model of my AxeFx Standard (sold it for a Dual Rectifier...). I recorded it without any cab models (cabinet IRs suck most of the time) and I simply applied the Metal T1 cabinet from Amplitube 3. Bang! That's one nice sound.

But mind that you need A LOT OF DISCIPLINE when you have an AxeFx. The myriad of parameters and amp/stomp/cab/fx/...-models and whatnot can make you tweak so much that you don't know that you already reached your favorite sound. It's so much easier to dial in a JCM800...

What really made me sell it were all those firmware updates. People liked them but I hated them. They changed the sound of nearly everything everytime, so all the tweaking started over and over again... arggghhh... I get confused with more than drive/low/mid/high/master.
__________________
Too many options kill creativity.
RiF is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 22nd January 2012   #15
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 2,195

Thread Starter
Quote:
Originally Posted by RiF View Post
I just digged out an old recording that I did using the ENGL model of my AxeFx Standard (sold it for a Dual Rectifier...). I recorded it without any cab models (cabinet IRs suck most of the time) and I simply applied the Metal T1 cabinet from Amplitube 3. Bang! That's one nice sound.

But mind that you need A LOT OF DISCIPLINE when you have an AxeFx. The myriad of parameters and amp/stomp/cab/fx/...-models and whatnot can make you tweak so much that you don't know that you already reached your favorite sound. It's so much easier to dial in a JCM800...

What really made me sell it were all those firmware updates. People liked them but I hated them. They changed the sound of nearly everything everytime, so all the tweaking started over and over again... arggghhh... I get confused with more than drive/low/mid/high/master.
Well if it's going to take me longer to dial in the tone I want, than just micing up a guitar cab. It kinda makes this whole product (For Me) Pointless.. It's to try and speed up delivery..

Thank's for the advice
ShadowAMD is offline   Reply With Quote
New Reply New Reply Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook  Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter  Submit Thread to LinkedIn LinkedIn 



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Similar Threads
Thread Thread starter Forum Replies Last Post
Stand-alone recorder vs. FW interface (or Tascam vs. Apogee) macula Remote Possibilities in Acoustic Music & Location Recording 2 23rd March 2008 11:02 PM
New omnis for remote? (DPA vs Oktava, etc) leddy Remote Possibilities in Acoustic Music & Location Recording 1 19th February 2008 07:28 AM
If you were going to build a laptop for on location work using cubase 4...(PC vs MAC) herecomesyourman Remote Possibilities in Acoustic Music & Location Recording 13 25th January 2008 08:44 PM
Anybody successfully recording 96 tracks at 96K BrianT Remote Possibilities in Acoustic Music & Location Recording 14 29th December 2007 02:25 AM
iso portable field mixer (fp33 vs. 302 vs. mixpre vs. ??) zimv20 Remote Possibilities in Acoustic Music & Location Recording 6 2nd June 2007 01:07 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:44 AM.

Home - Search Forum - Contact Us - Terms Of Use - Advertise on Gearslutz - All Advertisers - Archive - Top
 
 
Powered by vBulletin®
Gearslutz.com LTD - UK Company Number 7597610.
Registered Office - 35 Ballards Lane, London, N3 1XW.
Hosted by Nimbus Hosting.

SEO by vBSEO ©2010, Crawlability, Inc.