![]() | All Advertisers |
| Member Services Directory | Classifieds | Reviews | Jobs | Deal Zone | Merchandise | Marketplace | Books, DVDs & Gadgets | Video Vault | Tips & Techniques |
| |||||||
New Reply | Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| | #1 |
| Gear interested Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 4
Thread Starter | digital mixer vs. audio interface question Hi all, I posted a previous thread about making my studio all digital, but I think everyone missed my last reply with its question about digital mixers vs. audio interfaces. I want to make sure I understand this correctly: a digital mixer relieves a computer of the burden of audio because the D/A conversion occurs in the mixer and not the computer. The signals essentially reside in the digital mixer (at least up to the point of recording), relieving the computer of having to deal with them. Is this right? This would be different than using an audio interface (the MOTU 2408mk3 card, for example) which would direct the signals into a computer, only after which I could monitor the sound..?? Or does the 2408 function basically the same as a digital mixer? Thanks for any help you can provide. |
| | |
| | #2 | |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 3,965
| Quote:
You need an interface to get audio in and out of a computer anyway. Mixers are so yesterday. ![]() | |
| | |
| | #3 | |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 2,304
| Quote:
![]() | |
| | |
| | #4 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Dec 2005 Location: Orlando
Posts: 1,231
| Yeah, no man, that's not the deal. A digital mixer will give you more features that you're not getting with a regular interface, but it won't make it any easier on your computer. |
| | |
| | #5 |
| Gear interested Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 11
| what you want these days is a firewire interface. All the conversion takes place in the box and is transfered back and forth to the computer through the firewiare cable interface. The digital mixers do the same thing, sometimes the firewire part is an option (tascam calls it mlan). If you are running DAW software most of the moxer functions are useless as the eq and effects now take place in software. All the are good for is the moving faders. checkout the presonus firepod whihc comes with a version of cubase. |
| | |
New Reply
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Mac's built in digital I/O+AD/DA vs Audio Interface | autodidactic | Music computers | 50 | 4th December 2006 06:10 PM |
| Best Digital Audio Interface | Muso | So much gear, so little time! | 0 | 27th August 2006 05:06 AM |
| Dumb digital interface question | dblock | High end | 1 | 15th August 2006 04:50 AM |
| Digital desk, or analogue and audio interface...? | hazza | Low End Theory | 1 | 8th August 2006 03:29 PM |
| |