![]() | All Advertisers |
| Member Services Directory | Classifieds | Reviews | Jobs | Deal Zone | Merchandise | Marketplace | Facebook App | Books, DVDs & Gadgets | Video Vault | Tips & Techniques |
| |||||||
New Reply | Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| | #1 |
| Gear nut Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 77
Thread Starter | sub/nearfiled level matching for optimum output
i just picked up a tapco sw-10 to join a pair of mackie hr-624's. i set the x-over frequency @ 80hz. the input gain on both the sub and the sattelites is set to 12 oclock. (mackies are 50/100 watts - tweeter/woofer respectively, and the sub is 120 watts) main issue i had (still have) right away is that i have to turn down the master fader in cubase SX2.2 to about -12 so as the sub does not fart and the mackies are not too loud. each channel in cubase is riding around -1/-2 db. i am using the fixed level outs #1 & #2 on my motu 828 (not the outs that are controlable with the main/volume knob) ......... which is the best approach for optimum level matching? -should i stick to the current setup and work with a master fader output gain of -12 db? -or should i adjust the sub/nearfield attenuators while keeping master fader @ 0db? -or should i connect the monitors to the volume knob controllable outputs and use the motu "main" attenuator? (by the way, this attenuator is dirty and clicks/pops when i twist it) -------- one more question. -is there a way i can test the sub to make sure its performing up to par? it seems to me (although i very well might be wrong) that the sub driver starts to fart @ not very high levels, and i want to make sure its not defective. thanx |
| | |
| | #2 |
| Gear maniac |
Hello Ted: If you have an SPL meter (such as the ones sold at RadioShack for about $35), then you may find our test files and calibration instructions useful. They can be found by going to: www.abluesky.com/calibration Feel free to e-mail me directly if you have any questions. pascal@abluesky.com Cheers!
__________________ Pascal Sijen Director, Product Management, Cinema Solutions @ Dolby Labs | Former Co-Founder Blue Sky Int. & Audio Design Labs Inc. | I'm also a geek in my spare time. |
| | |
| | #3 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 990
|
I would say to use the monitor outputs. The pot you're refering to probably just needs to be exercised. Turn your speakers off, and turn the knob from full counter clockwise, to full clockwise about 100 times, or more, until it cleans up. Trust me, it works. You don't want to use your master fader as a volume control... you're losing bit depth, as well as making it really hard to make mixes that aren't 12db down from where they easily could be. Wow... I just checked out that sub. That thing really isn't capable of anything. No offense, but seriously... It probably is just farting out on you. Good luck, and did you happen to eat a mango today? |
| | |
| | #4 | |
| Gear nut Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 77
Thread Starter | Quote:
| |
| | |
| | #5 | |
| Gear nut Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 77
Thread Starter | Quote:
thats what i was concerned with regarding mixing @ -12db (loss of dynamics) the sub is much more capable than i need for my room, my main concern is that im sending a signal -12db and the attenuator on the sub is @ 12 oclock, and if i try to turn up the master fader to even lets say -10db - the sub starts to fart and i dont know if thats a flaw or simply the max power handling of the unit. mind you even @ -12db it is still very loud (too loud) for my room size | |
| | |
| | #6 | |
| Lives for gear Joined: Oct 2003 Location: San Antonio Texas
Posts: 1,773
| Quote:
The Tapco is no powerhouse sub but is quite useable for checking out what is going on down low. I am using the same sub with HR824s and have been very pleased with the results. I think we discussed this in in another thread when you were checking out this vs. the KRK. I use the sub in a very subtle way....but that is what I was looking for when I got it. It is more than enough for monitoring at 85-90db, where I live most of the time during a mix. | |
| | |
| | #7 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Dec 2005 Location: Orlando
Posts: 1,231
|
Get some sort of pad or attenuater between your motu and your monitors. Something simple and passive, but use something w/ high grade components. Should be an easy fix/problem solved sort of thing.
|
| | |
| | #8 | |
| Gear nut Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 77
Thread Starter | Quote:
i got 2 questions 4 u: - what frequency are you crossing over to the 824s? - what position is the attenuator set on the sub? (my main concern right now is to see if the driver is faulty/ripped/rubbing etc...and im asking cause like i said mine starts to fart @ -10 on cubase master fader (12 oclock attenuator position on sub) and i would like to compare if yours is about the same) appreciate the help | |
| | |
| | #9 | |
| Gear nut Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 77
Thread Starter | Quote:
do u have any links to some examples? | |
| | |
| | #10 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 990
|
Well, as for testing out the sub, run a sine wave generator through it. Preferrably something sweepable. start at around 30hz, and work your way up... slowly. If the driver is defective, you will hear the voice coil rubbing on the pole piece. You can also do this by lightly pushing on the cone (with 2 hands on the outside of the dust cap, as to not tip the cone at all...) and see if it rubs. You should be able to feel that. When you start to hear air turbulence, that's all she's got captain... The sine wave generator is also a good way to get your crossover point, and sub level matched. Just sweep up and down from about 200hz on down to 30hz or whatever, and listen for drastic level changes. Pay close attention to the crossover point, to see if your phase matches. That's a huge deal. Try moving the sub around in the room to get the flattest response from the sub itself. You can also use the sine wave sweep to see where the Mackies start to drop off... i'd say that you probably want it somewhere around 70, if you aren't listening to program material at a high level. As far as a volume control, if you want to spend money (HA!!!) Mackie makes the 'big knob' for about three bills. Otherwise, you're looking for a stepped attenuator, such as http://www.goldpt.com/vcb_sa1.html That thing is probably expensive, because it has the word gold in the name, but that's the basic idea. Or... if you feel like soldering.................... |
| | |
| | #11 |
| Gear nut Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 77
Thread Starter |
thanx for the info thumper, some good advice there...... i did most of it short of the sweep (i have to try to borrow a tone generator from work) i set the x over point @ 80hz - seems to be a happy balance. i would still like to get a reply from Crash regarding my questions above relating to his setup cheers |
| | |
| | #12 | |
| Lives for gear Joined: Oct 2003 Location: San Antonio Texas
Posts: 1,773
| Quote:
Anyway, to answer your questions, I am running the sub crossover at 80hz and the attenuator is around the 2-3 o'clock position if you were viewing the knob from the back side of the sub. My rig is a d8b/HDR rig so your cubase master fader positions are a foreign animal to me. I use the control room level pots to turn my monitors up and down. Sorry again for not responding sooner. | |
| | |
| | #13 | |
| Gear nut Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 77
Thread Starter | Quote:
see, my concern is that i can only go to about 10-11 oclock position on the input attenuator on the sub before it starts to fart, and i was (still am) a bit worried that maybe it is a faulty driver. mind you, as ive mentioned before i am going out of the fixed-level outputs on the motu 828 since my attenuator is dirty. anyways, thanx again - will post results when i have it all figured out. cheers | |
| | |
| | #14 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Oct 2003 Location: San Antonio Texas
Posts: 1,773
|
I can see your concern but I bet it has to do with the way you are feeding your signal straight off the master into your speaker rig. I would think that if I tried a similar setup on my rig, I would get my head blown off...and my sub would get very farty. You know anybody that has a rig where you could test your sub/sattelite combo in a setup that is more traditional where some sort of volume pot is used? Do you have a way to replicate your mix on a couple of auxes and use the aux masters as a volume knob for testing? Just trying to think of some otions so you caqn test it and get some anwers one way or the other. |
| | |
New Reply
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Level matching question | edwinhurwitz | Remote Possibilities in Acoustic Music & Location Recording | 7 | 23rd June 2006 10:52 PM |
| Level matching acoustic guitar recording in ORTF and NOS | Joost | Remote Possibilities in Acoustic Music & Location Recording | 19 | 6th November 2005 01:09 AM |
| Benchmark DAC-1 Level-Matching Question | Synth80s | So much gear, so little time! | 1 | 5th February 2005 12:30 AM |
| Keyboard/Amplifier Level Matching... | heylow | So much gear, so little time! | 1 | 7th July 2004 06:49 AM |
| How to find the optimum level for your high end gear | Auxillary | High end | 11 | 3rd December 2003 09:38 PM |
| |