![]() | All Advertisers |
| Member Services Directory | Classifieds | Reviews | Jobs | Deal Zone | Merchandise | Marketplace | Facebook App | Books, DVDs & Gadgets | Video Vault | Tips & Techniques |
| |||||||
New Reply | Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| | #31 |
| Gear addict Joined: Jun 2009 Location: Race Horse and Bourbon State
Posts: 357
|
Yeah, my ART is the DPS II and I've never tried the two space ART units but have heard they're a whole 'nother animal. Mine quit working so being a guitarist who knows that most amp problems are tube related I popped the top on the DPS and popped in an old tube from my tube stash. Well, it started working again and sounded better. Funny, while I had it open I checked the digital side of it and there were a boat load of Alesis chips in there. ART must have bought out the old ADAT stash or something. Also, the ART just had one tube for a stereo unit so they're using just one side of the triode for each channel. It seems to obviously be a starved plate. How many tubes do the two space ART mic pre's have? |
| | |
| | #32 | |
| Lives for gear | Quote:
My Behringer ADA8000 also has Alesis chips in it; maybe Alesis is a reseller for all things digital?
__________________ | |
| | |
| | #33 | |
| Gear nut Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 97
| Quote:
Sometimes I wonder why they make cheap tube pres that run at low voltage at all. It seems like a good majority of low end preamps have some kind of starved plate/hybrid tube circuitry. I'm sure a company can increase their sales by tacking "tube" onto their amp's title, cause a lot of people in the market for a budget pre will just see "tube" and think "yay" and buy. I was one of them. Also, does anyone know how the quality of the AD converters in the MPA digital units compare against other converters? Such as run of the mill interface converters? I have a focusrite Saffire Pro 40, which actually has some very nice pres for interface internals imo, but they have no way to completely override the input gain stage without going digital in. Last edited by nathanp; 25th March 2011 at 03:23 AM.. Reason: Question | |
| | |
| | #34 |
| Gear nut Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 78
|
i have an ART TPS 2 that i use for acoustic and vocals sometimes sounds great for $225 |
| | |
| | #35 | |
| Lives for gear Joined: Sep 2006 Location: Cornwall, UK
Posts: 3,091
| Quote:
From my experience with these I would personally choose the PRE73. Having said that, I would be tempted to try out a different vocal mic instead of changing the preamp as I've heard some great recordings made with those M-Audio pres. Upgrading the mic can make a bigger difference from my experience. | |
| | |
New Reply
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Help me to choose between Art Digital Mpa II and SCA N72 pre | NewStudio | Low End Theory | 15 | 27th November 2009 02:44 PM |
| Art MPA gold VS. GAP-73 | RTR | Low End Theory | 15 | 26th August 2009 09:35 PM |
| ART MPA II or ART MPA II Digital ? | Lifted | So much gear, so little time! | 3 | 1st July 2009 04:27 PM |
| ART MPA Gold vs. Digital MPA | indravayu | Low End Theory | 57 | 22nd December 2007 03:31 PM |
| |