![]() | All Advertisers |
| Member Services Directory | Classifieds | Reviews | Jobs | Deal Zone | Merchandise | Marketplace | Facebook App | Books, DVDs & Gadgets | Video Vault | Tips & Techniques |
| |||||||
New Reply | Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| | #1 |
| Gear Head Joined: Feb 2006 Location: Canada, Alberta
Posts: 43
Thread Starter | Better mic = Bigger headache
Better mic = Bigger headache I just bought a new Studio Project C1. It seems to have good reviews all over the internet, and people on this forum seem to like the mic, so I bought one ! I have been using a Shure 57 and Nady SCM-900, and I thought the Studio Projects C1 would be a step up. After trying to record some acoustic guitar, I thinking maybe that “step up” has also giving me a bigger headache. The C1 seems to pick up everything but my guitar. Cars, people talking next door, fans, computer hum, etc......... I live in an apartment, so I can’t just go about renovating to make a sound-proof room. I’m thinking the C1 would record awesome in a sound-proof room, or a fake rock in Russia. I’m thinking I just bought something to drive me crazy and give me more headaches. I’m trying to figure out how I could build a cardboard box booth that I could temporarily set up and take down. I don’t have room to leave a recording booth up permanent. I mostly just need the mic to record acoustic guitar. I’m not going to be singing any “Guns N Roses” cover songs in the apartment, so I don’t have to worry about the eviction notice. I just need to keep the sound of the neighbors breaking beer bottles, against the wall, out of my recordings. or ??? - should I just stick with the good old, tried and tested, Shure 57. . |
| | |
| | #2 |
| Gear interested Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 26
|
my name is chris ambriati i am an intern at a studio in abilene texas www.theglassjarstudio.com. the c1 is for the most part a vocal mic in my opinion so if you record vocals at all i would keep it. as far as you acoustic guitar look into the sp c4's they are a mathced pair and sound great! we use both mics in our studio and both are great!
|
| | |
| | #3 |
| Gear Guru Joined: Jul 2004 Location: Orygun
Posts: 10,233
| You can go and make some gobos using furring strips, pegboard, fiberglass or cotton insulation, and fabric covering. Basically, make a wall of pegboard behind you in a circle. Cover at least 90 degrees horizontally and from close to the floor to about 5 feet high. Cover this wall with 3-5" of insulation towards the mic and wrap it all up in fabric. You can make sections so that it stores and transports easy. -tINY |
| | |
| | #4 |
| Gear addict Joined: Dec 2005 Location: Boston, MA
Posts: 374
|
The C1 is a condenser microphone. It is much more sensitive to sound and picks up sound in a larger range. The mics you had been using before were dynamic, which picks up only what is in front of it, and in a limited range.
__________________ Dante Castro Audio Engineer / Producer |
| | |
| | #5 |
| Gear addict Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 319
|
I bet everyone's first condenser is an eye-opener, especially if it has a fairly wide pattern and a high frequency rise in its response. Takes more room treatment to get a good sound because as you noted it's more sensitive and picks up everything - good and bad in the room and playing. But with some high freq reflection control in the room the added detail might be what you want. I'd avoid using a 57 for acoustic guitar myself because I like a high-detail sound. Dynamic mic's come in all pickup patterns from omni to hypercardioid. The difference with condensers is mainly a sensitivity thing, I think, rather than directionality. Tim |
| | |
| | #6 |
| Gear interested Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 26
|
i agree get yourself a pair of small diaphrams |
| | |
| | #7 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Sep 2005 Location: hell, michigan
Posts: 2,797
|
its like everything else... more money, more problems. if you like dynamic mics try a shure SM7
__________________ 3WO - Mixing Without Tears "Some think I should teach men the way to heaven. But I would rather teach them the way to hell so they'll know how to go around it..." -- Niccolo Machiavelli |
| | |
| | #8 |
| Gear nut Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 88
|
[QUOTE=Wurly_b]Better mic = Bigger headache After trying to record some acoustic guitar, I thinking maybe that “step up” has also giving me a bigger headache. The C1 seems to pick up everything but my guitar. Cars, people talking next door, fans, computer hum, etc......... It seems obvious but you don't think maybe you have the mic facing the wrong way? |
| | |
| | #9 | |
| Gear Head Joined: Feb 2006 Location: Canada, Alberta
Posts: 43
Thread Starter | Quote:
- Because yes that is what I was doing. Duh, I’m I brain dead or what. Last night I tried some recording with the mic facing the right direction and it sounded way better ! I am going to put a sticky note on the mic “face mic this direction” and another note on my back “kick me I’m a bonehead”. Still ? I think I’m going to build some kind of temporary recording booth. I’m still picking up outside noise. There is that plastic cardboard, that sign painters use. It is super durable and I can buy the clear/transparent type. I’ll use a few eco 2X2’s for the frame, and tape or velcro on the plastic cardboard. The booth will be super light and I’ll be able to put it together and take it apart in minutes. I think the booth idea will cut out at least half the outside noise. I know it won’t completely eliminate the sounds of fire trucks, police cars, boom boxes, and the occasional gun shot, but hey ? - I might want to keep those sounds in for effect. I’m really liking this mic. I think I will work with it for at least a year or more before I buy any other mics. . | |
| | |
| | #10 | |
| Lives for gear Joined: Oct 2003 Location: San Antonio Texas
Posts: 1,773
| Quote:
| |
| | |
| | #11 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Apr 2005 Location: East Coast, Sweden
Posts: 1,491
|
It's happened to me too |
| | |
| | #12 |
| Lives for gear Joined: May 2005 Location: Albany, New York
Posts: 9,509
|
You could pioneer a new music that was all about cars passing and people talking.
__________________ Mountaintop Studios ~the peak of perfection~ Petersburgh NY 12138 mountaintop@taconic.net www.joelpatterson.us |
| | |
| | #13 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,124
|
Congrats on the new mic. Enjoy the adventure.
|
| | |
| | #14 |
| Gear Head Joined: Feb 2006 Location: Canada, Alberta
Posts: 43
Thread Starter |
I think my topic title was a bit unfair. I should of post it as “Different mic = Different headache”. I believe all mics are “better” used in better ways. Like for example my Nady SCM-900. I know it isn’t as sensitive sounding as my Studio Project C1, but used in conjunction with my Shure 57 I have been able to get some good recordings of guitar amps. I also like my $30 Shure C606. I use it on my $30 (toured around the world, Greyhound bus style) lap guitar. The C606 gives it that kind of “smokey club sound”. I tried using the Studio Projects C1 on that guitar last night...and...it didn’t sound right. It made the guitar sound like “weekday lawyer, wants to be Friday night blues guy”. I did some other recordings using the Studio Projects C1 with my classical guitar, and “WOW” that is the sound I was looking for. I could finally hear the nylon strings sounding mellow and beautiful. - and not like some elastic bands taped on a cupboard. OK - My new music (Robert Johnson meets Leona Boyd) Hmmmmm? I think Led Zeppelin has been there before....... Back on topic. I can really see how microphone collecting can be as additive as guitar collecting. . |
| | |
| | #15 | |
| Lives for gear Joined: Apr 2005 Location: East Coast, Sweden
Posts: 1,491
| Quote:
Sounds like a Woody Allen flick. | |
| | |
| | #16 |
| Gear addict Joined: Jun 2005 Location: Tasmania, Australia
Posts: 305
|
hah!... I still havent worked out who did it.. but once I went to use one of my mxl v67's.. and it sounded realy weird.. lots of room noise.. anyway.. I'm sitting there going like "what is the deal here" and evnentualy I worked out someone had opened it up.. and somehow managed to get the top part on backwards (which I couldn't replicate when I tried to demostrate it to someone).. so the little cardiod pattern picture I use to tell which side is the front was on the oposite side.
__________________ The Gear-less Slut |
| | |
| | #17 |
| Lives for gear Joined: May 2005 Location: Albany, New York
Posts: 9,509
|
Oddly enough... and I've always thought that would be a great name for a character in a Woody Allen movie, "Oddly Enough..." and Woody would turn to someone and say, "My friend, Oddly Enough..." and the guy would walk in the room.... But oddly enough, a few times when I've done the mic mod where you remove the inner stainless steel screening, it's ended up spun around in exactly that way. So when I mod its pair, I spin it around too. I call this the "oddly enough" mod. |
| | |
| | #18 | |
| Moderator emeritus Joined: Jun 2002 Location: Nashville, TN
Posts: 3,152
| Quote:
And good luck to you - I escaped from Abilene 30 years ago. | |
| | |
| | #19 | |
| Lives for gear Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 5,395
| Quote:
| |
| | |
| | #20 | |
| Gear Head Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 41
| Quote:
| |
| | |
New Reply
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| 5/8 locking ring headache | klaukholm | Remote Possibilities in Acoustic Music & Location Recording | 6 | 22nd August 2006 08:19 PM |
| The headache frequency | RainbowStorm | So much gear, so little time! | 18 | 20th June 2006 05:49 AM |
| midi headache! | jibarosoul | Rap + Hip Hop engineering & production | 2 | 1st February 2006 03:43 AM |
| midi headache! | jibarosoul | Rap + Hip Hop engineering & production | 2 | 1st February 2006 03:08 AM |
| splitting headache (splitter?) | cleantone | Remote Possibilities in Acoustic Music & Location Recording | 11 | 2nd December 2004 08:08 PM |
| |