Riding a vocal track: Pre or Post-fader compression? - Gearslutz.com

Gearslutz.com

All Advertisers
Go Back   Gearslutz.com > The Forums > Low End Theory


Riding a vocal track: Pre or Post-fader compression?

New Reply New Reply Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 20th January 2006   #1
Lives for gear
 
copperx's Avatar
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Location: Ciudad Juarez, Mexico
Posts: 530

Thread Starter
Send a message via MSN to copperx
Riding a vocal track: Pre or Post-fader compression?

Which is the most common approach?
copperx is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20th January 2006   #2
Lives for gear
 
Andreas G's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Location: Germany
Posts: 1,096

If you wanna make your compressors live easier, say with a very dynamic voice...pre
If the vocal track is smooth and fine with the comp...post

Andreas
Andreas G is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20th January 2006   #3
84K
Lives for gear
 
84K's Avatar
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Location: right coast
Posts: 3,857

depends on the sound you are going for. If are barely hitting the compressor and you are trying to maintain a natural dynamic, then you need to experiment as listen to what sounds more natural (which will depend on how dynamic the vocal is). If the compression is part of the effect ala modern pop/rock, then I would most-likely ride it post compression.
84K is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20th January 2006   #4
member no 666
 
Fletcher's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Location: Durham, NC
Posts: 10,108

I would recommend you put the compressor "pre-fader" because if you put it "post fader" you will have the compressor fighting what you're doing.

A compressor reduces the dynamic range. It makes loud stuff softer so you can make the soft stuff louder.

If you have a compressor after the fader then everytime you bring up the fader you will be increasing the amount of gain reduction from the compressor.

If you are compressing at say 3:1 then for every 3db of fader increase you will only have a net gain of 1db in terms of increased volume of the track in the mix... while you will gain additional compression artifacts because you'll be driving the compression device harder.

This might work as a cool effect sometime... but as a 'bread and butter technique' I don't think it would be all that practical.

As always... YMMV.
__________________

CN Fletcher

Professional Affiliations:

R/E/P Professional Recording Engineer and Producer forums - serious hobbyists welcome

SoundPure.com


mwagener wrote on Sat, 11 September 2004 14:33
We are selling emotions, there are no emotions in a grid

Roscoe Ambel once said:
Pro-Tools is to audio what fluorescent is to light
Fletcher is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15th April 2010   #5
Gear nut
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 143

BUMP.
arkmabat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15th April 2010   #6
Lives for gear
 
dbjp's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Location: Japan
Posts: 1,711

Some people use compressors purely as limiters when they insert post fader.
They tend to be people that go for more natural sounding vocals.
For me it's 99% pre-fader.
dbjp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15th April 2010   #7
Gear Head
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 62

I'd agree with the post above in some ways. But it really depends on what you want to accomplish. Compressing post fader (if your goal is to even the levels out with riding) can be a great way to go as the compressor is affecting the signal in a more similar way as a hole providing a more even character to the signal thus leaving no surprise's when high peaks hit. If the dynamics of the performance suit the song however I would be more likely to go with pre fader compression. Time is also a factor to consider. I'd suggest next time you have a familiar singer in to record that you can judge their dynamics really well to try riding the gain whilst recording into a compressor. Picked this up from stav's mixing with your mind. Quite a fun thing to try though I'd probably run this of a mult so you still have an unaffected signal for safety if possible.
VibeSound is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15th April 2010   #8
Gear addict
 
la grange's Avatar
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Location: canada
Posts: 388

I assume we are talking live work here.
Very little number of boards will aloow you to insert pre or post, and it is often pre.
The majority of engineers will ride the fader at low volume, under threshold and will set a compressor that will be more effective as you reach nominal.
That is what I do anyway.
I had to work with board that was post only once. I won't mention the brand and it doesn't start with a B but rather an S. It was a huge pain in the butt, as you compress also your auxs 99% of the time when you board is set to post.

Hope it helps

Oli
__________________
studio La Grange
Gaspe
QC, Canada
la grange is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15th April 2010   #9
Lives for gear
 
EddieTheRed's Avatar
 
Joined: May 2009
Location: Birmingham, UK
Posts: 983

From the tips & techniques archive:

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mike Tarsia
a technique i have used for years entails riding the input to and output of the compressor

back in tape days we did this when tracking.. [during those days the purpose wsas 2 fold..1. don't over compress...2. keep the level to tape hot even in the soft spots to keep s/n ratio high] with the advent of DAW's, i devised a simple method to accomplish the same thing for not over compressing. this works especially well on very dynamic vocals and vocalist who tend to drop lower in level at the end of sentences

1 buss your uncompressed vocal audio track to an aux

2. insert a compressor in the aux

3. create an audio track whose input is the output of the aux and whose output is the mix buss and keep this audio track on input monitor

4. automate rides on the vocal track so your compressor is doing 3 average and no more than an ocassional 5 dB hit on the compressor

5. ride tails of words and soft spots up so they get some compression too [dont worry that the levels sound a little unatural at this point ..the next step will correct that]

6. automate and adjust the output of the aux track to smooth the vocal levels in reference to your music track

7. record a pass to the new audio track

now you will have a track that is very smooth and where everything [ soft and loud] gets some nice compression without over hitting the compressor and geting that unatural squashed sound on loud passages and no "glue" on the low parts

at this point the vocals should sit very well..an additional compressor can be inserted on this track if desired and/or you can now do those "taste" rides to give life to your mix
EddieTheRed is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17th April 2010   #10
Gear interested
 
Joined: Feb 2010
Location: Orange County, CA
Posts: 29

I tend to run most of the vox compression pre, but I'll set up a buss with all the vocals and compress that at 8:1 with about 4dbs of gain reduction on the loudest notes.
Jordan-O is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17th April 2010   #11
Lives for gear
 
Cursed Lemon's Avatar
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Location: Nashville
Posts: 707

Send a message via AIM to Cursed Lemon Send a message via MSN to Cursed Lemon Send a message via Yahoo to Cursed Lemon
If you do it post, then you can control the amount of compression by simply riding the vocal, which I guess would be good for experimenting.
__________________
I'll normalize your FACE!
Cursed Lemon is offline   Reply With Quote
New Reply New Reply Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook  Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter  Submit Thread to LinkedIn LinkedIn 



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Similar Threads
Thread Thread starter Forum Replies Last Post
all you console people...are you compressing pre or post fader txgator So much gear, so little time! 11 1st September 2006 06:42 PM
SSL AWS direct outs - pre and post fader? toolskid So much gear, so little time! 2 13th March 2006 03:35 PM
Post-fader compression issues RKrizman High end 63 24th August 2005 11:53 PM
Pre vs Post Master Fader Compression Bang So much gear, so little time! 6 24th March 2005 09:25 AM
Compression Pre-EQ or Post-EQ??? pardahl Geekslutz forum 19 19th March 2005 06:40 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:50 PM.

Home - Search Forum - Contact Us - Terms Of Use - Advertise on Gearslutz - All Advertisers - Archive - Top
 
 
Powered by vBulletin®
Gearslutz.com LTD - UK Company Number 7597610.
Registered Office - 35 Ballards Lane, London, N3 1XW.
Hosted by Nimbus Hosting.

SEO by vBSEO ©2010, Crawlability, Inc.