![]() | All Advertisers |
| Member Services Directory | Classifieds | Reviews | Jobs | Deal Zone | Merchandise | Marketplace | Facebook App | Books, DVDs & Gadgets | Video Vault | Tips & Techniques |
| |||||||
New Reply | Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| | #1 |
| Lives for gear | Riding a vocal track: Pre or Post-fader compression?
Which is the most common approach?
|
| | |
| | #2 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Mar 2005 Location: Germany
Posts: 1,096
|
If you wanna make your compressors live easier, say with a very dynamic voice...pre If the vocal track is smooth and fine with the comp...post Andreas |
| | |
| | #3 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Oct 2004 Location: right coast
Posts: 3,857
|
depends on the sound you are going for. If are barely hitting the compressor and you are trying to maintain a natural dynamic, then you need to experiment as listen to what sounds more natural (which will depend on how dynamic the vocal is). If the compression is part of the effect ala modern pop/rock, then I would most-likely ride it post compression.
|
| | |
| | #4 |
| member no 666 Joined: Jun 2002 Location: Durham, NC
Posts: 10,108
|
I would recommend you put the compressor "pre-fader" because if you put it "post fader" you will have the compressor fighting what you're doing. A compressor reduces the dynamic range. It makes loud stuff softer so you can make the soft stuff louder. If you have a compressor after the fader then everytime you bring up the fader you will be increasing the amount of gain reduction from the compressor. If you are compressing at say 3:1 then for every 3db of fader increase you will only have a net gain of 1db in terms of increased volume of the track in the mix... while you will gain additional compression artifacts because you'll be driving the compression device harder. This might work as a cool effect sometime... but as a 'bread and butter technique' I don't think it would be all that practical. As always... YMMV.
__________________ CN Fletcher Professional Affiliations: R/E/P Professional Recording Engineer and Producer forums - serious hobbyists welcome SoundPure.com mwagener wrote on Sat, 11 September 2004 14:33 We are selling emotions, there are no emotions in a grid Roscoe Ambel once said: Pro-Tools is to audio what fluorescent is to light |
| | |
| | #5 |
| Gear nut Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 143
|
BUMP.
|
| | |
| | #6 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Jun 2008 Location: Japan
Posts: 1,711
|
Some people use compressors purely as limiters when they insert post fader. They tend to be people that go for more natural sounding vocals. For me it's 99% pre-fader. |
| | |
| | #7 |
| Gear Head Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 62
|
I'd agree with the post above in some ways. But it really depends on what you want to accomplish. Compressing post fader (if your goal is to even the levels out with riding) can be a great way to go as the compressor is affecting the signal in a more similar way as a hole providing a more even character to the signal thus leaving no surprise's when high peaks hit. If the dynamics of the performance suit the song however I would be more likely to go with pre fader compression. Time is also a factor to consider. I'd suggest next time you have a familiar singer in to record that you can judge their dynamics really well to try riding the gain whilst recording into a compressor. Picked this up from stav's mixing with your mind. Quite a fun thing to try though I'd probably run this of a mult so you still have an unaffected signal for safety if possible.
|
| | |
| | #8 |
| Gear addict Joined: Apr 2008 Location: canada
Posts: 388
|
I assume we are talking live work here. Very little number of boards will aloow you to insert pre or post, and it is often pre. The majority of engineers will ride the fader at low volume, under threshold and will set a compressor that will be more effective as you reach nominal. That is what I do anyway. I had to work with board that was post only once. I won't mention the brand and it doesn't start with a B but rather an S. It was a huge pain in the butt, as you compress also your auxs 99% of the time when you board is set to post. Hope it helps Oli
__________________ studio La Grange Gaspe QC, Canada |
| | |
| | #9 | |
| Lives for gear Joined: May 2009 Location: Birmingham, UK
Posts: 983
|
From the tips & techniques archive: Quote:
| |
| | |
| | #10 |
| Gear interested Joined: Feb 2010 Location: Orange County, CA
Posts: 29
|
I tend to run most of the vox compression pre, but I'll set up a buss with all the vocals and compress that at 8:1 with about 4dbs of gain reduction on the loudest notes.
|
| | |
| | #11 |
| Lives for gear |
If you do it post, then you can control the amount of compression by simply riding the vocal, which I guess would be good for experimenting.
__________________ I'll normalize your FACE! ![]() |
| | |
New Reply
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| all you console people...are you compressing pre or post fader | txgator | So much gear, so little time! | 11 | 1st September 2006 06:42 PM |
| SSL AWS direct outs - pre and post fader? | toolskid | So much gear, so little time! | 2 | 13th March 2006 03:35 PM |
| Post-fader compression issues | RKrizman | High end | 63 | 24th August 2005 11:53 PM |
| Pre vs Post Master Fader Compression | Bang | So much gear, so little time! | 6 | 24th March 2005 09:25 AM |
| Compression Pre-EQ or Post-EQ??? | pardahl | Geekslutz forum | 19 | 19th March 2005 06:40 PM |
| |