mic to thicken a thin sounding voice - Gearslutz.com Gearslutz.com
 


All Advertisers
Go Back   Gearslutz.com > The Forums > Low End Theory

mic to thicken a thin sounding voice
New Reply New Reply Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 31st October 2010   #1
Gear Head
 
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 30

Thread Starter
Arrow mic to thicken a thin sounding voice

yes, looking for mic to thicken my voice..will buy a used one on ebay. I also want to use this mic for my acoustic guitars. My mic pre is an isa ONE

What do u think of the cad trion 8000? audio technica 4047?

thanks
rol123 is online now  
Reply With Quote
Old 31st October 2010   #2
Lives for gear
 
uncle duncan's Avatar
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 3,997

I'd try a mxl 2003a for your voice, or a KEL hm2d. For your guitar, I'd try a CAD m179. The Trion 8000 could work for both sources, but you'd get more thickness out of the 2003a or the hm2d. The 4047 is an interesting mic. If your guitar is really bright, it could work, but the high end is funny on that mic - rather subdued in a vintage sort of way. If you want that defined, detailed acoustic guitar sound, the 4047 wouldn't be a good choice. However, if your guitar tracks suffer from too much of that fingernails-on-a-chalkboard sound, the 4047 could help to smooth that out a bit.
__________________
"You're either with a native DAW, or you're with the terrorists." G.W. Busch Lite
uncle duncan is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 31st October 2010   #3
Lives for gear
 
rty5150's Avatar
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Location: LR,AR
Posts: 2,855

mic to thicken a thin sounding voice

Try a good ribbon. When I need a fatter sound or less hype, I grab my fathead and it never disappoints. The fathead plays well with the ISA as I have the ISA428 and have used it for OH with the fathead pair I own. For vox, AG, EG, and fiddle; my neve clones get the majority of the duty. My sytek is used if I want less color or more clarity from it. AG and fiddle sound amazing with the FH through the sytek!
__________________
rich

rty5150 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 31st October 2010   #4
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 3,056

Post a clip. How thin are we talking here?
Chrisc_o is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 31st October 2010   #5
Gear addict
 
TRANQUILO's Avatar
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Location: CALIFORNIA
Posts: 494

B4

before you purchase a mic, consider using eq to fatten up the low end...or also consider a vocal booth that naturally boosts vocal low end...

Good recordings made in great studios will utilize vocal booths for the reason of enhancing the human body's natural resonances of the skull and chest and any other aspect of the body that makes up vocal characteristics. Low mid bass.
__________________
if music be the food of life...play on!

www.pandemoniumrecorders.com
TRANQUILO is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 31st October 2010   #6
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 5,476

I wouldn't want the same mic on voice and guitar, of the voice mic is supposed to thicken and fatten the sound. Could end up with a muddy guitar.

Dynamics like the M88, RE-20, MD441, MD 421, SM-7 have a nice proximity effect that I like better than the typical 58 sound.

Condensers and ribbons, I can't speak to the low end offerings. But typically I'd be using a small diaphragm condenser for the acoustic guitar.
Bill@WelcomeHome is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 31st October 2010   #7
Lives for gear
 
edva's Avatar
 
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 2,896

I commend you for wanting to get a mic that suits your voice, much better than trying to "fix it in the mix"! I think you want a mic with a transformer in it. One budget model that comes to mind is the Oktava 319, the "modded" versions sound particularly nice, and can be found for around $350 or less.
The Fathead ribbon also is a candidate, at about half that price. Don't give up, you are on the right track! thumbsup
edva is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 31st October 2010   #8
Lives for gear
 
paul999's Avatar
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Location: Edmonton AB. Canada
Posts: 972

I would look for an RE-20 used. At some point you'll be able to afford to put it through a great pre as well. Then you'll truly get the benefit.
__________________
paul999 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 31st October 2010   #9
3 + infractions, forum membership suspended.
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Location: Boston
Posts: 7,119

doubling or a doubling plugin will fatten it
robertshaw is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 31st October 2010   #10
Lives for gear
 
CJ Mastering's Avatar
 
Joined: May 2010
Location: South Florida
Posts: 2,380

Consider your recording enviroment (room) and your mic position if your vocals sound thin.
A new mic may not be what you need. Dotn fall into the trap of thinking gear is the fix. Soemtimes it is, but allot of times its not!

Vocal recording Tips
__________________


Audio-Mastering-Mixing.Com -Professional Mixing & Mastering Studio Providing Online And Attended Sessions.
Mixed And Mastered Best Album Of The Year By En-Sound
CJ Mastering is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 31st October 2010   #11
Lives for gear
 
camus's Avatar
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 952

Any recommendations you read are basically useless unless the people giving you advice have actually heard what your voice sounds like. You'll get better help if you post a clip.
__________________
"There are two kinds of fools,
One says-this is old and therefore good.
The other says-this is new and therefore better."
-Bob's Mom
camus is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 31st October 2010   #12
Gear addict
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Location: Athens GA
Posts: 396

Kel HM-2d works really well on thin voices.

DB
fiddler59 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 31st October 2010   #13
PDC
Lives for gear
 
PDC's Avatar
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,890

Quote:
Originally Posted by rol123 View Post
yes, looking for mic to thicken my voice..will buy a used one on ebay. I also want to use this mic for my acoustic guitars. My mic pre is an isa ONE

What do u think of the cad trion 8000? audio technica 4047?

thanks
A good ribbon, SM7A, etc. Stay away from condensers.
PDC is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 31st October 2010   #14
Gear addict
 
Jonathawkes's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Location: Toronto, Ontario
Posts: 316

Quote:
Originally Posted by CJ Mastering View Post
Consider your recording enviroment (room) and your mic position if your vocals sound thin.
A new mic may not be what you need. Dotn fall into the trap of thinking gear is the fix. Soemtimes it is, but allot of times its not!

Vocal recording Tips
+1

Mics are a lot more versatile than people around here would have you think. Mic Placement, acoustic treatment, compression, EQ etc etc... would be my first move before purchasing more microphones.
Jonathawkes is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 31st October 2010   #15
Lives for gear
 
edva's Avatar
 
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 2,896

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jonathawkes View Post
+1

Mics are a lot more versatile than people around here would have you think. Mic Placement, acoustic treatment, compression, EQ etc etc... would be my first move before purchasing more microphones.
I respectfully disagree. The OP will most likely have the same voice all of his life, so why not find the best mic for it early on, and enjoy many good recordings from here on? Also, if you do some serious A/B comparisons, there are pretty big differences between different mics. Acoustics don't matter as much with vocals, and getting it right at the source always beats trying to fix it in the mix later, but does make fixing it easier anyway. Plus, it's a nice thing to own a mic that you like the sound of, you'll always be happy with it.
edva is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 31st October 2010   #16
Lives for gear
 
GZsound's Avatar
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Location: Oregon
Posts: 1,263

Quote:
Originally Posted by rty5150 View Post
Try a good ribbon. When I need a fatter sound or less hype, I grab my fathead and it never disappoints. The fathead plays well with the ISA as I have the ISA428 and have used it for OH with the fathead pair I own. For vox, AG, EG, and fiddle; my neve clones get the majority of the duty. My sytek is used if I want less color or more clarity from it. AG and fiddle sound amazing with the FH through the sytek!
What are your "Neve clones"?
GZsound is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 31st October 2010   #17
PDC
Lives for gear
 
PDC's Avatar
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,890

Quote:
Originally Posted by edva View Post
Acoustics don't matter as much with vocals.
Really? Wow. Acoustics are everything. Positioning is everything.

The vocal is the center piece of the mix. Compression is going to bring out all of those unimportant acoustic artifacts.
PDC is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 31st October 2010   #18
Lives for gear
 
edva's Avatar
 
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 2,896

Quote:
Originally Posted by PDC View Post
Really? Wow. Acoustics are everything. Positioning is everything.

The vocal is the center piece of the mix. Compression is going to bring out all of those unimportant acoustic artifacts.
Because of the (normally) close-micing, and because of the (normally) low to moderate volume of a vocal (e.g. not loud enough to excite resonances in the space), the direct-to-reflected ratio of a vocal recording is (normally) very good, so (normally) acoustics don't matter AS MUCH as they can with other sources. Which is not to say they don't matter at all.
edva is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 31st October 2010   #19
Lives for gear
 
junior's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 2,354

I guess I'd start with the mic: RE20, MD441 maybe?
junior is online now  
Reply With Quote
Old 31st October 2010   #20
Lives for gear
 
rty5150's Avatar
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Location: LR,AR
Posts: 2,855

mic to thicken a thin sounding voice

Quote:
Originally Posted by GZsound

What are your "Neve clones"?
CL 7622, 7602 and TNC ACMP-73,81,84's
rty5150 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 31st October 2010   #21
Lives for gear
 
kidvybes's Avatar
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Location: Banana Republic
Posts: 2,976

Quote:
Originally Posted by edva View Post
Because of the (normally) close-micing, and because of the (normally) low to moderate volume of a vocal (e.g. not loud enough to excite resonances in the space), the direct-to-reflected ratio of a vocal recording is (normally) very good, so (normally) acoustics don't matter AS MUCH as they can with other sources. Which is not to say they don't matter at all.
+1
kidvybes is online now  
Reply With Quote
Old 1st November 2010   #22
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Location: USA
Posts: 564

V69M w/ NOS Mullard 12AT7. Aim between mouth and chest... bingo.
Track 7 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 1st November 2010   #23
Gear addict
 
Jonathawkes's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Location: Toronto, Ontario
Posts: 316

Quote:
Originally Posted by edva View Post
Because of the (normally) close-micing, and because of the (normally) low to moderate volume of a vocal (e.g. not loud enough to excite resonances in the space), the direct-to-reflected ratio of a vocal recording is (normally) very good, so (normally) acoustics don't matter AS MUCH as they can with other sources. Which is not to say they don't matter at all.
The human voice having a conversation is around 60db, that's a lot louder than you would think and singing in many cases is quite a bit louder than talking. Now consider the distortions caused by early reflections (this causes the effect that many people mistake for "digital harshness") it doesn't take very much to have a negative effect on sound quality.
You might also consider why so many people spend all that time and money to build a vocal booth. The space you record in is very important. Now if you have a relatively large bedroom with carpeted floors, shelves, a bed, curtains, upholstered furniture and optimal proportions, you might find that you're sitting pretty. Don't get me wrong though, I totally support expanding ones mic locker, but it's important to have perspective. New shiny gear is often NOT the solution to unsatisfactory results.
Jonathawkes is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 1st November 2010   #24
Lives for gear
 
jitterybit's Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Location: Nashville
Posts: 1,117

no one's mentioned "working" the mic and proximity effect. Johnny Cash a foot off the mic wouldn't sound near as "thick"

For less desirable acoustical conditions, stick with a dynamic. The variable roll off filter on a 421 wound be great. Stay on the mic and roll off to taste.

"Thickening" also has to do with the entire signal chain and proper use of compression.
jitterybit is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 1st November 2010   #25
RiF
Lives for gear
 
RiF's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Location: Germany
Posts: 2,567

I can recommend the Mojave Audio 201FET for both vocal and acoustic guitar. It sounds very up-front and "big", sometimes too "big" for already "big" vocals.
__________________
Too many options kill creativity.
RiF is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 1st November 2010   #26
Lives for gear
 
edva's Avatar
 
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 2,896

[QUOTE=Jonathawkes;5951964
You might also consider why so many people spend all that time and money to build a vocal booth. The space you record in is very important. [/QUOTE]

IMHO, people build vocal booths to keep sounds OUT of their vocal tracks, not because they like the sound of a booth on a vocal.
edva is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 1st November 2010   #27
Lives for gear
 
kidvybes's Avatar
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Location: Banana Republic
Posts: 2,976

Quote:
Originally Posted by edva View Post
IMHO, people build vocal booths to keep sounds OUT of their vocal tracks, not because they like the sound of a booth on a vocal.
...another

...you only need to take the time to study how many of the most amazing vocals were recorded over the past 50 plus years (Motown, Nashville, Memphis, Philly, Atlanta, etc.) not to mention the classic jazz recordings of the 50's and 60's (not done in isolated booths)...too many times an overly "dead" vocal booth is more the detriment then asset to great vocal tracking...
__________________
reggae souljah

"It was only four tracks on the machine, but I was picking up twenty from the extra terrestrial squad."
LEE 'SCRATCH' PERRY (avatar)
kidvybes is online now  
Reply With Quote
Old 1st November 2010   #28
Lives for gear
 
theproduca's Avatar
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Posts: 514

Cool

Out of all the midpriced mics I've had (Compared to U47's and Manley's), I would like to have the BLUE BLUEBERRY BACK again. Excellent for voice, and enough clarity and air for you guitar. YES, the BLUEBERRY!! that's midprice by the way......other than that, BUY whatever you want over 2K if you gotz it like that.......LOL.
__________________
http://music.burst-dev.com/playlist.php?id=1009039679
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ihC_G4CNqUo
"The Obvious" by RaJuR available on iTunes, Amazon, and ZUNE.

The HolloMedia Group
theproduca is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 1st November 2010   #29
Lives for gear
 
theproduca's Avatar
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Posts: 514

Cool

Quote:
Originally Posted by kidvybes View Post
...another

...you only need to take the time to study how many of the most amazing vocals were recorded over the past 50 plus years (Motown, Nashville, Memphis, Philly, Atlanta, etc.) not to mention the classic jazz recordings of the 50's and 60's (not done in isolated booths)...too many times an overly "dead" vocal booth is more the detriment then asset to great vocal tracking...
Madonna (Bathtub), Prince (Control Room), Someone else I read (Stairway with a monitor for reverb or something). It doesn't matter if the song is BOOOTY!!!
theproduca is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 1st November 2010   #30
Lives for gear
 
theproduca's Avatar
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Posts: 514

Cool

Quote:
Originally Posted by rol123 View Post
yes, looking for mic to thicken my voice..will buy a used one on ebay. I also want to use this mic for my acoustic guitars. My mic pre is an isa ONE

What do u think of the cad trion 8000? audio technica 4047?

thanks
4047SV, sounds nice, would like to have that one back as well. MO, a little dark for guitar though.
theproduca is offline  
Reply With Quote
New Reply New Reply Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook  Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter  Submit Thread to LinkedIn LinkedIn 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Similar Threads
Thread Thread starter Forum Replies Last Post
421 u-5 sounding thin Seditionary So much gear, so little time! 11 17th October 2010 03:59 AM
Help needed: should D112 be thin sounding or is this a faulty mic? Tom Hakala So much gear, so little time! 11 14th October 2010 11:43 PM
Mixes sounding thin... looking for advice aof21 So much gear, so little time! 11 7th January 2010 04:34 AM
Mic for thin voice and guitar cab... laiben Low End Theory 13 15th March 2006 03:25 PM
Help: How would you guys thicken up a thin sounding dist guitar tone. JB872 So much gear, so little time! 52 4th January 2006 07:17 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:58 AM.

Home - Search Forum - Contact Us - Terms Of Use / Privacy Policy - Advertise on Gearslutz - All Advertisers - Top
 
 
Powered by vBulletin®
Gearslutz.com LTD - UK Company Number 7597610.
Registered Office - 35 Ballards Lane, London, N3 1XW.
Hosted by Nimbus Hosting.

By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies.

SEO by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.