31st October 2010
|
#1 | | Gear Head
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 30
Thread Starter | mic to thicken a thin sounding voice
yes, looking for mic to thicken my voice..will buy a used one on ebay. I also want to use this mic for my acoustic guitars. My mic pre is an isa ONE
What do u think of the cad trion 8000? audio technica 4047?
thanks
|
| |
31st October 2010
|
#2 | | Lives for gear
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 3,997
|
I'd try a mxl 2003a for your voice, or a KEL hm2d. For your guitar, I'd try a CAD m179. The Trion 8000 could work for both sources, but you'd get more thickness out of the 2003a or the hm2d. The 4047 is an interesting mic. If your guitar is really bright, it could work, but the high end is funny on that mic - rather subdued in a vintage sort of way. If you want that defined, detailed acoustic guitar sound, the 4047 wouldn't be a good choice. However, if your guitar tracks suffer from too much of that fingernails-on-a-chalkboard sound, the 4047 could help to smooth that out a bit.
__________________
"You're either with a native DAW, or you're with the terrorists." G.W. Busch Lite
|
| |
31st October 2010
|
#3 | | Lives for gear
Joined: Feb 2009 Location: LR,AR
Posts: 2,855
| mic to thicken a thin sounding voice
Try a good ribbon. When I need a fatter sound or less hype, I grab my fathead and it never disappoints. The fathead plays well with the ISA as I have the ISA428 and have used it for OH with the fathead pair I own. For vox, AG, EG, and fiddle; my neve clones get the majority of the duty. My sytek is used if I want less color or more clarity from it. AG and fiddle sound amazing with the FH through the sytek!
__________________
rich |
| |
31st October 2010
|
#4 | | Lives for gear
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 3,056
|
Post a clip. How thin are we talking here?
|
| |
31st October 2010
|
#5 | | Gear addict
Joined: Dec 2009 Location: CALIFORNIA
Posts: 494
| B4
before you purchase a mic, consider using eq to fatten up the low end...or also consider a vocal booth that naturally boosts vocal low end...
Good recordings made in great studios will utilize vocal booths for the reason of enhancing the human body's natural resonances of the skull and chest and any other aspect of the body that makes up vocal characteristics. Low mid bass.
|
| |
31st October 2010
|
#6 | | Lives for gear
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 5,476
|
I wouldn't want the same mic on voice and guitar, of the voice mic is supposed to thicken and fatten the sound. Could end up with a muddy guitar.
Dynamics like the M88, RE-20, MD441, MD 421, SM-7 have a nice proximity effect that I like better than the typical 58 sound.
Condensers and ribbons, I can't speak to the low end offerings. But typically I'd be using a small diaphragm condenser for the acoustic guitar.
|
| |
31st October 2010
|
#7 | | Lives for gear
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 2,896
|
I commend you for wanting to get a mic that suits your voice, much better than trying to "fix it in the mix"!  I think you want a mic with a transformer in it. One budget model that comes to mind is the Oktava 319, the "modded" versions sound particularly nice, and can be found for around $350 or less.
The Fathead ribbon also is a candidate, at about half that price. Don't give up, you are on the right track! thumbsup
|
| |
31st October 2010
|
#8 | | Lives for gear
Joined: Nov 2008 Location: Edmonton AB. Canada
Posts: 972
|
I would look for an RE-20 used. At some point you'll be able to afford to put it through a great pre as well. Then you'll truly get the benefit.
|
| |
31st October 2010
|
#9 | | 3 + infractions, forum membership suspended.
Joined: Jun 2006 Location: Boston
Posts: 7,119
|
doubling or a doubling plugin will fatten it
|
| |
31st October 2010
|
#10 | | Lives for gear
Joined: May 2010 Location: South Florida
Posts: 2,380
|
Consider your recording enviroment (room) and your mic position if your vocals sound thin.
A new mic may not be what you need. Dotn fall into the trap of thinking gear is the fix. Soemtimes it is, but allot of times its not! Vocal recording Tips
__________________ Audio-Mastering-Mixing.Com -Professional Mixing & Mastering Studio Providing Online And Attended Sessions. Mixed And Mastered Best Album Of The Year By En-Sound |
| |
31st October 2010
|
#11 | | Lives for gear
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 952
|
Any recommendations you read are basically useless unless the people giving you advice have actually heard what your voice sounds like. You'll get better help if you post a clip.
__________________
"There are two kinds of fools,
One says-this is old and therefore good.
The other says-this is new and therefore better."
-Bob's Mom
|
| |
31st October 2010
|
#12 | | Gear addict
Joined: Apr 2005 Location: Athens GA
Posts: 396
|
Kel HM-2d works really well on thin voices.
DB
|
| |
31st October 2010
|
#13 | | Lives for gear
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,890
| Quote:
Originally Posted by rol123 yes, looking for mic to thicken my voice..will buy a used one on ebay. I also want to use this mic for my acoustic guitars. My mic pre is an isa ONE
What do u think of the cad trion 8000? audio technica 4047?
thanks | A good ribbon, SM7A, etc. Stay away from condensers.
|
| |
31st October 2010
|
#14 | | Gear addict
Joined: Jan 2010 Location: Toronto, Ontario
Posts: 316
| Quote:
Originally Posted by CJ Mastering Consider your recording enviroment (room) and your mic position if your vocals sound thin.
A new mic may not be what you need. Dotn fall into the trap of thinking gear is the fix. Soemtimes it is, but allot of times its not! Vocal recording Tips | +1
Mics are a lot more versatile than people around here would have you think. Mic Placement, acoustic treatment, compression, EQ etc etc... would be my first move before purchasing more microphones.
|
| |
31st October 2010
|
#15 | | Lives for gear
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 2,896
| Quote:
Originally Posted by Jonathawkes +1
Mics are a lot more versatile than people around here would have you think. Mic Placement, acoustic treatment, compression, EQ etc etc... would be my first move before purchasing more microphones. | I respectfully disagree. The OP will most likely have the same voice all of his life, so why not find the best mic for it early on, and enjoy many good recordings from here on? Also, if you do some serious A/B comparisons, there are pretty big differences between different mics. Acoustics don't matter as much with vocals, and getting it right at the source always beats trying to fix it in the mix later, but does make fixing it easier anyway. Plus, it's a nice thing to own a mic that you like the sound of, you'll always be happy with it.
|
| |
31st October 2010
|
#16 | | Lives for gear
Joined: Oct 2003 Location: Oregon
Posts: 1,263
| Quote:
Originally Posted by rty5150 Try a good ribbon. When I need a fatter sound or less hype, I grab my fathead and it never disappoints. The fathead plays well with the ISA as I have the ISA428 and have used it for OH with the fathead pair I own. For vox, AG, EG, and fiddle; my neve clones get the majority of the duty. My sytek is used if I want less color or more clarity from it. AG and fiddle sound amazing with the FH through the sytek! | What are your "Neve clones"?
|
| |
31st October 2010
|
#17 | | Lives for gear
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,890
| Quote:
Originally Posted by edva Acoustics don't matter as much with vocals. | Really? Wow. Acoustics are everything. Positioning is everything.
The vocal is the center piece of the mix. Compression is going to bring out all of those unimportant acoustic artifacts.
|
| |
31st October 2010
|
#18 | | Lives for gear
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 2,896
| Quote:
Originally Posted by PDC Really? Wow. Acoustics are everything. Positioning is everything.
The vocal is the center piece of the mix. Compression is going to bring out all of those unimportant acoustic artifacts. | Because of the (normally) close-micing, and because of the (normally) low to moderate volume of a vocal (e.g. not loud enough to excite resonances in the space), the direct-to-reflected ratio of a vocal recording is (normally) very good, so (normally) acoustics don't matter AS MUCH as they can with other sources. Which is not to say they don't matter at all.
|
| |
31st October 2010
|
#19 | | Lives for gear
Joined: Jan 2005 Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 2,354
|
I guess I'd start with the mic: RE20, MD441 maybe?
|
| |
31st October 2010
|
#20 | | Lives for gear
Joined: Feb 2009 Location: LR,AR
Posts: 2,855
| mic to thicken a thin sounding voice Quote: |
Originally Posted by GZsound
What are your "Neve clones"? | CL 7622, 7602 and TNC ACMP-73,81,84's
|
| |
31st October 2010
|
#21 | | Lives for gear
Joined: Feb 2005 Location: Banana Republic
Posts: 2,976
| Quote:
Originally Posted by edva Because of the (normally) close-micing, and because of the (normally) low to moderate volume of a vocal (e.g. not loud enough to excite resonances in the space), the direct-to-reflected ratio of a vocal recording is (normally) very good, so (normally) acoustics don't matter AS MUCH as they can with other sources. Which is not to say they don't matter at all. | +1 |
| |
1st November 2010
|
#22 | | Lives for gear
Joined: Mar 2008 Location: USA
Posts: 564
|
V69M w/ NOS Mullard 12AT7. Aim between mouth and chest... bingo.
|
| |
1st November 2010
|
#23 | | Gear addict
Joined: Jan 2010 Location: Toronto, Ontario
Posts: 316
| Quote:
Originally Posted by edva Because of the (normally) close-micing, and because of the (normally) low to moderate volume of a vocal (e.g. not loud enough to excite resonances in the space), the direct-to-reflected ratio of a vocal recording is (normally) very good, so (normally) acoustics don't matter AS MUCH as they can with other sources. Which is not to say they don't matter at all. | The human voice having a conversation is around 60db, that's a lot louder than you would think and singing in many cases is quite a bit louder than talking. Now consider the distortions caused by early reflections (this causes the effect that many people mistake for "digital harshness") it doesn't take very much to have a negative effect on sound quality.
You might also consider why so many people spend all that time and money to build a vocal booth. The space you record in is very important. Now if you have a relatively large bedroom with carpeted floors, shelves, a bed, curtains, upholstered furniture and optimal proportions, you might find that you're sitting pretty. Don't get me wrong though, I totally support expanding ones mic locker, but it's important to have perspective. New shiny gear is often NOT the solution to unsatisfactory results.
|
| |
1st November 2010
|
#24 | | Lives for gear
Joined: Jul 2005 Location: Nashville
Posts: 1,117
|
no one's mentioned "working" the mic and proximity effect. Johnny Cash a foot off the mic wouldn't sound near as "thick"
For less desirable acoustical conditions, stick with a dynamic. The variable roll off filter on a 421 wound be great. Stay on the mic and roll off to taste.
"Thickening" also has to do with the entire signal chain and proper use of compression.
|
| |
1st November 2010
|
#25 | | Lives for gear
Joined: Jan 2007 Location: Germany
Posts: 2,567
|
I can recommend the Mojave Audio 201FET for both vocal and acoustic guitar. It sounds very up-front and "big", sometimes too "big" for already "big" vocals.
__________________ Too many options kill creativity. |
| |
1st November 2010
|
#26 | | Lives for gear
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 2,896
|
[QUOTE=Jonathawkes;5951964
You might also consider why so many people spend all that time and money to build a vocal booth. The space you record in is very important. [/QUOTE]
IMHO, people build vocal booths to keep sounds OUT of their vocal tracks, not because they like the sound of a booth on a vocal.
|
| |
1st November 2010
|
#27 | | Lives for gear
Joined: Feb 2005 Location: Banana Republic
Posts: 2,976
| Quote:
Originally Posted by edva IMHO, people build vocal booths to keep sounds OUT of their vocal tracks, not because they like the sound of a booth on a vocal. | ...another
...you only need to take the time to study how many of the most amazing vocals were recorded over the past 50 plus years (Motown, Nashville, Memphis, Philly, Atlanta, etc.) not to mention the classic jazz recordings of the 50's and 60's (not done in isolated booths)...too many times an overly "dead" vocal booth is more the detriment then asset to great vocal tracking...
__________________ reggae souljah "It was only four tracks on the machine, but I was picking up twenty from the extra terrestrial squad." LEE 'SCRATCH' PERRY (avatar) |
| |
1st November 2010
|
#28 | | Lives for gear
Joined: Aug 2003 Location: Philadelphia, PA
Posts: 514
|
Out of all the midpriced mics I've had (Compared to U47's and Manley's), I would like to have the BLUE BLUEBERRY BACK again. Excellent for voice, and enough clarity and air for you guitar. YES, the BLUEBERRY!! that's midprice by the way......other than that, BUY whatever you want over 2K if you gotz it like that.......LOL. |
| |
1st November 2010
|
#29 | | Lives for gear
Joined: Aug 2003 Location: Philadelphia, PA
Posts: 514
| Quote:
Originally Posted by kidvybes ...another
...you only need to take the time to study how many of the most amazing vocals were recorded over the past 50 plus years (Motown, Nashville, Memphis, Philly, Atlanta, etc.) not to mention the classic jazz recordings of the 50's and 60's (not done in isolated booths)...too many times an overly "dead" vocal booth is more the detriment then asset to great vocal tracking... | Madonna (Bathtub), Prince (Control Room), Someone else I read (Stairway with a monitor for reverb or something). It doesn't matter if the song is BOOOTY!!! |
| |
1st November 2010
|
#30 | | Lives for gear
Joined: Aug 2003 Location: Philadelphia, PA
Posts: 514
| Quote:
Originally Posted by rol123 yes, looking for mic to thicken my voice..will buy a used one on ebay. I also want to use this mic for my acoustic guitars. My mic pre is an isa ONE
What do u think of the cad trion 8000? audio technica 4047?
thanks | 4047SV, sounds nice, would like to have that one back as well. MO, a little dark for guitar though.
|
| | | |