![]() | All Advertisers |
| Member Services Directory | Classifieds | Reviews | Jobs | Deal Zone | Merchandise | Marketplace | Facebook App | Books, DVDs & Gadgets | Video Vault | Tips & Techniques |
| |||||||
New Reply | Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| | #1 |
| Gear interested Joined: May 2010 Location: Newstead, Victoria, Australia
Posts: 13
Thread Starter | First Condenser: MXL V67G vs. Audio Technica AT2020 vs. other
G'day everyone, Been planning out a basic home recording set-up lately and I'm finding it hard choosing a condenser mic. I would be using it mainly for vocals and acoustic guitar but would also like something versitile enough so it could be used for pretty much anything else as well ranging from a guitar amp to perhaps even a drum overhead. And I know it's going to be difficult but I would like something around the AU$150 - 200 mark (I think thats about US$150 - 200 mark). At the moment I'm looking very closely at the MXL V67G because lots of people have good praise for its sound plus, you have to admit, it looks pretty sexy. However, my attention has also come to a few other mic's such as the Audio Technica AT2020, the Studio Projects B1, the Rode NT1A and various other MXL's such as the 2006 and the Genesis as well as maybe even the 990 (although I don't think the latter is all that great). Even the AKG Perception Series perhaps. But the thing is: I AM AN ABSOLUTE BEGINNER AND HAVE NO IDEA ABOUT ANY OF THESE MICS! So I would like proffesional opinions from anyone who has used any of these mic's (and if you've used more than one a comparison and preference would be great!). Thanks in advance. Teaserer |
| | |
| | #2 |
| Gear interested Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 29
|
Having just been in a similar position I would advise drawing up a short list of 3 definite candidates and save searches for each on Ebay as well as keeping an eye on the classifieds here. If you don't have a dire need and are unsure on purpose then just see if something comes up for a good price. Should the mic not suit then you don't lose value as much.
|
| | |
| | #3 | |
| Gear interested Joined: May 2010 Location: Newstead, Victoria, Australia
Posts: 13
Thread Starter | Quote:
But the reason I started this thread was so I COULD find out which ones are the best and would suit me the most so that I hopefully don't have to sell them. Do you actually have any experience with any low end condensers you would recommend? But thanks for the advice, I most definitely will do that. | |
| | |
| | #4 |
| Gear interested Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 29
|
The reason I recommended that technique rather than a specific mic is that you already had many of the usual suspects on your list. Any one of them may well suit you down to the ground but you're only going to feel like you've gotten a steal when you find the one for you. So assuming you don't have any opportunities to try them then it's going to be a bit of a crap shoot regardless. Buying second hand gives you a chance to try a couple to find out at least. And just to contradict myself I wouldn't go for the AKG Perception or Rodes personally. Always think they show their cheapness a bit too readily, being a bit sibilant and/or shrill.
|
| | |
| | #5 |
| cork sniffer Joined: Dec 2009 Location: Naperville, IL
Posts: 1,413
|
I'd say an SM57 and MXL V67G could cover a lot of ground for you. I had the MXL for a short while, and did find it very useful. It's very neutral, and doesn't pick up a ton from the room for a condenser. Obviosly, it's no high-end mic; so it does have limitations. I found it to have a "haze" or "veil" in front of the sound, but the bulk of the chinese condensers all have this.
__________________ my music:http://soundcloud.com/ron-vogel |
| | |
| | #6 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Sep 2008 Location: ...playing in traffic.
Posts: 1,619
|
I used the V67G as my go to mic, the first 2 years of projects.You can get a SM57 used for less than $70, a V67G for somewhere around $50. Just remember a good performance recorded on a Shure or an MXL, trumps a weak performance tracked with a Neumann. Recording Proggies don't make you an engineer, any more than Quicken Books makes you an accountant. You can do most of what you need to do short of recording a full set of drums, (and that could be argued) with those 2 mics. Brandy new about $200 for the pair in the US. Don't know what's available Down Under. Here's a good resource for new guys: http://www.tweakheadz.com/
__________________ Forget musical talent, experience, or skill. All you need is an opinion, and a computer. More free stuff is on The Good News Channel! |
| | |
| | #7 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 3,714
|
Take a look at the frequency response graphs for the mics, which you can usually find on the manufacturer's website. It's important to know how the mic is going to change the sound, something that can't be discerned by "that mic sounds really great" type of comments. Ideally, you'd want two mics with different response characteristics, so if you have a bright source, you can use a neutral mic, and if you have a dark, muffled source, you can use a bright mic. The MXL v67g is very neutral, and it can be modded to bring it up to professional standards, although I don't know if anyone in OZ is doing that yet. It's limitation is that it's cardioid only. The V67i has a bright capsule on one side, and the neutral one on the other. This would give you two mics in one, but I don't know if the V67i is a candidate for the same electronics mod as the g model. The Genesis tube mic would solve the pattern problem, and it would sound much smoother than a stock V67g, while exhibiting the same neutral sound. If they have CAD mics down there, the M179 is fairly neutral, and it's multi-pattern. If you're recording a live guitar/vocal, using the figure 8 pattern on the vocal eliminates bleed from the guitar into the vocal mic. Likewise, using a second figure 8 pattern mic on the guitar eliminates the vocal from getting into the guitar mic. You do have to deal with the other side of the figure 8 pattern picking up the room, but if the mics are close to the source, the sound from the room won't be an issue. If you're just starting out, you need knowledge more than you need gear, so do some research on the internet, or buy a book or something. "That mic sounds really great" won't get you very far when you're acquiring gear, although it will keep the manufacturers happy.
__________________ "You're either with a native DAW, or you're with the terrorists." G.W. Busch Lite |
| | |
| | #8 | |
| 3 + infractions, forum membership suspended. | Quote:
Audio-Technica AT2035 & 2050 | |
| | |
| | #9 | |
| Gear maniac Joined: Sep 2006 Location: Baltimore, MD USA
Posts: 255
| Quote:
Here's one that doesn't. I don't like MXL mics in general because of the above, but this one seems to have escaped without the problem and it's very affordable. MXL MCA SP-1 Studio Condenser Microphone With Clip*-* Large Diaphragm Condenser Mics Don't get me wrong, I really am a firm believer in paying more to get more, but if you're just starting out, this is a good start. Regards, Ty Ford | |
| | |
| | #10 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Aug 2003 Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 4,414
|
I think I am going to be the 3rd one here to suggest the MXL V67G and an Shure SM57. Used they will come in under budget. If you do that do not forget to try try the SM57 on many of the things you think you are supposed to use a condenser mic on.
__________________ Ronan Chris Murphy+ http://ronansrecordingshow.com Six Day Recording Boot Camps in Los Angeles July 16-21, 2012 |
| | |
| | #11 |
| 3 + infractions, forum membership suspended. Joined: Nov 2005 Location: Cape Cod
Posts: 2,735
|
The MXL 2003A is the new whup-ass low cost mic. Its revised circuit now incorporates HF de-emphasis EQ for its K67-type capsule (a capsule found in many other mics that do not have HF de-emphasis and are way too bright as a result). A better mic than the v67 - lower noise floor and timbre-balance closer to the gold standard U 87 than the v67. Btw - I've always gotten a kick out of this marketing double-speak for the MCA SP1: "...The MCA SP-1 Studio Mic is a true breakthrough in affordable microphone technology, giving you a true large-diaphragm condenser design..." (citation from here). I guess the operative word above is "design" - because the MCA SP1 uses the same small diaphragm condenser capsule as found in the MXL 603, GAD GXL1200, Nady CM-90 etc. But yes, it does use the same FET / transformerless "circuit design" found in many large diaphragm condenser mics. |
| | |
| | #12 |
| Lives for gear |
yes. the MXL V67 is a fantasic mic for the price, i was floored when i first heard it. i often fool experienced 'snooty' engineers with it.
__________________ Neither the Beatles, nor Stevie Wonder had Protools.... maybe you just suck. .- overheard in a session |
| | |
| | #13 |
| Gear maniac |
I need a mic for pretty much the same things as the OP (acoustic guitar, maybe overheads) after reading this thread, and many others, I'm thinking MXL V67 or AT2035 which do you think is a better choice? |
| | |
| | #14 |
| 3 + infractions, forum membership suspended. | Ultimately, it comes down to personal taste. Go to your local music store and try both of them. In general terms, the AT2035 is more "transparent" while the MXL V67 is more "colored." Also consider that AT have a better track record when it comes to consistency/sample variation (i.e. better quality control.) The 2035 is made in Taiwan, the V67 in China. Also, the 2035 comes with a much better shock mount and a better case (but it also costs an extra $20-30 compared to the V67.)
|
| | |
| | #15 |
| Gear nut Joined: May 2006
Posts: 146
|
+1 on the CAD M179. Great on tons of things and it will take a long time before your skills exceed its abilities. Plus you get to learn all about different patterns. The V67 is a very usable mic too. I got mine second hand for $30. |
| | |
| | #16 |
| Gear interested Joined: Jul 2010 Location: Lexington Ky
Posts: 1
| mics
try a Sterling Audio st51...got mine for $50 on Craigslist...I love it
|
| | |
| | #17 | |
| Lives for gear Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 1,068
| Quote:
+1 on finding the mic that suits your specific application best And isn't it great that these mics are low-cost enough that you can actually go to a local music store and try them out! If they are too lazy to hook the thing into a stock mixer and headphones, there's always a store with better customer service. | |
| | |
| | #18 | |
| Lives for gear Joined: Jun 2008 Location: Columbus, OH
Posts: 2,219
| Quote:
there could be a million good answers but only one might be great/perfect for your particular scenario
__________________ Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the the universe. -Albert Einstein | |
| | |
| | #19 |
| Gear interested |
You are right in trying to find a mic that works for everything. When starting out that is the only mind set you should have... When I was weaned off of my college's gear, I was in the same position... and for the most part still am. As suggested before (I know... starting to sound like a broken record) an SM57. You can use that mic as a vocal mic, as drum overheads, as an acoustic guitar mic, as an amp mic... hell I used it for a kick mic for the longest time and got some of the punchiest recordings with it My suggestion for a condenser... is to get a matched pair and a stereo bar. I find myself recording with those three things more than anything a lot of times. Perhaps a pair of Samson C02s? Cheap and alright... and a matched pair. All of a sudden you have a condenser that can record just about anything... and you can do it in stereo. Matched pairs are a God send when recording anything. XY patterns on overheads, acoustic guitars, and room mics are a quick easy way to get a wide sound without having much problems with phase. |
| | |
| | #20 |
| Gear nut Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 76
| Same, only better
You most likely have already made your first mic purchase, but just in case ... In order to avoid repeating myself, and thus annoying some Slutz who may be tired of it, I will instead provide a link to a prior post: http://www.gearslutz.com/board/6399322-post5.html Why the MXL v67g continues as the target of raves, while an improved version was essentially ignored, will never cease to puzzle me. I can only guess that it must be the green paint, and "gold" plating. Even without any additional mods, the 9090 is still a much better option, on features alone. Well, except for the gr --- oh never mind. If you are wondering what MXL thinks these days about their unique (and patented!) "two capsule flavors in one mic" concept, see the recently announced MXL Genesis II, one of their flagship products. MXL Genesis II Tube Microphone That's right, the update has two switch selectable capsules, "warm", and "bright". HTH, Emmit Sycamore |
| | |
| | #21 |
| Gear maniac Joined: Sep 2006 Location: Baltimore, MD USA
Posts: 255
| |
| | |
| | #22 |
| Gear nut |
+ 1 CAD M179. Great microphones. Good on just about everything, including OH duty. + 1 MXL 2003A. I've gotten great results with all vocalists I've tried it on so far. I didn't like it on OH. It sounded "washy" IMO. I haven't used the MXL V67G, but you probably can't go wrong with any of these. |
| | |
| | #23 |
| Gear nut Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 76
| Fair enough, done your homework?
Ty, No reason you should believe me, I'm just another one of the "Slutz" around here. Maybe what these folks have to say will "help". "same mic as the V67i, sans cosmetics" http://www.gearslutz.com/board/3675067-post19.html "The price difference is partly just esthetics, partly just based on the V67's good rep" http://www.gearslutz.com/board/4955549-post2.html "for anyone interested in the V67G, the MXL 9090 is a V67i (a V67 with a second "bright" capsule) without the gold&green cosmetics" http://www.gearslutz.com/board/3848999-post67.html "The inference of better response based on design within the headbasket may have learned from Oktava Mod, as surely as the single mesh on the MXL 9090 (Musician's Friend version of the V67i)" http://www.gearslutz.com/board/3919344-post109.html "The MXL 9090, ADK A51, Vienna, Hamburg and V67i ... all have similar circuits." http://www.gearslutz.com/board/5959172-post37.html "The original V67i and the MXL9090 are the same mic." http://www.gearslutz.com/board/5982801-post9.html "Bought the first one because I was fond of my V67g. Bought the second one because I liked the first one. Just bought a third one as a present for a friend." MXL 9090 is Stupid Deal! $70 - Home Recording forums Or, you can ignore all this, your choice. "HTH", Emmit Sycamore |
| | |
| | #24 |
| Gear maniac Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 234
|
AT2035+ Clear and clean, no vices - a good starting point. Worth the extra $ over the 2020. The V67 sounds pretty good - at first... then you realize there's a veil from the cheap transformer, and then the high end starts sounding like a muted buzz saw. I've owned all the above. Still have the 2035. |
| | |
| | #25 |
| Gear nut Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 76
| All of the above?
Greetings asap_audio, Just to clarify, did you mean to say that you have owned all of the mics mentioned so far in this thread, and have only kept the AT2035? "I've owned all the above. Still have the 2035." You specifically mention direct experience with the MXL v67g. Did you have any "mods" done to improve the v67g? If so, what mods were done? Also, were you satisfied that the shortcomings had been mitigated? If you have owned the MXL 9090, what would you say the most noticeable difference is, in terms of audio output, compared to the v67g? Since the stock 9090 has a single layer headbasket, plus upgraded electronic components, I would expect that you would recognize a clear improvement over the stock v67g. Thanks in advance for any additional insight! Emmit Sycamore Last edited by EmmitSycamore; 10th March 2011 at 01:14 AM.. Reason: superfluous data, cluttering page |
| | |
| | #26 |
| Gear maniac Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 234
| Just to clarify, did you mean to say that you have owned all of the mics mentioned so far in this thread*, and have only kept the AT2035? No No. I was saying I ownedthe 2020, 2035, v67G, and among those the 2035 was the clear winner FOR ME.I produce TV and Radio VO. My usual weapons are a Neumann TLM 193. Sennheiser MKH 416, and EV RE-20. The AT 2035 holds it's own nicely against those. |
| | |
| | #27 |
| Gear interested Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 23
|
It looks like this thread was 6 months old before Emmit bumped it. So the original poster probably has his mic by now. But I'm sure there are still others looking in this price range. And at the moment, I think the 2035, which replaced the 3035 a couple years back, is looking like a very good deal available on Amazon.com and a couple of other places now for under $100, and is a clear upgrade over the 2020, and unlike the 2020 comes with a shockmount. Audio-Technica AT2035 Cardioid Condenser Side-Address AT2035 B&H |
| | |
| | #28 | |
| Lives for gear Joined: Jun 2006 Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 1,342
| Quote:
Just thought I'd give this a bump - B&H has the at2035 for $95 right now. I walked into my local GC, had them price match, walked out with 3 of them. | |
| | |
| | #29 |
| Gear interested Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 28
| NOT for a home studio.
I have an MXL V67i (bright/warm sides, pad, roll-off) and stopped using it because it picks up so much of the room it may as well be an omni. My friend's V67g is even worse. Even when it's right up on the source, room reflections cheapen the track. In a related problem, it's very difficult to get the V67 tracks to sit forward in a mix. The 990 (with a FABRIC pop filter to tame the highs) solved both of those problems, and is much more flattering to our voices than a lot of mics we've tried. If you listen to the Jam Room Sessions samples you'll hear what I mean. The SM7b I rented sounded much like my Audix i5, with less high end. And the SM7b needs so much gain a cheap preamp/audio interface may be too noisy. |
| | |
| | #30 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Feb 2011 Location: Salt Lake City, UT
Posts: 1,203
| |
| | |
New Reply
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| mxl .008 vs blue icicle with mxl v67g or audio technica at2035? | lando423 | Low End Theory | 2 | 11th February 2011 05:04 AM |
| MXl v67g vs audio technica or other mics in that price range | lando423 | Rap + Hip Hop engineering & production | 0 | 2nd December 2009 08:20 AM |
| Shure SM57 vs. Audio Technica AT2020 | .nox | Rap + Hip Hop engineering & production | 11 | 30th July 2009 08:57 PM |
| |