![]() | All Advertisers |
| Member Services Directory | Classifieds | Reviews | Jobs | Deal Zone | Merchandise | Marketplace | Books, DVDs & Gadgets | Video Vault | Tips & Techniques |
| |||||||
New Reply | Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| | #1 |
| Gear Head Join Date: May 2004 Location: Västerås,Sweden
Posts: 44
Thread Starter | Tutorial on signal path in a Daw mixer? Hello folks, I´ve never been that interested in learning how/where/why you should send the input signal through a DAW ( I use Logic Studio btw) until recently. Is there a nice tutorial somewhere on the net that explains the basic stuff like - when to send for example the OH´s to a bus and what good will it do etc. My workflow basically goes like this: preamp-AD/DA- channel 1 in DAW mixer-stereo bus (for reverb etc)- output-monitors Is this it? It doesn´t sound like a A+ mix if you know what I mean ( e).Or can I send the signal thru a bunch of busses with various effects, and it will be better than just putting all of the effects on the same bus ( because of the internal signal routing yada yada)? What the hell are the busses/AUX´s good for except sending several channels through the same reverb etc? Sorry for the shaky English skills, and for the (maybe) noobie questions. David
__________________ Website |
| | |
| | #2 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Sep 2004 Location: UK
Posts: 4,567
| Hi A DAW is (or should be) all about versatility in that you can work how you want to, and probably more importantly can change things for different sessions. Direct stereo mic to 2 tracks is easy but maybe you want to have loads more signals, with effects and so on which you can assign to busses or groups. I am suprised the manuals for the software don't at least run through various scenarios. It can make a simple stereo recording. It can emulate a 'real' desk with multitrack busses, it just depends how you like to work. Matt s |
| | |
| | #3 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Oct 2008 Location: Now in Wellington
Posts: 823
| Agreed with the above post. It is all about how you like working. You can keep it as simple or as complicated as you like it. That being said, it is often good to use aux's for reverbs and delays with the mix control on the delay's and reverbs set all the way wet. This allows you EQ and pan the verbs and delays separately from the original signal. I am also surprised that most DAW's don't include more tutorials in their manuals. I guess if they did though, there wouldn't be a market for all those educational books and videos. I have the first book of the Apple Logic training series, and its pretty good, but most of what I know came from experimenting.
__________________ The Big Rybowski |
| | |
New Reply
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Need help with my signal path... | lodge | Low End Theory | 3 | 22nd July 2008 12:51 AM |
| Transformers in the Signal Path-- how many is enough? | chickencoop | So much gear, so little time! | 16 | 18th January 2008 02:11 AM |
| the shorter the path the better the signal... | alessio | So much gear, so little time! | 2 | 24th May 2007 06:24 PM |
| Big Ben and Signal path/mixer opinions | Razor Blade | High end | 0 | 16th July 2006 08:29 PM |
| Bass Signal Path | rmx16 | High end | 0 | 24th July 2002 05:12 PM |
| |