(quiet) acoustic guitar mic advice. - Gearslutz.com

Gearslutz.com

All Advertisers
Go Back   Gearslutz.com > The Forums > Low End Theory


(quiet) acoustic guitar mic advice.

New Reply New Reply Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 30th July 2009   #1
Gear interested
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 6

Thread Starter
(quiet) acoustic guitar mic advice.

Hi all,
I would greatly appreciate some advice regarding what microphone/microphones would be appropriate for my recording needs.
I primarily intend to record solo acoustic guitar and classical guitar work with occasional vocals. To record in stereo a friend recommended using a small condenser mic, such as the nt5 or se4, placed at the neck and a large diameter condenser mic placed towards the bridge. The large condenser mic could then be used for vocals (although obviously not at the same time.) Does this configuration sound appropriate? Would I be better off going down the matched stereo small condenser route?
My budget all told is about £500 ($850) and its also worth noting that I have the opportunity to buy an AT4047 for half its RRP. I Love the AT4047 on vocals but have no experience of it on guitars.
Finally I should point out that I have a rode m3, which has 20db self noise, and find it problematic for recording, in that I have a delicate (quiet) finger-picking style, so mics with a low self noise are a what I’m looking for.
Many thanks for any help in advance,
Cal.
calbruc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30th July 2009   #2
Gear Head
 
corey.schroeder's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 74

Honestly, I would check out the Blue Baby Bottle.

Though it tapers off around 200Hz, its (in my opinion) an extremely warm mic. It has a present midrange that gives you a nice full/rich sound without sounding too muddy.

Paired with the right pre, you can get a well rounded yet crispy sound out of this mic.
The self noise level is only 5.5dB (super quiet) and its only $500.

Thats my vote.. Ive really liked mine on everything I've put it on.
corey.schroeder is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30th July 2009   #3
Gear addict
 
RBowlin's Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 330

I've had great luck with the AKG C451b on acoustic. If you can get your hands on one, I'd suggest you give it a try.

-Rich
RBowlin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30th July 2009   #4
Gear interested
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 6

Thread Starter
thanks guys.
I'm definately drawn to Blue's mics (low prices, low self noise, nice sound) both the baby bottle and the blue bird. But what do people think of stereo recording with a small condensor large condensor combination ? I'm obviously inexperienced but to me it sounds like a good idea but wrong at the same time?
calbruc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30th July 2009   #5
Lives for gear
 
TurboJets's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Location: Mesa, AZ
Posts: 1,869

A 4047 paired with a 4041 is super nice. I personally love stereo mic'ing ac guitars with LDC + SDC config's for the exact reason you mention calbruc.

A pair of 4041's are nice and the 4033 is fantastic for ac guitar as well.

But if you have the inside on a half-price deal for a 4047 I would at least grab that up first. Totally one of my favorite flavors for ac guitar.
TurboJets is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30th July 2009   #6
Gear interested
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 6

Thread Starter
Thanks for input TurboJets.
Yep, pretty set on the 4047. I love its top end and 'character' and I'd be stupid not to take up the offer. not sure about SDC mic though. I have virtualy no experience with them.
Would it be a fair generalisation to say that small diaphram condensor mics have higher levels of self noise than their large diaphram cousins?
calbruc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30th July 2009   #7
Gear Head
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 31

If you go for a multipattern large diaphragm condenser instead of the 4047 (like a CAD M179 or AT4050), you'd have the option of doing M/S stereo on the guitar as well as the stereo technique you already mentioned.

Just an idea.
blueshowdoyoudo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30th July 2009   #8
Lives for gear
 
TurboJets's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Location: Mesa, AZ
Posts: 1,869

Quote:
Originally Posted by calbruc View Post
Thanks for input TurboJets.
Yep, pretty set on the 4047. I love its top end and 'character' and I'd be stupid not to take up the offer. not sure about SDC mic though. I have virtualy no experience with them.
Would it be a fair generalisation to say that small diaphram condensor mics have higher levels of self noise than their large diaphram cousins?
Audio Technica SDC's have no self-noise just like the other AT mics.

My 4041 is as quiet as my 4033. You can't even tell they're on except for ambient noise you hear in the room, especially with the 4041 because they pickup every single transient so fast and with such detail it's freaky. For that reason alone I recommend the 4041 for classical/nylon guitars...but others will have varying opinions on that. I know most people prefer LDC for classical/nylon guitars. The other SDC I like so much is of course the 012 which so many recommend, especially with the Joly mod which is well-worth the money. Everybody's got different opinions of course, all valid, all based on their experience and taste. And it really comes down to taste. Do you like the darker/intimate sound of a 4047 or the open but meaty sound of a 4050 or the open transparent clarity of a 4033?...all 3 share AT's characteristic smoothness when coupled with a fast preamp.
TurboJets is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30th July 2009   #9
Gear maniac
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 268

The cad m179 works well for me ou acoustic. I have used it both spaced (with beyer mc930) and in middle and side with beyer mc930 and lauten clarion. The cad is really cheap and fairly low self noise. I would go with at4047 and cadm179
__________________
Audio and Video production

www.bradleysteenkamp.com
bradley is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30th July 2009   #10
Lives for gear
 
GZsound's Avatar
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Location: Oregon
Posts: 955

Quote:
Originally Posted by TurboJets View Post
Audio Technica SDC's have no self-noise just like the other AT mics.

My 4041 is as quiet as my 4033. You can't even tell they're on except for ambient noise you hear in the room, especially with the 4041 because they pickup every single transient so fast and with such detail it's freaky. For that reason alone I recommend the 4041 for classical/nylon guitars...but others will have varying opinions on that. I know most people prefer LDC for classical/nylon guitars. The other SDC I like so much is of course the 012 which so many recommend, especially with the Joly mod which is well-worth the money. Everybody's got different opinions of course, all valid, all based on their experience and taste. And it really comes down to taste. Do you like the darker/intimate sound of a 4047 or the open but meaty sound of a 4050 or the open transparent clarity of a 4033?...all 3 share AT's characteristic smoothness when coupled with a fast preamp.

I think the 4033 works so well on acoustic guitar because it's NOT a large diaphragm condenser mic. The same reason it can sound shrill on vocals makes it a great clear crisp guitar mic.
__________________
Mark G.
GZsound is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30th July 2009   #11
Lives for gear
 
Karloff70's Avatar
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Location: london
Posts: 6,739

Good suggestions already. How about a mix .....a 4047. Vocal covered. A Cad M179. Now you can do the guitar M/S. And maybe check out sahiaman's little blondie mics. Listen to the files in the thread around somewhere. You'd fit a pair of those into your budget as well = covered. So guitar either M/S 4047/Cad or little blondie/Cad, or little blondie pair and Cad on guit and 4047 on vox.....bla bla bla.....effective set of mics!! For very little.......and all really quiet.
__________________
what is a small difference? genetically there's only a small difference between a human and a banana. - golden beers
Karloff70 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30th July 2009   #12
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Location: Sweden
Posts: 3,960

I have a pair of AT4033 and I think they suck for AG. A nylon strung possibly but on steel strings? No thanks! :-)

Also it's to noisy for soft picking. A much better mic for guitar (and lots of other sources) is Line Audio CM3. The latter having higher resolution, more neutral sound and less noise.

Funny we can write so differently about the same gear.


/Peter
Audiop is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30th July 2009   #13
Gear interested
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 6

Thread Starter
Thanks so much for help guys. I feel much clearer about what I should be doing.
cal
calbruc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30th July 2009   #14
Lives for gear
 
rkopald's Avatar
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Location: PNW
Posts: 568

Quote:
Originally Posted by Audiop View Post
A much better mic for guitar (and lots of other sources) is Line Audio CM3...
/Peter
That mic doesn't cost too much at all! It's really a good mic?? I need a new sdc, and I was thinking about spending $800(US), so just wondering...
rkopald is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30th July 2009   #15
Gear addict
 
lobsty's Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Location: Berlin
Posts: 379

Quote:
Originally Posted by TurboJets View Post
Audio Technica SDC's have no self-noise just like the other AT mics.
I wouldn't go that far... in fact I'd say the opposite. I have a couple of 4041s but I gave up using them on acoustic guitar and quiet instruments because they were often too noisy.

Recording classical guitar can be tricky... a lot of cheaper mics have a lot of high end that can sometimes just pick up too much finger noise and string attack. Having said, that a gentle eq roll of on the highs can help
lobsty is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31st July 2009   #16
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Location: Sweden
Posts: 3,960

Quote:
Originally Posted by rkopald View Post
That mic doesn't cost too much at all! It's really a good mic?? I need a new sdc, and I was thinking about spending $800(US), so just wondering...
More or less on the level of Earthworks and Sennheiser.

I have MKH8040, MKH8020 and QTC1 and the CM3 plays in the same league IMO. Getting my second pair soon.


/Peter
Audiop is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31st July 2009   #17
Gear addict
 
willsing's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Location: Northern California
Posts: 324

I have pretty much the same recording needs as you. What I have found best for my fingerpicking acoustic guitar is a stereo set up with an AT4050 at the lower bout, around the bridge (search around for your sweet spot) and a Kel HM7U at the fingerboard, at about the joint, to the 12th fret, about eight inches to a foot away works depending on your taste. Before the Kel, I had an Oktava MK 012, that was very nice. Kel won though. Tried an AT4060, the acoustic guitar did not like it as much as the AT4050.

For the classical, I do not yet have the holy grail mic, but after trying all of my mics, the AT4060 really brought out the sweetness of the cedar top classical. The tone sounded oh so sweet. I have been round and round on that one, and so far, I like the 4060 the best (of what I have). It likes the MK 012 too.
I have found that while I like to record steel string acoustic in stereo, I have not been to keen on the nylon string in stereo. I get just the tone I want with one mic and play around with the spacial aspect in my DAW.

For what that's worth, hope that helps.

Regards,
Will
__________________
"God help me to be the person my dog thinks I am"
willsing is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31st July 2009   #18
Gear Head
 
Joined: May 2009
Location: Toronto
Posts: 51

Quote:
Originally Posted by Audiop View Post
More or less on the level of Earthworks and Sennheiser.

I have MKH8040, MKH8020 and QTC1 and the CM3 plays in the same league IMO. Getting my second pair soon.


/Peter
Please correct me if I am wrong as I'm not sure I fully understand sensitivity ratings, but they seem to have a pretty low sensitivity rating (6mV/PA) when comparing to the MC930 (30mV/PA).

I have a c1000 that has the same sensitivity as the CM3, and find that I don't get enough level out of it when recording guitar (quiet) - so would the same hold true on the CM3s?
fufaso is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31st July 2009   #19
Lives for gear
 
TurboJets's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Location: Mesa, AZ
Posts: 1,869

Quote:
Originally Posted by lobsty View Post
I wouldn't go that far... in fact I'd say the opposite. I have a couple of 4041s but I gave up using them on acoustic guitar and quiet instruments because they were often too noisy.
That's what I thought at first with the 4041 until I realized it was actually picking up the noise of the air conditioner (which was almost inaudible). I shut down the AirCon and that changed everything.

No self-noise in my personal experience and freakishly fast, picks up every little thing. In that regard it may be undesirable for some.
TurboJets is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1st August 2009   #20
Lives for gear
 
rkopald's Avatar
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Location: PNW
Posts: 568

Quote:
Originally Posted by Audiop View Post
More or less on the level of Earthworks and Sennheiser.

I have MKH8040, MKH8020 and QTC1 and the CM3 plays in the same league IMO. Getting my second pair soon.


/Peter
Wow. Really?? That's crazy to me. But then again, I fall into the "If it costs THAT much money, it's GOT to be amazing!" category.
Good thing I'm broke!
rkopald is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1st August 2009   #21
Gear maniac
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 268

I just want to clarify incase any recording novices are reading: the mics being discussed all have SOME self noise. Impossible for them to have NO self noise. I think what is meant in reference to some mics is that the self noise is too low to be an issue and that it is usually something else causeing noise. Like an AC unit or a fan in another room etc. SDC's tend to have more self noise than LDC's (but not always) yet SDC's are very often the choice for recording guitar. Sennheiser MKH series are superb as are schoeps but not cheap!

I find the beyer mc930 pair are excellent for guitar but the cad m179 is also great and has a little less self noise. The mc930 send out a lot of signal and tend to require less preamp gain than most other mics.
bradley is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2nd August 2009   #22
Gear addict
 
stafs's Avatar
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 468

Beyer MC930 is excellent on accoustic guitars! I just can't stop prase these mics. Check this mic out and i'm sure, You will love it. A combo of 4047 and 930 on accoustic will give You awesome results. You can get warmth and body from 4047 and super smooth detailed sound from 930. I'm using both mics all the time, and beyer is my 'go to' mic for accoustic, and 4047 is main vocal mic.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by RCM - Ronan View Post
For those of us that get to make records for a living, our worst days in the studio are usually better than the best days of people that actually work or living.
stafs is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3rd August 2009   #23
Gear Head
 
Joined: May 2009
Location: Toronto
Posts: 51

Quote:
Originally Posted by stafs View Post
Beyer MC930 is excellent on accoustic guitars! I just can't stop prase these mics. Check this mic out and i'm sure, You will love it. A combo of 4047 and 930 on accoustic will give You awesome results. You can get warmth and body from 4047 and super smooth detailed sound from 930. I'm using both mics all the time, and beyer is my 'go to' mic for accoustic, and 4047 is main vocal mic.
Are you using 1 mc930 with the 4047?

If so, in the mix, are you panning the 2 tracks at all?

What I'm aiming to do, is isolate the bass strings with 1 mic, and the treble strings with the other, and then pan them in opposite directions (ie: bass strings panned left, treble strings panned right) and do the opposite on a 2nd guitar. Is this possible if the combo of 1 mc930 and 1 4070?
fufaso is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3rd August 2009   #24
Gear addict
 
lobsty's Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Location: Berlin
Posts: 379

Quote:
Originally Posted by TurboJets View Post
That's what I thought at first with the 4041 until I realized it was actually picking up the noise of the air conditioner (which was almost inaudible). I shut down the AirCon and that changed everything.

No self-noise in my personal experience and freakishly fast, picks up every little thing. In that regard it may be undesirable for some.
I get where you're going with that but I still think the 4041s are noisier than a lot of other mics and as bradley said - no mic has no self noise, everything gives off something, I just think that that 4041s are too noisy for really quiet instruments.
lobsty is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4th August 2009   #25
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Location: Sweden
Posts: 3,960

Quote:
Originally Posted by rkopald View Post
Wow. Really?? That's crazy to me. But then again, I fall into the "If it costs THAT much money, it's GOT to be amazing!" category.
Good thing I'm broke!
Yes! Cost is not a performance parameter.


/Peter
Audiop is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4th August 2009   #26
Lives for gear
 
nosebleedaudio's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Location: Birmingham, AL USA
Posts: 3,700

Send a message via AIM to nosebleedaudio
Check out the new 4051b if you can do an A/B...
the 4051a on AC Gtr is very nice IMHO..Thru my mic pre...Ha..
__________________
Michael Keith
www.jmkaudio.com
nosebleedaudio is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4th August 2009   #27
Lives for gear
 
TurboJets's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Location: Mesa, AZ
Posts: 1,869

Quote:
Originally Posted by nosebleedaudio View Post
Check out the new 4051b if you can do an A/B...
the 4051a on AC Gtr is very nice IMHO..Thru my mic pre...Ha..
A TapeOp shootout recently chose the 4021 over the 4051 if I'm not mistaken. Surprised me. The panel chose the 4021 "easily" over the 4041 too.
TurboJets is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4th August 2009   #28
Lives for gear
 
nosebleedaudio's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Location: Birmingham, AL USA
Posts: 3,700

Send a message via AIM to nosebleedaudio
Quote:
Originally Posted by TurboJets View Post
A TapeOp shootout recently chose the 4021 over the 4051 if I'm not mistaken. Surprised me. The panel chose the 4021 "easily" over the 4041 too.
Which one? a or b?
nosebleedaudio is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5th August 2009   #29
Gear addict
 
stafs's Avatar
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 468

Quote:
Originally Posted by fufaso View Post
Are you using 1 mc930 with the 4047?

If so, in the mix, are you panning the 2 tracks at all?

What I'm aiming to do, is isolate the bass strings with 1 mic, and the treble strings with the other, and then pan them in opposite directions (ie: bass strings panned left, treble strings panned right) and do the opposite on a 2nd guitar. Is this possible if the combo of 1 mc930 and 1 4070?
I tend not to pan when recording with LDC and sdc. Of course - it all depends . To me panned guitar sounds best when recorded with two 930's.

About panning: i think You'll get better results with panning one take (both mics) to left side, and other to right.
stafs is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5th August 2009   #30
Gear Head
 
Joined: May 2009
Location: Toronto
Posts: 51

Quote:
Originally Posted by stafs View Post
I tend not to pan when recording with LDC and sdc. Of course - it all depends . To me panned guitar sounds best when recorded with two 930's.

About panning: i think You'll get better results with panning one take (both mics) to left side, and other to right.
Just ordered the 930s so I'm looking forward to getting them and trying out a few different ideas.

I usually sing while playing - can I expect a lot of vocal bleed into the 930s?
fufaso is offline   Reply With Quote
New Reply New Reply Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook  Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter  Submit Thread to LinkedIn LinkedIn 



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Similar Threads
Thread Thread starter Forum Replies Last Post
advice on this acoustic guitar recording please! lubaloo Work In Progress / Advice Requested / Show & Tell / Artist Showcase / Mix-Offs 8 26th January 2009 01:59 AM
12 String Acoustic Guitar. Advice please!!!. Pandemonium instruments, guitar, bass, amps 6 14th May 2008 06:21 PM
Mics with least noise for quiet fingerpicking acoustic guitar largeunit Remote Possibilities in Acoustic Music & Location Recording 24 18th October 2007 11:05 PM
quintessential mic/pre combination for voice, acoustic guitar, acoustic piano kissingonstilts Remote Possibilities in Acoustic Music & Location Recording 1 20th May 2006 10:06 AM
Tips for Very Quiet Acoustic Guitar largeunit Remote Possibilities in Acoustic Music & Location Recording 40 30th July 2005 01:24 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:07 AM.

Home - Search Forum - Contact Us - Terms Of Use - Advertise on Gearslutz - All Advertisers - Archive - Top
 
 
Powered by vBulletin®
Gearslutz.com LTD - UK Company Number 7597610.
Registered Office - 35 Ballards Lane, London, N3 1XW.
Hosted by Nimbus Hosting.

SEO by vBSEO ©2010, Crawlability, Inc.