![]() | All Advertisers |
| Member Services Directory | Classifieds | Reviews | Jobs | Deal Zone | Merchandise | Marketplace | Books, DVDs & Gadgets | Video Vault | Tips & Techniques |
| |||||||
New Reply | Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| | #1 |
| 3 + infractions, forum membership suspended. Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 320
Thread Starter | Digital Signal level Into "Analog" emulation plugins? What is an ideal input level into an analog emulation plugin? If the plugin is modeled correctly on the analog hardware then wouldn't too "hot" a digital signal cause the plugin to react the same way as it would if you blasted it with too high an analog signal in the real world? What would be a general equivalent, I read somewhere that around -18db digital is the same as around 0db with analog gear, so wouldn't an input level of -18db get a more "realistic" result from the plugin? I'm sure a real Fairchild or whatnot wouldn't sound too great if you sent a way too high signal into it causing it too overload and not sound correct? Any info on whether this makes any difference at all or not? (all the dipsh1ts with there "it's not the real thing so it sucks" comments need not reply, the question is kind of specific) |
| | |
| | #2 |
| Lives for gear | I'd suggest "use your ears" stereotype comment, but that's annoying ![]() On the other hand, gain staging is important, not just for "analog modeled" plugs, but for most What helped me the most is that utility called "plugin analyzer" which kinda gives you precise info what each plug is doing - THD, phase shifting, etc To me, that was a big help with demystifying plugins None of available plugs is the exact copy of its analog counterparts, which is normal, but you get the info which part of analog modeling they focused on and eventually got it pretty good. Most of "analog" plugs just emulate harmonic distortion To answer your question - I think it's better to keep levels not higher than -6db's That helps not to overload plugs with distortion they produce and believe me it's easier to drive plugs harder than you actually want and hear. |
| | |
| | #3 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Feb 2009 Location: San Diego
Posts: 1,346
| You are correct in keeping your recorded signal around -18dbfs. Not just for the plugs either! |
| | |
| | #4 | |
| Gear Guru | Quote:
If you don't put a value on the dB reading, it's just a gain ratio. So you can add 6dB of gain, but not have a level of 6dB - it needs to be relative to something, eg dBFs (which has to be digital), or 6dBVU. Now... -18 is used in music recording as a link between the analogue and digital worlds. A common lineup for interfacing converters with mixing desks is that -18dBFs = 0VU. ie when a signal reads 0VU on the mixing desk, sending it at unity gain to the DAW gives a reading of -18dBFs (-16 and -14 are also in use regularly). Which means that a lot of the time, if you apply good gain staging so that your levels are hitting 0VU on the console, sending to tape WILL give you a level of around -18dBFs. Essentially, all you're doing is leaving sufficient headroom. It's not like -18 is this magical figure to aim at. If this is confusing to anyone, the wikipedia article on decibels is quite good. Essentially though, don't add to the confusion by throwing around "-18dB" without qualifying what you're referring to. | |
| | |
New Reply
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Proper way to transfer digital signal via RCA SPDIF? Why am I getting "clicks"? | 666666 | High end | 5 | 29th September 2008 07:00 PM |
| what's the go with the "phase" button on analog and digital systems | lukejay | Music computers | 5 | 21st May 2008 07:43 PM |
| Balanced 1/4" Necessary for Line Level Signal? | DJNOBS | Geekslutz forum | 10 | 24th December 2007 08:57 PM |
| PorticoTM 5042 Two-Channel "True Tape" Emulation and Line Driver | Jules | High end | 100 | 8th June 2006 02:50 AM |
| Famous Fun Thread: Analog v. Digital--Which is "The King" of great sound quality | Johnny B | Music computers | 798 | 8th November 2005 09:01 PM |
| |